Search (72 results, page 4 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Hapke, T.: Zu einer ganzheitlichen Informationskompetenz gehört eine kritische Wissenschaftskompetenz : Informationskompetenz und Demokratie (2020) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Theme
    Information
  2. Michel, A.: Informationsdidaktik für verschiedene Wissenskulturen (2020) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In den vergangenen Monaten sind in Password Online eine ganze Reihe von Beiträgen erschienen, die sich mit dem Thema Informationskompetenz auseinandergesetzt haben. Sie alle hatten einen unterschiedlichen Fokus, es einte sie jedoch eine eher kritische Perspektive auf ein universelles Kompetenzset, aus dem sich "Informationskompetenz" ergibt. Spannend ist insbesondere im Kontext des aktuellen, lebhaften Diskurses zu Fake News, dass einige Autor*innen explizit soziale und emotionale Faktoren als relevante Kriterien für den Umgang mit Information betonen. (Mit diesem Text und dem sich anschließenden Beitrag von Inka Tappenbeck möchten wir auf die "wissenskulturelle Praxis" als einen weiteren Faktor genauer eingehen, der prägt, was in unterschiedlichen Kontexten als Informationskompetenz zu verstehen ist).
  3. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification in support of diversity : the role of concepts and terms in representing religion (2020) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The paper examines the development of facet analysis as a methodology and the role it plays in building classifications and other knowledge-organization tools. The use of categorical analysis in areas other than library and information science is also considered. The suitability of the faceted approach for humanities documentation is explored through a critical description of the FATKS (Facet Analytical Theory in Managing Knowledge Structure for Humanities) project carried out at University College London. This research focused on building a conceptual model for the subject of religion together with a relational database and search-and-browse interfaces that would support some degree of automatic classification. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences between the conceptual model and the vocabulary used to populate it, and how, in the case of religion, the choice of terminology can create an apparent bias in the system.
  4. Pampel, H.: Empfehlungen für transformative Zeitschriftenverträge mit Publikationsdienstleistern veröffentlicht (2022) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Mailtext: "Im Rahmen der Schwerpunktinitiative "Digitale Information" der Allianz der Wissenschaftsorganisationen wurden jetzt "Empfehlungen für transformative Zeitschriftenverträge mit Publikationsdienstleistern" veröffentlicht. Die formulierten Kriterien dienen als gemeinsamer und handlungsleitender Rahmen der Akteur:innen aus allen Wissenschaftsorganisationen, d.h. Hochschulen ebenso wie außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen, für Verhandlungen mit Publikationsdienstleistern. Dabei bildet die Forderung nach größtmöglicher Kostentransparenz und Kosteneffizienz im Gesamtsystem den Kern des Handelns der Wissenschaftsorganisationen im Kontext ihrer Open-Access-Strategie für die Jahre 2021-2025. Diese Kriterien gliedern sich in die Aspekte Transformation von Zeitschriften, Preisgestaltung, Transparenz, Workflow, Preprints, Qualitätssicherung, Metadaten und Schnittstellen, Statistiken, Tracking und Waiver. Deutsche Version: https://doi.org/10.48440/allianzoa.045 Englische Version: https://doi.org/10.48440/allianzoa.046 Siehe auch: Empfehlungen für transformative Zeitschriftenverträge mit Publikationsdienstleistern veröffentlicht https://www.allianzinitiative.de/2022/11/24/empfehlungen-fuer-transformative-zeitschriftenvertraege-mit-publikationsdienstleistern-veroeffentlicht/ Recommendations for Transformative Journal Agreements with Providers of Publishing Services published https://www.allianzinitiative.de/2022/11/24/recommendations-for-transformative-journal-agreements-with-providers-of-publishing-services-published/?lang=en"
  5. Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 54(2023) no.x, S.xx-xx
  6. Dhillon, P.; Singh, M.: ¬An extended ontology model for trust evaluation using advanced hybrid ontology (2023) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 41(2023) Jan., S.1-23
  7. Jörs, B.: Wider eine Überschätzung der gegenwärtigen Leistungen der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft : Keine fehlende Fundierung? Doch mit gesellschaftlicher Relevanz ausgestattet? (2020) 0.00 
    0.00294135 = product of:
  0.0088240495 = sum of:
    0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 5564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088240495 = score(doc=5564,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5564, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5564)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In einem aktuellen Beitrag von Open Password (#664, 19. November ) zu einer Veranstaltung des Berliner Arbeitskreises Information unter dem Titel "Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft. Hat die Informationswissenschaft eine Zukunft?" nimmt der Herausgeber des gleichnamigen Buches, Dr. Willi Bredemeier, die Rolle eines Berichterstatters ein. Vorgestellt werden die Inhalte eines Vortrages des Hamburger HAW-Referenten, Prof. Dr. Dirk Lewandowski, zum Thema: "Warum die Frage nach der Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft falsch gestellt ist". Dem Bericht darüber in Open Password wurde der Titel "Die Informationswissenschaft hat ein strukturelles, kein inhaltliches Problem. Ein Sechs-Punkte-Programm, um aus dem Status eines kleinen Faches herauszukommen" gegeben.
  8. Giesselbach, S.; Estler-Ziegler, T.: Dokumente schneller analysieren mit Künstlicher Intelligenz (2021) 0.00 
    0.00294135 = product of:
  0.0088240495 = sum of:
    0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088240495 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Vortrag im Rahmen des Berliner Arbeitskreis Information (BAK) am 25.02.2021.
  9. Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021) 0.00 
    0.00235308 = product of:
  0.00705924 = sum of:
    0.00705924 = weight(_text_:information in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00705924 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
  10. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz ist auf domänenspezifisches Vorwissen angewiesen und kann immer nur vorläufig sein : eine Antwort auf Steve Patriarca (2021) 0.00 
    0.00235308 = product of:
  0.00705924 = sum of:
    0.00705924 = weight(_text_:information in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00705924 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Schon die Überschrift des Statements von Steve Patriarca belegt, dass die Anhänger der "Informationskompetenz" (Information Literacy) nach wie vor von der einfachen und naiven Annahme ausgehen, dass die reine Verfügbarkeit von "Informationskompetenz" ausreicht, um "uns die Werkzeuge" zu geben, "Quellen zu prüfen und Tatsachenbehauptungen zu verifizieren". Ohne nochmals gebetsmühlenartig die Argumente gegen eine "allgemeingültige Informationskompetenz" zu wiederholen, die es als eigenständige "Kompetenz" nicht geben kann (siehe die letzten Stellungnahmen zu diesem Unbegriff in Open Password Nr. 682, 691, 759, 960, 963, 965, 971, 979 usw.), und zudem auf die dort eingebundenen Sichten der Nachbarwissenschaften (Neurowissenschaften, Kommunikationswissenschaft usw.) zu diesem unguten Terminus der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft zu verweisen, sei hier lediglich kurz klargestellt:
  11. Ostrzinski, U.: Deutscher MeSH : ZB MED veröffentlicht aktuelle Jahresversion 2022 - freier Zugang und FAIRe Dateiformate (2022) 0.00 
    0.00235308 = product of:
  0.00705924 = sum of:
    0.00705924 = weight(_text_:information in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00705924 = score(doc=625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Der MeSH ist ein polyhierarchisches, konzeptbasiertes Schlagwortregister für biomedizinische Fachbegriffe umfasst das Vokabular, welches in den NLM-Datenbanken, beispielsweise MEDLINE oder PubMed, erscheint. Er wird jährlich aktualisiert von der U. S. National Library of Medicine herausgegeben. Für die deutschsprachige Fassung übersetzt ZB MED dann die jeweils neu hinzugekommenen Terme und ergänzt sie um zusätzliche Synonyme. Erstmalig erstellte ZB MED den Deutschen MeSH im Jahr 2020. Vorher lag die Verantwortung beim Deutschen Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI/BfArM)."
  12. Aydin, Ö.; Karaarslan, E.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: : digital twin in healthcare (2022) 0.00 
    0.00235308 = product of:
  0.00705924 = sum of:
    0.00705924 = weight(_text_:information in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00705924 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Literature review articles are essential to summarize the related work in the selected field. However, covering all related studies takes too much time and effort. This study questions how Artificial Intelligence can be used in this process. We used ChatGPT to create a literature review article to show the stage of the OpenAI ChatGPT artificial intelligence application. As the subject, the applications of Digital Twin in the health field were chosen. Abstracts of the last three years (2020, 2021 and 2022) papers were obtained from the keyword "Digital twin in healthcare" search results on Google Scholar and paraphrased by ChatGPT. Later on, we asked ChatGPT questions. The results are promising; however, the paraphrased parts had significant matches when checked with the Ithenticate tool. This article is the first attempt to show the compilation and expression of knowledge will be accelerated with the help of artificial intelligence. We are still at the beginning of such advances. The future academic publishing process will require less human effort, which in turn will allow academics to focus on their studies. In future studies, we will monitor citations to this study to evaluate the academic validity of the content produced by the ChatGPT. 1. Introduction OpenAI ChatGPT (ChatGPT, 2022) is a chatbot based on the OpenAI GPT-3 language model. It is designed to generate human-like text responses to user input in a conversational context. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations and can be used to create responses to a wide range of topics and prompts. The chatbot can be used for customer service, content creation, and language translation tasks, creating replies in multiple languages. OpenAI ChatGPT is available through the OpenAI API, which allows developers to access and integrate the chatbot into their applications and systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI. It is designed to generate human-like text, allowing it to engage in conversation with users naturally and intuitively. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations, allowing it to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and contexts. It can be used in various applications, such as chatbots, customer service agents, and language translation systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model able to generate coherent and natural text that can be indistinguishable from text written by a human. As an artificial intelligence, ChatGPT may need help to change academic writing practices. However, it can provide information and guidance on ways to improve people's academic writing skills.

Authors

Languages

  • d 48
  • e 23
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 57
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes