Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T.: ¬The PageRank citation ranking : Bringing order to the Web (1999) 0.08
    0.080164835 = product of:
      0.2404945 = sum of:
        0.2404945 = weight(_text_:citation in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2404945 = score(doc=496,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            1.0257815 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  2. Atkins, H.: ¬The ISI® Web of Science® - links and electronic journals : how links work today in the Web of Science, and the challenges posed by electronic journals (1999) 0.06
    0.058394577 = product of:
      0.17518373 = sum of:
        0.17518373 = weight(_text_:citation in 1246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17518373 = score(doc=1246,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.7472114 = fieldWeight in 1246, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1246)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Since their inception in the early 1960s the strength and unique aspect of the ISI citation indexes has been their ability to illustrate the conceptual relationships between scholarly documents. When authors create reference lists for their papers, they make explicit links between their own, current work and the prior work of others. The exact nature of these links may not be expressed in the references themselves, and the motivation behind them may vary (this has been the subject of much discussion over the years), but the links embodied in references do exist. Over the past 30+ years, technology has allowed ISI to make the presentation of citation searching increasingly accessible to users of our products. Citation searching and link tracking moved from being rather cumbersome in print, to being direct and efficient (albeit non-intuitive) online, to being somewhat more user-friendly in CD format. But it is the confluence of the hypertext link and development of Web browsers that has enabled us to present to users a new form of citation product -- the Web of Science -- that is intuitive and makes citation indexing conceptually accessible. A cited reference search begins with a known, important (or at least relevant) document used as the search term. The search allows one to identify subsequent articles that have cited that document. This feature adds the dimension of prospective searching to the usual retrospective searching that all bibliographic indexes provide. Citation indexing is a prime example of a concept before its time - important enough to be used in the meantime by those sufficiently motivated, but just waiting for the right technology to come along to expand its use. While it was possible to follow citation links in earlier citation index formats, this required a level of effort on the part of users that was often just too much to ask of the casual user. In the citation indexes as presented in the Web of Science, the relationship between citing and cited documents is evident to users, and a click of the mouse is all it takes to follow a citation link. Citation connections are established between the published papers being indexed from the 8,000+ journals ISI covers and the items their reference lists contain during the data capture process. It is the standardized capture of each of the references included with these documents that enables us to provide the citation searching feature in all the citation index formats, as well as both internal and external links in the Web of Science.
  3. Day, M.; Koch, T.: ¬The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : DESIRE - Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. Specification for resource description methods, part 3 (1997) 0.02
    0.018676046 = product of:
      0.05602814 = sum of:
        0.05602814 = product of:
          0.11205628 = sum of:
            0.11205628 = weight(_text_:reports in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11205628 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.49762118 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.ub.lu.se/desire/radar/reports/D3.2.3/class_v10.html
  4. Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:26:34
  5. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  6. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
  7. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.02
    0.015805759 = product of:
      0.047417276 = sum of:
        0.047417276 = product of:
          0.09483455 = sum of:
            0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09483455 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54
  8. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.015805759 = product of:
      0.047417276 = sum of:
        0.047417276 = product of:
          0.09483455 = sum of:
            0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09483455 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  9. Eurodoc : Produkte für das Dokumentenmanagement finden und vergleichen (1998) 0.01
    0.014940838 = product of:
      0.044822514 = sum of:
        0.044822514 = product of:
          0.08964503 = sum of:
            0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08964503 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die EURODOC-Datenbank enthält ausführliche und einheitlich strukturierte Beschreibungen von Produkten des Dokument-Managementmarktes (Software-Systeme, -komponenten und Diennstleistungen). Die Benutzeroberfläche ist dreisprachig (dt., engl., franz.). Basis der Produktinformationen ist ein standardisierter Fragebogen, der als Kriterienkatalog für die Suche nach geeigneten Produkten verwendet wird. Daneben ist auch die Volltextsuche möglich. Aufgrund der gefundenen Produkte / Dienstleistungen und des nach Wünschen des Anwenders eingeschränkten Fragenkatalogs können kompakte, übersichtliche Reports ausgedruckt werden. Die Daten können für weitere Auswertungen in Tabellenkalkulationsprogrammen bereitgestellt werden
  10. Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997) 0.01
    0.013547793 = product of:
      0.04064338 = sum of:
        0.04064338 = product of:
          0.08128676 = sum of:
            0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08128676 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2002 20:22:55
  11. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.01
    0.013547793 = product of:
      0.04064338 = sum of:
        0.04064338 = product of:
          0.08128676 = sum of:
            0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08128676 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  12. Yang, Y.; Liu, X.: ¬A re-examination of text categorization methods (1999) 0.01
    0.013073232 = product of:
      0.039219696 = sum of:
        0.039219696 = product of:
          0.07843939 = sum of:
            0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07843939 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports a controlled study with statistical significance tests an five text categorization methods: the Support Vector Machines (SVM), a k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) classifier, a neural network (NNet) approach, the Linear Leastsquares Fit (LLSF) mapping and a Naive Bayes (NB) classifier. We focus an the robustness of these methods in dealing with a skewed category distribution, and their performance as function of the training-set category frequency. Our results show that SVM, kNN and LLSF significantly outperform NNet and NB when the number of positive training instances per category are small (less than ten, and that all the methods perform comparably when the categories are sufficiently common (over 300 instances).
  13. Roszkowski, M.; Lukas, C.: ¬A distributed architecture for resource discovery using metadata (1998) 0.01
    0.012939146 = product of:
      0.038817436 = sum of:
        0.038817436 = product of:
          0.07763487 = sum of:
            0.07763487 = weight(_text_:reports in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07763487 = score(doc=1256,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.3447621 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes an approach for linking geographically distributed collections of metadata so that they are searchable as a single collection. We describe the infrastructure, which uses standard Internet protocols such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP), to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index information. We discuss the advantages of using linked collections of authoritative metadata as an alternative to using a keyword indexing search-engine for resource discovery. We examine other architectures that use metadata for resource discovery, such as Dienst/NCSTRL, the AHDS HTTP/Z39.50 Gateway, and the ROADS initiative. Finally, we discuss research issues and future directions of the project. The Internet Scout Project, which is funded by the National Science Foundation and is located in the Computer Sciences Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is charged with assisting the higher education community in resource discovery on the Internet. To that end, the Scout Report and subsequent subject-specific Scout Reports were developed to guide the U.S. higher education community to research-quality resources. The Scout Report Signpost utilizes the content from the Scout Reports as the basis of a metadata collection. Signpost consists of more than 2000 cataloged Internet sites using established standards such as Library of Congress subject headings and abbreviated call letters, and emerging standards such as the Dublin Core (DC). This searchable and browseable collection is free and freely accessible, as are all of the Internet Scout Project's services.
    As well developed as both the Scout Reports and Signpost are, they cannot capture the wealth of high-quality content that is available on the Internet. An obvious next step toward increasing the usefulness of our own collection and its value to our customer base is to partner with other high-quality content providers who have developed similar collections and to develop a single, virtual collection. Project Isaac (working title) is the Internet Scout Project's latest resource discovery effort. Project Isaac involves the development of a research testbed that allows experimentation with protocols and algorithms for creating, maintaining, indexing and searching distributed collections of metadata. Project Isaac's infrastructure uses standard Internet protocols, such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP) to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index or centroid information. The overall goal is to support a single-search interface to geographically distributed and independently maintained metadata collections.
  14. Brinkman's cumulative catalogue on CD-ROM (1996-) 0.01
    0.0112898275 = product of:
      0.033869483 = sum of:
        0.033869483 = product of:
          0.067738965 = sum of:
            0.067738965 = weight(_text_:22 in 6474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067738965 = score(doc=6474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16. 2.1997 16:22:51
  15. Jahrbuch der Auktionspreise für Bücher, Handschriften und Autographen : Ergebnisse der Auktionen in Deutschland, den Niederlanden, Österreich und der Schweiz. Mit einem Anhang: Spezialgebiete der Antiquariate (1992) 0.01
    0.0112898275 = product of:
      0.033869483 = sum of:
        0.033869483 = product of:
          0.067738965 = sum of:
            0.067738965 = weight(_text_:22 in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067738965 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 3.1996 21:22:40
  16. Jahrbuch der Auktionspreise für Bücher, Handschriften und Autographen (JAP) : Computerdatei (1997) 0.01
    0.0112898275 = product of:
      0.033869483 = sum of:
        0.033869483 = product of:
          0.067738965 = sum of:
            0.067738965 = weight(_text_:22 in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067738965 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 3.1996 21:22:40
  17. Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999) 0.01
    0.0112056285 = product of:
      0.033616886 = sum of:
        0.033616886 = product of:
          0.06723377 = sum of:
            0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06723377 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The emerging network environment brings access to an increasing population of heterogeneous repositories. Inevitably, these, have quite diverse metadata vocabularies (categorization codes, classification numbers, index and thesaurus terms). So, necessarily, the number of metadata vocabularies that are accessible but unfamiliar for any individual searcher is increasing steeply. When an unfamiliar metadata vocabulary is encountered, how is a searcher to know which codes or terms will lead to what is wanted? This paper reports work at the University of California, Berkeley, on the design and development of English language indexes to metadata vocabularies. Further details and the current status of the work can be found at the project website http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/metadata/
  18. Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Simple, proven approaches to text retrieval (1997) 0.01
    0.009338023 = product of:
      0.02801407 = sum of:
        0.02801407 = product of:
          0.05602814 = sum of:
            0.05602814 = weight(_text_:reports in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05602814 = score(doc=4532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.24881059 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Auch unter: http://www.ftp.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/papers/reports/.
  19. Hesse, W.; Verrijn-Stuart, A.: Towards a theory of information systems : the FRISCO approach (1999) 0.01
    0.009338023 = product of:
      0.02801407 = sum of:
        0.02801407 = product of:
          0.05602814 = sum of:
            0.05602814 = weight(_text_:reports in 3059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05602814 = score(doc=3059,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.24881059 = fieldWeight in 3059, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3059)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information Systems (IS) is among the most widespread terms in the Computer Science field but a well founded, widely accepted theory of IS is still missing. With the Internet publication of the FRISCO report, the IFIP task group "FRamework of Information System COncepts" has taken a first step towards such a theory. Among the major achievements of this report are: (1) it builds on a solid basis formed by semiotics and ontology, (2) it defines a compendium of about 100 core IS concepts in a coherent and consistent way, (3) it goes beyond the common narrow view of information systems as pure technical artefacts by adopting an interdisciplinary, socio-technical view on them. In the autumn of 1999, a first review of the report and its impact was undertaken at the ISCO-4 conference in Leiden. In a workshop specifically devoted to the subject, the original aims and goals of FRISCO were confirmed to be still valid and the overall approach and achievements of the report were acknowledged. On the other hand, the workshop revealed some misconceptions, errors and weaknesses of the report in its present form, which are to be removed through a comprehensive revision now under way. This paper reports on the results of the Leiden conference and the current revision activities. It also points out some important consequences of the FRISCO approach as a whole.
  20. Electronic Dewey (1993) 0.01
    0.009031862 = product of:
      0.027095586 = sum of:
        0.027095586 = product of:
          0.054191172 = sum of:
            0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054191172 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17