Search (392 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.07 
    0.07183626 = product of:
  0.14367253 = sum of:
    0.14367253 = sum of:
      0.070752785 = weight(_text_:c in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070752785 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
      0.07291974 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07291974 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.06 
    0.059863552 = product of:
  0.119727105 = sum of:
    0.119727105 = sum of:
      0.05896065 = weight(_text_:c in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05896065 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.060766455 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060766455 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  3. Schlögl, C.: Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Gegenstandsbereich und Perspektiven (2014) 0.04 
    0.041904487 = product of:
  0.08380897 = sum of:
    0.08380897 = sum of:
      0.041272454 = weight(_text_:c in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041272454 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
      0.042536516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042536516 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2017 18:04:28
  4. Mühlbauer, P.: Upload in Computer klappt . (2018) 0.04 
    0.041904487 = product of:
  0.08380897 = sum of:
    0.08380897 = sum of:
      0.041272454 = weight(_text_:c in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041272454 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
      0.042536516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042536516 = score(doc=4113,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4113, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4113)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Den drei an der Technischen Universität in Wien forschenden Informatikern Mathias Lechner, Radu Grosu und Ramin Hasani ist es gelungen, das Nervensystem des Fadenwurm Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) als Software in einen Computer zu übertragen und nachzuweisen, dass der "hochgeladene" virtuelle Wurm auf Reize genau so reagiert wie ein echter Nematodenwurm auf echte Reize in der Realität. Dafür ließen sie ihn eine Aufgabe bewältigen, die Hasani zufolge dem Balancieren eines Stabes ähnelt.
    Date
    12. 2.2018 15:22:19
  5. Allo, P.; Baumgaertner, B.; D'Alfonso, S.; Fresco, N.; Gobbo, F.; Grubaugh, C.; Iliadis, A.; Illari, P.; Kerr, E.; Primiero, G.; Russo, F.; Schulz, C.; Taddeo, M.; Turilli, M.; Vakarelov, O.; Zenil, H.: ¬The philosophy of information : an introduction (2013) 0.04 
    0.04068411 = sum of:
  0.028176669 = product of:
    0.08453 = sum of:
      0.030895762 = weight(_text_:authors in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030895762 = score(doc=3380,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20446584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
      0.05363424 = weight(_text_:back in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05363424 = score(doc=3380,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26939675 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.19909015 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
    0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  0.012507443 = product of:
    0.025014887 = sum of:
      0.025014887 = weight(_text_:c in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025014887 = score(doc=3380,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.16169086 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Philosophy "done informationally" has been around a long time, but PI as a discipline is quite new. PI takes age-old philosophical debates and engages them with up-to-the minute conceptual issues generated by our ever-changing, information-laden world. This alters the philosophical debates, and makes them interesting to many more people - including many philosophically-minded people who aren't subscribing philosophers. We, the authors, are young researchers who think of our work as part of PI, taking this engaged approach. We're excited by it and want to teach it. Students are excited by it and want to study it. Writing a traditional textbook takes a while, and PI is moving quickly. A traditional textbook doesn't seem like the right approach for the philosophy of the information age. So we got together to take a new approach, team-writing this electronic text to make it available more rapidly and openly.
    Here, we introduce PI now. We cover core ideas, explaining how they relate both to traditional philosophy, and to the conceptual issues arising all over the place - such as in computer science, AI, natural and social sciences, as well as in popular culture. This is the first version, for 2013. Next year we'll tell you about PI 2014. We hope you love PI as much as we do! If so, let us have your feedback, and come back in 2014. Maybe some of you will ultimately join us as researchers. Either way, enjoy it. Yours, Patrick, Bert, Simon, Nir, Federico, Carson, Phyllis, Andrew, Eric, Giuseppe, Federica, Christoph, Mariarosaria, Matteo, Orlin, and Hector.
  6. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.04 
    0.040345427 = sum of:
  0.014564402 = product of:
    0.087386414 = sum of:
      0.087386414 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087386414 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20446584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.025781024 = product of:
    0.05156205 = sum of:
      0.05156205 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05156205 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  7. Galinski, C.: Fragen der semantischen Interoperabilität brechen jetzt überall auf (o.J.) 0.04 
    0.03591813 = product of:
  0.07183626 = sum of:
    0.07183626 = sum of:
      0.035376392 = weight(_text_:c in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035376392 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.03645987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03645987 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:16:32
  8. Vogt, T.: ¬Die Transformation des renommierten Informationsservices zbMATH zu einer Open Access-Plattform für die Mathematik steht vor dem Abschluss. (2020) 0.03 
    0.0314108 = product of:
  0.0628216 = sum of:
    0.0628216 = product of:
      0.37692955 = sum of:
        0.37692955 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37692955 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4373378 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."
  9. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.03 
    0.029931776 = product of:
  0.059863552 = sum of:
    0.059863552 = sum of:
      0.029480325 = weight(_text_:c in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029480325 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
      0.030383227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030383227 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  10. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.03 
    0.029931776 = product of:
  0.059863552 = sum of:
    0.059863552 = sum of:
      0.029480325 = weight(_text_:c in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029480325 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.030383227 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030383227 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  11. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.03 
    0.029681142 = product of:
  0.059362285 = sum of:
    0.059362285 = product of:
      0.3561737 = sum of:
        0.3561737 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3561737 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3802444 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  12. Pepper, S.; Groenmo, G.O.: Towards a general theory of scope (2002) 0.03 
    0.029651677 = product of:
  0.059303354 = sum of:
    0.059303354 = product of:
      0.17791006 = sum of:
        0.051492937 = weight(_text_:authors in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051492937 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20446584 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.12641712 = weight(_text_:back in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12641712 = score(doc=539,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26939675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.46925998 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper is concerned with the issue of scope in topic maps. Topic maps are a form of knowledge representation suitable for solving a number of complex problems in the area of information management, ranging from findability (navigation and querying) to knowledge management and enterprise application integration (EAI). The topic map paradigm has its roots in efforts to understand the essential semantics of back-of-book indexes in order that they might be captured in a form suitable for computer processing. Once understood, the model of a back-of-book index was generalised in order to cover the needs of digital information, and extended to encompass glossaries and thesauri, as well as indexes. The resulting core model, of typed topics, associations, and occurrences, has many similarities with the semantic networks developed by the artificial intelligence community for representing knowledge structures. One key requirement of topic maps from the earliest days was to be able to merge indexes from disparate origins. This requirement accounts for two further concepts that greatly enhance the power of topic maps: subject identity and scope. This paper concentrates on scope, but also includes a brief discussion of the feature known as the topic naming constraint, with which it is closely related. It is based on the authors' experience in creating topic maps (in particular, the Italian Opera Topic Map, and in implementing processing systems for topic maps (in particular, the Ontopia Topic Map Engine and Navigator.
  13. Auer, S.; Bizer, C.; Kobilarov, G.; Lehmann, J.; Cyganiak, R.; Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a Web of open data (2007) 0.03 
    0.027986784 = sum of:
  0.010298587 = product of:
    0.061791524 = sum of:
      0.061791524 = weight(_text_:authors in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061791524 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20446584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.017688196 = product of:
    0.035376392 = sum of:
      0.035376392 = weight(_text_:c in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035376392 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    DBpedia is a community effort to extract structured information from Wikipedia and to make this information available on the Web. DBpedia allows you to ask sophisticated queries against datasets derived from Wikipedia and to link other datasets on the Web to Wikipedia data. We describe the extraction of the DBpedia datasets, and how the resulting information is published on the Web for human- and machineconsumption. We describe some emerging applications from the DBpedia community and show how website authors can facilitate DBpedia content within their sites. Finally, we present the current status of interlinking DBpedia with other open datasets on the Web and outline how DBpedia could serve as a nucleus for an emerging Web of open data.
  14. Thomas, C.; McDonald, R.H.; McDowell, C.S.: Overview - Repositories by the numbers (2007) 0.03 
    0.025033446 = sum of:
  0.014715333 = product of:
    0.088291995 = sum of:
      0.088291995 = weight(_text_:authors in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.088291995 = score(doc=1169,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.20446584 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.43181783 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.0103181135 = product of:
    0.020636227 = sum of:
      0.020636227 = weight(_text_:c in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020636227 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scholarly digital repositories continue to be one of the most dynamic and varying components of the emerging digital research library. Little consensus is evident on matters such as depositing content in disciplinary or institutional repositories, or both. Debates about deposit mandates and access to research have spilled into the political arena and have focused much attention on various aspects of digital repositories, including the economics and patterns of scholarly publishing, systems and technology, governmental and organizational policies, access, accountability, research impact, and the motivations of individual researchers. Scholarly digital repositories are a rich area for both empirical research and philosophical debate, and are the central theme of a growing body of published literature. It is surprising, therefore, that so much is still unknown about the basic nature of digital repositories, including both differences and similarities. As the two Repositories by the Numbers articles in this issue show, digital scholarly repositories are diversifying both in their general nature and in the information they contain. Because there is still much to be discovered or understood at the most basic levels of digital repositories, co-authors Chuck Thomas and Robert H. McDonald and author Cat McDowell offer readers two different but complementary statistical studies of various types of institutional and disciplinary repositories. Re-iterating a theme of many of the recent works presented at the 2nd International Conference on Institutional Repositories, Thomas and McDonald apply statistical techniques to explore patterns of scholarly participation by more than 30,000 authors in several categories of repositories. McDowell reports on her ongoing analysis of the growth and development of institutional repositories in American universities and colleges. Together, these articles reveal new aspects of the digital repository landscape, and present data that will be of immense interest to repository planners and sponsors.
    While each article is concerned with different aspects and measurements of repositories, two themes are common to both articles. First, the authors of both articles explain difficulties involved in gathering and comparing data from a variety of systems and organizations. Just as the definition and purpose of a digital scholarly repository is likely to vary among scholars, disciplines and organizations, obtaining and comparing similar data about each analyzed repository was a major challenge for both studies. In some instances, data from individual repositories were so dissimilar, or introduced so many uncertainties, that some repositories could not be measured as part of the study. Co-authors Thomas and McDonald give a lengthy explanation of these issues, and call for the scholarly digital repository community to begin work on some common reporting standards and guidelines. The second theme common to both articles is the value of automated harvesting and analysis of data from repositories. Harnad (2006) explained the value of real-time data gathered from repositories; the Repositories by the Numbers authors detail the manual tabulation and analysis that was required in an environment of inconsistent and uncertain data gathered from a variety of scholarly digital repositories. However, both articles acknowledge the need for more automated harvesters to gather and analyze various data on the characteristics and contents of repositories. Each article analyzes different characteristics of repositories. Even so, important topics like deposit mandates, research impact, and repository categorization inevitably are discussed as important considerations when evaluating many different aspects of scholarly digital repositories. By drawing upon the latest and most authoritative literature across the spectrum of digital repository research and debate, and by introducing new and thoughtful insights into the current state of digital repositories, the authors of both Repositories by the Numbers articles give D-Lib's readers useful reports to consider as they construct their respective pieces of the emerging digital repository.
  15. Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996) 0.02 
    0.024306582 = product of:
  0.048613165 = sum of:
    0.048613165 = product of:
      0.09722633 = sum of:
        0.09722633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09722633 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:26:34
  16. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.02 
    0.024306582 = product of:
  0.048613165 = sum of:
    0.048613165 = product of:
      0.09722633 = sum of:
        0.09722633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09722633 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  17. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.02 
    0.024306582 = product of:
  0.048613165 = sum of:
    0.048613165 = product of:
      0.09722633 = sum of:
        0.09722633 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09722633 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
  18. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.02 
    0.024257468 = sum of:
  0.008939041 = product of:
    0.05363424 = sum of:
      0.05363424 = weight(_text_:back in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05363424 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26939675 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.19909015 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.006528 = idf(docFreq=295, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.015318427 = product of:
    0.030636854 = sum of:
      0.030636854 = weight(_text_:c in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030636854 = score(doc=1202,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.19803005 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The concept of c-space is proposed as a visualization schema relating containers of content to cataloging surrogates and classification structures. Possible applications of keyword vector clusters within c-space could include improved retrieval rates through the use of captioning within visual hierarchies, tracings of semantic bleeding among subclasses, and access to buried knowledge within subject-neutral publication containers. The Scholastica Project is described as one example, following a tradition of research dating back to the 1980's. Preliminary focus group assessment indicates that this type of classification rendering may offer digital library searchers enriched entry strategies and an expanded range of re-entry vocabularies. Those of us who work in traditional libraries typically assume that our systems of classification: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), are descriptive rather than prescriptive. In other words, LCC classes and subclasses approximate natural groupings of texts that reflect an underlying order of knowledge, rather than arbitrary categories prescribed by librarians to facilitate efficient shelving. Philosophical support for this assumption has traditionally been found in a number of places, from the archetypal tree of knowledge, to Aristotelian categories, to the concept of discursive formations proposed by Michel Foucault. Gary P. Radford has elegantly described an encounter with Foucault's discursive formations in the traditional library setting: "Just by looking at the titles on the spines, you can see how the books cluster together...You can identify those books that seem to form the heart of the discursive formation and those books that reside on the margins. Moving along the shelves, you see those books that tend to bleed over into other classifications and that straddle multiple discursive formations. You can physically and sensually experience...those points that feel like state borders or national boundaries, those points where one subject ends and another begins, or those magical places where one subject has morphed into another..."
  19. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.02 
    0.023945421 = product of:
  0.047890842 = sum of:
    0.047890842 = sum of:
      0.02358426 = weight(_text_:c in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02358426 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1547081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.024306582 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024306582 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044850662 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  20. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.02 
    0.023778636 = product of:
  0.047557272 = sum of:
    0.047557272 = product of:
      0.095114544 = sum of:
        0.095114544 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095114544 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15705937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044850662 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 232
  • d 146
  • a 2
  • el 2
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 210
  • i 10
  • m 7
  • r 6
  • s 6
  • x 5
  • b 3
  • n 3
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications