-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.05
0.054477263 = sum of:
0.045551956 = product of:
0.18220782 = sum of:
0.18220782 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18220782 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38904333 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0089253085 = product of:
0.013387962 = sum of:
0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009150138 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.004237824 = weight(_text_:s in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004237824 = score(doc=4388,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
- Language
- d
- Pages
- XII, 71 S
-
Thomi, M.: Überblick und Bewertung von Musiksuchmaschinen (2011)
0.00
0.004858693 = product of:
0.009717386 = sum of:
0.009717386 = product of:
0.014576078 = sum of:
0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 3046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010980166 = score(doc=3046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 3046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3046)
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 3046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=3046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3046)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Pages
- 65 S
-
Sünkler, S.: Prototypische Entwicklung einer Software für die Erfassung und Analyse explorativer Suchen in Verbindung mit Tests zur Retrievaleffektivität (2012)
0.00
0.0044626542 = product of:
0.0089253085 = sum of:
0.0089253085 = product of:
0.013387962 = sum of:
0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009150138 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.004237824 = weight(_text_:s in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004237824 = score(doc=479,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Pages
- 132 S
-
Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017)
0.00
0.004249825 = product of:
0.00849965 = sum of:
0.00849965 = product of:
0.012749475 = sum of:
0.0103522 = weight(_text_:d in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0103522 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.118742 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.0023972753 = weight(_text_:s in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0023972753 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
- Pages
- 128 S
-
Kara, S.: ¬An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing (2012)
0.00
0.0010380507 = product of:
0.0020761015 = sum of:
0.0020761015 = product of:
0.0062283045 = sum of:
0.0062283045 = weight(_text_:s in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062283045 = score(doc=3829,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of science in Computer Engineering (XII, 57 S.)
- Source
- Information Systems. 37(2012) no. 4, S.294-305
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.00
6.992053E-4 = product of:
0.0013984106 = sum of:
0.0013984106 = product of:
0.004195232 = sum of:
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=1077,freq=8.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
- Pages
- 243 S
-
Baier Benninger, P.: Model requirements for the management of electronic records (MoReq2) : Anleitung zur Umsetzung (2011)
0.00
5.993188E-4 = product of:
0.0011986376 = sum of:
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0035959128 = sum of:
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 85 S
-
Thornton, K: Powerful structure : inspecting infrastructures of information organization in Wikimedia Foundation projects (2016)
0.00
5.993188E-4 = product of:
0.0011986376 = sum of:
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0035959128 = sum of:
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=3288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- IX, 162 S
-
Li, Z.: ¬A domain specific search engine with explicit document relations (2013)
0.00
4.994324E-4 = product of:
9.988648E-4 = sum of:
9.988648E-4 = product of:
0.0029965942 = sum of:
0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029965942 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- IV, 55 S
-
Vocht, L. De: Exploring semantic relationships in the Web of Data : Semantische relaties verkennen in data op het web (2017)
0.00
2.497162E-4 = product of:
4.994324E-4 = sum of:
4.994324E-4 = product of:
0.0014982971 = sum of:
0.0014982971 = weight(_text_:s in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014982971 = score(doc=4232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- XXV, 184 S
