-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.30
0.2998547 = product of:
0.39980626 = sum of:
0.07245665 = product of:
0.21736994 = sum of:
0.21736994 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21736994 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21736994 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21736994 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.10997967 = weight(_text_:logic in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10997967 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.4663946 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.19
0.19426394 = product of:
0.25901857 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.010595793 = product of:
0.031787377 = sum of:
0.031787377 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787377 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.17
0.1656152 = product of:
0.3312304 = sum of:
0.0828076 = product of:
0.24842279 = sum of:
0.24842279 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24842279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.24842279 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24842279 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.17
0.1656152 = product of:
0.3312304 = sum of:
0.0828076 = product of:
0.24842279 = sum of:
0.24842279 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24842279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.24842279 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24842279 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.16
0.16279891 = product of:
0.32559782 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26349214 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26349214 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.16
0.16279891 = product of:
0.32559782 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26349214 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26349214 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.12
0.12421139 = product of:
0.24842279 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.12
0.12421139 = product of:
0.24842279 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.12
0.12421139 = product of:
0.24842279 = sum of:
0.062105697 = product of:
0.18631709 = sum of:
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18631709 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18631709 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
DeRaedt, L.: Logical settings for concept-learning (1997)
0.12
0.12358351 = product of:
0.24716702 = sum of:
0.2221925 = weight(_text_:logic in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2221925 = score(doc=3780,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.94225943 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
0.024974523 = product of:
0.07492357 = sum of:
0.07492357 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07492357 = score(doc=3780,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Analyzes 3 different formalisations of concept-learning in logic. Learning from interpretations reduces to learning from entailment, which in turn reduces to learning from satisfiability. Discusses the implications for inductive logic programming and computational learning theory and formulates guidelines for choosing a problem-setting method
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
22. 1.1999 18:56:45
-
Minker, J.: Logic and databases : past, present, and future (1997)
0.12
0.11992608 = product of:
0.23985216 = sum of:
0.2221925 = weight(_text_:logic in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2221925 = score(doc=1477,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.94225943 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
0.017659657 = product of:
0.052978966 = sum of:
0.052978966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052978966 = score(doc=1477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Assesses the progress of the field of logic in databases over the past 20 years. covers the intellectual contributions of deductive databases, considers the status of implementations of deductive databases and discusses future work needed in deductive databases
- Date
- 22. 1.1999 18:53:18
-
Ledesma, L.D.: ¬A computational approach to George Boole's discovery of mathematical logic (1997)
0.12
0.11616055 = product of:
0.2323211 = sum of:
0.21995933 = weight(_text_:logic in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21995933 = score(doc=463,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.9327892 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.012361759 = product of:
0.037085276 = sum of:
0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037085276 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports a computational model of George Boole's discovery of logic as part of mathematics. Studies the different historical factors that influences this theory, and produces a computational representation of Boole's logic before it was mathematized, and a production system, BOOLE2, that rediscovers logic as a science that behaves exactly as a branch of mathematics, and that thus validates to some extent the historical explanation. The system's discovery methods are found to be general enough to handle 3 other cases: 2 version of a geometry due to a contemporary of Boole, and a small subset of the differential calculus
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.10
0.1035095 = product of:
0.207019 = sum of:
0.05175475 = product of:
0.15526424 = sum of:
0.15526424 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15526424 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15526424 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15526424 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.10
0.1035095 = product of:
0.207019 = sum of:
0.05175475 = product of:
0.15526424 = sum of:
0.15526424 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15526424 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15526424 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15526424 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Hurt, C.D.: Nonmonotonic logic for use in information retrieval : an exploratory paper (1998)
0.09
0.094268285 = product of:
0.37707314 = sum of:
0.37707314 = weight(_text_:logic in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37707314 = score(doc=1142,freq=18.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
1.5990672 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Monotonic logic requires reexamination of the entirety of a logic string when there is a contradiction. Nonmonotonic logic allows the user to withdraw conclusions in the face of contradiction without harm to the logic string. This attribute has considerable application to the field of information searching. Artificial intelligence models and neural networks based on nonmonotonic logic have the potential for more robust findings than the use of monotonic logic alone. This paper demonstrates the power of nonmonotonic logic but does not implement the logic
-
Domsa, Z.; Komuves, E.: BLISS Bibliografiai Osztalyozasa (1997)
0.09
0.092323706 = product of:
0.18464741 = sum of:
0.058956355 = product of:
0.17686906 = sum of:
0.17686906 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17686906 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12569106 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents Bliss's classification system prepared primarily for school libraries. Describes the basic principles of the classification. Bliss's logic of the organization of disciplines, main classes of the Bibliographic Classification, document groups, the four faceted analysis of diciplines, systematic tables, mnemonic codes, methods of notation, and the index. Finally, the whole system is assessed
-
Wojdynski, B.W.; Kalyanaraman, S.: ¬The three dimensions of website navigability : explication and effects (2016)
0.09
0.08693663 = product of:
0.17387326 = sum of:
0.16327746 = weight(_text_:logic in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16327746 = score(doc=2644,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.6924164 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.010595793 = product of:
0.031787377 = sum of:
0.031787377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787377 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although the navigability of digital interfaces has been long discussed as a key determinant of media effects of web use, existing scholarship has not yielded a clear conceptual understanding of navigability, nor how to measure perceived navigability as an outcome. The present paper attempts to redress both and proposes that navigability be conceptually examined along three dimensions, namely, logic of structure, clarity of structure, and clarity of target. A 2?×?2?×?2 factorial between-subjects experiment (N?=?128) was conducted to examine distinct contributions of these dimensions to perceptions of a nonprofit website. The results showed significant effects for logic of structure and clarity on perceived navigability, while logic of structure and content domain involvement affected attitudes toward the website.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:18:13
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.08
0.08297182 = product of:
0.16594364 = sum of:
0.1571138 = weight(_text_:logic in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1571138 = score(doc=5588,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.666278 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.008829828 = product of:
0.026489483 = sum of:
0.026489483 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026489483 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.08
0.076851875 = product of:
0.3074075 = sum of:
0.3074075 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3074075 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.33151442 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.07
0.07195565 = product of:
0.1439113 = sum of:
0.1333155 = weight(_text_:logic in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1333155 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.56535566 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.010595793 = product of:
0.031787377 = sum of:
0.031787377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787377 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039102852 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
