Search (67 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Lezius, W.: Morphy - Morphologie und Tagging für das Deutsche (2013) 0.11
    0.105090946 = product of:
      0.21018189 = sum of:
        0.21018189 = sum of:
          0.1554811 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1554811 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046712 = queryNorm
              0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
          0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054700784 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046712 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:30:24
  2. Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012) 0.09
    0.08745811 = product of:
      0.17491622 = sum of:
        0.17491622 = product of:
          0.34983245 = sum of:
            0.34983245 = weight(_text_:tagging in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.34983245 = score(doc=309,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                1.1741256 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  3. Heller, L.: Ordnung des Thesaurus, Anarchie des Taggens : im Bibliothekskatalog glücklich vereint? (2011) 0.08
    0.082456306 = product of:
      0.16491261 = sum of:
        0.16491261 = product of:
          0.32982522 = sum of:
            0.32982522 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32982522 = score(doc=2957,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                1.1069763 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Neue Webdienste vereinen die Vorteile von Thesauri und durch privates "Tagging" gewonnenen "Ego-Daten".
    Theme
    Social tagging
  4. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07
    0.066795975 = product of:
      0.13359195 = sum of:
        0.13359195 = product of:
          0.40077582 = sum of:
            0.40077582 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.40077582 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4278608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  5. Heller, L.: Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia - einfach anfangen? (2011) 0.05
    0.048587844 = product of:
      0.09717569 = sum of:
        0.09717569 = product of:
          0.19435138 = sum of:
            0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19435138 = score(doc=4424,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.652292 = fieldWeight in 4424, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Social tagging
  6. Heller, L.: Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia : eine Spielidee (2010) 0.05
    0.048587844 = product of:
      0.09717569 = sum of:
        0.09717569 = product of:
          0.19435138 = sum of:
            0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19435138 = score(doc=4428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.652292 = fieldWeight in 4428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Social tagging
  7. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.03
    0.033397987 = product of:
      0.066795975 = sum of:
        0.066795975 = product of:
          0.20038791 = sum of:
            0.20038791 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20038791 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4278608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  8. Xiaoyue M.; Cahier, J.-P.: Iconic categorization with knowledge-based "icon systems" can improve collaborative KM (2011) 0.02
    0.024293922 = product of:
      0.048587844 = sum of:
        0.048587844 = product of:
          0.09717569 = sum of:
            0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09717569 = score(doc=4837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.326146 = fieldWeight in 4837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Icon system could represent an efficient solution for collective iconic categorization of knowledge by providing graphical interpretation. Their pictorial characters assist visualizing the structure of text to become more understandable beyond vocabulary obstacle. In this paper we are proposing a Knowledge Engineering (KM) based iconic representation approach. We assume that these systematic icons improve collective knowledge management. Meanwhile, text (constructed under our knowledge management model - Hypertopic) helps to reduce the diversity of graphical understanding belonging to different users. This "position paper" also prepares to demonstrate our hypothesis by an "iconic social tagging" experiment which is to be accomplished in 2011 with UTT students. We describe the "socio semantic web" information portal involved in this project, and a part of the icons already designed for this experiment in Sustainability field. We have reviewed existing theoretical works on icons from various origins, which can be used to lay the foundation of robust "icons systems".
  9. Donath, A.: Flickr sorgt mit Automatik-Tags für Aufregung (2015) 0.02
    0.024293922 = product of:
      0.048587844 = sum of:
        0.048587844 = product of:
          0.09717569 = sum of:
            0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09717569 = score(doc=1876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.326146 = fieldWeight in 1876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Flickr hat ein Tagging der heraufgeladenen Fotos eingeführt, das zusätzlich zu den Bildbeschreibungen der Nutzer versucht, die Fotos mit Schlagwörtern zu versehen, die den Bildinhalt beschreiben. Nach einem Bericht des britischen Guardian werden dabei Fehler gemacht, die unangebrachte Beschreibungen bis hin zu rassistischen oder politisch inkorrekten Bemerkungen beinhalten. So wurden dunkelhäutiger Menschen als "monochrom", "Tier" und "Affe" beschrieben. Auch das Gesicht einer hellhäutigen Frau wurde mit "Tier" klassifiziert. Bilder eines Konzentrationslagers wurden gar mit "Sport" und "Klettergerüst" verschlagwortet. Die automatischen Tags lassen sich nicht abschalten - und befinden sich nach Angaben von Yahoo noch in der Betaphase. Viel bringen sie nach Einschätzung von Golem.de nicht, da sie recht allgemein gehalten und wenig aussagekräftig sind. Oftmals kann der Algorithmus nur "Indoor" oder "Outdoor" hinzufügen, was zwar fast immer korrekt zugeordnet wird, dennoch wenig nutzt. Hinter den Kulissen scheint Flickr bereits an einer Verbesserung zu arbeiten - und hat dem Guardian auf Nachfrage versichert, dass die Probleme mit falschen Tags bekannt seien. Einige fehlerhafte Schlagwörter wurden mittlerweile auch wieder entfernt." Vgl. auch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8621658.
  10. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.02
    0.024293922 = product of:
      0.048587844 = sum of:
        0.048587844 = product of:
          0.09717569 = sum of:
            0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09717569 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.326146 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
  11. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.024174558 = product of:
      0.048349116 = sum of:
        0.048349116 = product of:
          0.09669823 = sum of:
            0.09669823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09669823 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  12. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02
    0.023931593 = product of:
      0.047863185 = sum of:
        0.047863185 = product of:
          0.09572637 = sum of:
            0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09572637 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  13. Röthler, D.: "Lehrautomaten" oder die MOOC-Vision der späten 60er Jahre (2014) 0.02
    0.020512793 = product of:
      0.041025586 = sum of:
        0.041025586 = product of:
          0.08205117 = sum of:
            0.08205117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08205117 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 11:04:35
  14. Wei, W.; Ram, S.: Utilizing sozial bookmarking tag space for Web content discovery : a social network analysis approach (2010) 0.02
    0.019435138 = product of:
      0.038870275 = sum of:
        0.038870275 = product of:
          0.07774055 = sum of:
            0.07774055 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07774055 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.2609168 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Social tagging
  15. Schultz, S.: ¬Die eine App für alles : Mobile Zukunft in China (2016) 0.02
    0.019339647 = product of:
      0.038679294 = sum of:
        0.038679294 = product of:
          0.07735859 = sum of:
            0.07735859 = weight(_text_:22 in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07735859 = score(doc=4313,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:22:02
  16. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  17. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  18. Schönherr, M.: Bestechend brillant : die Schönheit der Algorithmen (2016) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 2.2016 17:22:23
  19. Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2019 11:45:19
  20. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.02
    0.016922193 = product of:
      0.033844385 = sum of:
        0.033844385 = product of:
          0.06768877 = sum of:
            0.06768877 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06768877 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42

Languages

  • d 47
  • e 18
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 40
  • r 2
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…