-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.30
0.29670644 = sum of:
0.042530727 = product of:
0.12759218 = sum of:
0.12759218 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12759218 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.19879025 = weight(_text_:mass in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19879025 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.51309484 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.05538548 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05538548 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Hendley, T.: Digital mass storage options (1993)
0.23
0.22840019 = product of:
0.45680037 = sum of:
0.45680037 = sum of:
0.39350268 = weight(_text_:mass in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39350268 = score(doc=5080,freq=6.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
1.0156645 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
0.0632977 = weight(_text_:22 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0632977 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines the options currently available for mass storage of digital media, technical and standards issues and how to compare them. Lists criteria for grouping storage media. Examines: seminconductor storage, hard magnetic discs, diskette/flexible disc storage, costs of mastering read-only discs, WORM optical dics storage, rewritable optical disc storage, optical tape storage, optical card storage. Reviews mass storage systems and describes optical disc jukeboxes
- Source
- Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.1, S.22-32
-
Powell, C.K.: OPAC integration in the era of mass digitization : the MBooks experience (2008)
0.18
0.18309666 = sum of:
0.042530727 = product of:
0.12759218 = sum of:
0.12759218 = weight(_text_:objects in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12759218 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14056593 = product of:
0.28113186 = sum of:
0.28113186 = weight(_text_:mass in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28113186 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.7256257 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the OPAC integration in the University of Michigan's local implementation of materials digitized in the partnership with Google. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a discussion of different strategies used in integrating metadata with digital resources and presenting the digital objects to the user in the OPAC. Findings - The paper finds that methods that had served in smaller digitization projects require more automation and error reduction processes in an undertaking of this scale. Increased integration with the OPAC is one approach. Originality/value - Michigan is the first of the Google partners to mount their materials themselves and others involved in mass digitization may be interested in the experience.
-
What has happened to Sony Data Discman and Mini-Disc (1996)
0.18
0.18155411 = product of:
0.36310822 = sum of:
0.36310822 = sum of:
0.2839861 = weight(_text_:mass in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2839861 = score(doc=5134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.73299265 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
0.07912212 = weight(_text_:22 in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07912212 = score(doc=5134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Traces the initial success of the Sony Data Discman and Mini Disc 3,5 inch CD-ROM in Japan and its ultimate failure to reach a mass market as a publishing medium
- Source
- Digital publisher. 1(1996) no.4, S.22-24
-
Sandler, M.: Disruptive beneficence : the Google Print program and the future of libraries (2005)
0.15
0.14524329 = product of:
0.29048657 = sum of:
0.29048657 = sum of:
0.22718887 = weight(_text_:mass in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22718887 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.58639413 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.0632977 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0632977 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries must learn to accommodate themselves to Google, and complement its mass digitization efforts with niche digitization of our own. We need to plan for what our activities and services will look like when our primary activity is no longer the storage and circulation of widely-available print materials, and once the printed book is no longer the only major vehicle for scholarly communication.
- Pages
- S.5-22
-
Morris, M.; Ogan, C.: ¬The Internet as mass medium (1996)
0.14
0.14199305 = product of:
0.2839861 = sum of:
0.2839861 = product of:
0.5679722 = sum of:
0.5679722 = weight(_text_:mass in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5679722 = score(doc=4767,freq=8.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
1.4659853 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- If mass communications researchers continue to disregard reesrach into the Internet, their theories about communication will become less useful. Proposes a conceptualization of the Internet as a mass medium, based on revision of what constitutes a mass audience and a mediating technology
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.13
0.12715992 = sum of:
0.018227454 = product of:
0.054682363 = sum of:
0.054682363 = weight(_text_:objects in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054682363 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.17617138 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.108932465 = sum of:
0.08519583 = weight(_text_:mass in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08519583 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2198978 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.023736635 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023736635 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
- Abstract
- There will soon be a critical mass of web-based digital objects and usage statistics on which to model scholars' communication behaviors - publishing, posting, blogging, scanning, reading, downloading, glossing, linking, citing, recommending, acknowledging - and with which to track their scholarly influence and impact, broadly conceived and broadly felt (Cronin, 2005, p. 196). A decade after Cronin's prediction and five years after the coining of altmetrics, the time seems ripe to reflect upon the role of social media in scholarly communication. This Special Issue does so by providing an overview of current research on the indicators and metrics grouped under the umbrella term of altmetrics, on their relationships with traditional indicators of scientific activity, and on the uses that are made of the various social media platforms - on which these indicators are based - by scientists of various disciplines.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993)
0.13
0.12708786 = product of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.19879025 = weight(_text_:mass in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19879025 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.51309484 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.05538548 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05538548 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The 1991 IFLA programme given by the section on bibliography presented the theme that national bibliography becomes part of national memeory by recording the publications of the nation. Examines whether the widely distributed publications of popular culture are 'forgotten' by national bibliography. Considers the bibliographic control of newspapers, mass market publications and erotica in the US bibliographic control system. For the last 2 categories, searches selected titles in the OCLC database where many publications were found with wide distribution but recorded by few or no libraries. Popular culture materials should be recorded in national bibliographies to provide a more extended and historically accurate national memory
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
-
Castro, M.C.P.S.: Communicacao e modernidadde : o impasse antinomica e as possibilidades da polifonia (1993)
0.13
0.12708786 = product of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.19879025 = weight(_text_:mass in 4662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19879025 = score(doc=4662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.51309484 = fieldWeight in 4662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4662)
0.05538548 = weight(_text_:22 in 4662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05538548 = score(doc=4662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Communication studies at present have reached an impasse because of the proliferation of competing theories, none of which is fully explanatory. 4 main paradigms can be distinguished, deriving respectively from studies of mass communication developed in the US; the French school, focusing on communication 'messages'; the Frankfurt school, originating in the critique of modern industrial society; and Latin American theorists, concerned with cultural domination and imperialism. The way forward lies in establishing some linkage - a harmonious polyphony - between these divergent views, by taking language as the nodal point since this is the necassary common basis of all communication
- Source
- Revista da Escola de Biblioteconomia da UFMG. 22(1993), no.2, S.133-167
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.13
0.12708786 = product of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.19879025 = weight(_text_:mass in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19879025 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.51309484 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.05538548 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05538548 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.13
0.12708786 = product of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.25417572 = sum of:
0.19879025 = weight(_text_:mass in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19879025 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.51309484 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.05538548 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05538548 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.12
0.11648918 = sum of:
0.092752546 = product of:
0.27825764 = sum of:
0.27825764 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27825764 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.49510446 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.023736635 = product of:
0.04747327 = sum of:
0.04747327 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04747327 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Gopinath, M.A.; Reddy, D.S.: Comparative study of the theoretical basis of mass communication and information science (1993)
0.11
0.113594435 = product of:
0.22718887 = sum of:
0.22718887 = product of:
0.45437774 = sum of:
0.45437774 = weight(_text_:mass in 7570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.45437774 = score(doc=7570,freq=8.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
1.1727883 = fieldWeight in 7570, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Delineates the difference between mass communication and information science. Establishes the theoretical models which present a framework for mass communication. Presents the inter-relationships existing between mass communication studies and information science in the form of a table. Also shows how the two can work together for an information conscious society
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.11
0.112754196 = sum of:
0.08506145 = product of:
0.25518435 = sum of:
0.25518435 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25518435 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02769274 = product of:
0.05538548 = sum of:
0.05538548 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05538548 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.11
0.10767289 = product of:
0.21534579 = sum of:
0.21534579 = product of:
0.32301867 = sum of:
0.091137275 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091137275 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.23188138 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23188138 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.49510446 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.11
0.107344076 = sum of:
0.021265363 = product of:
0.06379609 = sum of:
0.06379609 = weight(_text_:objects in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06379609 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.20553327 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.08607871 = product of:
0.17215742 = sum of:
0.17215742 = weight(_text_:mass in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17215742 = score(doc=1172,freq=6.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.4443532 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Ren, J.; Dong, H.; Padmanabhan, B.; Nickerson, J.V.: How does social media sentiment impact mass media sentiment? : a study of news in the financial markets (2021)
0.10
0.10434315 = product of:
0.2086863 = sum of:
0.2086863 = product of:
0.4173726 = sum of:
0.4173726 = weight(_text_:mass in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4173726 = score(doc=349,freq=12.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
1.0772748 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Mass media sentiment of financial news significantly influences investment decisions of investors. Hence, studying how this sentiment emerges is important. In years past, this was straightforward, often dictated by journalists who cover financial news, but this has become more complex now. In this paper, we focus on how social media sentiment affects mass media sentiment. Using data from Sina Weibo and Sina Finance (around 60 million weibos and 6.2 million news articles), we show that social media does influence mass media sentiment emergence for financial news. The sentiment consistency between social media reaction and prior news articles amplifies the persistence of mass media sentiment over time. By contrast, we found limited evidence of social media reducing the persistence of mass media sentiment over time. The results have significant implications for understanding how 2 types of media, treated separately in the literature, may be connected.
-
Rusho, Y.; Raban, D.R.: Join the club? : peer effects on information value perception (2021)
0.10
0.10137562 = sum of:
0.030379092 = product of:
0.091137275 = sum of:
0.091137275 = weight(_text_:objects in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091137275 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.07099652 = product of:
0.14199305 = sum of:
0.14199305 = weight(_text_:mass in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14199305 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38743374 = queryWeight, product of:
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.36649632 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.634292 = idf(docFreq=157, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While it is widely recognized that value perception increases when individuals engage in making physical objects, the impact of peer presence on value perception during production or consumption has not been studied. Peer production is prevalent for information products, which are the focus of the present study. Most research to date has focused on value as perceived by consumers, while consumers are increasingly involved in online processes of information production. Information, being intangible and experiential, is a unique type of good. This study places participants in the position of producing or consuming information in order to assess effects of peer group size on value perceptions. Six hundred and fifty one participants took part in 16 information consumption and production experiments. Consumers read information and producers created the same information. Consumers' willingness-to-pay and producers' willingness-to-accept payment were measured before or after peer consumption and production. Results indicate that value perception is highest when participants consume information individually, declining in small and medium-sized groups and growing in mass consumption. Generally, post-consumption values are higher. In production, point of measurement is cardinal. Before production, value perceived individually is lowest, however, having experienced peer production, individuals ascribe the highest value to self-production. Value perceptions in massive groups converge.
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.10
0.100388885 = sum of:
0.06874004 = product of:
0.2062201 = sum of:
0.2062201 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2062201 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.03164885 = product of:
0.0632977 = sum of:
0.0632977 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0632977 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.10
0.100388885 = sum of:
0.06874004 = product of:
0.2062201 = sum of:
0.2062201 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2062201 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.310393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.03164885 = product of:
0.0632977 = sum of:
0.0632977 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0632977 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20450215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058398657 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
