Search (191 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.31 
    0.3068502 = product of:
  0.7159838 = sum of:
    0.1022834 = product of:
      0.3068502 = sum of:
        0.3068502 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3068502 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.3068502 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3068502 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.3068502 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3068502 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.25 
    0.24548016 = product of:
  0.57278705 = sum of:
    0.08182672 = product of:
      0.24548015 = sum of:
        0.24548015 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24548015 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.24548015 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24548015 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.24548015 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24548015 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.15 
    0.1534251 = product of:
  0.3579919 = sum of:
    0.0511417 = product of:
      0.1534251 = sum of:
        0.1534251 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1534251 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1534251 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1534251 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.1534251 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1534251 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32758754 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. McIlwaine, J.: Bibliographical control : self-instruction from individualised investigations (2000) 0.03 
    0.025777398 = product of:
  0.18044178 = sum of:
    0.18044178 = weight(_text_:instruction in 5410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18044178 = score(doc=5410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2293201 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.7868555 = fieldWeight in 5410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5410)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  5. Hawking, S.: This is the most dangerous time for our planet (2016) 0.02 
    0.021676961 = product of:
  0.07586936 = sum of:
    0.033838835 = weight(_text_:great in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033838835 = score(doc=3273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.15552977 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
    0.042030524 = product of:
      0.08406105 = sum of:
        0.08406105 = weight(_text_:britain in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08406105 = score(doc=3273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28835937 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.29151487 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    "As a theoretical physicist based in Cambridge, I have lived my life in an extraordinarily privileged bubble. Cambridge is an unusual town, centered around one of the world's great universities. Within that town, the scientific community which I became part of in my twenties is even more rarefied. And within that scientific community, the small group of international theoretical physicists with whom I have spent my working life might sometimes be tempted to regard themselves as the pinnacle. Add to this, the celebrity that has come with my books, and the isolation imposed by my illness, I feel as though my ivory tower is getting taller. So the recent apparent rejection of the elite in both America and Britain is surely aimed at me, as much as anyone. Whatever we might think about the decision by the British electorate to reject membership of the European Union, and by the American public to embrace Donald Trump as their next President, there is no doubt in the minds of commentators that this was a cry of anger by people who felt that they had been abandoned by their leaders. It was, everyone seems to agree, the moment that the forgotten spoke, finding their voice to reject the advice and guidance of experts and the elite everywhere.
    I am no exception to this rule. I warned before the Brexit vote that it would damage scientific research in Britain, that a vote to leave would be a step backward, and the electorate, or at least a sufficiently significant proportion of it, took no more notice of me than any of the other political leaders, trade unionists, artists, scientists, businessmen and celebrities who all gave the same unheeded advice to the rest of the country. What matters now however, far more than the choices made by these two electorates, is how the elites react. Should we, in turn, reject these votes as outpourings of crude populism that fail to take account of the facts, and attempt to circumvent or circumscribe the choices that they represent? I would argue that this would be a terrible mistake. The concerns underlying these votes about the economic consequences of globalisation and accelerating technological change are absolutely understandable. The automation of factories has already decimated jobs in traditional manufacturing, the rise of AI is likely to extend this job destruction deep into the middle classes, with only the most caring, creative or supervisory roles remaining.
  6. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.02 
    0.018460691 = product of:
  0.06461242 = sum of:
    0.054142136 = weight(_text_:great in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054142136 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
    0.010470283 = product of:
      0.020940566 = sum of:
        0.020940566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020940566 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13530953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03863967 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  7. ChatGPT : Optimizing language models for dalogue (2022) 0.02 
    0.017184932 = product of:
  0.12029452 = sum of:
    0.12029452 = weight(_text_:instruction in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12029452 = score(doc=836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2293201 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.52457035 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    We've trained a model called ChatGPT which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
  8. Kempf, A.O.; Ritze, D.; Eckert, K.; Zapilko, B.: New ways of mapping knowledge organization systems : using a semi­automatic matching­procedure for building up vocabulary crosswalks (2013) 0.02 
    0.016698359 = product of:
  0.11688851 = sum of:
    0.11688851 = weight(_text_:assisted in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11688851 = score(doc=989,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26102042 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.44781366 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Crosswalks between different vocabularies are an indispensable prerequisite for integrated and high quality search scenarios in distributed data environments. Offered through the web and linked with each other they act as a central link so that users can move back and forth between different data sources available online. In the past, crosswalks between different thesauri have primarily been developed manually. In the long run the intellectual updating of such crosswalks requires huge personnel expenses. Therefore, an integration of automatic matching procedures, as for example Ontology Matching Tools, seems an obvious need. On the basis of computer generated correspondences between the Thesaurus for Economics (STW) and the Thesaurus for the Social Sciences (TheSoz) our contribution will explore cross-border approaches between IT-assisted tools and procedures on the one hand and external quality measurements via domain experts on the other hand. The techniques that emerge enable semi-automatically performed vocabulary crosswalks.
  9. Combs, A.; Krippner, S.: Collective consciousness and the social brain (2008) 0.02 
    0.016698359 = product of:
  0.11688851 = sum of:
    0.11688851 = weight(_text_:assisted in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11688851 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26102042 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.44781366 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses supportive neurological and social evidence for 'collective consciousness', here understood as a shared sense of being together with others in a single or unified experience. Mirror neurons in the premotor and posterior parietal cortices respond to the intentions as well as the actions of other individuals. There are also mirror neurons in the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortices which have been implicated in empathy. Many authors have considered the likely role of such mirror systems in the development of uniquely human aspects of sociality including language. Though not without criticism, Menant has made the case that mirror-neuron assisted exchanges aided the original advent of self-consciousness and intersubjectivity. Combining these ideas with social mirror theory it is not difficult to imagine the creation of similar dynamical patterns in the emotional and even cognitive neuronal activity of individuals in human groups, creating a feeling in which the participating members experience a unified sense of consciousness. Such instances pose a kind of 'binding problem' in which participating individuals exhibit a degree of 'entanglement'.
  10. Zia, L.L.: Growing a national learning environments and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education : current issues and opportunities for the NSDL program (2001) 0.02 
    0.015469182 = product of:
  0.10828427 = sum of:
    0.10828427 = weight(_text_:great in 1217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10828427 = score(doc=1217,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 1217, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1217)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Digital Library (NSDL) program seeks to create, develop, and sustain a national digital library supporting science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education at all levels -- preK-12, undergraduate, graduate, and life-long learning. The resulting virtual institution is expected to catalyze and support continual improvements in the quality of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education in both formal and informal settings. The vision for this program has been explored through a series of workshops over the past several years and documented in accompanying reports and monographs. (See [1-7, 10, 12, and 13].) These efforts have led to a characterization of the digital library as a learning environments and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education, that is: * designed to meet the needs of learners, in both individual and collaborative settings; * constructed to enable dynamic use of a broad array of materials for learning primarily in digital format; and * managed actively to promote reliable anytime, anywhere access to quality collections and services, available both within and without the network. Underlying the NSDL program are several working assumptions. First, while there is currently no lack of "great piles of content" on the Web, there is an urgent need for "piles of great content". The difficulties in discovering and verifying the authority of appropriate Web-based material are certainly well known, yet there are many examples of learning resources of great promise available (particularly those exploiting the power of multiple media), with more added every day. The breadth and interconnectedness of the Web are simultaneously a great strength and shortcoming. Second, the "unit" or granularity of educational content can and will shrink, affording the opportunity for users to become creators and vice versa, as learning objects are reused, repackaged, and repurposed. To be sure, this scenario cannot take place without serious attention to intellectual property and digital rights management concerns. But new models and technologies are being explored (see a number of recent articles in the January issue of D-Lib Magazine). Third, there is a need for an "organizational infrastructure" that facilitates connections between distributed users and distributed content, as alluded to in the third bullet above. Finally, while much of the ongoing use of the library is envisioned to be "free" in the sense of the public good, there is an opportunity and a need to consider multiple alternative models of sustainability, particularly in the area of services offered by the digital library. More details about the NSDL program including information about proposal deadlines and current awards may be found at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl>.
  11. Mitchell, J.S.; Panzer, M.: Dewey linked data : Making connections with old friends and new acquaintances (2012) 0.01 
    0.0139153 = product of:
  0.097407095 = sum of:
    0.097407095 = weight(_text_:assisted in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.097407095 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26102042 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper explores the history, uses cases, and future plans associated with availability of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as linked data. Parts of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have been available as linked data since 2009. Initial efforts included the DDC Summaries (the top three levels of the DDC) in eleven languages exposed as linked data in dewey.info. In 2010, the content of dewey.info was further extended by the addition of assignable numbers and captions from the Abridged Edition 14 data files in English, Italian, and Vietnamese. During 2012, we will add assignable numbers and captions from the latest full edition database, DDC 23. In addition to the "old friends" of different Dewey language versions, institutions such as the British Library and Deutsche Nationalbibliothek have made use of Dewey linked data in bibliographic records and authority files, and AGROVOC has linked to our data at a general level. We expect to extend our linked data network shortly to "new acquaintances" such as GeoNames, ISO 639-3 language codes, and Mathematics Subject Classification. In particular, we will examine the linking process to GeoNames as an example of cross-domain vocabulary alignment. In addition to linking plans, we report on use cases that facilitate machine-assisted categorization and support discovery in the Semantic Web environment.
  12. ¬The Computer Science Ontology (CSO) (2018) 0.01 
    0.0139153 = product of:
  0.097407095 = sum of:
    0.097407095 = weight(_text_:assisted in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.097407095 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26102042 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.37317806 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The Computer Science Ontology (CSO) is a large-scale ontology of research areas that was automatically generated using the Klink-2 algorithm on the Rexplore dataset, which consists of about 16 million publications, mainly in the field of Computer Science. The Klink-2 algorithm combines semantic technologies, machine learning, and knowledge from external sources to automatically generate a fully populated ontology of research areas. Some relationships were also revised manually by experts during the preparation of two ontology-assisted surveys in the field of Semantic Web and Software Architecture. The main root of CSO is Computer Science, however, the ontology includes also a few secondary roots, such as Linguistics, Geometry, Semantics, and so on. CSO presents two main advantages over manually crafted categorisations used in Computer Science (e.g., 2012 ACM Classification, Microsoft Academic Search Classification). First, it can characterise higher-level research areas by means of hundreds of sub-topics and related terms, which enables to map very specific terms to higher-level research areas. Secondly, it can be easily updated by running Klink-2 on a set of new publications. A more comprehensive discussion of the advantages of adopting an automatically generated ontology in the scholarly domain can be found in.
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Lifeboat for knowledge organization 0.01 
    0.013535535 = product of:
  0.09474874 = sum of:
    0.09474874 = weight(_text_:great in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09474874 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In spring 2002 I started teaching Knowledge Organization (KO) at the new master education at The Royal School of Library and Information Science in Copenhagen (MS RSLIS). I began collecting information about KO as support for my own teaching and research. In the beginning I made the information available to the student through a password protected system "SiteScape". This site was a great success, but I encountered problems in transferring the system for new classes the following years. Therefore I have now decided to make it public on the www and to protect only information that should not be made public. References freely available in electronic form are given an URL (if known).
  14. Quick Guide to Publishing a Classification Scheme on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.01 
    0.013535535 = product of:
  0.09474874 = sum of:
    0.09474874 = weight(_text_:great in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09474874 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This document describes in brief how to express the content and structure of a classification scheme, and metadata about a classification scheme, in RDF using the SKOS vocabulary. RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other RDF data by semantic web applications. The Semantic Web, which is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF), provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries. Publishing classifications schemes in SKOS will unify the great many of existing classification efforts in the framework of the Semantic Web.
  15. Shechtman, N.; Chung, M.; Roschelle, J.: Supporting member collaboration in the Math Tools digital library : a formative user study (2004) 0.01 
    0.012888699 = product of:
  0.09022089 = sum of:
    0.09022089 = weight(_text_:instruction in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09022089 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2293201 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we discuss a user study done at the formative stage of development of a Math Tools developers' community. The Math Tools digital library, which aims to collect software tools to support K-12 and university mathematics instruction, has two synergistic purposes. One is to support federated search and the other is to create a community of practice in which developers and users can work together. While much research has explored the technical problem of federated search, there has been little investigation into how to grow a creative, working community around a digital library. To this end, we surveyed and interviewed members of the Math Tools community in order to elicit concerns and priorities. These data led to rich descriptions of the teachers, developers, and researchers who comprise this community. Insights from these descriptions were then used to inform the creation of a set of metaphors and design principles that the Math Tools team could use in their continuing design work.
  16. Danskin, A.: Linked and open data : RDA and bibliographic control (2012) 0.01 
    0.012888699 = product of:
  0.09022089 = sum of:
    0.09022089 = weight(_text_:instruction in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09022089 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2293201 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    RDA: Resource Description and Access is a new cataloguing standard which will replace the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, which has been widely used in libraries since 1981. RDA, like AACR2, is a content standard providing guidance and instruction on how to identify and record attributes or properties of resources which are significant for discovery. However, RDA is also an implementation of the FRBR and FRAD models. The RDA element set and vocabularies are being published on the Open Metadata Registry as linked open data. RDA provides a rich vocabulary for the description of resources and for expressing relationships between them. This paper describes what RDA offers and considers the challenges and potential of linked open data in the broader framework of bibliographic control.
  17. Hajdu Barat, A.: Multilevel education, training, traditions and research in Hungary (2007) 0.01 
    0.011601887 = product of:
  0.081213206 = sum of:
    0.081213206 = weight(_text_:great in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.081213206 = score(doc=545,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper aims to explore the theory and practice of education in schools and the further education as two levels of the Information Society in Hungary . The LIS education is considered the third level over previous levels. I attempt to survey the curriculum and content of different subjects in school; and the division of the programme for librarians. There is a great and long history of UDC usage in Hungary. The lecture sketches stairs of tradition from the beginning to the situation nowadays. Szab ó Ervin began to train the UDC at the Municipal Library in Budapest from 1910. He not only used, but taught the UDC for librarians in his courses, too. As a consequence of Szab ó Ervin's activity the librarians knew and used the UDC very early, and all libraries would use it. The article gives a short overview of recent developments and duties, the situation after the new Hungarian edition, the UDC usage in Hungarian OPAC and the possibility of UDC visualization.
  18. EuropeanaTech and Multilinguality : Issue 1 of EuropeanaTech Insight (2015) 0.01 
    0.010938364 = product of:
  0.076568544 = sum of:
    0.076568544 = weight(_text_:great in 1832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076568544 = score(doc=1832,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.3519237 = fieldWeight in 1832, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1832)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Welcome to the very first issue of EuropeanaTech Insight, a multimedia publication about research and development within the EuropeanaTech community. EuropeanaTech is a very active community. It spans all of Europe and is made up of technical experts from the various disciplines within digital cultural heritage. At any given moment, members can be found presenting their work in project meetings, seminars and conferences around the world. Now, through EuropeanaTech Insight, we can share that inspiring work with the whole community. In our first three issues, we're showcasing topics discussed at the EuropeanaTech 2015 Conference, an exciting event that gave rise to lots of innovative ideas and fruitful conversations on the themes of data quality, data modelling, open data, data re-use, multilingualism and discovery. Welcome, bienvenue, bienvenido, Välkommen, Tervetuloa to the first Issue of EuropeanaTech Insight. Are we talking your language? No? Well I can guarantee you Europeana is. One of the European Union's great beauties and strengths is its diversity. That diversity is perhaps most evident in the 24 different languages spoken in the EU. Making it possible for all European citizens to easily and seamlessly communicate in their native language with others who do not speak that language is a huge technical undertaking. Translating documents, news, speeches and historical texts was once exclusively done manually. Clearly, that takes a huge amount of time and resources and means that not everything can be translated... However, with the advances in machine and automatic translation, it's becoming more possible to provide instant and pretty accurate translations. Europeana provides access to over 40 million digitised cultural heritage offering content in over 33 languages. But what value does Europeana provide if people can only find results in their native language? None. That's why the EuropeanaTech community is collectively working towards making it more possible for everyone to discover our collections in their native language. In this issue of EuropeanaTech Insight, we hear from community members who are making great strides in machine translation and enrichment tools to help improve not only access to data, but also how we retrieve, browse and understand it.
  19. Severiens, T.; Hohlfeld, M.; Zimmermann, K.; Hilf, E.R.: PhysDoc - a distributed network of physics institutions documents : collecting, indexing, and searching high quality documents by using harvest (2000) 0.01 
    0.009668238 = product of:
  0.06767767 = sum of:
    0.06767767 = weight(_text_:great in 6470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06767767 = score(doc=6470,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 6470, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6470)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    PhysNet offers online services that enable a physicist to keep in touch with the worldwide physics community and to receive all information he or she may need. In addition to being of great value to physicists, these services are practical examples of the use of modern methods of digital libraries, in particular the use of metadata harvesting. One service is PhysDoc. This consists of a Harvest-based online information broker- and gatherer-network, which harvests information from the local web-servers of professional physics institutions worldwide (mostly in Europe and USA so far). PhysDoc focuses on scientific information posted by the individual scientist at his local server, such as documents, publications, reports, publication lists, and lists of links to documents. All rights are reserved for the authors who are responsible for the content and quality of their documents. PhysDis is an analogous service but specifically for university theses, with their dual requirements of examination work and publication. The strategy is to select high quality sites containing metadata. We report here on the present status of PhysNet, our experience in operating it, and the development of its usage. To continuously involve authors, research groups, and national societies is considered crucial for a future stable service.
  20. Kelley, D.: Relevance feedback : getting to know your user (2008) 0.01 
    0.009668238 = product of:
  0.06767767 = sum of:
    0.06767767 = weight(_text_:great in 1924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06767767 = score(doc=1924,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21757144 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03863967 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 1924, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1924)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Relevance feedback was one of the first interactive information retrieval techniques to help systems learn more about users' interests. Relevance feedback has been used in a variety of IR applications including query expansion, term disambiguation, user profiling, filtering and personalization. Initial relevance feedback techniques were explicit, in that they required the user's active participation. Many of today's relevance feedback techniques are implicit and based on users' information seeking behaviors, such as the pages they choose to visit, the frequency with which they visit pages, and the length of time pages are displayed. Although this type of information is available in great abundance, it is difficult to interpret without understanding more about the user's search goals and context. In this talk, I will address the following questions: what techniques are available to help us learn about users' interests and preferences? What types of evidence are available through a user's interactions with the system and with the information provided by the system? What do we need to know to accurately interpret and use this evidence? I will address the first two questions by presenting an overview of relevance feedback research in information retrieval. I will address the third question by presenting results of some of my own research that examined the online information seeking behaviors of users during a 14-week period and the context in which these behaviors took place.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 87
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 85
  • i 10
  • m 5
  • r 3
  • b 2
  • s 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects