Search (313 results, page 2 of 16)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.02
    0.022122633 = product of:
      0.044245265 = sum of:
        0.044245265 = product of:
          0.066367894 = sum of:
            0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968852 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
            0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03639904 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
  2. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.02
    0.022122633 = product of:
      0.044245265 = sum of:
        0.044245265 = product of:
          0.066367894 = sum of:
            0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968852 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
            0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03639904 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
  3. Li, G.; Siddharth, L.; Luo, J.: Embedding knowledge graph of patent metadata to measure knowledge proximity (2023) 0.02
    0.022122633 = product of:
      0.044245265 = sum of:
        0.044245265 = product of:
          0.066367894 = sum of:
            0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968852 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
            0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03639904 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:06:55
  4. Wu, Z.; Li, R.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, J.; Jiang, J.; Su, X.: ¬A user sensitive subject protection approach for book search service (2020) 0.02
    0.021883722 = product of:
      0.043767445 = sum of:
        0.043767445 = product of:
          0.06565116 = sum of:
            0.035318628 = weight(_text_:j in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035318628 = score(doc=5617,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2020 17:22:25
  5. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.02
    0.021883722 = product of:
      0.043767445 = sum of:
        0.043767445 = product of:
          0.06565116 = sum of:
            0.035318628 = weight(_text_:j in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035318628 = score(doc=5839,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  6. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.02
    0.021883722 = product of:
      0.043767445 = sum of:
        0.043767445 = product of:
          0.06565116 = sum of:
            0.035318628 = weight(_text_:j in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035318628 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
  7. Palsdottir, A.: Data literacy and management of research data : a prerequisite for the sharing of research data (2021) 0.02
    0.020351086 = product of:
      0.04070217 = sum of:
        0.04070217 = product of:
          0.061053254 = sum of:
            0.036787223 = weight(_text_:n in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036787223 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
            0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024266029 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the knowledge and attitude about research data management, the use of data management methods and the perceived need for support, in relation to participants' field of research. Design/methodology/approach This is a quantitative study. Data were collected by an email survey and sent to 792 academic researchers and doctoral students. Total response rate was 18% (N = 139). The measurement instrument consisted of six sets of questions: about data management plans, the assignment of additional information to research data, about metadata, standard file naming systems, training at data management methods and the storing of research data. Findings The main finding is that knowledge about the procedures of data management is limited, and data management is not a normal practice in the researcher's work. They were, however, in general, of the opinion that the university should take the lead by recommending and offering access to the necessary tools of data management. Taken together, the results indicate that there is an urgent need to increase the researcher's understanding of the importance of data management that is based on professional knowledge and to provide them with resources and training that enables them to make effective and productive use of data management methods. Research limitations/implications The survey was sent to all members of the population but not a sample of it. Because of the response rate, the results cannot be generalized to all researchers at the university. Nevertheless, the findings may provide an important understanding about their research data procedures, in particular what characterizes their knowledge about data management and attitude towards it. Practical implications Awareness of these issues is essential for information specialists at academic libraries, together with other units within the universities, to be able to design infrastructures and develop services that suit the needs of the research community. The findings can be used, to develop data policies and services, based on professional knowledge of best practices and recognized standards that assist the research community at data management. Originality/value The study contributes to the existing literature about research data management by examining the results by participants' field of research. Recognition of the issues is critical in order for information specialists in collaboration with universities to design relevant infrastructures and services for academics and doctoral students that can promote their research data management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  9. Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:37:33
  10. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  11. Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:18:34
  12. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12
  13. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
  14. Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:55:20
  15. Wang, J.; Halffman, W.; Zhang, Y.H.: Sorting out journals : the proliferation of journal lists in China (2023) 0.02
    0.018435527 = product of:
      0.036871053 = sum of:
        0.036871053 = product of:
          0.055306576 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
            0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030332536 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2023 16:39:23
  16. Franz, S.; Lopatka, T.; Kunze, G.; Meyn, N.; Strupler, N.: Un/Doing Classification : Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme zwischen Universalitätsanspruch und reduktionistischer Wissensorganisation (2022) 0.02
    0.017341664 = product of:
      0.034683328 = sum of:
        0.034683328 = product of:
          0.10404998 = sum of:
            0.10404998 = weight(_text_:n in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10404998 = score(doc=675,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.53895706 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.01
    0.014748422 = product of:
      0.029496845 = sum of:
        0.029496845 = product of:
          0.044245265 = sum of:
            0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019979235 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
            0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024266029 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01
    0.014155183 = product of:
      0.028310366 = sum of:
        0.028310366 = product of:
          0.0849311 = sum of:
            0.0849311 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0849311 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  19. Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020) 0.01
    0.013274446 = product of:
      0.026548892 = sum of:
        0.026548892 = product of:
          0.07964668 = sum of:
            0.07964668 = weight(_text_:n in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07964668 = score(doc=103,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.41255307 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
  20. Döring, N.: Computervermittelte Kommunikation (2023) 0.01
    0.012262408 = product of:
      0.024524815 = sum of:
        0.024524815 = product of:
          0.073574446 = sum of:
            0.073574446 = weight(_text_:n in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073574446 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 242
  • d 70
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 49
  • p 2
  • More… Less…