Search (597 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Hummel, P.: Millionen Fachartikel illegal im Netz verfügbar (2016) 0.07
    0.06697952 = sum of:
      0.06055366 = product of:
        0.24221464 = sum of:
          0.24221464 = weight(_text_:2200 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24221464 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.49787608 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.48649582 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.006425859 = product of:
        0.019277576 = sum of:
          0.019277576 = weight(_text_:h in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019277576 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Online-Plattform Sci-Hub überwindet die Paywalls der Verlage und baut eine riesige "Schattenbibliothek" der Wissenschaft auf. Auch Gerichte können sie bislang nicht stoppen. Das hatte sich Elsevier sicherlich anders vorgestellt. Der große Wissenschaftsverlag hat im Juni 2015 Klage gegen die Online-Plattformen Sci-Hub und LibGen eingereicht. Der Grund: Dort war eine riesige Anzahl akademischer Publikationen frei und kostenlos zugänglich gemacht worden. Sci-Hub bot Nutzern Zugriff auf Millionen Veröffentlichungen, viele davon urheberrechtlich geschützt. Seit nun letzte Woche die Website Bigthink.com ausführlich über das Verfahren gegen Sci-Hub vor einem US-Bundesbezirksgerichts in New York berichtet hat, verbreitet sich die Nachricht vom "Pirate Bay für die Wissenschaft" in den sozialen Netzwerken rasant. Eine bessere Werbemaßnahme als das Gerichtsverfahren hätte sich Sci-Hub kaum wünschen können. Elsevier ist einer der größten akademischen Verlage der Welt. Nach Presseberichten macht das Unternehmen mit seinen mehr als 2200 Journalen einen jährlichen Reinerlös von über einer Milliarde Dollar. Doch es sieht seine Geschäfte offenbar durch Sci-Hub bedroht. Mit aktuell mehr als 49 Millionen Veröffentlichungen, die 35 Terabyte an Daten umfassen, wie der (nicht verifizierte) Twitter-Account @Sci_Hub schreibt, umfasst die "Schattenbibliothek" wohl eine der größten je vorhandenen Sammlungen akademischer Literatur.
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2016, H.2. [http://www.spektrum.de/news/sci-hub-millionen-fachartikel-illegal-im-netz-verfuegbar/1399718]
  2. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.06
    0.060367167 = product of:
      0.120734334 = sum of:
        0.120734334 = product of:
          0.1811015 = sum of:
            0.08918501 = weight(_text_:c in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918501 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
            0.091916494 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091916494 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06
    0.056120325 = product of:
      0.11224065 = sum of:
        0.11224065 = product of:
          0.4489626 = sum of:
            0.4489626 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4489626 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4793041 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Thomas, C.; McDonald, R.H.; McDowell, C.S.: Overview - Repositories by the numbers (2007) 0.05
    0.054161094 = sum of:
      0.027823364 = product of:
        0.11129346 = sum of:
          0.11129346 = weight(_text_:authors in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11129346 = score(doc=1169,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.25773242 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.43181783 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.026337732 = product of:
        0.039506596 = sum of:
          0.026012292 = weight(_text_:c in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026012292 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.0134943025 = weight(_text_:h in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0134943025 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scholarly digital repositories continue to be one of the most dynamic and varying components of the emerging digital research library. Little consensus is evident on matters such as depositing content in disciplinary or institutional repositories, or both. Debates about deposit mandates and access to research have spilled into the political arena and have focused much attention on various aspects of digital repositories, including the economics and patterns of scholarly publishing, systems and technology, governmental and organizational policies, access, accountability, research impact, and the motivations of individual researchers. Scholarly digital repositories are a rich area for both empirical research and philosophical debate, and are the central theme of a growing body of published literature. It is surprising, therefore, that so much is still unknown about the basic nature of digital repositories, including both differences and similarities. As the two Repositories by the Numbers articles in this issue show, digital scholarly repositories are diversifying both in their general nature and in the information they contain. Because there is still much to be discovered or understood at the most basic levels of digital repositories, co-authors Chuck Thomas and Robert H. McDonald and author Cat McDowell offer readers two different but complementary statistical studies of various types of institutional and disciplinary repositories. Re-iterating a theme of many of the recent works presented at the 2nd International Conference on Institutional Repositories, Thomas and McDonald apply statistical techniques to explore patterns of scholarly participation by more than 30,000 authors in several categories of repositories. McDowell reports on her ongoing analysis of the growth and development of institutional repositories in American universities and colleges. Together, these articles reveal new aspects of the digital repository landscape, and present data that will be of immense interest to repository planners and sponsors.
    While each article is concerned with different aspects and measurements of repositories, two themes are common to both articles. First, the authors of both articles explain difficulties involved in gathering and comparing data from a variety of systems and organizations. Just as the definition and purpose of a digital scholarly repository is likely to vary among scholars, disciplines and organizations, obtaining and comparing similar data about each analyzed repository was a major challenge for both studies. In some instances, data from individual repositories were so dissimilar, or introduced so many uncertainties, that some repositories could not be measured as part of the study. Co-authors Thomas and McDonald give a lengthy explanation of these issues, and call for the scholarly digital repository community to begin work on some common reporting standards and guidelines. The second theme common to both articles is the value of automated harvesting and analysis of data from repositories. Harnad (2006) explained the value of real-time data gathered from repositories; the Repositories by the Numbers authors detail the manual tabulation and analysis that was required in an environment of inconsistent and uncertain data gathered from a variety of scholarly digital repositories. However, both articles acknowledge the need for more automated harvesters to gather and analyze various data on the characteristics and contents of repositories. Each article analyzes different characteristics of repositories. Even so, important topics like deposit mandates, research impact, and repository categorization inevitably are discussed as important considerations when evaluating many different aspects of scholarly digital repositories. By drawing upon the latest and most authoritative literature across the spectrum of digital repository research and debate, and by introducing new and thoughtful insights into the current state of digital repositories, the authors of both Repositories by the Numbers articles give D-Lib's readers useful reports to consider as they construct their respective pieces of the emerging digital repository.
  5. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.05
    0.050305974 = product of:
      0.10061195 = sum of:
        0.10061195 = product of:
          0.15091792 = sum of:
            0.07432084 = weight(_text_:c in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07432084 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
            0.07659708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07659708 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  6. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.05
    0.04920292 = sum of:
      0.027537988 = product of:
        0.110151954 = sum of:
          0.110151954 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.110151954 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25773242 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021664929 = product of:
        0.06499478 = sum of:
          0.06499478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06499478 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  7. Karg, H.: Mapping Dewey and subject authorities : CrissCross (2007) 0.05
    0.04606089 = product of:
      0.09212178 = sum of:
        0.09212178 = product of:
          0.13818267 = sum of:
            0.04626618 = weight(_text_:h in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04626618 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
            0.091916494 = weight(_text_:22 in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091916494 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  8. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.04
    0.04489626 = product of:
      0.08979252 = sum of:
        0.08979252 = product of:
          0.35917008 = sum of:
            0.35917008 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35917008 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4793041 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  9. Tetens, H.: Zur Erkenntnistheorie des religiösen Gottesglaubens (2018) 0.04
    0.042948686 = product of:
      0.08589737 = sum of:
        0.08589737 = product of:
          0.12884605 = sum of:
            0.07432084 = weight(_text_:c in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07432084 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
            0.05452522 = weight(_text_:h in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05452522 = score(doc=536,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information Philosophie. 2018. H.1, S.8-16 [https://www.information-philosophie.de/?a=1&t=8679&n=2&y=4&c=131]
  10. Krattenthaler, C.: Was der h-Index wirklich aussagt (2021) 0.04
    0.04280874 = product of:
      0.08561748 = sum of:
        0.08561748 = product of:
          0.12842622 = sum of:
            0.05945667 = weight(_text_:c in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05945667 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
            0.068969555 = weight(_text_:h in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068969555 = score(doc=407,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Diese Note legt dar, dass der sogenannte h-Index (Hirschs bibliometrischer Index) im Wesentlichen dieselbe Information wiedergibt wie die Gesamtanzahl von Zitationen von Publikationen einer Autorin oder eines Autors, also ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index ist. Dies basiert auf einem faszinierenden Satz der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, der hier ebenfalls erläutert wird.
    Content
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1515/dmvm-2021-0050. Auch abgedruckt u.d.T.: 'Der h-Index - "ein nutzloser bibliometrischer Index"' in Open Password Nr. 1007 vom 06.12.2021 unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM3NCwiZDI3MzMzOTEwMzUzIiwwLDAsMzQ4LDFd.
    Object
    h-index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2021, H.3, S.124-128
  11. Allo, P.; Baumgaertner, B.; D'Alfonso, S.; Fresco, N.; Gobbo, F.; Grubaugh, C.; Iliadis, A.; Illari, P.; Kerr, E.; Primiero, G.; Russo, F.; Schulz, C.; Taddeo, M.; Turilli, M.; Vakarelov, O.; Zenil, H.: ¬The philosophy of information : an introduction (2013) 0.04
    0.03846829 = sum of:
      0.00973615 = product of:
        0.0389446 = sum of:
          0.0389446 = weight(_text_:authors in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0389446 = score(doc=3380,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25773242 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02873214 = product of:
        0.043098208 = sum of:
          0.03153166 = weight(_text_:c in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03153166 = score(doc=3380,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.16169086 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
          0.011566545 = weight(_text_:h in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011566545 = score(doc=3380,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Philosophy "done informationally" has been around a long time, but PI as a discipline is quite new. PI takes age-old philosophical debates and engages them with up-to-the minute conceptual issues generated by our ever-changing, information-laden world. This alters the philosophical debates, and makes them interesting to many more people - including many philosophically-minded people who aren't subscribing philosophers. We, the authors, are young researchers who think of our work as part of PI, taking this engaged approach. We're excited by it and want to teach it. Students are excited by it and want to study it. Writing a traditional textbook takes a while, and PI is moving quickly. A traditional textbook doesn't seem like the right approach for the philosophy of the information age. So we got together to take a new approach, team-writing this electronic text to make it available more rapidly and openly.
  12. Brinkman's cumulative catalogue on CD-ROM (1996-) 0.04
    0.03838408 = product of:
      0.07676816 = sum of:
        0.07676816 = product of:
          0.11515223 = sum of:
            0.038555153 = weight(_text_:h in 6474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038555153 = score(doc=6474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 6474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6474)
            0.07659708 = weight(_text_:22 in 6474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07659708 = score(doc=6474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6474)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 2.1997 16:22:51
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IfB 4(1996) H.4, S.605-606 (S. Hedrich)
  13. Poggendorff, J.C.: Biographisch-literarisches Handwörterbuch der exakten Naturwissenschaften (2000) 0.04
    0.03838408 = product of:
      0.07676816 = sum of:
        0.07676816 = product of:
          0.11515223 = sum of:
            0.038555153 = weight(_text_:h in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038555153 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
            0.07659708 = weight(_text_:22 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07659708 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 4.1996 15:41:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Online Mitteilungen 2001, Nr.70, S.64-69 (H. Hauffe u. E. Pipp)
  14. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.04
    0.03838408 = product of:
      0.07676816 = sum of:
        0.07676816 = product of:
          0.11515223 = sum of:
            0.038555153 = weight(_text_:h in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038555153 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
            0.07659708 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07659708 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Biographed
    Maturana, H.
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
  15. Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023) 0.04
    0.03838408 = product of:
      0.07676816 = sum of:
        0.07676816 = product of:
          0.11515223 = sum of:
            0.038555153 = weight(_text_:h in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038555153 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
            0.07659708 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07659708 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
  16. Schubert, C.; Kinkeldey, C.; Reich, H.: Handbuch Datenbankanwendung zur Wissensrepräsentation im Verbundprojekt DeCOVER (2006) 0.04
    0.038309522 = product of:
      0.076619044 = sum of:
        0.076619044 = product of:
          0.11492856 = sum of:
            0.08408444 = weight(_text_:c in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08408444 = score(doc=4256,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
            0.03084412 = weight(_text_:h in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03084412 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Atkins, H.; Lyons, C.; Ratner, H.; Risher, C.; Shillum, C.; Sidman, D.; Stevens, A.: Reference linking with DOIs : a case study (2000) 0.04
    0.03665054 = product of:
      0.07330108 = sum of:
        0.07330108 = product of:
          0.109951615 = sum of:
            0.07723648 = weight(_text_:c in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07723648 = score(doc=1229,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
            0.03271513 = weight(_text_:h in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03271513 = score(doc=1229,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14045826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Schlögl, C.: Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Gegenstandsbereich und Perspektiven (2014) 0.04
    0.035214182 = product of:
      0.070428364 = sum of:
        0.070428364 = product of:
          0.10564254 = sum of:
            0.052024584 = weight(_text_:c in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052024584 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
            0.053617954 = weight(_text_:22 in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053617954 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2017 18:04:28
  19. Mühlbauer, P.: Upload in Computer klappt . (2018) 0.04
    0.035214182 = product of:
      0.070428364 = sum of:
        0.070428364 = product of:
          0.10564254 = sum of:
            0.052024584 = weight(_text_:c in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052024584 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
            0.053617954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053617954 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19797583 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05653497 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Den drei an der Technischen Universität in Wien forschenden Informatikern Mathias Lechner, Radu Grosu und Ramin Hasani ist es gelungen, das Nervensystem des Fadenwurm Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) als Software in einen Computer zu übertragen und nachzuweisen, dass der "hochgeladene" virtuelle Wurm auf Reize genau so reagiert wie ein echter Nematodenwurm auf echte Reize in der Realität. Dafür ließen sie ihn eine Aufgabe bewältigen, die Hasani zufolge dem Balancieren eines Stabes ähnelt.
    Date
    12. 2.2018 15:22:19
  20. Auer, S.; Bizer, C.; Kobilarov, G.; Lehmann, J.; Cyganiak, R.; Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a Web of open data (2007) 0.03
    0.034336466 = sum of:
      0.0194723 = product of:
        0.0778892 = sum of:
          0.0778892 = weight(_text_:authors in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0778892 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25773242 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014864168 = product of:
        0.044592503 = sum of:
          0.044592503 = weight(_text_:c in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044592503 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19501202 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05653497 = queryNorm
              0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    DBpedia is a community effort to extract structured information from Wikipedia and to make this information available on the Web. DBpedia allows you to ask sophisticated queries against datasets derived from Wikipedia and to link other datasets on the Web to Wikipedia data. We describe the extraction of the DBpedia datasets, and how the resulting information is published on the Web for human- and machineconsumption. We describe some emerging applications from the DBpedia community and show how website authors can facilitate DBpedia content within their sites. Finally, we present the current status of interlinking DBpedia with other open datasets on the Web and outline how DBpedia could serve as a nucleus for an emerging Web of open data.

Authors

Languages

  • d 305
  • e 269
  • m 6
  • a 2
  • el 2
  • f 2
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 286
  • i 69
  • b 20
  • m 18
  • r 13
  • s 9
  • x 6
  • n 4
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes