Search (28718 results, page 1 of 1436)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.17 
    0.1704474 = product of:
  0.51134217 = sum of:
    0.034793857 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14761783 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14761783 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.14761783 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14761783 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.14761783 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14761783 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.0065819086 = weight(_text_:in in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065819086 = score(doc=484,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.027112871 = weight(_text_:der in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027112871 = score(doc=484,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.55406165 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    Eine der wesentlichen Aufgaben als Fachreferent*in ist die inhaltliche Erschließung der neuerworbenen Literatur, sowie die Begutachtung und Auswahl der neu erschienenen Werke in den jeweiligen Fachgebieten hinsichtlich der Relevanz für die eigenen Sammlungen gemäß dem Sammlungsprofil der TU Wien Bibliothek. Im Zuge der Corona-Krise wurde die herkömmliche Arbeitsweise in der Sacherschließung beeinträchtigt, und es haben sich neue Herausforderungen, aber auch Möglichkeiten ergeben. Neben der fehlenden Autopsie der Literatur leidet auch die Sichtung und Erwerbung neuer Literatur unter der physischen Abwesenheit vom Arbeitsplatz bzw. der entsprechenden technischen Infrastruktur. Auch der persönliche Austausch mit den Kolleg*innen wurde deutlich erschwert. Neben den Schwierigkeiten wurden aber auch die neuen Handlungsoptionen auf beruflicher und individueller Ebene positiv gesehen. In dem Artikel werden unsere individuellen Erfahrungen an der TU Wien Bibliothek sowie Ausblicke in die Zukunft wiedergegeben.
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503
  2. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.15 
    0.14997002 = product of:
  0.6748651 = sum of:
    0.21749283 = product of:
      0.43498567 = sum of:
        0.43498567 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43498567 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23217463 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.21749283 = product of:
      0.43498567 = sum of:
        0.43498567 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43498567 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23217463 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.21749283 = product of:
      0.43498567 = sum of:
        0.43498567 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43498567 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23217463 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02238661 = product of:
      0.06715983 = sum of:
        0.06715983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06715983 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(4/18)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  3. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.13 
    0.1337354 = product of:
  0.48144743 = sum of:
    0.034793857 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14761783 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14761783 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.14761783 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14761783 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.14761783 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14761783 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.003800067 = weight(_text_:in in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003800067 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  4. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.13 
    0.12986135 = product of:
  0.46750084 = sum of:
    0.04639181 = product of:
      0.13917543 = sum of:
        0.13917543 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13917543 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003582737 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  5. Zimmermann, K.: ¬Die Anforderungen an ein wissenschaftliches Informationsportal für die Telekommunikation (2004) 0.13 
    0.1271315 = product of:
  0.3813945 = sum of:
    0.12177851 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12177851 = score(doc=3174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.060889255 = product of:
      0.12177851 = sum of:
        0.12177851 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12177851 = score(doc=3174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.1273423 = weight(_text_:telekommunikation in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1273423 = score(doc=3174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15970448 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7973621 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005429798 = score(doc=3174,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.02536177 = weight(_text_:der in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02536177 = score(doc=3174,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.5182773 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.040592838 = product of:
      0.12177851 = sum of:
        0.12177851 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12177851 = score(doc=3174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    Mit der Telekommunikation ist ein relativ neuer, interdisziplinärer Forschungsbereich entstanden, der sich aus der Überlappung von Mathematik, Physik, Elektro- / sowie Nachrichtentechnik und der Informatik ergibt. Die wissenschaftliche Forschung lebt vom freien Austausch von Fachwissen, sei es über Publikationen (Paper), Konferenzvorträgen oder der Nutzung neuer Medien und deren online Services. Da eine unstrukturierte Suche nach Informationen im Internet leicht zu einem Overkill an Resultaten führen kann, sind aufbereitete, fachlich eingeschränkte Angebote mit den richtigen Keywords erforderlich. In diesem Zusammenhang soll auf die Bedeutung von unterschiedlichen Klassifikationen eingegangen sowie andere interdisziplinäre Portale betrachtet werden.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.8
    Source
    Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
  6. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.12 
    0.120770186 = product of:
  0.43477264 = sum of:
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003582737 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.013663604 = weight(_text_:der in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013663604 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Karrieren und Publikationen benötigen Reputation und möglichst viel Beachtung. Literatur, die diese Aufmerksamkeit findet, wird - so die gängige Annahme - häufig zitiert. Ausgehend von dieser Überlegung wurden Verfahren der Zitationsmessung entwickelt, die Auskunft über die Relevanz oder (wie im- und explizit oft auch postuliert wird) gar die Qualität einer Publikation oder eines Wissenschaftlers geben sollen.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  7. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12 
    0.11887189 = product of:
  0.35661566 = sum of:
    0.034793857 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026870528 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.005990031 = product of:
      0.017970093 = sum of:
        0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017970093 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  8. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12 
    0.11885393 = product of:
  0.35656178 = sum of:
    0.034793857 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026870528 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.0059361467 = product of:
      0.01780844 = sum of:
        0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01780844 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  9. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.12 
    0.11857118 = product of:
  0.5335703 = sum of:
    0.17222081 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17222081 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.17222081 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17222081 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.17222081 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17222081 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.016907847 = weight(_text_:der in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016907847 = score(doc=4031,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.22222222 = coord(4/18)
    Abstract
    Als Erfinder des «Allgemeinen» gilt, gemäß dem Bericht des Aristoteles und seit diesem Bericht, Sokrates. Er ist es, der nicht mehr danach suchte, woraus ein Ding zu dem geworden ist, was es ist, oder wie es entstanden ist, sondern danach, «was [ein Ding] ist», und somit ist Sokrates der erste gewesen, der die Herausarbeitung des Allgemeinen (?a?????) forderte und mit seinen Fragen seine Gesprächspartner zu dieser Herausarbeitung trieb bzw. lockte; die Definition (???sµ??) war das Ziel des sokratischen Gesprächs, und die sokratische Aporie war das Vehikel.
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
    Source
    Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hrsg.: J. Ritter, K. Gründer u. G. Gabriel
  10. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.11 
    0.11470506 = product of:
  0.4129382 = sum of:
    0.040592838 = product of:
      0.12177851 = sum of:
        0.12177851 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12177851 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.12177851 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12177851 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.12177851 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12177851 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.12177851 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12177851 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.0070098387 = weight(_text_:in in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070098387 = score(doc=306,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  11. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.10 
    0.10401179 = product of:
  0.31203535 = sum of:
    0.028994884 = product of:
      0.08698465 = sum of:
        0.08698465 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08698465 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.0050070276 = weight(_text_:in in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050070276 = score(doc=5895,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.017079504 = weight(_text_:der in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017079504 = score(doc=5895,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    Das Problem der Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Wahrheit durch die Medien führt zu vier zentralen Fragen: Wie viel Wahrheit gibt es in der Welt, über die Journalisten berichten müssen? Wie ermittelt oder recherchiert man diese Wahrheit? Wie trennt man die Spreu vom Weizen? Und wie geht man als Journalist mit dem um, was man als Wahrheit erkannt hat oder erkannt zu haben glaubt? Hier gibt es ganz offensichtlich eine Parallele zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern. Journalisten und Wissenschaftler brauchen erstens Hypothesen, zweitens geeignete Hypothesentests, drittens ein gutes Abgrenzungs-Kriterium und viertens Verfahren, um die erkannten Sachverhalte auf angemessene Weise für eine Kommunikation mit anderen zu repräsentieren, das heißt sie darzustellen. Es gibt zwei große Unterschiede zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern: Journalisten sind in der Regel auf raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen aus, Wissenschaftler in der Regel auf raumzeitlich unbegrenzte Gesetze. Aber diese Unterschiede sind fließend, weil Wissenschaftler raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen brauchen, um ihre All-Aussagen zu überprüfen, und Journalisten sich immer häufiger auf das Feld der allgemeinen Gesetzes-Aussagen wagen oder doch zumindest Kausalinterpretationen für soziale Phänomene anbieten. Der zweite Unterschied besteht darin, dass die Wissenschaft weitgehend professionalisiert ist (zumindest gilt dies uneingeschränkt für die Naturwissenschaften und die Medizin), was ihr relativ klare Abgrenzungs- und Güte-Kriterien beschert hat. Diese fehlen weitgehend im Journalismus.
    Content
    Der Beitrag basiert auf einem Vortrag beim 9. Ethiktag "Wissenschaft und Medien" am Zentrum für Ethik und Recht in der Medizin des Universitätsklinikums Freiburg im Februar 2001.
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  12. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.10 
    0.10309291 = product of:
  0.4639181 = sum of:
    0.04639181 = product of:
      0.13917543 = sum of:
        0.13917543 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13917543 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.22222222 = coord(4/18)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  13. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.10 
    0.10015526 = product of:
  0.30046576 = sum of:
    0.028994884 = product of:
      0.08698465 = sum of:
        0.08698465 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044784215 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.0060385168 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060385168 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  14. Zimmermann, K.; Lorenz, B.: Interdisziplinäre Themengebiete - Eine Herausforderung auch an die Wissensorganisation? : Am Beispiel der Telekommunikation (2006) 0.10 
    0.09848453 = product of:
  0.29545358 = sum of:
    0.08698465 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 5891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08698465 = score(doc=5891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5891)
    0.043492325 = product of:
      0.08698465 = sum of:
        0.08698465 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 5891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08698465 = score(doc=5891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.111401305 = weight(_text_:telekommunikation in 5891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111401305 = score(doc=5891,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15970448 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.69754654 = fieldWeight in 5891, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.290168 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5891)
    0.0054849237 = weight(_text_:in in 5891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0054849237 = score(doc=5891,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 5891, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5891)
    0.019095466 = weight(_text_:der in 5891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019095466 = score(doc=5891,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.390223 = fieldWeight in 5891, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5891)
    0.028994884 = product of:
      0.08698465 = sum of:
        0.08698465 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 5891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08698465 = score(doc=5891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5891)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    Abstract
    Fachwissenschaftlerinnen arbeiten in der Telekommunikation interdisziplinär aus den Bereichen der Elektro- und Nachrichtentechnik, Mathematik, Physik sowie der Informatik zusammen. Die Community wächst ständig und ist weltweit vertreten. Veröffentlicht wird jedoch vorrangig in der 'Haus'-Disziplin und die Metadaten dementsprechend vergeben. Bei einer Recherche jedoch ist eigentlich die vernetzte, parallele Suche über alle in Frage kommenden (Unter-)Gebiete erforderlich. Da diese sich aber untereinander nicht 1:1 abbilden lassen, wären ausgefeilte Crosskonkordanz-Schemata und Ontologien erforderlich, um adäquate Ergebnisse zu liefern. Für den Bereich bibliothekarischer Klassifikationen ist das Paradigma Telekommunikation von Belang, weil es im Zusammenhang der klassisch strukturierten, thematisch umfassenden Klassifikationen nur einen kleinen, hierarchisch untergeordneten Teilbereich darstellt und dementsprechend meist nur sehr marginal (oft in mehreren Fächern, noch dazu sprachlich wenig normiert) dargestellt ist. Diese Performanz ist deutlich zu optimieren und in ihrer Angemessenheit vor allem für Nutzer zu hinterfragen. Dieses soll im ersten Teil des vorliegenden Artikels untersucht werden. Anschließend werden die Grundlagen für Anwendungen im Semantic Web diskutiert und ein Überblick über bestehende Entwicklungen gegeben.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.9
    Source
    Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
  15. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.10 
    0.09794241 = product of:
  0.35259268 = sum of:
    0.034793857 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.0046541123 = weight(_text_:in in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046541123 = score(doc=862,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  16. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.10 
    0.097396016 = product of:
  0.35062563 = sum of:
    0.034793857 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026870528 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  17. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (2003) 0.09 
    0.08810253 = product of:
  0.31716907 = sum of:
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.052190784 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026870528 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.017749542 = weight(_text_:der in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017749542 = score(doc=1506,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.1401601 = sum of:
      0.10438157 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10438157 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.021906832 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017970093 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.021906832 = queryNorm
          0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01780844 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.021906832 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    Die Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft ist in aller Munde, das Verständnis derselben ist gleichwohl unklar. Unscharf ist auch das Verständnis der zugrunde liegenden Begriffe Information und Wissen sowie des Erwerbs von Information aus den verschiedenen medialen Repräsentationsformen. Allenfalls lässt sich eine gewisse Einseitigkeit bemerken, die durch den informationstechnischen Primat und an der Nachrichtentechnik orientierten Übertragungsformen geprägt ist. Ausgangspunkt der Erörterung ist die Beobachtung, dass Menschen Informationsbedürfnisse besitzen, die sie durch Inanspruchnahme verschiedenster externer Quellen und Hilfsmittel befriedigen wollen. Die neuartigen Speicher- und Findeformen führen zu übersteigerten Erwartungen, wenn man an all die Formulierungen mit virtuell, cyber, Hyper, Multimedia, Information Superhighway etc. denkt. Häufig wird dabei suggeriert, die veränderte mediale Präsentation habe neuartige und bessere Qualitäten für die Rezeption von Information, ohne dass die dabei beteiligten Prozesse völlig verstanden sind. Innerhalb eines konstruktivistischen Modells der kognitiven Informationsverarbeitung und der Rezeption medial gespeicherter Information werden Fragen der Darstellung und Rezeption von Information untersucht.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:29
  18. Ratzek, W.: ¬Die multimediale Gesellschaft : Entertainment als Attraktor (1996) 0.08 
    0.07607926 = product of:
  0.2738853 = sum of:
    0.13917543 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13917543 = score(doc=3174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.069587715 = product of:
      0.13917543 = sum of:
        0.13917543 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13917543 = score(doc=3174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050667557 = score(doc=3174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.013663604 = weight(_text_:der in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013663604 = score(doc=3174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
    0.04639181 = product of:
      0.13917543 = sum of:
        0.13917543 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 3174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13917543 = score(doc=3174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 3174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3174)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    Das Faktum, Daß Nachrichtentechnik, das Verlagswesen, Film-Funk-Fernsehen (FFF) zum 'Global village' zusammenwachsen, ist mittlerweile hinlänglich bekannt. Über die technische Verfügbarkeit neuer Systeme und Anwendungen halten uns die Medien auf dem laufenden, wohingegen die Formen der Präsentation ins Hintertreffen geraten. Unter Präsentationsformen ist in diesem Zusammenhang die 'marktfähige Verpackung' der Inhalte zu verstehen. Dies ist eine Themestellung, die insbesondere für den IuD-Bereich von Interesse ist. Im vorliegenden beitrag werden einmal in diesem Zusammenhang relevante Schlüsselbegriffe wie Infotainment, Edutainment, Intertainment und Infomercial erläutert. Darüberhinaus werden einige multimediale Berufsbilder und Ausbildungseinrichtungen vorgestellt
  19. Binder, A.; Meinecke, F.C.; Bießmann, F.; Kawanabe, M.; Müller, K.-R.: Maschinelles Lernen, Mustererkennung in der Bildverarbeitung (2013) 0.07 
    0.072569534 = product of:
  0.3265629 = sum of:
    0.09385616 = product of:
      0.18771233 = sum of:
        0.18771233 = weight(_text_:mustererkennung in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18771233 = score(doc=727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19292286 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.97299165 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.2092938 = weight(_text_:bildverarbeitung in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2092938 = score(doc=727,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20371147 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        1.0274031 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
    0.0063334443 = weight(_text_:in in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063334443 = score(doc=727,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
    0.017079504 = weight(_text_:der in 727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017079504 = score(doc=727,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 727, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=727)
  0.22222222 = coord(4/18)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  20. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (2000) 0.07 
    0.071826875 = product of:
  0.25857675 = sum of:
    0.10438157 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10438157 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
    0.052190784 = product of:
      0.10438157 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026870528 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
    0.017749542 = weight(_text_:der in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017749542 = score(doc=4397,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021906832 = queryNorm
        0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
    0.08156778 = product of:
      0.12235166 = sum of:
        0.10438157 = weight(_text_:nachrichtentechnik in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438157 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
        0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017970093 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2777778 = coord(5/18)
    Abstract
    Die Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft ist in aller Munde, das Verständnis derselben ist gleichwohl unklar. Unscharf ist auch das Verständnis der zugrunde liegenden Begriffe Information und Wissen sowie des Erwerbs von Information aus den verschiedenen medialen Repräsentationsformen. Allenfalls lässt sich eine gewisse Einseitigkeit bemerken, die durch den informationstechnischen Primat und an der Nachrichtentechnik orientierten Übertragungsformen geprägt ist. Ausgangspunkt der Erörterung ist die Beobachtung, dass Menschen Informationsbedürfnisse besitzen, die sie durch Inanspruchnahme verschiedenster externer Quellen und Hilfsmittel befriedigen wollen. Die neuartigen Speicher- und Findeformen führen zu übersteigerten Erwartungen, wenn man an all die Formulierungen mit virtuell, cyber, Hyper, Multimedia, Information Superhighway etc. denkt. Häufig wird dabei suggeriert, die veränderte mediale Präsentation habe neuartige und bessere Qualitäten für die Rezeption von Information, ohne dass die dabei beteiligten Prozesse völlig verstanden sind. Innerhalb eines konstruktivistischen Modells der kognitiven Informationsverarbeitung und der Rezeption medial gespeicherter Information werden Fragen der Darstellung und Rezeption von Information untersucht.
    Date
    9. 8.2018 12:59:29

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • el 902
  • b 60
  • p 3
  • i 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications