Search (213 results, page 3 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Aleksander, K.; Bucher, M.; Dornick, S.; Franke-Maier, M.; Strickert, M.: Mehr Wissen sichtbar machen : Inhaltserschließung in Bibliotheken und alternative Zukünfte. (2022) 0.01
    0.007366187 = product of:
      0.04419712 = sum of:
        0.04419712 = weight(_text_:wissen in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04419712 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.2695561 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    "Auch unter bibliotheksethischen Aspekten sind Erwerbung und Inhaltserschließung verschiedenster Wissen einer Gesellschaft wünschenswert. Auf der Ebene der angewandten Wissensorganisationssysteme entstehen dabei Fragen im Zusammenhang mit solchen "allgemeinen" bibliotheksethischen Werten, wie zum Beispiel Gleichbehandlung und Neutralität, aber auch der Orientierung am Nutzer*innenbedarf, Informationen, Inhalte, Ressourcen suchen und finden zu können. Letztlich stellt sich die Frage: Müssen Bibliotheken neutral sein? Und gibt es zum Beispiel einen Anspruch auf unkommentierten access to disinformation?"
  2. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.01
    0.0068988404 = product of:
      0.04139304 = sum of:
        0.04139304 = product of:
          0.06208956 = sum of:
            0.031185046 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031185046 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
            0.030904513 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030904513 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  3. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01
    0.0068988404 = product of:
      0.04139304 = sum of:
        0.04139304 = product of:
          0.06208956 = sum of:
            0.031185046 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031185046 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.030904513 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030904513 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  4. Fischer, E.P.: Wissenschaft rettet die Welt (2020) 0.01
    0.00651085 = product of:
      0.0390651 = sum of:
        0.0390651 = weight(_text_:wissen in 5785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0390651 = score(doc=5785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23825617 = fieldWeight in 5785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5785)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Vor 350 Jahren schrieb der Chemiker Robert Boyle eine Wunschliste an die Wissenschaft - die meisten Hoffnungen erfüllten sich. Eine Erfolgsgeschichte. - Das heutige Wissen erscheint aus Sicht der Vergangenheit unrealistisch. - Erkenntnisse der Wissenschaft haben das Leben von Milliarden Menschen erheblich verbessert. - Die Vereinten Nationen haben eine aktuelle Wunschliste an die Wissenschaft geschrieben.
  5. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" I : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.01
    0.00651085 = product of:
      0.0390651 = sum of:
        0.0390651 = weight(_text_:wissen in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0390651 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23825617 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval (2023) 0.01
    0.00651085 = product of:
      0.0390651 = sum of:
        0.0390651 = weight(_text_:wissen in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0390651 = score(doc=798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23825617 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit Information Retrieval (IR) sind in Forschung und Entwicklung in unterschiedlicher Breite und aus verschiedenen Perspektiven mehrere Disziplinen befasst. Die verschiedenen Ausrichtungen sind wichtig, da nur in ihrer Verknüpfung eine Gesamtschau des IR vermittelt werden kann. Die Informatik verfolgt einen stärker systemgetriebenen, technologischen Ansatz des IR und stellt Algorithmen und Implementationen in den Vordergrund, während für die Informationswissenschaft die Benutzer*innen in ihren vielschichtigen Kontexten den Schwerpunkt bilden. Deren Eigenschaften (fachlicher Hintergrund, Domänenzugehörigkeit, Expertise etc.) und Zielsetzungen, die durch das IR verfolgt werden, spielen im Interaktionsprozess zwischen Mensch und System eine zentrale Rolle. Auch wird intensiv der Frage nachgegangen, wie sich Benutzer*innen in diesen Prozessen verhalten und aus welchen Gründen sie verschiedene Systeme in Anspruch nehmen. Da ein Großteil des heutigen Wissens nach wie vor in Texten repräsentiert ist, ist eine weitere Disziplin - nämlich die Computerlinguistik/Sprachtechnologie für das IR von Bedeutung. Zusätzlich kommen aber auch visuelle und auditive Wissensobjekte immer stärker zum Tragen und werden aufgrund ihrer anwachsenden Menge immer wichtiger für das IR. Ein neues Fachgebiet ist die Data Science, die auf altbekannten Konzepten aus Statistik und Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung aufsetzt, auf den Daten operiert und auch traditionelles IR-Wissen für die Zusammenführung von strukturierten Fakten und unstrukturierten Texten nutzt. Hier soll die informationswissenschaftliche Perspektive im Vordergrund stehen.
  7. Option für Metager als Standardsuchmaschine, Suchmaschine nach dem Peer-to-Peer-Prinzip (2021) 0.01
    0.006325407 = product of:
      0.03795244 = sum of:
        0.03795244 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03795244 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18068628 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.21004607 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Fernsehfilm "Digitale Verlustzone". Der Dokumentarfilmer Andreas Orth hat im vorletzten Jahr eine Dokumentation über Digitalisierung gedreht. Das Ergebnis der Reportage "Digitale Verlustzone" wurde schon 2020 in der ARD gesendet. Nun wird der Film, in dem auch die Geschichte MetaGers ein Thema ist und MetaGer-Erfinder und Suchmaschinen-Pionier Dr. Wolfgang Sander-Beuermann interviewt wurde, auf NDR am 27. November wiederholt."
  8. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.0057490338 = product of:
      0.034494203 = sum of:
        0.034494203 = product of:
          0.051741302 = sum of:
            0.02598754 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02598754 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.025753763 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025753763 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.0057490338 = product of:
      0.034494203 = sum of:
        0.034494203 = product of:
          0.051741302 = sum of:
            0.02598754 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02598754 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.025753763 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025753763 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  10. Weßels, D.: ChatGPT - ein Meilenstein der KI-Entwicklung (2022) 0.01
    0.0052086804 = product of:
      0.031252082 = sum of:
        0.031252082 = weight(_text_:wissen in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031252082 = score(doc=929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.19060494 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    "Seit dem 30. November 2022 ist meine Welt - und die vieler Bildungsexpertinnen und Bildungsexperten - gefühlt eine andere Welt, die uns in eine "Neuzeit" führt, von der wir noch nicht wissen, ob wir sie lieben oder fürchten sollen. Der Ableger und Prototyp ChatGPT des derzeit (zumindest in der westlichen Welt) führenden generativen KI-Sprachmodells GPT-3 von OpenAI wurde am 30. November veröffentlicht und ist seit dieser Zeit für jeden frei zugänglich und kostenlos. Was zunächst als unspektakuläre Ankündigung von OpenAI anmutete, nämlich das seit 2020 bereits verfügbare KI-Sprachmodell GPT-3 nun in leicht modifizierter Version (GPT-3,5) als Chat-Variante für die Echtzeit-Kommunikation bereitzustellen, entpuppt sich in der Anwendung - aus Sicht der Nutzerinnen und Nutzer - als Meilenstein der KI-Entwicklung. Fakt ist, dass die Leistungsvielfalt und -stärke von ChatGPT selbst IT-Expertinnen und -Experten überrascht hat und sie zu einer Fülle von Superlativen in der Bewertung veranlasst, jedoch immer in Kombination mit Hinweisen zur fehlenden Faktentreue und Verlässlichkeit derartiger generativer KI-Modelle. Mit WebGPT von OpenAI steht aber bereits ein Forschungsprototyp bereit, der mit integrierter Internetsuchfunktion die "Halluzinationen" aktueller GPT-Varianten ausmerzen könnte. Für den Bildungssektor stellt sich die Frage, wie sich das Lehren und Lernen an Hochschulen (und nicht nur dort) verändern wird, wenn derartige KI-Werkzeuge omnipräsent sind und mit ihrer Hilfe nicht nur die Hausarbeit "per Knopfdruck" erstellt werden kann. Beeindruckend ist zudem die fachliche Bandbreite von ChatGPT, siehe den Tweet von @davidtsong, der ChatGPT dem Studierfähigkeitstest SAT unterzogen hat."
  11. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.00
    0.004006141 = product of:
      0.024036845 = sum of:
        0.024036845 = product of:
          0.07211053 = sum of:
            0.07211053 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07211053 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  12. Springer, M.: Ewiges Wachstum (2020) 0.00
    0.0034650052 = product of:
      0.020790031 = sum of:
        0.020790031 = product of:
          0.06237009 = sum of:
            0.06237009 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06237009 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29
  13. Springer, M.: Schwarzer Schwan im Internet (2020) 0.00
    0.0034650052 = product of:
      0.020790031 = sum of:
        0.020790031 = product of:
          0.06237009 = sum of:
            0.06237009 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06237009 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29
  14. Müller, P.: Text-Automat mit Tücken (2023) 0.00
    0.0034650052 = product of:
      0.020790031 = sum of:
        0.020790031 = product of:
          0.06237009 = sum of:
            0.06237009 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06237009 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2
  15. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.00
    0.0034338348 = product of:
      0.020603009 = sum of:
        0.020603009 = product of:
          0.061809026 = sum of:
            0.061809026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061809026 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  16. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.00
    0.0034338348 = product of:
      0.020603009 = sum of:
        0.020603009 = product of:
          0.061809026 = sum of:
            0.061809026 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061809026 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  17. Rötzer, F.: Droht bei einer Verschmelzung des Gehirns mit KI der Verlust des Bewusstseins? (2020) 0.00
    0.0028875046 = product of:
      0.017325027 = sum of:
        0.017325027 = product of:
          0.05197508 = sum of:
            0.05197508 = weight(_text_:29 in 5699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05197508 = score(doc=5699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5699)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
  18. Lewis, T.: Woher stammt Sars-CoV-2? (2023) 0.00
    0.0028875046 = product of:
      0.017325027 = sum of:
        0.017325027 = product of:
          0.05197508 = sum of:
            0.05197508 = weight(_text_:29 in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05197508 = score(doc=1060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    25. 9.2023 18:29:02
  19. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.00
    0.0028615294 = product of:
      0.017169176 = sum of:
        0.017169176 = product of:
          0.051507525 = sum of:
            0.051507525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051507525 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
  20. Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020) 0.00
    0.0028615294 = product of:
      0.017169176 = sum of:
        0.017169176 = product of:
          0.051507525 = sum of:
            0.051507525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051507525 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:40

Languages

  • e 125
  • d 88

Types

  • el 51
  • p 1
  • More… Less…