-
Tang, X.-B.; Liu, G.-C.; Yang, J.; Wei, W.: Knowledge-based financial statement fraud detection system : based on an ontology and a decision tree (2018)
0.04
0.039721094 = product of:
0.07944219 = sum of:
0.07944219 = sum of:
0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499214 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036942977 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 6.2018 10:22:43
-
Dreisiebner, S.; Beutelspacher, L.; Henkel, M.: Informationskompetenz - Forschung in Graz und Düsseldorf (2017)
0.04
0.039721094 = product of:
0.07944219 = sum of:
0.07944219 = sum of:
0.042499214 = weight(_text_:g in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042499214 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.036942977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036942977 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 5.2018 14:48:22
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Themenheft: Düsseldorfer und Grazer Informationswissenschaft / Gastherausgeber: Wolfgang G. Stock, Christian Schlögl.
-
Beck, G.; Meissner, S.: Strukturierung und Vermittlung von heterogenen (Nicht-)Wissensbeständen in der Risikokommunikation : Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege (2010)
0.03
0.033100914 = product of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035416014 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030785816 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010)
0.03
0.033100914 = product of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035416014 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030785816 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 1.2011 19:22:48
-
Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011)
0.03
0.033100914 = product of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035416014 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030785816 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:19:42
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.03
0.033100914 = product of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035416014 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030785816 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012)
0.03
0.033100914 = product of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035416014 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030785816 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:39:23
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.03
0.033100914 = product of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.06620183 = sum of:
0.035416014 = weight(_text_:g in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035416014 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.030785816 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030785816 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
-
Zhang, C.-T.: Relationship of the h-index, g-index, and e-index (2010)
0.03
0.030051483 = product of:
0.060102966 = sum of:
0.060102966 = product of:
0.12020593 = sum of:
0.12020593 = weight(_text_:g in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12020593 = score(doc=3418,freq=16.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Of h-type indices available now, the g-index is an important one in that it not only keeps some advantages of the h-index but also counts citations from highly cited articles. However, the g-index has a drawback that one has to add fictitious articles with zero citation to calculate this index in some important cases. Based on an alternative definition without introducing fictitious articles, an analytical method has been proposed to calculate the g-index based approximately on the h-index and the e-index. If citations for a scientist are ranked by a power law, it is shown that the g-index can be calculated accurately by the h-index, the e-index, and the power parameter. The relationship of the h-, g-, and e-indices presented here shows that the g-index contains the citation information from the h-index, the e-index, and some papers beyond the h-core.
- Object
- g-index
-
Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015)
0.03
0.030051483 = product of:
0.060102966 = sum of:
0.060102966 = product of:
0.12020593 = sum of:
0.12020593 = weight(_text_:g in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12020593 = score(doc=1864,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Object
- g-index
-
Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013)
0.03
0.028332809 = product of:
0.056665618 = sum of:
0.056665618 = product of:
0.113331236 = sum of:
0.113331236 = weight(_text_:g in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113331236 = score(doc=1113,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.663964 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Using a very small sample of 8 data sets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference. Using another somewhat larger empirical sample of 26 data sets I show that the difference may be larger and I argue in favor of the g-index.
- Object
- g-index
-
Hovden, R.: Bibliometrics for Internet media : applying the h-index to YouTube (2013)
0.03
0.027717413 = product of:
0.055434827 = sum of:
0.055434827 = product of:
0.11086965 = sum of:
0.11086965 = weight(_text_:g in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11086965 = score(doc=1111,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.6495425 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The h-index can be a useful metric for evaluating a person's output of Internet media. Here I advocate and demonstrate adaption of the h-index and the g-index to the top video content creators on YouTube. The h-index for Internet video media is based on videos and their view counts. The h-index is defined as the number of videos with >=h × 10**5 views. The g-index is defined as the number of videos with >=g × 10**5 views on average. When compared with a video creator's total view count, the h-index and g-index better capture both productivity and impact in a single metric.
- Object
- g-index
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.03
0.027066985 = product of:
0.05413397 = sum of:
0.05413397 = product of:
0.21653588 = sum of:
0.21653588 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21653588 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.03
0.027066985 = product of:
0.05413397 = sum of:
0.05413397 = product of:
0.21653588 = sum of:
0.21653588 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21653588 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38528278 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.03
0.02648073 = product of:
0.05296146 = sum of:
0.05296146 = sum of:
0.028332809 = weight(_text_:g in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028332809 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.165991 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.024628652 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024628652 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014)
0.03
0.025042903 = product of:
0.050085805 = sum of:
0.050085805 = product of:
0.10017161 = sum of:
0.10017161 = weight(_text_:g in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10017161 = score(doc=1508,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is shown that a normalized version of the g-index is a good normalized impact and concentration measure. A proposal for such a measure by Bartolucci is improved.
- Object
- g-index
-
Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015)
0.03
0.025042903 = product of:
0.050085805 = sum of:
0.050085805 = product of:
0.10017161 = sum of:
0.10017161 = weight(_text_:g in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10017161 = score(doc=1696,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Irle, G.; Kattenbeck, M.: ISI 2015 Conference Review (2015)
0.02
0.024791209 = product of:
0.049582418 = sum of:
0.049582418 = product of:
0.099164836 = sum of:
0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 2315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099164836 = score(doc=2315,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 2315, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2315)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fröhlich, G.: Wissenszugang und Informationskompetenz für alle? : Zur ODOK 2010 in Leoben (Österreich) (2010)
0.02
0.024791209 = product of:
0.049582418 = sum of:
0.049582418 = product of:
0.099164836 = sum of:
0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099164836 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Albrecht, R.; Meßmer, G.; Rusch, B.; Thiessen, P.: Katalogisierung in der Datenwolke (2016)
0.02
0.024791209 = product of:
0.049582418 = sum of:
0.049582418 = product of:
0.099164836 = sum of:
0.099164836 = weight(_text_:g in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099164836 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
