Search (35 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Jahrbuch der Auktionspreise für Bücher, Handschriften und Autographen : Ergebnisse der Auktionen in Deutschland, den Niederlanden, Österreich und der Schweiz. Mit einem Anhang: Spezialgebiete der Antiquariate (1992) 0.01
    0.01395822 = product of:
      0.0697911 = sum of:
        0.0697911 = weight(_text_:22 in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0697911 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 3.1996 21:22:40
  2. Jahrbuch der Auktionspreise für Bücher, Handschriften und Autographen (JAP) : Computerdatei (1997) 0.01
    0.01395822 = product of:
      0.0697911 = sum of:
        0.0697911 = weight(_text_:22 in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0697911 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 3.1996 21:22:40
  3. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.; Noodén, L.: ¬The construction of a robot-generated subject index : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 1 (1999) 0.01
    0.013040888 = product of:
      0.06520444 = sum of:
        0.06520444 = weight(_text_:index in 1668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06520444 = score(doc=1668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 1668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1668)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  4. Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999) 0.01
    0.013040888 = product of:
      0.06520444 = sum of:
        0.06520444 = weight(_text_:index in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06520444 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The emerging network environment brings access to an increasing population of heterogeneous repositories. Inevitably, these, have quite diverse metadata vocabularies (categorization codes, classification numbers, index and thesaurus terms). So, necessarily, the number of metadata vocabularies that are accessible but unfamiliar for any individual searcher is increasing steeply. When an unfamiliar metadata vocabulary is encountered, how is a searcher to know which codes or terms will lead to what is wanted? This paper reports work at the University of California, Berkeley, on the design and development of English language indexes to metadata vocabularies. Further details and the current status of the work can be found at the project website http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/metadata/
  5. Plotkin, R.C.; Schwartz, M.S.: Data modeling for news clip archive : a prototype solution (1997) 0.01
    0.013040888 = product of:
      0.06520444 = sum of:
        0.06520444 = weight(_text_:index in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06520444 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Film, videotape and multimedia archive systems must address the issues of editing, authoring and searching at the media (i.e. tape) or sub media (i.e. scene) level in addition to the traditional inventory management capabilities associated with the physical media. This paper describes a prototype of a database design for the storage, search and retrieval of multimedia and its related information. It also provides a process by which legacy data can be imported to this schema. The Continuous Media Index, or Comix system is the name of the prototype. An implementation of such a digital library solution incorporates multimedia objects, hierarchical relationships and timecode in addition to traditional attribute data. Present video and multimedia archive systems are easily migrated to this architecture. Comix was implemented for a videotape archiving system. It was written for, and implemented using IBM Digital Library version 1.0. A derivative of Comix is currently in development for customer specific applications. Principles of the Comix design as well as the importation methods are not specific to the underlying systems used.
  6. Atkins, H.: ¬The ISI® Web of Science® - links and electronic journals : how links work today in the Web of Science, and the challenges posed by electronic journals (1999) 0.01
    0.012295068 = product of:
      0.06147534 = sum of:
        0.06147534 = weight(_text_:index in 1246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06147534 = score(doc=1246,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 1246, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1246)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since their inception in the early 1960s the strength and unique aspect of the ISI citation indexes has been their ability to illustrate the conceptual relationships between scholarly documents. When authors create reference lists for their papers, they make explicit links between their own, current work and the prior work of others. The exact nature of these links may not be expressed in the references themselves, and the motivation behind them may vary (this has been the subject of much discussion over the years), but the links embodied in references do exist. Over the past 30+ years, technology has allowed ISI to make the presentation of citation searching increasingly accessible to users of our products. Citation searching and link tracking moved from being rather cumbersome in print, to being direct and efficient (albeit non-intuitive) online, to being somewhat more user-friendly in CD format. But it is the confluence of the hypertext link and development of Web browsers that has enabled us to present to users a new form of citation product -- the Web of Science -- that is intuitive and makes citation indexing conceptually accessible. A cited reference search begins with a known, important (or at least relevant) document used as the search term. The search allows one to identify subsequent articles that have cited that document. This feature adds the dimension of prospective searching to the usual retrospective searching that all bibliographic indexes provide. Citation indexing is a prime example of a concept before its time - important enough to be used in the meantime by those sufficiently motivated, but just waiting for the right technology to come along to expand its use. While it was possible to follow citation links in earlier citation index formats, this required a level of effort on the part of users that was often just too much to ask of the casual user. In the citation indexes as presented in the Web of Science, the relationship between citing and cited documents is evident to users, and a click of the mouse is all it takes to follow a citation link. Citation connections are established between the published papers being indexed from the 8,000+ journals ISI covers and the items their reference lists contain during the data capture process. It is the standardized capture of each of the references included with these documents that enables us to provide the citation searching feature in all the citation index formats, as well as both internal and external links in the Web of Science.
  7. Roszkowski, M.; Lukas, C.: ¬A distributed architecture for resource discovery using metadata (1998) 0.01
    0.012295068 = product of:
      0.06147534 = sum of:
        0.06147534 = weight(_text_:index in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06147534 = score(doc=1256,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes an approach for linking geographically distributed collections of metadata so that they are searchable as a single collection. We describe the infrastructure, which uses standard Internet protocols such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP), to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index information. We discuss the advantages of using linked collections of authoritative metadata as an alternative to using a keyword indexing search-engine for resource discovery. We examine other architectures that use metadata for resource discovery, such as Dienst/NCSTRL, the AHDS HTTP/Z39.50 Gateway, and the ROADS initiative. Finally, we discuss research issues and future directions of the project. The Internet Scout Project, which is funded by the National Science Foundation and is located in the Computer Sciences Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is charged with assisting the higher education community in resource discovery on the Internet. To that end, the Scout Report and subsequent subject-specific Scout Reports were developed to guide the U.S. higher education community to research-quality resources. The Scout Report Signpost utilizes the content from the Scout Reports as the basis of a metadata collection. Signpost consists of more than 2000 cataloged Internet sites using established standards such as Library of Congress subject headings and abbreviated call letters, and emerging standards such as the Dublin Core (DC). This searchable and browseable collection is free and freely accessible, as are all of the Internet Scout Project's services.
    As well developed as both the Scout Reports and Signpost are, they cannot capture the wealth of high-quality content that is available on the Internet. An obvious next step toward increasing the usefulness of our own collection and its value to our customer base is to partner with other high-quality content providers who have developed similar collections and to develop a single, virtual collection. Project Isaac (working title) is the Internet Scout Project's latest resource discovery effort. Project Isaac involves the development of a research testbed that allows experimentation with protocols and algorithms for creating, maintaining, indexing and searching distributed collections of metadata. Project Isaac's infrastructure uses standard Internet protocols, such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP) to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index or centroid information. The overall goal is to support a single-search interface to geographically distributed and independently maintained metadata collections.
  8. Electronic Dewey (1993) 0.01
    0.011166576 = product of:
      0.05583288 = sum of:
        0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05583288 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17
  9. Lusti, M.: Data Warehousing and Data Mining : Eine Einführung in entscheidungsunterstützende Systeme (1999) 0.01
    0.011166576 = product of:
      0.05583288 = sum of:
        0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05583288 = score(doc=4261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4261)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 19:22:06
  10. Gehirn, Gedächtnis, neuronale Netze (1996) 0.01
    0.009770754 = product of:
      0.04885377 = sum of:
        0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04885377 = score(doc=4661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4661)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:45:51
  11. Deutsche Nationalbibliographie : CD-ROM 1972-1985 (1997) 0.01
    0.009770754 = product of:
      0.04885377 = sum of:
        0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04885377 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2000 10:38:22
  12. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.009770754 = product of:
      0.04885377 = sum of:
        0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04885377 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  13. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01
    0.008374932 = product of:
      0.04187466 = sum of:
        0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04187466 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  14. Stocker, G.; Bruck, P.A.: Öffentliche Bibliotheken im Informationszeitalter : Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts: Die Digitale Bibliothek (1996) 0.01
    0.008374932 = product of:
      0.04187466 = sum of:
        0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 6478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04187466 = score(doc=6478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6478)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 8.2001 18:03:22
  15. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.008374932 = product of:
      0.04187466 = sum of:
        0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04187466 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31