Search (11484 results, page 1 of 575)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Goodchild, M.F.: ¬The Alexandria Digital Library Project : review, assessment, and prospects (2004) 0.30
    0.30437198 = sum of:
      0.042803407 = product of:
        0.12841022 = sum of:
          0.12841022 = weight(_text_:objects in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12841022 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14145125 = weight(_text_:digital in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14145125 = score(doc=1153,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.062851794 = weight(_text_:library in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062851794 = score(doc=1153,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.057265528 = product of:
        0.114531055 = sum of:
          0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114531055 = score(doc=1153,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) was established in the late 1990s as a response to several perceived problems of traditional map libraries, notably access and organization. By 1999 it had evolved into an operational digital library, offering a well-defined set of services to a broad user community, based on an extensive collection of georeferenced information objects. The vision of ADL continues to evolve, as technology makes new services possible, as its users become more sophisticated and demanding, and as the broader field of geographic information science (GIScience) identifies new avenues for research and application.
    Object
    Alexandria Digital Library Project
  2. Arms, W.Y.; Blanchi, C.; Overly, E.A.: ¬An architecture for information in digital libraries (1997) 0.30
    0.3018579 = sum of:
      0.060533162 = product of:
        0.18159948 = sum of:
          0.18159948 = weight(_text_:objects in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18159948 = score(doc=1260,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.15414293 = weight(_text_:digital in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15414293 = score(doc=1260,freq=38.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.66488653 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
            6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
              38.0 = termFreq=38.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
      0.052113958 = weight(_text_:library in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052113958 = score(doc=1260,freq=22.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.33722717 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
            4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
              22.0 = termFreq=22.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
      0.035067834 = product of:
        0.07013567 = sum of:
          0.07013567 = weight(_text_:project in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07013567 = score(doc=1260,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2827139 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Flexible organization of information is one of the key design challenges in any digital library. For the past year, we have been working with members of the National Digital Library Project (NDLP) at the Library of Congress to build an experimental system to organize and store library collections. This is a report on the work. In particular, we describe how a few technical building blocks are used to organize the material in collections, such as the NDLP's, and how these methods fit into a general distributed computing framework. The technical building blocks are part of a framework that evolved as part of the Computer Science Technical Reports Project (CSTR). This framework is described in the paper, "A Framework for Distributed Digital Object Services", by Robert Kahn and Robert Wilensky (1995). The main building blocks are: "digital objects", which are used to manage digital material in a networked environment; "handles", which identify digital objects and other network resources; and "repositories", in which digital objects are stored. These concepts are amplified in "Key Concepts in the Architecture of the Digital Library", by William Y. Arms (1995). In summer 1995, after earlier experimental development, work began on the implementation of a full digital library system based on this framework. In addition to Kahn/Wilensky and Arms, several working papers further elaborate on the design concepts. A paper by Carl Lagoze and David Ely, "Implementation Issues in an Open Architectural Framework for Digital Object Services", delves into some of the repository concepts. The initial repository implementation was based on a paper by Carl Lagoze, Robert McGrath, Ed Overly and Nancy Yeager, "A Design for Inter-Operable Secure Object Stores (ISOS)". Work on the handle system, which began in 1992, is described in a series of papers that can be found on the Handle Home Page. The National Digital Library Program (NDLP) at the Library of Congress is a large scale project to convert historic collections to digital form and make them widely available over the Internet. The program is described in two articles by Caroline R. Arms, "Historical Collections for the National Digital Library". The NDLP itself draws on experience gained through the earlier American Memory Program. Based on this work, we have built a pilot system that demonstrates how digital objects can be used to organize complex materials, such as those found in the NDLP. The pilot was demonstrated to members of the library in July 1996. The pilot system includes the handle system for identifying digital objects, a pilot repository to store them, and two user interfaces: one designed for librarians to manage digital objects in the repository, the other for library patrons to access the materials stored in the repository. Materials from the NDLP's Coolidge Consumerism compilation have been deposited into the pilot repository. They include a variety of photographs and texts, converted to digital form. The pilot demonstrates the use of handles for identifying such material, the use of meta-objects for managing sets of digital objects, and the choice of metadata. We are now implementing an enhanced prototype system for completion in early 1997.
  3. Farnel, S.; Shiri, A.; Campbell, S.; Cockney, C.; Rathi, D.; Stobbs, R.: ¬A community-driven metadata framework for describing cultural resources : the Digital Library North Project (2017) 0.30
    0.29901704 = product of:
      0.3986894 = sum of:
        0.1581473 = weight(_text_:digital in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1581473 = score(doc=5149,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.6821592 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
        0.07027044 = weight(_text_:library in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07027044 = score(doc=5149,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
        0.17027164 = sum of:
          0.114531055 = weight(_text_:project in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114531055 = score(doc=5149,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
          0.055740576 = weight(_text_:22 in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055740576 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the Digital Library North (DLN) project, a collaboration among researchers at the University of Alberta, staff at the Inuvialuit Cultural Resource Centre, and communities within the Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR) to develop a culturally appropriate metadata framework for a digital library of cultural resources. It will discuss gathering of data to inform the first iteration of the metadata framework and digital library prototype, as well as revisions made to both the framework and the digital library based on feedback obtained through community interaction with the prototype.
    Date
    18. 3.2019 14:16:22
  4. Fox, E.A.: Users, user interfaces and objects : envision, a digital library (1993) 0.29
    0.29137403 = sum of:
      0.06918076 = product of:
        0.20754227 = sum of:
          0.20754227 = weight(_text_:objects in 6532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20754227 = score(doc=6532,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 6532, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6532)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14000043 = weight(_text_:digital in 6532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14000043 = score(doc=6532,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.60388374 = fieldWeight in 6532, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6532)
      0.03591531 = weight(_text_:library in 6532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03591531 = score(doc=6532,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 6532, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6532)
      0.04627753 = product of:
        0.09255506 = sum of:
          0.09255506 = weight(_text_:project in 6532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09255506 = score(doc=6532,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 6532, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6532)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Part of a special section on digital libraries. Reports on Project Envision which aims to build a user centred database from computer science literature. Sets out principles for digital libraries which cover issues of representation of architecture and interfacing. Describes interviews with users which led to design and evaluation of the Envision user interface which features innovative query formulation and search results screens. Describes how the system builds upon work to identity and represent 'objects' in computer science that will facilitate reuse and high level communication of information from author to reader
  5. Hill, L.L.; Janée, G.; Dolin, R.; Frew, J.; Larsgaard, M.: Collection metadata solutions for digital library applications (1999) 0.29
    0.2854793 = sum of:
      0.06354659 = product of:
        0.19063976 = sum of:
          0.19063976 = weight(_text_:objects in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19063976 = score(doc=4053,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12124394 = score(doc=4053,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
      0.06598064 = weight(_text_:library in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06598064 = score(doc=4053,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
      0.03470815 = product of:
        0.0694163 = sum of:
          0.0694163 = weight(_text_:project in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694163 = score(doc=4053,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Within a digital library, collections may range from an ad hoc set of objects that serve a temporary purpose to established library collections intended to persist through time. The objects in these collections vary widely, from library and data center holdings to pointers to real-world objects, such as geographic places, and the various metadata schemes that describe them. The key to integrated use of such a variety of collections in a digital library is collection metadata that represents the inherent and contextual characteristics of a collection. The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Project has designed and implemented collection metadata for several purposes: in XML form, the collection metadatada 'registers' the collection with the user interface client; in HTML form, it is used for user documentation; eventually, it will be used to describe the collection to network search agents; and it is used for internal collection management, including mapping the object metadata attributes to the common search parameters of the system
  6. Sturmane, A.; Eglite, E.; Jankevica-Balode, M.: Subject metadata development for digital resources in Latvia (2014) 0.27
    0.26919043 = sum of:
      0.042803407 = product of:
        0.12841022 = sum of:
          0.12841022 = weight(_text_:objects in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12841022 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14145125 = weight(_text_:digital in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14145125 = score(doc=1963,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
      0.04444293 = weight(_text_:library in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04444293 = score(doc=1963,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
      0.04049284 = product of:
        0.08098568 = sum of:
          0.08098568 = weight(_text_:project in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08098568 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The National Library of Latvia (NLL) made a decision to use the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in 2000. At present the NLL Subject Headings Database in Latvian holds approximately 34,000 subject headings and is used for subject cataloging of textual resources, including articles from serials. For digital objects NLL uses a system like Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST). We succesfully use it in the project "In Search of Lost Latvia," one of the milestones in the development of the subject cataloging of digital resources in Latvia.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
  7. Altenhöner, R.: Data for the future : the German project "Co-operative development of a long-term digital information archive" (kopal) (2006) 0.26
    0.26422358 = sum of:
      0.030573865 = product of:
        0.091721594 = sum of:
          0.091721594 = weight(_text_:objects in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091721594 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.112962365 = weight(_text_:digital in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112962365 = score(doc=2590,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.4872566 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.03887947 = weight(_text_:library in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03887947 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.0818079 = product of:
        0.1636158 = sum of:
          0.1636158 = weight(_text_:project in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1636158 = score(doc=2590,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6595283 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - One of the unresolved problems of the global information society is ensuring the long-term accessibility of digital documents. The project kopal tackles this problem head-on: in a three-year project kopal's objective is the practical testing and implementation of a cooperatively created and operated long-term archival system for digital resources. Design/methodology/approach - The system will be implemented in accordance with international standards for long-term archiving and metadata within the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) framework. The project partners, Die Deutsche Bibliothek (DDB), Göttingen State and University Library (SUB Göttingen), IBM Deutschland GmbH and the Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG), will establish a cooperatively transferable solution for cultural heritage institutions, as well as for business and industry. Findings - Within the project, the project partners DDB and SUB Göttingen are developing software for the input and access of data, which will be released under an open-source license. Research limitations/implications - Long-term preservation methods and strategies will be discussed in general in the paper. Practical implications - The project will present a stable and reusable platform for additional partners and users, especially for cultural heritage organisations. Originality/value - The solution is based on Digital Information and Archiving System (DIAS), jointly devised by IBM and the National Library of The Netherlands in The Hague, and it will be adapted to the needs of the project with several extensions. Establishing a collaborative solution for long-term preservation is a milestone in the development of systems for the long-term availability of digital objects.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 24(2006) no.4, S.574-582
  8. Buzinkay, M.: Neue Entwicklungen im Web : eSnips, meX, Google Book Search und World Digital Library Project (2005) 0.26
    0.25936663 = product of:
      0.34582216 = sum of:
        0.17146482 = weight(_text_:digital in 7601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17146482 = score(doc=7601,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 7601, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7601)
        0.07618788 = weight(_text_:library in 7601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07618788 = score(doc=7601,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 7601, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7601)
        0.09816947 = product of:
          0.19633894 = sum of:
            0.19633894 = weight(_text_:project in 7601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19633894 = score(doc=7601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05877307 = queryNorm
                0.79143393 = fieldWeight in 7601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Object
    World Digital Library Project
  9. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.25
    0.2522414 = sum of:
      0.04853451 = product of:
        0.14560352 = sum of:
          0.14560352 = weight(_text_:objects in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14560352 = score(doc=1195,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.4661057 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.13555482 = weight(_text_:digital in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13555482 = score(doc=1195,freq=40.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.58470786 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
            6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
              40.0 = termFreq=40.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.03809394 = weight(_text_:library in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03809394 = score(doc=1195,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.030058142 = product of:
        0.060116284 = sum of:
          0.060116284 = weight(_text_:project in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060116284 = score(doc=1195,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.24232619 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  10. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.25
    0.25125772 = sum of:
      0.06918076 = product of:
        0.20754227 = sum of:
          0.20754227 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20754227 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11430988 = weight(_text_:digital in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11430988 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.493069 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.03591531 = weight(_text_:library in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03591531 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.031851757 = product of:
        0.063703515 = sum of:
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  11. Thaller, M.: From the digitized to the digital library (2001) 0.25
    0.24982454 = sum of:
      0.025942784 = product of:
        0.07782835 = sum of:
          0.07782835 = weight(_text_:objects in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07782835 = score(doc=1159,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.24914396 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12859862 = weight(_text_:digital in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12859862 = score(doc=1159,freq=36.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.55470264 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
            6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
              36.0 = termFreq=36.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.040404722 = weight(_text_:library in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040404722 = score(doc=1159,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.2614572 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.05487841 = product of:
        0.10975682 = sum of:
          0.10975682 = weight(_text_:project in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10975682 = score(doc=1159,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.44242507 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author holds a chair in Humanities Computer Science at the University of Cologne. For a number of years, he has been responsible for digitization projects, either as project director or as the person responsible for the technology being employed on the projects. The "Duderstadt project" (http://www.archive.geschichte.mpg.de/duderstadt/dud-e.htm) is one such project. It is one of the early large-scale manuscript servers, finished at the end of 1998, with approximately 80,000 high resolution documents representing the holdings of a city archive before the year 1600. The digital library of the Max-Planck-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte in Frankfurt (http://www.mpier.uni-frankfurt.de/dlib) is another project on which the author has worked, with currently approximately 900,000 pages. The author is currently project director of the project "Codices Electronici Ecclesiae Colonensis" (CEEC), which has just started and will ultimately consist of approximately 130,000 very high resolution color pages representing the complete holdings of the manuscript library of a medieval cathedral. It is being designed in close cooperation with the user community of such material. The project site (http://www.ceec.uni-koeln.de), while not yet officially opened, currently holds about 5,000 pages and is growing by 100 - 150 pages per day. Parallel to the CEEC model project, a conceptual project, the "Codex Electronicus Colonensis" (CEC), is at work on the definition of an abstract model for the representation of medieval codices in digital form. The following paper has grown out of the design considerations for the mentioned CEC project. The paper reflects a growing concern of the author's that some of the recent advances in digital (research) libraries are being diluted because it is not clear whether the advances really reach the audience for whom the projects would be most useful. Many, if not most, digitization projects have aimed at existing collections as individual servers. A digital library, however, should be more than a digitized one. It should be built according to principles that are not necessarily the same as those employed for paper collections, and it should be evaluated according to different measures which are not yet totally clear. The paper takes the form of six theses on various aspects of the ongoing transition to digital libraries. These theses have been presented at a forum on the German "retrodigitization" program. The program aims at the systematic conversion of library resources into digital form, concentrates for a number of reasons on material primarily of interest to the Humanities, and is funded by the German research council. As such this program is directly aimed at improving the overall infrastructure of academic research; other users of libraries are of interest, but are not central to the program.
    Content
    Theses: 1. Who should be addressed by digital libraries? How shall we measure whether we have reached the desired audience? Thesis: The primary audience for a digital library is neither the leading specialist in the respective field, nor the freshman, but the advanced student or young researcher and the "almost specialist". The primary topic of digitization projects should not be the absolute top range of the "treasures" of a collection, but those materials that we always have wanted to promote if they were just marginally more important. Whether we effectively serve them to the appropriate community of serious users can only be measured according to criteria that have yet to be developed. 2. The appropriate size of digital libraries and their access tools Thesis: Digital collections need a critical, minimal size to make their access worthwhile. In the end, users want to access information, not metadata or gimmicks. 3. The quality of digital objects Thesis: If digital library resources are to be integrated into the daily work of the research community, they must appear on the screen of the researcher in a quality that is useful in actual work. 4. The granularity / modularity of digital repositories Thesis: While digital libraries are self-contained bodies of information, they are not the basic unit that most users want to access. Users are, as a rule, more interested in the individual objects in the library and need a straightforward way to access them. 5. Digital collections as integrated reference systems Thesis: Traditional libraries support their collections with reference material. Digital collections need to find appropriate models to replicate this functionality. 6. Library and teaching Thesis: The use of multimedia in teaching is as much of a current buzzword as the creation of digital collections. It is obvious that they should be connected. A clear-cut separation of the two approaches is nevertheless necessary.
  12. Buchel, O.; Coleman, A.: How can classificatory structures be used to improve science education? (2003) 0.25
    0.24913076 = product of:
      0.33217433 = sum of:
        0.14000043 = weight(_text_:digital in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14000043 = score(doc=155,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.60388374 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
        0.03591531 = weight(_text_:library in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03591531 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
        0.15625858 = sum of:
          0.09255506 = weight(_text_:project in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09255506 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    There is increasing evidence that libraries, traditional and digital, must support learning, especially the acquisition and enhancement of scientific reasoning skills. This paper discusses how classificatory structures, such as a faceted thesaurus, can be enhanced for novice science learning. Physical geography is used as the domain discipline, and the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype project provides the test bed for instructional materials and user analyses. The use of concept maps and topic maps for developing digital learning spaces is briefly discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.1, S.4-15
  13. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.25
    0.24790458 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16039065 = weight(_text_:digital in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16039065 = score(doc=3387,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026936483 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.023888817 = product of:
        0.047777634 = sum of:
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
    Source
    Semantic digital libraries. Eds.: S.R. Kruk, B. McDaniel
  14. Hardesty, J.L.; Young, J.B.: ¬The semantics of metadata : Avalon Media System and the move to RDF (2017) 0.24
    0.24498534 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=3896,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12124394 = score(doc=3896,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
      0.026936483 = weight(_text_:library in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026936483 = score(doc=3896,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
      0.060116284 = product of:
        0.12023257 = sum of:
          0.12023257 = weight(_text_:project in 3896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12023257 = score(doc=3896,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.48465237 = fieldWeight in 3896, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3896)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Avalon Media System (Avalon) provides access and management for digital audio and video collections in libraries and archives. The open source project is led by the libraries of Indiana University Bloomington and Northwestern University and is funded in part by grants from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Institute of Museum and Library Services. Avalon is based on the Samvera Community (formerly Hydra Project) software stack and uses Fedora as the digital repository back end. The Avalon project team is in the process of migrating digital repositories from Fedora 3 to Fedora 4 and incorporating metadata statements using the Resource Description Framework (RDF) instead of XML files accompanying the digital objects in the repository. The Avalon team has worked on the migration path for technical metadata and is now working on the migration paths for structural metadata (PCDM) and descriptive metadata (from MODS XML to RDF). This paper covers the decisions made to begin using RDF for software development and offers a window into how Semantic Web technology functions in the real world.
  15. Hunt, L.; Wegner, L.S.: Project ISLA : a space/time/full-text/format search and retrieval system designed by end users (1996) 0.24
    0.24466302 = product of:
      0.32621735 = sum of:
        0.080829285 = weight(_text_:digital in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080829285 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
        0.05079192 = weight(_text_:library in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05079192 = score(doc=437,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
        0.19459614 = sum of:
          0.13089263 = weight(_text_:project in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13089263 = score(doc=437,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.52762264 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of end users in the design of a multi-format digital library project (ISLA) being developed at the University of Southern California Library, USA, for the study of the Los Angeles region. ISLA focuses on the specific needs of cross-disciplinray research involving large urban regions
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.6, S.440-449
  16. Schaefer, M.T.: Internet information retrieval for libraries : four keys & sites that use them (1998) 0.24
    0.2380477 = product of:
      0.31739694 = sum of:
        0.080829285 = weight(_text_:digital in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080829285 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.08030908 = weight(_text_:library in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08030908 = score(doc=99,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.51967657 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.15625858 = sum of:
          0.09255506 = weight(_text_:project in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09255506 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Provides illustrative examples of the methods, tools and resources that enable librarians, information specialists and end users to make the most of the WWW. The 4 key factors that facilitate access are location, evaluation, organization and communication. Outlines how a number of sistes make use of these factors. Describes: the Internet Library for Librarians, Argus Clearinghouse's Digital Librarian's Award; FEDSTATS, the University Library System, chines University of Hong Kong, the WWW Virtual Library, the Finnish Virtual Library Project, and BIBNET
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:19:44
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 33(1998) no.8, S.1-3
  17. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.23
    0.23338535 = product of:
      0.31118047 = sum of:
        0.07072563 = weight(_text_:digital in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072563 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.04444293 = weight(_text_:library in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04444293 = score(doc=758,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.19601192 = sum of:
          0.14027134 = weight(_text_:project in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14027134 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.5654278 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.055740576 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055740576 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  18. Pattuelli, M.C.: Teachers' perspectives and contextual dimensions to guide the design of N.C. history learning objects and ontology (2008) 0.23
    0.23247305 = sum of:
      0.060533162 = product of:
        0.18159948 = sum of:
          0.18159948 = weight(_text_:objects in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18159948 = score(doc=2041,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.10002114 = weight(_text_:digital in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10002114 = score(doc=2041,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
      0.031425897 = weight(_text_:library in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031425897 = score(doc=2041,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
      0.04049284 = product of:
        0.08098568 = sum of:
          0.08098568 = weight(_text_:project in 2041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08098568 = score(doc=2041,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 2041, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2041)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes an ongoing research project that involves the study of teachers' information seeking behaviors, needs and practices in relation to a collection of primary source materials available through the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Library's digital library Documenting the American South (DocSouth). By gaining an in-depth understanding of the needs and wants of teachers in the context of their work, we hope to build a collection of learning objects and a domain ontology applied to the collection to improve teachers' access to the cultural heritage materials and to facilitate their actual use in the classroom.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenschwerpunktes "Digital libraries in the context of users' broader activities"
  19. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.23
    0.22986284 = product of:
      0.30648378 = sum of:
        0.11430988 = weight(_text_:digital in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11430988 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.493069 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.03591531 = weight(_text_:library in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03591531 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05877307 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.15625858 = sum of:
          0.09255506 = weight(_text_:project in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09255506 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24808002 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.063703515 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063703515 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  20. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.22
    0.21991533 = sum of:
      0.036688637 = product of:
        0.11006591 = sum of:
          0.11006591 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11006591 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31238306 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12124394 = weight(_text_:digital in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12124394 = score(doc=2419,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.23183343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.03809394 = weight(_text_:library in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03809394 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15453665 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05877307 = queryNorm
          0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.023888817 = product of:
        0.047777634 = sum of:
          0.047777634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047777634 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20581327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05877307 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 342
  • b 48
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications