Search (509 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.14 
    0.1395046 = sum of:
  0.08276157 = product of:
    0.33104628 = sum of:
      0.33104628 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.33104628 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44177356 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05674303 = product of:
    0.11348606 = sum of:
      0.11348606 = weight(_text_:i in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11348606 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.57742584 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.12 
    0.122000694 = product of:
  0.24400139 = sum of:
    0.24400139 = sum of:
      0.1310424 = weight(_text_:i in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1310424 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.11295898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11295898 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
    Type
    i
  3. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.11 
    0.10675061 = product of:
  0.21350121 = sum of:
    0.21350121 = sum of:
      0.11466211 = weight(_text_:i in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11466211 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
      0.098839104 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.098839104 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54
    Type
    i
  4. Jahrbuch der Auktionspreise für Bücher, Handschriften und Autographen : Ergebnisse der Auktionen in Deutschland, den Niederlanden, Österreich und der Schweiz. Mit einem Anhang: Spezialgebiete der Antiquariate (1992) 0.08 
    0.076250434 = product of:
  0.15250087 = sum of:
    0.15250087 = sum of:
      0.0819015 = weight(_text_:i in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0819015 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
      0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07059936 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 3.1996 21:22:40
    Type
    i
  5. Jahrbuch der Auktionspreise für Bücher, Handschriften und Autographen (JAP) : Computerdatei (1997) 0.08 
    0.076250434 = product of:
  0.15250087 = sum of:
    0.15250087 = sum of:
      0.0819015 = weight(_text_:i in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0819015 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
      0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07059936 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 3.1996 21:22:40
    Type
    i
  6. Poggendorff, J.C.: Biographisch-literarisches Handwörterbuch der exakten Naturwissenschaften (2000) 0.08 
    0.076250434 = product of:
  0.15250087 = sum of:
    0.15250087 = sum of:
      0.0819015 = weight(_text_:i in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0819015 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
      0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07059936 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 4.1996 15:41:22
    Type
    i
  7. Grimm, J.; Grimm, W.: Deutsches Wörterbuch - Der digitale Grimm : Elektronische Ausgabe der Erstbearbeitung (2004) 0.08 
    0.076250434 = product of:
  0.15250087 = sum of:
    0.15250087 = sum of:
      0.0819015 = weight(_text_:i in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0819015 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07059936 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:54:37
    Type
    i
  8. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019) 0.06 
    0.06147801 = sum of:
  0.020938838 = product of:
    0.08375535 = sum of:
      0.08375535 = weight(_text_:authors in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08375535 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.040539175 = product of:
    0.08107835 = sum of:
      0.08107835 = weight(_text_:i in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08107835 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
  9. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.06 
    0.061000347 = product of:
  0.122000694 = sum of:
    0.122000694 = sum of:
      0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0655212 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.05647949 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05647949 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Final version now available! http://youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g http://mediatedcultures.net A higher quality version is available for download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?6duzg3zioyd. Please note that this is the second draft and the final version will not be available until late February after I review all comments and revise the video. Please return for a new download link at that time.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  10. Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Digital (2005) 0.06 
    0.061000347 = product of:
  0.122000694 = sum of:
    0.122000694 = sum of:
      0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0655212 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
      0.05647949 = weight(_text_:22 in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05647949 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Komplette Textsubstanz aller 30 Bände + Zusatz- und Quellentexte mit nahezu demselben Umfang wie die Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Umfassende Recherchemöglichkeiten, einschließlich natürlichsprachlicher Suchhilfe Frei dreh- und zoombarer 3-D-Globus mit mehr als 2 Millionen geografischen Karteneinträgen 25000 Bilder und Zugang zur Bilddatenbank der dpa mit mehr als 2 Millionen Bildern 280 Videos, 140 Animationen, 6000 Audios, 22 000 kommentierte Weblinks u.v. m. Zugriff auf die Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Online (auch per minibrowserfähigem PDA, Smartphone oder Pocket-PC*), kostenlos bis 31.12.2010 1 USB-Memory-Stick in Docking-Station Für Windows
    Type
    i
  11. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.06 
    0.06011957 = sum of:
  0.010469419 = product of:
    0.041877676 = sum of:
      0.041877676 = weight(_text_:authors in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041877676 = score(doc=1077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.04965015 = product of:
    0.0993003 = sum of:
      0.0993003 = weight(_text_:i in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0993003 = score(doc=1077,freq=24.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.5052476 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
            4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
              24.0 = termFreq=24.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
  12. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.06 
    0.056054503 = sum of:
  0.018133568 = product of:
    0.07253427 = sum of:
      0.07253427 = weight(_text_:authors in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07253427 = score(doc=2362,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.30534133 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.037920933 = product of:
    0.07584187 = sum of:
      0.07584187 = weight(_text_:i in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07584187 = score(doc=2362,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.38588926 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
    According to my findings several relations available in the thesaurus query interface as "roles", are not used, i.e. there are not yet any assertions with them. And those which are used do not contribute to complete concept definitions of concepts which represent thesaurus main entries. In other words: The authors claim to already have a "description logic based nomenclature", where there is not yet one which deserves that title by being much more than a thesaurus with strict subsumption and additional inheritable semantic links. In the last section of the paper the authors say: "The most time consuming process in this conversion was making a careful analysis of the Thesaurus to understand the best way to translate it into OWL." "For other conversions, these same types of distinctions and decisions must be made. The expressive power of a proprietary encoding can vary widely from that in OWL or RDF. Understanding the original semantics and engineering a solution that most closely duplicates it is critical for creating a useful and accu-rate ontology." My question is: What decisions were made and are they exemplary, can they be rec-ommended as "the best way"? I raise strong doubts with respect to that, and I miss more profound discussions of the issues at stake. The following notes are dedicated to a critical description and assessment of the results of that conversion activity. They are written in a tutorial style more or less addressing students, but myself being a learner especially in the field of medical knowledge representation I do not speak "ex cathedra".
  13. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.06 
    0.05533448 = sum of:
  0.025381705 = product of:
    0.10152682 = sum of:
      0.10152682 = weight(_text_:authors in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10152682 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.029952776 = product of:
    0.05990555 = sum of:
      0.05990555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05990555 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  14. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.05 
    0.053375304 = product of:
  0.10675061 = sum of:
    0.10675061 = sum of:
      0.057331055 = weight(_text_:i in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057331055 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.049419552 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049419552 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  15. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05 
    0.051725984 = product of:
  0.10345197 = sum of:
    0.10345197 = product of:
      0.41380787 = sum of:
        0.41380787 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41380787 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44177356 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05210816 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  16. P.M. Enzyklopädie 2006 (2005) 0.05 
    0.04575026 = product of:
  0.09150052 = sum of:
    0.09150052 = sum of:
      0.049140904 = weight(_text_:i in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049140904 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
      0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042359617 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 3.2006 15:03:22
    Type
    i
  17. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.04 
    0.038125217 = product of:
  0.076250434 = sum of:
    0.076250434 = sum of:
      0.04095075 = weight(_text_:i in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04095075 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.03529968 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03529968 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  18. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.04 
    0.038125217 = product of:
  0.076250434 = sum of:
    0.076250434 = sum of:
      0.04095075 = weight(_text_:i in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04095075 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.03529968 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03529968 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
    Content
    Vgl. auch Teil I: Open Password. 2021, Nr.946 vom 12. Juli 2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzMxNSwiM2MwMDJhZWIwZDQ0IiwwLDAsMjg1LDFd].
  19. ws: ¬Das Große Wissen.de Lexikon 2004 (2003) 0.04 
    0.03728512 = product of:
  0.07457024 = sum of:
    0.07457024 = sum of:
      0.04633049 = weight(_text_:i in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04633049 = score(doc=1079,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.028239746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028239746 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05210816 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 3.2004 12:58:22
    Footnote
    Rez. u.d.T. "Die Welt ist eine Scheibe" in: CD-Info. 2004, H.1, S.29 (ws): "Das Lexikon entspricht mit seinen 117.000 Stichworten vom Umfang etwa einem ca. 24-bändigen gedruckten Lexikon und vereint aktuelle Inhalte mit einer Vielzahl von Multimedia-Elementen wie Tondokumenten, Bildern und Videos. Dank ausgeklügelter Suchfunktionen, einem Online Update-Service und ergänzenden Links ins Internet, ist das Lexikon sowohl zum Nachschlagen als auch zum Stöbern geeignet. Neben dem Lexikon enthält die DVD noch ein Fremdwörterlexikon, ein viersprachiges Wörterbuch (E, F, I, E) sowie einen aktuellen Weltatlas. Mit Hilfe der übersichtlichen Benutzeroberfläche stehen dem Benutzer mehrere Einstiegsmöglichkeiten zur Verfügung: "Wissen A - Z" beinhaltet eine Stichwort- und Volltextsuche, "Timeline" liefert die Geschichte der Menschheit von den alten Ägyptern bis zum Fall Bagdads auf einem Zeitstrahl. "Themenreisen" stellt besondere Themengebiete wie beispielsweise "Aufstieg und Fall der Sowjetunion" kompakt mit allen zugehörigen Lexika-Einträgen und Internet-Links dar. Und in der "Mediengalerie" erschließen sich dem Benutzer die über 16.000 enthaltenen Medienelemente übersichtlich sortiert nach Themengebiet oder Medientyp."
    Type
    i
  20. CD-ROMs in print : an international guide to CD-ROMs, CD-I, CDTV & electronic book products (1994) 0.03 
    0.03474787 = product of:
  0.06949574 = sum of:
    0.06949574 = product of:
      0.13899148 = sum of:
        0.13899148 = weight(_text_:i in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13899148 = score(doc=5013,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05210816 = queryNorm
            0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 260
  • d 221
  • i 7
  • m 4
  • a 2
  • el 2
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • no 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 186
  • i 167
  • m 16
  • b 9
  • r 5
  • n 4
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications