-
Hori, I.: ¬The cognitive structure of classification work (1989)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:12:09
-
Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:52:34
-
Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 3.1996 13:22:21
-
Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Walker, A.: Australia's pictorial collections on interactive videodisc (1989)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.1999 11:22:04
-
Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:01
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.01
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04302117 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983)
0.01
0.009218821 = product of:
0.018437643 = sum of:
0.018437643 = product of:
0.036875285 = sum of:
0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036875285 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
-
Miller, J.: From subject headings for audiovisual media (1988)
0.01
0.009218821 = product of:
0.018437643 = sum of:
0.018437643 = product of:
0.036875285 = sum of:
0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036875285 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Inspel. 22(1988), S.121-145
-
Woodhead, P.A.; Martin, J.V.: Subject specialization in British university libraries : a survey (1982)
0.01
0.009218821 = product of:
0.018437643 = sum of:
0.018437643 = product of:
0.036875285 = sum of:
0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036875285 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system (1985)
0.01
0.007961999 = product of:
0.015923997 = sum of:
0.015923997 = product of:
0.031847995 = sum of:
0.031847995 = weight(_text_:f in 3649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031847995 = score(doc=3649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 3649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- F. W. Lancaster is known for his writing an the state of the art in librarylinformation science. His skill in identifying significant contributions and synthesizing literature in fields as diverse as online systems, vocabulary control, measurement and evaluation, and the paperless society have earned him esteem as a chronicler of information science. Equally deserving of repute is his own contribution to research in the discipline-his evaluation of the MEDLARS operating system. The MEDLARS study is notable for several reasons. It was the first large-scale application of retrieval experiment methodology to the evaluation of an actual operating system. As such, problems had to be faced that do not arise in laboratory-like conditions. One example is the problem of recall: how to determine, for a very large and dynamic database, the number of documents relevant to a given search request. By solving this problem and others attendant upon transferring an experimental methodology to the real world, Lancaster created a constructive procedure that could be used to improve the design and functioning of retrieval systems. The MEDLARS study is notable also for its contribution to our understanding of what constitutes a good index language and good indexing. The ideal retrieval system would be one that retrieves all and only relevant documents. The failures that occur in real operating systems, when a relevant document is not retrieved (a recall failure) or an irrelevant document is retrieved (a precision failure), can be analysed to assess the impact of various factors an the performance of the system. This is exactly what Lancaster did. He found both the MEDLARS indexing and the McSH index language to be significant factors affecting retrieval performance. The indexing, primarily because it was insufficiently exhaustive, explained a large number of recall failures. The index language, largely because of its insufficient specificity, accounted for a large number of precision failures. The purpose of identifying factors responsible for a system's failures is ultimately to improve the system. Unlike many user studies, the MEDLARS evaluation yielded recommendations that were eventually implemented.* Indexing exhaustivity was increased and the McSH index language was enriched with more specific terms and a larger entry vocabulary.
-
Kuhlen, R.; Hammwöhner, R.; Sonnenberger, G.; Thiel, U.: TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC : ein wissensbasiertes System zur situationsgerechten Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation in graphischen Retrievaldialogen (1988)
0.01
0.0076823514 = product of:
0.015364703 = sum of:
0.015364703 = product of:
0.030729406 = sum of:
0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030729406 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 1.2005 14:10:22
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.01
0.006145881 = product of:
0.012291762 = sum of:
0.012291762 = product of:
0.024583524 = sum of:
0.024583524 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024583524 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.01
0.005377646 = product of:
0.010755292 = sum of:
0.010755292 = product of:
0.021510584 = sum of:
0.021510584 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021510584 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
