Search (1360 results, page 1 of 68)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.10 
    0.09876236 = product of:
  0.2962871 = sum of:
    0.05651486 = product of:
      0.16954458 = sum of:
        0.16954458 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16954458 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30167106 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.23977223 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23977223 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.30167106 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.08 
    0.075353146 = product of:
  0.22605944 = sum of:
    0.05651486 = product of:
      0.16954458 = sum of:
        0.16954458 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16954458 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30167106 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16954458 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16954458 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30167106 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  3. Cronin, B.: Metrics à la mode (2013) 0.06 
    0.06215022 = product of:
  0.37290132 = sum of:
    0.37290132 = weight(_text_:1091 in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37290132 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29288712 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        1.2731912 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1091
  4. Efron, M.; Winget, M.: Query polyrepresentation for ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments (2010) 0.06 
    0.057994973 = product of:
  0.17398492 = sum of:
    0.15981485 = weight(_text_:1091 in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15981485 = score(doc=3469,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29288712 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.5456534 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
    0.014170073 = product of:
      0.04251022 = sum of:
        0.04251022 = weight(_text_:k in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04251022 = score(doc=3469,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Ranking information retrieval (IR) systems with respect to their effectiveness is a crucial operation during IR evaluation, as well as during data fusion. This article offers a novel method of approaching the system-ranking problem, based on the widely studied idea of polyrepresentation. The principle of polyrepresentation suggests that a single information need can be represented by many query articulations-what we call query aspects. By skimming the top k (where k is small) documents retrieved by a single system for multiple query aspects, we collect a set of documents that are likely to be relevant to a given test topic. Labeling these skimmed documents as putatively relevant lets us build pseudorelevance judgments without undue human intervention. We report experiments where using these pseudorelevance judgments delivers a rank ordering of IR systems that correlates highly with rankings based on human relevance judgments.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1081-1091
  5. Steele, R.; Min, K.; Lo, A.: Personal health record architectures : technology infrastructure implications and dependencies (2012) 0.06 
    0.056611534 = product of:
  0.1698346 = sum of:
    0.15981485 = weight(_text_:1091 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15981485 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29288712 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.5456534 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
    0.010019755 = product of:
      0.030059265 = sum of:
        0.030059265 = weight(_text_:k in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030059265 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.6, S.1079-1091
  6. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.04 
    0.037676573 = product of:
  0.22605944 = sum of:
    0.22605944 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22605944 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30167106 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  7. Keßler, K.; Krüger, A.T.; Ghammad, Y.; Wulle, S.; Balke, W.-T.; Stump, K.: PubPharm - Der Fachinformationsdienst Pharmazie (2016) 0.04 
    0.037001833 = product of:
  0.07400367 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
    0.011808395 = product of:
      0.035425186 = sum of:
        0.035425186 = weight(_text_:k in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035425186 = score(doc=3133,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.031689867 = product of:
      0.063379735 = sum of:
        0.063379735 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063379735 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20204939 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.31368437 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Der Fachinformationsdienst (FID) Pharmazie verfolgt das Ziel, die Informationsinfrastruktur und die Literaturversorgung für die pharmazeutische Hochschulforschung nachhaltig zu verbessern. Das Projekt wird seit dem 1. Januar 2015 von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft gefördert. Eine Besonderheit stellt die Kooperation zwischen der Universitätsbibliothek Braunschweig und dem Institut für Informationssysteme (IfIS) der TU Braunschweig dar, wodurch aktuelle Forschung auf dem Gebiet der Informatik in die Implementierung innovativer FID-Dienste mündet. Im Zentrum des Projektes steht der nutzerzentrierte Aufbau einer erweiterbaren und personalisierbaren Informationsinfrastruktur. Das vom FID entwickelte Discovery System "PubPharm" zur pharmaziespezifischen Recherche basiert, als Weiterentwicklung des beluga-Systems der SUB Hamburg, auf der Open Source Software VuFind. Als Datengrundlage enthält es u.a. die Medline Daten, erweitert durch Normdaten, die unter anderem die Suche nach chemischen Strukturen erlauben. Gleichzeitig werden vom Institut für Informationssysteme innovative Suchmöglichkeiten basierend auf Narrativer Intelligenz untersucht und perspektivisch in das Retrieval des Discovery Systems eingebunden. Im Rahmen von sog. FID-Lizenzen bietet der FID Pharmazie Wissenschaftlern/innen Volltextzugriff auf pharmazeutische Fachzeitschriften. Bestandteil der Lizenzen ist das Recht zur Langzeitarchivierung. Bei deren technischer Umsetzung kooperiert der FID mit der TIB Hannover. Der FID Pharmazie koppelt seine Aktivitäten eng an die pharmazeutische Fachcommunity: unter anderem begleitet ein Fachbeirat die Entwicklungen. Im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit werden Nutzer/innen umfassend über die Angebote informiert, u.a. in Webcasts und im PubPharm Blog.
  8. Rötzer, F.: Psychologen für die Künstliche Intelligenz (2018) 0.04 
    0.035701815 = product of:
  0.21421088 = sum of:
    0.21421088 = sum of:
      0.1756431 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1756431 = score(doc=4427,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20204939 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
            0.035582762 = queryNorm
          0.86930776 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
      0.038567785 = weight(_text_:22 in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038567785 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.035582762 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Künstliche Intelligenz kann lernen anhand von Erfahrungen und Vorgaben. Das Problem ist aber, dass sich maschinelles Lernen zwar in eine bestimmte Richtung steuern lässt, um bestimmte Probleme zu lösen, dass aber der Programmierer mitunter nicht mehr weiß, was in dem "künstlichen Gehirn" bzw. dem neuronalen Netzwerk vor sich geht, das mit zunehmender Komplexität und Lernerfahrung für den Menschen zur Black Box wird, wo man nur sehen kann, was an Daten einfließt und was herauskommt.
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:08:27
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Psychologen-fuer-die-Kuenstliche-Intelligenz-3947256.html?view=print
  9. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.04 
    0.035242345 = product of:
  0.21145406 = sum of:
    0.21145406 = product of:
      0.63436216 = sum of:
        0.63436216 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63436216 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3469667 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  10. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.03 
    0.03404627 = product of:
  0.1021388 = sum of:
    0.07321297 = weight(_text_:t in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07321297 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
    0.028925838 = product of:
      0.057851676 = sum of:
        0.057851676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057851676 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-02-index.php.
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  11. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.03 
    0.0332268 = product of:
  0.19936079 = sum of:
    0.19936079 = product of:
      0.59808236 = sum of:
        0.59808236 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.59808236 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3469667 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
  12. Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011) 0.03 
    0.030544579 = product of:
  0.061089158 = sum of:
    0.036606483 = weight(_text_:t in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036606483 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
    0.010019755 = product of:
      0.030059265 = sum of:
        0.030059265 = weight(_text_:k in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030059265 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.014462919 = product of:
      0.028925838 = sum of:
        0.028925838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028925838 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Date
    13. 7.2011 14:47:22
  13. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.03 
    0.030544579 = product of:
  0.061089158 = sum of:
    0.036606483 = weight(_text_:t in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036606483 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
    0.010019755 = product of:
      0.030059265 = sum of:
        0.030059265 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030059265 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.014462919 = product of:
      0.028925838 = sum of:
        0.028925838 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028925838 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  14. Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015) 0.03 
    0.028371891 = product of:
  0.08511567 = sum of:
    0.061010804 = weight(_text_:t in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061010804 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
    0.024104865 = product of:
      0.04820973 = sum of:
        0.04820973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04820973 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    6. 6.2016 18:42:22
  15. Koumenides, C.L.; Shadbolt, N.R.: Ranking methods for entity-oriented semantic web search (2014) 0.03 
    0.026635809 = product of:
  0.15981485 = sum of:
    0.15981485 = weight(_text_:1091 in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15981485 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29288712 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.5456534 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.6, S.1091-1106
  16. Albertson, D.: Visual information seeking (2015) 0.03 
    0.026635809 = product of:
  0.15981485 = sum of:
    0.15981485 = weight(_text_:1091 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15981485 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29288712 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.5456534 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.6, S.1091-1105
  17. Ferro, N.; Silvello, G.; Keskustalo, H.; Pirkola, A.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The twist measure for IR evaluation : taking user's effort into account (2016) 0.03 
    0.02552065 = product of:
  0.07656195 = sum of:
    0.06821215 = weight(_text_:t in 2771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06821215 = score(doc=2771,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.48662123 = fieldWeight in 2771, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2771)
    0.008349796 = product of:
      0.025049387 = sum of:
        0.025049387 = weight(_text_:k in 2771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025049387 = score(doc=2771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2771)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    We present a novel measure for ranking evaluation, called Twist (t). It is a measure for informational intents, which handles both binary and graded relevance. t stems from the observation that searching is currently a that searching is currently taken for granted and it is natural for users to assume that search engines are available and work well. As a consequence, users may assume the utility they have in finding relevant documents, which is the focus of traditional measures, as granted. On the contrary, they may feel uneasy when the system returns nonrelevant documents because they are then forced to do additional work to get the desired information, and this causes avoidable effort. The latter is the focus of t, which evaluates the effectiveness of a system from the point of view of the effort required to the users to retrieve the desired information. We provide a formal definition of t, a demonstration of its properties, and introduce the notion of effort/gain plots, which complement traditional utility-based measures. By means of an extensive experimental evaluation, t is shown to grasp different aspects of system performances, to not require extensive and costly assessments, and to be a robust tool for detecting differences between systems.
  18. Balakrishnan, V.; Ahmadi, K.; Ravana, S.D.: Improving retrieval relevance using users' explicit feedback (2016) 0.03 
    0.025453815 = product of:
  0.05090763 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
    0.008349796 = product of:
      0.025049387 = sum of:
        0.025049387 = weight(_text_:k in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025049387 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012052433 = product of:
      0.024104865 = sum of:
        0.024104865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024104865 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to improve users' search results relevancy by manipulating their explicit feedback. Design/methodology/approach CoRRe - an explicit feedback model integrating three popular feedback, namely, Comment-Rating-Referral is proposed in this study. The model is further enhanced using case-based reasoning in retrieving the top-5 results. A search engine prototype was developed using Text REtrieval Conference as the document collection, and results were evaluated at three levels (i.e. top-5, 10 and 15). A user evaluation involving 28 students was administered, focussing on 20 queries. Findings Both Mean Average Precision and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain results indicate CoRRe to have the highest retrieval precisions at all the three levels compared to the other feedback models. Furthermore, independent t-tests showed the precision differences to be significant. Rating was found to be the most popular technique among the participants, producing the best precision compared to referral and comments. Research limitations/implications The findings suggest that search retrieval relevance can be significantly improved when users' explicit feedback are integrated, therefore web-based systems should find ways to manipulate users' feedback to provide better recommendations or search results to the users. Originality/value The study is novel in the sense that users' comment, rating and referral were taken into consideration to improve their overall search experience.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016) 0.03 
    0.025453815 = product of:
  0.05090763 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
    0.008349796 = product of:
      0.025049387 = sum of:
        0.025049387 = weight(_text_:k in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025049387 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012052433 = product of:
      0.024104865 = sum of:
        0.024104865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024104865 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010) 0.03 
    0.025107218 = product of:
  0.07532165 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
    0.044816248 = product of:
      0.089632496 = sum of:
        0.089632496 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089632496 = score(doc=4375,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20204939 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.44361675 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Die Auszeichnung digitaler Medien durch Tagging ist zur festen Größe für das Wissensmanagement im Internet avanciert. Im Kontext des zunehmenden information overload' stehen wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken vor der Aufgabe, die große Flut digital publizierter Artikel und Werke möglichst inhaltlich erschlossen verfügbar zu machen. Die Frage ist, ob durch den Einsatz von Tagging-Systemen die kollaborative Intelligenz der NutzerInnen für die Sacherschließung eingesetzt werden kann, während diese von einer intuitiven und individuellen Wissensorganisation profitieren. Die große Freiheit bei der Vergabe von Deskriptoren durch die NutzerInnen eines Tagging-Systems ist nämlich ein ambivalentes Phänomen: Kundennähe und kreatives Potenzial stehen der großen Menge völlig unkontrollierter Meta-Informationen gegenüber, deren inhaltliche Qualität und Aussagekraft noch unklar ist. Bisherige Forschungsbemühungen konzentrieren sich hauptsächlich auf die automatische Hierarchisierung bzw. Relationierung der Tag-Daten (etwa mittels Ähnlichkeitsalgorithmen) oder auf die Analyse des (Miss-)Erfolgs, den die NutzerInnen bei einer Suchanfrage subjektiv erfahren. Aus der Sicht stark strukturierter Wissensorganisation, wie sie Experten z. B. durch die Anwendung von Klassifikationen realisieren, handelt es sich bei den zunächst unvermittelt nebeneinander stehenden Tags allerdings kurz gesagt um Chaos. Dass in diesem Chaos aber auch Struktur und wertvolles Wissen als Gemeinschaftsprodukt erzeugt werden kann, ist eine der zentralen Thesen dieses Artikels.
    Source
    ¬The Ne(x)t generation: das Angebot der Bibliotheken; 30. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag, Graz, 15.-18.9.2009. Hrsg.: Ute Bergner u. Erhard Göbel

Authors

Languages

  • e 954
  • d 397
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 129
  • b 4
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications