Search (3107 results, page 1 of 156)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Curwen, A.G.: Bliss for beginners (1989) 0.24
    0.24235377 = product of:
      0.96941507 = sum of:
        0.96941507 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.96941507 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            2.2354977 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bliss classification bulletin. 1989, no.31, S.14-17
  2. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.24
    0.23652087 = product of:
      0.47304174 = sum of:
        0.41555014 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41555014 = score(doc=2550,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.95827 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.057491608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057491608 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
    Biographed
    Bliss, Henry Evelyn
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  3. Bliss, H.E.: Simplified book notation (1910) 0.17
    0.17137 = product of:
      0.68548 = sum of:
        0.68548 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.68548 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Classification Research Group / Bliss Classification Association (1991) 0.17
    0.17137 = product of:
      0.68548 = sum of:
        0.68548 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.68548 = score(doc=3928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 3928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3928)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Bliss, H.E.: Theoretic principles of bibliographic classification (1966) 0.17
    0.17137 = product of:
      0.68548 = sum of:
        0.68548 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.68548 = score(doc=4945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 4945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4945)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.17
    0.16905868 = product of:
      0.33811736 = sum of:
        0.28883883 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28883883 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.51393163 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.04927852 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04927852 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.15
    0.1487048 = product of:
      0.2974096 = sum of:
        0.239918 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.239918 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.057491608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057491608 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Survey on the activities going to develop the UDC into a fully faceted classification system according to the Recommendations of the UDC Management Board. A Master Reference File (MRF) has been created from which any publisher or insitution may develop its own versions according to the requests of its clientele. The UDC Technical Director at the FID Headquarters in The Hague maintains the file. An Editorial Board and an Editor in Chief was appointed. Extensions and Corrections are being published. Examples are given on ongoing revision work in the classes for Astronomy, Linguistics and Philology as well as in Medicine. Cooperation with the Editors of the Bliss Classification and the DDC exists
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  8. Thomas, A.R.: Blissful beliefs : Henry Evelyn Bliss councels on classification (1995) 0.15
    0.1487048 = product of:
      0.2974096 = sum of:
        0.239918 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.239918 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
        0.057491608 = weight(_text_:22 in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057491608 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Pages
    S.17-22
  9. Thomas, A.: Bliss regained : the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (1993) 0.15
    0.14841077 = product of:
      0.59364307 = sum of:
        0.59364307 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.59364307 = score(doc=5077,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.3689572 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the early development of the Bliss Bliographic Classification, the work leading up to the preparation of the second edition, the role of the BC in libraries in the USA, and the potential contribution of the second ed. to library development
  10. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A modern classification for libraries, with simple notation, mnemonics, and alternatives (1910) 0.14
    0.137096 = product of:
      0.548384 = sum of:
        0.548384 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.548384 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Freeman, C.B.: ¬The new schedules : a note (1965) 0.14
    0.137096 = product of:
      0.548384 = sum of:
        0.548384 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.548384 = score(doc=3933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 3933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3933)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bliss classification bulletin. 3(1965) no.2, S.3
  12. Campbell, D.J.: ¬A summary of reviews of and published comments on the 2nd edition of the Bibliographic Classification. (1980) 0.14
    0.137096 = product of:
      0.548384 = sum of:
        0.548384 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.548384 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bliss classification bulletin. 7(1980), S.18-30
  13. Ukoh, R.A.: Library classification and change : the example of Bliss (1975) 0.14
    0.137096 = product of:
      0.548384 = sum of:
        0.548384 = weight(_text_:bliss in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.548384 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Aitchison, J.: ¬A classification as a source for a thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986) 0.14
    0.1360207 = product of:
      0.5440828 = sum of:
        0.5440828 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5440828 = score(doc=1569,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.2546699 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The second edition of the Bibliographic Classidication of H.E. Bliss (BC2), being prepared under the editorship of Jack Mills, Vanda Broughton and others, is a rich source of structure and terminology for thesauri covering different subject fields. The new edition employs facet analysis and is thesaurus-compatible. A number of facet-based thesauri have drawn upon Bliss for terms and relationships. In two of these thesauri the Bliss Classification was the source of both systematic and alphabetical displays. The DHSS-DATA thesaurus, published by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security, provides controlled terms and Bliss class numbers for indexing and searching the DHSS-DATA database. The ECOT thesaurus (Educational courses and occupations thesaurus) prepared for the Department of Education and Science, uses the software sedigned for the British Standards Institution ROOT thesaurus to genearte an alphabetical display from the systematic display derived from the Bliss schedules. Problems, benefits, and future prospects of Bliss-based thesaurus construction are discussed
  15. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.13
    0.12746125 = product of:
      0.2549225 = sum of:
        0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.205644 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
        0.04927852 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04927852 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
  16. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.13
    0.12746125 = product of:
      0.2549225 = sum of:
        0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.205644 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.04927852 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04927852 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Idrees, H.: Library classification systems and organization of Islamic knowledge (2012) 0.13
    0.12746125 = product of:
      0.2549225 = sum of:
        0.205644 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.205644 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
        0.04927852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04927852 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21227868 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Standard library classification systems like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), U.S. Library of Congress Classification (LCC), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are internationally known and widely used by libraries as the tools for organizing information. Charles Ammi Cutter's Expansive Classification (EC), James Duff Brown's Subject Classification (SC), Henry E. Bliss' Bibliographic Classification (BC), and S. R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification (CC) also are standard classification systems, but they are less commonly used compared to aforementioned three systems. All these systems are easy to use and convenient for most general collection libraries. However, these systems are not adequate for some special collections. Libraries with rich collections on Islam also face problems while using these systems, although such libraries often use expansions in the original systems for their collections. This paper examines this problem and presents a potential optimal solution. The author collected data, using a semistructured interview technique, from a representative sample of thirty libraries in eight countries with strong collections in Islam. These data were analyzed employing qualitative methods.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Aitchison, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986) 0.12
    0.12117688 = product of:
      0.48470753 = sum of:
        0.48470753 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48470753 = score(doc=1570,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Mills, J.: ¬The new Bliss Classification (1976) 0.12
    0.12117688 = product of:
      0.48470753 = sum of:
        0.48470753 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48470753 = score(doc=1980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1980)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Summary of the decisions taken for the revision of the Bliss Classification and their consequences concerning internal organisation of classes, facet analysis, citation order, filing order, notation, and the A/Z index. Also, maintenance of the new BC and its possible future envisaged for about a century. It will be published in 20 separate volumens in the forthcoming 3-4 years
  20. Thomas, A.R.: Options in the arrangement of library materials and the new edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (1992) 0.12
    0.119959 = product of:
      0.479836 = sum of:
        0.479836 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.479836 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4336462 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06061936 = queryNorm
            1.1065149 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    

Languages

Types

  • el 71
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes