Search (73 results, page 4 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Beaujean, M.: ¬Die Einheitsklassifikation aus der Sicht der Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1978) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 1583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=1583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 1583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Dykstra, M.: ¬The lion that squeaked (1978) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 1647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=1647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 1647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Guillien, G.: ¬Le problème de la traduction dans ses rapports avec l'édition française de la Classification Décimale de Dewey (1977) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dewey International: papers given at the European Centenary Seminar on the Dewey Decimal Classification, Banbury, 1976. Ed. by J.C. Downing and M. Yelland
  4. Scheele, M.: ¬Die universelle Facetten-Classifikation (UFC) und ihre mögliche Bedeutung für Allgemeinbildung, Terminologieforschung und Informationswesen (1978) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=66,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Rovira, C.: ¬The present Spanish translation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (1977) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 5248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=5248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 5248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dewey International: papers given at the European Centenary Seminar on the Dewey Decimal Classification, Banbury, 1976. Ed. by J.C. Downing and M. Yelland
  6. Greitzke, M.: Anforderungen einer Öffentlichen Bibliothek an Diplom-Bibliothekare, die an einem Bibliothekssystem in der Abteilung Alphabetische Katalogisierung arbeiten (1976) 0.01
    0.007837306 = product of:
      0.015674612 = sum of:
        0.015674612 = product of:
          0.031349223 = sum of:
            0.031349223 = weight(_text_:m in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031349223 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Scheele, M.: ¬Der Mensch als Voraussetzung und als Ziel der Klassifikationsforschung (1979) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=72,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Mlitzke, E.: Zur Klassifikation von Aussagen (1979) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Um eine facettenartige Bedeutungsanalyse von Aussagen nach universellen Aspekten zu ermöglichen, wird eine allgemeine Standard-Aussageform vorgeschlagen, die aus folgender Begriffskette besteht: A: Antrieb, Auslöser, Motivation; Z: Ziel; M: Methode; S: System, Substrat; E: Ergebnis, Effekt, Erfahrung, Entscheidung; H: Hintergrund, die auch durch die geläufigen Fragepronomen: warum, wozu, was, wie, wovon angesprochen werden. Es wird gezeigt, wie diese, als 'Semoperatoren' bezeichneten Aussageelemente bei der klassifikatorischen Analyse allgemein und mit Bezug auf die Physik verwenden werden können
  9. Mountcastle, V.B.: ¬An organizing principle for cerebral function : the unit model and the distributed system (1978) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mindful brain: cortical organization and the group-selective theory of higher brain function. Eds.: Gerald M. Edelman u. B.B. Mountcastle
  10. Chaitin, G.J.: Algorithmic information theory (1977) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews algorithmic information theory, which is an attempt to apply information-theoretic and probabilistic ideas to recursive function theory. Typical concerns in this approach are, for example, the number of bits of information required to specify an algorithm, or the probability that a program whose bits are chosen by coin flipping produces a given output. During the past few years the definitions of algorithmic information theory have been reformulated. The basic features of the new formalism are presented here and certain results of R. M. Solovay are reported.
  11. Pflug, G.: Information Retrieval System (1972) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Libri. 22(1972) no.1, S.85-92
  12. Shrejder, J.A.: ¬The algebra of classification (197?) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Any classification describes some structure of taxons on a subject field. Thus, one of the natural aspects of a classification theory is the study of possible taxon structure types. In particular, two classifications generating isomorphic taxon structures (regardless of size or how filled they are) could quite rightly be said to be of the same type. Let us formulate this situation in precise terms. Assume M is the subject field of the classification (the class of all objects to be classified). We use T to denote the set of taxon subclasses identified by the classificational features. On taxon set T the is a natural order of inclusion
  13. Hollnagel, E.: ¬The relation between intention, meaning and action (1979) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Informatics 5: the analysis of meaning, March 25-28, Oxford. Ed.: K. Gray and M. MacCafferty

Languages

  • d 41
  • e 31
  • f 1
  • More… Less…