-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.50
0.49853498 = product of:
0.8546314 = sum of:
0.22639075 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22639075 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.22639075 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22639075 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.033546 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033546 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.22639075 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22639075 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.04653322 = weight(_text_:world in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04653322 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.06183393 = weight(_text_:wide in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06183393 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.033546 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033546 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.26
0.25898954 = product of:
0.7769686 = sum of:
0.056597687 = product of:
0.16979305 = sum of:
0.16979305 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16979305 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.24012363 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24012363 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.24012363 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24012363 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.24012363 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24012363 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.19
0.18865895 = product of:
0.56597686 = sum of:
0.056597687 = product of:
0.16979305 = sum of:
0.16979305 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16979305 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16979305 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16979305 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16979305 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Joint, N.: Web 2.0 and the library : a transformational technology? (2010)
0.13
0.12855509 = product of:
0.30853224 = sum of:
0.047441207 = weight(_text_:web in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047441207 = score(doc=4202,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.02326661 = weight(_text_:world in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326661 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.030916965 = weight(_text_:wide in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030916965 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.047441207 = weight(_text_:web in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047441207 = score(doc=4202,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.15946625 = sum of:
0.1401541 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1401541 = score(doc=4202,freq=14.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.019312155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019312155 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper is the final one in a series which has tried to give an overview of so-called transformational areas of digital library technology. The aim has been to assess how much real transformation these applications can bring about, in terms of creating genuine user benefit and also changing everyday library practice. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a summary of some of the legal and ethical issues associated with web 2.0 applications in libraries, associated with a brief retrospective view of some relevant literature. Findings - Although web 2.0 innovations have had a massive impact on the larger World Wide Web, the practical impact on library service delivery has been limited to date. What probably can be termed transformational in the effect of web 2.0 developments on library and information work is their effect on some underlying principles of professional practice. Research limitations/implications - The legal and ethical challenges of incorporating web 2.0 platforms into mainstream institutional service delivery need to be subject to further research, so that the risks associated with these innovations are better understood at the strategic and policy-making level. Practical implications - This paper makes some recommendations about new principles of library and information practice which will help practitioners make better sense of these innovations in their overall information environment. Social implications - The paper puts in context some of the more problematic social impacts of web 2.0 innovations, without denying the undeniable positive contribution of social networking to the sphere of human interactivity. Originality/value - This paper raises some cautionary points about web 2.0 applications without adopting a precautionary approach of total prohibition. However, none of the suggestions or analysis in this piece should be considered to constitute legal advice. If such advice is required, the reader should consult appropriate legal professionals.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 17:54:04
-
Neubauer, G.: Visualization of typed links in linked data (2017)
0.10
0.10312301 = product of:
0.24749523 = sum of:
0.05930151 = weight(_text_:web in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05930151 = score(doc=3912,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
0.041129943 = weight(_text_:world in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041129943 = score(doc=3912,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
0.054653995 = weight(_text_:wide in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054653995 = score(doc=3912,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
0.05930151 = weight(_text_:web in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05930151 = score(doc=3912,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
0.033108287 = product of:
0.06621657 = sum of:
0.06621657 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06621657 = score(doc=3912,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.320393 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Das Themengebiet der Arbeit behandelt Visualisierungen von typisierten Links in Linked Data. Die wissenschaftlichen Gebiete, die im Allgemeinen den Inhalt des Beitrags abgrenzen, sind das Semantic Web, das Web of Data und Informationsvisualisierung. Das Semantic Web, das von Tim Berners Lee 2001 erfunden wurde, stellt eine Erweiterung zum World Wide Web (Web 2.0) dar. Aktuelle Forschungen beziehen sich auf die Verknüpfbarkeit von Informationen im World Wide Web. Um es zu ermöglichen, solche Verbindungen wahrnehmen und verarbeiten zu können sind Visualisierungen die wichtigsten Anforderungen als Hauptteil der Datenverarbeitung. Im Zusammenhang mit dem Sematic Web werden Repräsentationen von zusammenhängenden Informationen anhand von Graphen gehandhabt. Der Grund des Entstehens dieser Arbeit ist in erster Linie die Beschreibung der Gestaltung von Linked Data-Visualisierungskonzepten, deren Prinzipien im Rahmen einer theoretischen Annäherung eingeführt werden. Anhand des Kontexts führt eine schrittweise Erweiterung der Informationen mit dem Ziel, praktische Richtlinien anzubieten, zur Vernetzung dieser ausgearbeiteten Gestaltungsrichtlinien. Indem die Entwürfe zweier alternativer Visualisierungen einer standardisierten Webapplikation beschrieben werden, die Linked Data als Netzwerk visualisiert, konnte ein Test durchgeführt werden, der deren Kompatibilität zum Inhalt hatte. Der praktische Teil behandelt daher die Designphase, die Resultate, und zukünftige Anforderungen des Projektes, die durch die Testung ausgearbeitet wurden.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011)
0.09
0.087478995 = product of:
0.262437 = sum of:
0.08233908 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08233908 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.050318997 = weight(_text_:web in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050318997 = score(doc=4907,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.050318997 = weight(_text_:web in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050318997 = score(doc=4907,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.07945989 = product of:
0.15891978 = sum of:
0.15891978 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15891978 = score(doc=4907,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.7689432 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- Services in Web 2.0 generate a large quantity of information, distributed over a range of resources (e.g. photos, URLs, videos) and integrated into different platforms (e.g. social bookmarking systems, sharing platforms (Peters, 2009). To adequately use this mass of information and to extract it from the platforms, users must be equipped with suitable tools and knowledge. After all, the best information is useless if users cannot find it: 'The model of information consumption relies on the information being found' (Vander Wal, 2004). In Web 2.0, the retrieval component has been established through so-called folksonomies (Vander Wal, 2005a), which are considered as several combinations of an information resource, one or more freely chosen keywords ('tags') and a user. Web 2.0 services that use folksonomies as an indexing and retrieval tool are defined as 'collaborative information services' because they allow for the collaborative creation of a public database that is accessible to all users (registered, where necessary) via the tags of the folksonomy (Ding et al., 2009; Heymann, Paepcke and Garcia-Molina, 2010).
- Object
- Web 2.0
-
Li, C.; Sugimoto, S.: Provenance description of metadata application profiles for long-term maintenance of metadata schemas : Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information as the foundation for library and information science (2018)
0.09
0.08661706 = product of:
0.20788094 = sum of:
0.029650755 = weight(_text_:web in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650755 = score(doc=4048,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
0.08084996 = weight(_text_:log in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08084996 = score(doc=4048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22837062 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3540296 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
0.029083263 = weight(_text_:world in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029083263 = score(doc=4048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
0.038646206 = weight(_text_:wide in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038646206 = score(doc=4048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
0.029650755 = weight(_text_:web in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650755 = score(doc=4048,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Purpose Provenance information is crucial for consistent maintenance of metadata schemas over time. The purpose of this paper is to propose a provenance model named DSP-PROV to keep track of structural changes of metadata schemas. Design/methodology/approach The DSP-PROV model is developed through applying the general provenance description standard PROV of the World Wide Web Consortium to the Dublin Core Application Profile. Metadata Application Profile of Digital Public Library of America is selected as a case study to apply the DSP-PROV model. Finally, this paper evaluates the proposed model by comparison between formal provenance description in DSP-PROV and semi-formal change log description in English. Findings Formal provenance description in the DSP-PROV model has advantages over semi-formal provenance description in English to keep metadata schemas consistent over time. Research limitations/implications The DSP-PROV model is applicable to keep track of the structural changes of metadata schema over time. Provenance description of other features of metadata schema such as vocabulary and encoding syntax are not covered. Originality/value This study proposes a simple model for provenance description of structural features of metadata schemas based on a few standards widely accepted on the Web and shows the advantage of the proposed model to conventional semi-formal provenance description.
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.09
0.085880384 = product of:
0.25764114 = sum of:
0.109785445 = weight(_text_:tagging in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109785445 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.047441207 = weight(_text_:web in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047441207 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.047441207 = weight(_text_:web in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047441207 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.05297326 = product of:
0.10594652 = sum of:
0.10594652 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10594652 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- Folksonomies ermöglichen den Nutzern in Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten den Zugang zu verschiedenartigen Informationsressourcen. In welchen Fällen beide Bestandteile des Web 2.0 am besten für das Information Retrieval geeignet sind und wo sie die Websuche ggf. ersetzen können, wird in diesem Beitrag diskutiert. Dazu erfolgt eine detaillierte Betrachtung der Reichweite von Social-Bookmarking-Systemen und Sharing-Systemen sowie der Retrievaleffektivität von Folksonomies innerhalb von Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten.
- Source
- Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012)
0.08
0.08394929 = product of:
0.25184786 = sum of:
0.096062265 = weight(_text_:tagging in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096062265 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.4566044 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.050840456 = weight(_text_:web in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050840456 = score(doc=828,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.05410469 = weight(_text_:wide in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05410469 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.050840456 = weight(_text_:web in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050840456 = score(doc=828,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- There are close to a billion websites on the Internet with approximately 400 million users worldwide [www.internetworldstats.com]. People go to websites for a wide variety of different information tasks, from finding a restaurant to serious research. Many of the difficulties with searching the Web, as it is structured currently, can be attributed to increases to scale. The content of the Web is now so large that we only have a rough estimate of the number of sites and the range of information is extremely diverse, from blogs and photos to research articles and news videos.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Huang, C.; Fu, T.; Chen, H.: Text-based video content classification for online video-sharing sites (2010)
0.08
0.081925154 = product of:
0.24577545 = sum of:
0.068615906 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068615906 = score(doc=3452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
0.055471484 = weight(_text_:web in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055471484 = score(doc=3452,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
0.055471484 = weight(_text_:web in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055471484 = score(doc=3452,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
0.06621657 = product of:
0.13243315 = sum of:
0.13243315 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13243315 = score(doc=3452,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.640786 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- With the emergence of Web 2.0, sharing personal content, communicating ideas, and interacting with other online users in Web 2.0 communities have become daily routines for online users. User-generated data from Web 2.0 sites provide rich personal information (e.g., personal preferences and interests) and can be utilized to obtain insight about cyber communities and their social networks. Many studies have focused on leveraging user-generated information to analyze blogs and forums, but few studies have applied this approach to video-sharing Web sites. In this study, we propose a text-based framework for video content classification of online-video sharing Web sites. Different types of user-generated data (e.g., titles, descriptions, and comments) were used as proxies for online videos, and three types of text features (lexical, syntactic, and content-specific features) were extracted. Three feature-based classification techniques (C4.5, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine) were used to classify videos. To evaluate the proposed framework, user-generated data from candidate videos, which were identified by searching user-given keywords on YouTube, were first collected. Then, a subset of the collected data was randomly selected and manually tagged by users as our experiment data. The experimental results showed that the proposed approach was able to classify online videos based on users' interests with accuracy rates up to 87.2%, and all three types of text features contributed to discriminating videos. Support Vector Machine outperformed C4.5 and Naïve Bayes techniques in our experiments. In addition, our case study further demonstrated that accurate video-classification results are very useful for identifying implicit cyber communities on video-sharing Web sites.
- Object
- Web 2.0
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Calvanese, D.; Kalayci, T.E.; Montali, M.; Santoso, A.: OBDA for log extraction in process mining (2017)
0.08
0.08058291 = product of:
0.24174872 = sum of:
0.03631461 = weight(_text_:web in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03631461 = score(doc=3931,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
0.14003624 = weight(_text_:log in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14003624 = score(doc=3931,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22837062 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.61319727 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
0.029083263 = weight(_text_:world in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029083263 = score(doc=3931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
0.03631461 = weight(_text_:web in 3931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03631461 = score(doc=3931,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 3931, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3931)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- Process mining is an emerging area that synergically combines model-based and data-oriented analysis techniques to obtain useful insights on how business processes are executed within an organization. Through process mining, decision makers can discover process models from data, compare expected and actual behaviors, and enrich models with key information about their actual execution. To be applicable, process mining techniques require the input data to be explicitly structured in the form of an event log, which lists when and by whom different case objects (i.e., process instances) have been subject to the execution of tasks. Unfortunately, in many real world set-ups, such event logs are not explicitly given, but are instead implicitly represented in legacy information systems. To apply process mining in this widespread setting, there is a pressing need for techniques able to support various process stakeholders in data preparation and log extraction from legacy information systems. The purpose of this paper is to single out this challenging, open issue, and didactically introduce how techniques from intelligent data management, and in particular ontology-based data access, provide a viable solution with a solid theoretical basis.
- Series
- Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc;10370) (Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI
- Source
- Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
-
Griebel, R.; Lipp. A.; Tröger, B.: Den Wandel gestalten : Informations-Infrastrukturen im digitalen Zeitalter (2011)
0.08
0.08006964 = product of:
0.19216713 = sum of:
0.035580907 = weight(_text_:web in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035580907 = score(doc=4715,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
0.034899916 = weight(_text_:world in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034899916 = score(doc=4715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
0.046375446 = weight(_text_:wide in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046375446 = score(doc=4715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
0.035580907 = weight(_text_:web in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035580907 = score(doc=4715,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
0.039729945 = product of:
0.07945989 = sum of:
0.07945989 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07945989 = score(doc=4715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
- Abstract
- Seit den ersten Annäherungsversuchen der Bibliothekswelt an die elektronische Datenverarbeitung bis heute ist bereits ein langer Weg zurückgelegt worden. Am Beginn stand in den 1970er und 1980erJahren die Automatisierung der bibliotheksinternen Arbeitsprozesse, die Katalogisierung anfänglich im Offline-Verfahren, die Ausleihverbuchung und die Erwerbungsautomatisierung, woraus sich integrierte Lokalsysteme entwickelten. Mit dem World Wide Web waren die Voraussetzungen für den OPAC,einen Meilenstein im Aufbau endnutzerorientierter bibliothekarischer Dienstleistungen, vor allem aber auch für die grundlegende Veränderung des Literaturmarktes gegeben: neben der klassischen Printwelt bildete sich seit der zweiten Hälfte der-1990er Jahre ein rasant wachsendes Angebot an elektronischen Medien - Datenbanken, elektronischen Zeitschriften und E-Books-heraus, eine gewaltige Herausforderung für die wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken. Dazu trat seit Mitte der iggoer Jahre die Retrodigitalisierung der Bibliotheksbestände. Im ersten Jahrzehnt des 21. Jahrhunderts stand dann der konsequente Ausbau eines strikt nutzerorientierten innovativen Dienstleistungsangebots im Mittelpunkt - genannt seien Stichworte wie Such maschinentechnologie, Kataloganreicherung, SFX-Technologie oder Web 2.0.
-
Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012)
0.08
0.07851441 = product of:
0.23554322 = sum of:
0.18154062 = weight(_text_:tagging in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18154062 = score(doc=515,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.8629013 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.02096625 = weight(_text_:web in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02096625 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.02096625 = weight(_text_:web in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02096625 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.012070097 = product of:
0.024140194 = sum of:
0.024140194 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024140194 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- A new collaborative approach in information organization and sharing has recently arisen, known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. A key element of collaborative tagging is the concept of collective intelligence (CI), which is a shared intelligence among all participants. This research investigates the phenomenon of social tagging in the context of CI with the aim to serve as a stepping-stone towards the mining of truly valuable social tags for web resources. This study focuses on assessing and evaluating the degree of CI embedded in social tagging over time in terms of two-parameter values, number of participants, and top frequency ranking window. Five different metrics were adopted and utilized for assessing the similarity between ranking lists: overlapList, overlapRank, Footrule, Fagin's measure, and the Inverse Rank measure. The result of this study demonstrates that a substantial degree of CI is most likely to be achieved when somewhere between the first 200 and 400 people have participated in tagging, and that a target degree of CI can be projected by controlling the two factors along with the selection of a similarity metric. The study also tests some experimental conditions for detecting social tags with high CI degree. The results of this study can be applicable to the study of filtering social tags based on CI; filtered social tags may be utilized for the metadata creation of tagged resources and possibly for the retrieval of tagged resources.
- Date
- 25.12.2012 15:22:37
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Rorissa, A.: ¬A comparative study of Flickr tags and index terms in a general image collection (2010)
0.08
0.076547205 = product of:
0.22964162 = sum of:
0.13723181 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13723181 = score(doc=4100,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.652292 = fieldWeight in 4100, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4100)
0.029650755 = weight(_text_:web in 4100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650755 = score(doc=4100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4100)
0.029650755 = weight(_text_:web in 4100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650755 = score(doc=4100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4100)
0.033108287 = product of:
0.06621657 = sum of:
0.06621657 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06621657 = score(doc=4100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.320393 = fieldWeight in 4100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- Web 2.0 and social/collaborative tagging have altered the traditional roles of indexer and user. Traditional indexing tools and systems assume the top-down approach to indexing in which a trained professional is responsible for assigning index terms to information sources with a potential user in mind. However, in today's Web, end users create, organize, index, and search for images and other information sources through social tagging and other collaborative activities. One of the impediments to user-centered indexing had been the cost of soliciting user-generated index terms or tags. Social tagging of images such as those on Flickr, an online photo management and sharing application, presents an opportunity that can be seized by designers of indexing tools and systems to bridge the semantic gap between indexer terms and user vocabularies. Empirical research on the differences and similarities between user-generated tags and index terms based on controlled vocabularies has the potential to inform future design of image indexing tools and systems. Toward this end, a random sample of Flickr images and the tags assigned to them were content analyzed and compared with another sample of index terms from a general image collection using established frameworks for image attributes and contents. The results show that there is a fundamental difference between the types of tags and types of index terms used. In light of this, implications for research into and design of user-centered image indexing tools and systems are discussed.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010)
0.08
0.076250955 = product of:
0.30500382 = sum of:
0.21784876 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21784876 = score(doc=3421,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
1.0354816 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.043577533 = weight(_text_:web in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043577533 = score(doc=3421,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.043577533 = weight(_text_:web in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043577533 = score(doc=3421,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.25 = coord(3/12)
- Abstract
- Data integration and mediation have become central concerns of information technology over the past few decades. With the advent of the Web and the rapid increases in the amount of data and the number of Web documents and users, researchers have focused on enhancing the interoperability of data through the development of metadata schemes. Other researchers have looked to the wealth of metadata generated by bookmarking sites on the Social Web. While several existing ontologies have capitalized on the semantics of metadata created by tagging activities, the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO) emphasizes the structure of tagging activities to facilitate modeling of tagging data and the integration of data from different bookmarking sites as well as the alignment of tagging ontologies. UTO is described and its utility in modeling, harvesting, integrating, searching, and analyzing data is demonstrated with metadata harvested from three major social tagging systems (Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube).
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Zumstein, P.: ¬Die Rolle des Semantic Web für Bibliotheken : Linked Open Data und mehr: Welche Strategien können hier die Bibliotheken in die Zukunft führen? (2012)
0.08
0.075363584 = product of:
0.22609074 = sum of:
0.06563474 = weight(_text_:web in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06563474 = score(doc=2450,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
0.040716566 = weight(_text_:world in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040716566 = score(doc=2450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
0.05410469 = weight(_text_:wide in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05410469 = score(doc=2450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
0.06563474 = weight(_text_:web in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06563474 = score(doc=2450,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- Das Semantic Web ist die Vision einer Erweiterung des World Wide Webs, so dass die Daten nicht nur für Menschen leicht verständlich dargestellt werden, sondern auch von Maschinen verwertbar sind. Mit einer entsprechenden Ausgestaltung von Links zwischen einzelnen Webressourcen wäre das Web als riesige, globale Datenbank nutzbar. Darin könnten dann Softwareagenten für uns auch komplexe Fragestellungen und Planungen bearbeiten. In dieser Arbeit soll gezeigt werden, dass jede Bibliothek interessante Daten für das Semantic Web hat und umgekehrt von ihm profitieren kann. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt auf möglichen Anwendungsszenarien mit dem speziellen Fokus beim Bibliothekswesen.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012)
0.07
0.07433406 = product of:
0.29733625 = sum of:
0.24701725 = weight(_text_:tagging in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24701725 = score(doc=309,freq=18.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
1.1741256 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.025159499 = weight(_text_:web in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025159499 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.025159499 = weight(_text_:web in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025159499 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.25 = coord(3/12)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
- Source
- Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Perez, M.: Web 2.0 im Einsatz für die Wissenschaft (2010)
0.07
0.074286595 = product of:
0.29714638 = sum of:
0.08302212 = weight(_text_:web in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08302212 = score(doc=4848,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
0.08302212 = weight(_text_:web in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08302212 = score(doc=4848,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
0.13110214 = product of:
0.2622043 = sum of:
0.2622043 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2622043 = score(doc=4848,freq=16.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(3/12)
- Abstract
- In diesem Artikel geht es darum, was Web 2.0 für die Wissenschaft bedeutet und welchen Nutzen Web 2.0-Dienste für Wissenschaftler haben. Im Rahmen dieses Themas wird eine Studie vorgestellt, bei der Wissenschaftler unterschiedlicher Fachbereiche unter anderem gefragt wurden, welche Web 2.0-Dienste sie kennen und warum sie Web 2.0-Dienste nutzen. Nach einer kurzen Einleitung zu Web 2.0 und dem bisherigen Forschungsstand folgen die Ergebnisse der Studie, die zeigen werden, dass Web 2.0-Dienste bekannt sind und für private Zwecke und zur Unterhaltung genutzt werden, sie sich allerdings noch nicht als Werkzeuge für die Wissenschaft etabliert haben.
- Object
- Web 2.0
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.07
0.07275806 = product of:
0.21827418 = sum of:
0.068615906 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068615906 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.029650755 = weight(_text_:web in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650755 = score(doc=3524,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.029650755 = weight(_text_:web in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650755 = score(doc=3524,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.09035677 = sum of:
0.06621657 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06621657 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.320393 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.024140194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024140194 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
- Abstract
- Tags (keywords freely assigned by users to describe web content) have become highly popular on Web 2.0 applications, because of the strong stimuli and easiness for users to create and describe their own content. This increase in tag popularity has led to a vast literature on tag recommendation methods. These methods aim at assisting users in the tagging process, possibly increasing the quality of the generated tags and, consequently, improving the quality of the information retrieval (IR) services that rely on tags as data sources. Regardless of the numerous and diversified previous studies on tag recommendation, to our knowledge, no previous work has summarized and organized them into a single survey article. In this article, we propose a taxonomy for tag recommendation methods, classifying them according to the target of the recommendations, their objectives, exploited data sources, and underlying techniques. Moreover, we provide a critical overview of these methods, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we describe the main open challenges related to the field, such as tag ambiguity, cold start, and evaluation issues.
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
-
Konkova, E.; Göker, A.; Butterworth, R.; MacFarlane, A.: Social tagging: exploring the image, the tags, and the game (2014)
0.07
0.072252646 = product of:
0.28901058 = sum of:
0.21784876 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21784876 = score(doc=1370,freq=14.0), product of:
0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
1.0354816 = fieldWeight in 1370, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1370)
0.035580907 = weight(_text_:web in 1370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035580907 = score(doc=1370,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1370, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1370)
0.035580907 = weight(_text_:web in 1370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035580907 = score(doc=1370,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.035634913 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1370, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1370)
0.25 = coord(3/12)
- Abstract
- Large image collections on the Web need to be organized for effective retrieval. Metadata has a key role in image retrieval but rely on professionally assigned tags which is not a viable option. Current content-based image retrieval systems have not demonstrated sufficient utility on large-scale image sources on the web, and are usually used as a supplement to existing text-based image retrieval systems. We present two social tagging alternatives in the form of photo-sharing networks and image labeling games. Here we analyze these applications to evaluate their usefulness from the semantic point of view, investigating the management of social tagging for indexing. The findings of the study have shown that social tagging can generate a sizeable number of tags that can be classified as in terpretive for an image, and that tagging behaviour has a manageable and adjustable nature depending on tagging guidelines.
- Theme
- Social tagging
