Search (4105 results, page 3 of 206)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Oxbrow, N.: Information literacy : the final key to an information society (1998) 0.06
    0.06168072 = product of:
      0.12336144 = sum of:
        0.12336144 = sum of:
          0.0743306 = weight(_text_:n in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0743306 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049030844 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:55:13
  2. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.06
    0.06168072 = product of:
      0.12336144 = sum of:
        0.12336144 = sum of:
          0.0743306 = weight(_text_:n in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0743306 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049030844 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  3. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.06
    0.06168072 = product of:
      0.12336144 = sum of:
        0.12336144 = sum of:
          0.0743306 = weight(_text_:n in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0743306 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049030844 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  4. Kaiser, R.; Ockenfeld, M.; Skurcz, N.: Wann versteht mich mein Computer endlich? : 1. DGI-Konfernz: Semantic Web & Linked Data - Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen (2011) 0.06
    0.06168072 = product of:
      0.12336144 = sum of:
        0.12336144 = sum of:
          0.0743306 = weight(_text_:n in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0743306 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
          0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049030844 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BuB. 63(2011) H.1, S.22-23
  5. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.06
    0.05780632 = product of:
      0.11561264 = sum of:
        0.11561264 = sum of:
          0.0788395 = weight(_text_:n in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0788395 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036773134 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00
  6. Schlicht, T.: Soziale Kognition (2011) 0.06
    0.05780632 = product of:
      0.11561264 = sum of:
        0.11561264 = sum of:
          0.0788395 = weight(_text_:n in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0788395 = score(doc=4583,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
          0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036773134 = score(doc=4583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Mensch ist ein soziales Wesen, und im Alltag gehen wir unhinterfragt davon aus, dass andere Menschen wie wir selbst geistbegabt sind und somit Gefühle, Gedanken und Absichten haben, und wir geben diese Annahme nur in den äußersten Ausnahmefällen auf. Aber auf welche Weise gelangen wir überhaupt zu berechtigten Überzeugungen darüber, was genau andere in einer bestimmten Situation fühlen, denken oder beabsichtigen, wo uns doch ein direkter Zugang zu deren Psyche verwehrt zu sein scheint? Welche Strategie(n) verwenden wir, um Zugang zu der Psyche eines Anderen zu erhalten und welche Art(en) von Wissen sind dabei involviert? Orientieren wir uns eher an unserem eigenen Vorbild und projizieren unsere Vorstellungen in die andere Person hinein oder ähnelt unsere Fähigkeit zur sozialen Kognition eher unserem theoretischen Verständnis anderer 'Objekte'? Beruht unser Wissen über die Psyche eines Anderen auf unserem vorhergehenden Selbstverständnis oder sind intentionaler Selbst- und Frem dbezug systematisch gleichberechtigt? Diese und andere Fragen bewegen nicht nur Philosophen seit alters her, sondern gleichermaßen auch Psychologen sowie jüngst auch Neurowissenschaftler, die solchen Fähigkeiten zugrunde liegende psychologische Prozesse und neuronale Mechanismen im Gehirn untersuchen.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.information-philosophie.de/?a=1&t=7815&n=2#.
    Source
    Information Philosophie. 2014/2 (2014), S.22-27
  7. Fjällbrant, N.: EDUCATE: a networked user education project in Europe (1996) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.31-34
  8. Bunnell, N.: ¬The Internet and learning (1996) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 7346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=7346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 7346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7346)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 7346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=7346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 13(1996) nos.3/4, S.5-22
  9. Duff, A.S.: Some post-war models of the information chain (1997) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the literature of the information chain analogous to ecology's food chain, taking the Royal Scientific Information Conference 1948 as the seminal point. Describes 8 successive models of the information chain each incorporating contemporary thoughts and experiences. Each model is labelled with the year to which it may be said to refer: Distribution of Scientific Information 1948; Document Network 1967; Dissemination of scientific and technical information 1978; Structure of Scientific Literature 1979; Ecosystem of scientific communication 1980; Information Chain 1988; Information Chain 1989; Pathways of N formation Flow 1993. Although of wide applicability the focus of interest for information scientists tends to be the communication of learned information
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  10. Moore, N.: Policies for an information society (1998) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 3.1999 16:03:22
  11. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00
    Location
    N
  12. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  13. Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:29:22
  14. Nyseter, T.: Learning centres and knowledge management : based on common ideas? (2005) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:55:29
    Location
    N
  15. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.05
    0.053970627 = product of:
      0.107941255 = sum of:
        0.107941255 = sum of:
          0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06503927 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04290199 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  16. Windfeld Lund, N.; Smalheiser, N.; Torvik, V.: Author name disambiguation (2009) 0.05
    0.05255967 = product of:
      0.10511934 = sum of:
        0.10511934 = product of:
          0.21023868 = sum of:
            0.21023868 = weight(_text_:n in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21023868 = score(doc=675,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045236014 = queryNorm
                1.0779141 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.05
    0.048171937 = product of:
      0.096343875 = sum of:
        0.096343875 = sum of:
          0.06569959 = weight(_text_:n in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06569959 = score(doc=4193,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030644279 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  18. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.05
    0.048171937 = product of:
      0.096343875 = sum of:
        0.096343875 = sum of:
          0.06569959 = weight(_text_:n in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06569959 = score(doc=263,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030644279 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    When people experience major life changes, this often impacts their self-presentation, networks, and online behavior in substantial ways. To effectively study major life transitions and events, we surveyed a large U.S. sample (n = 554) to create the Major Life Events Taxonomy, a list of 121 life events in 12 categories. We then applied this taxonomy to a second large U.S. survey sample (n = 775) to understand on average how much social readjustment each event required, how likely each event was to be shared on social media with different types of audiences, and how much online network separation each involved. We found that social readjustment is positively correlated with sharing on social media, with both broad audiences and close ties as well as in online spaces separate from one's network of known ties. Some life transitions involve high levels of sharing with both separate audiences and broad audiences on social media, providing evidence for what previous research has called social media as social transition machinery. Researchers can use the Major Life Events Taxonomy to examine how people's life transition experiences relate to their behaviors, technology use, and health and well-being outcomes.
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
  19. Egghe, L.: Properties of the n-overlap vector and n-overlap similarity theory (2006) 0.05
    0.046456624 = product of:
      0.09291325 = sum of:
        0.09291325 = product of:
          0.1858265 = sum of:
            0.1858265 = weight(_text_:n in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1858265 = score(doc=194,freq=32.0), product of:
                0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045236014 = queryNorm
                0.95275044 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
                  5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                    32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the first part of this article the author defines the n-overlap vector whose coordinates consist of the fraction of the objects (e.g., books, N-grams, etc.) that belong to 1, 2, , n sets (more generally: families) (e.g., libraries, databases, etc.). With the aid of the Lorenz concentration theory, a theory of n-overlap similarity is conceived together with corresponding measures, such as the generalized Jaccard index (generalizing the well-known Jaccard index in case n 5 2). Next, the distributional form of the n-overlap vector is determined assuming certain distributions of the object's and of the set (family) sizes. In this section the decreasing power law and decreasing exponential distribution is explained for the n-overlap vector. Both item (token) n-overlap and source (type) n-overlap are studied. The n-overlap properties of objects indexed by a hierarchical system (e.g., books indexed by numbers from a UDC or Dewey system or by N-grams) are presented in the final section. The author shows how the results given in the previous section can be applied as well as how the Lorenz order of the n-overlap vector is respected by an increase or a decrease of the level of refinement in the hierarchical system (e.g., the value N in N-grams).
  20. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.05
    0.046260543 = product of:
      0.09252109 = sum of:
        0.09252109 = sum of:
          0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05574795 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036773134 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92

Languages

Types

  • el 119
  • b 35
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes