Search (304 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.17 
    0.17453474 = product of:
  0.29089123 = sum of:
    0.13282767 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13282767 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.100405425 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.100405425 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.05765812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05765812 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  2. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.12 
    0.118157245 = product of:
  0.2953931 = sum of:
    0.2294981 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2294981 = score(doc=7411,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.81689894 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    - Formal characterization given to the thesaurus mapping problem - Interopearbility workflow - - Thesauri SKOS Core transformation - - Thesaurus Mapping algorithms implementation - The "gold standard" data set and the THALEN application - Thesaurus interoperability assessment measures - Experimental results
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
    Object
    Unesco thesaurus
  3. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.12 
    0.118157245 = product of:
  0.2953931 = sum of:
    0.2294981 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2294981 = score(doc=2227,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.81689894 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    - Introduction to the Thesaurus Interoperability problem - Analysis of the thesauri for the project case study - Overview of Schema/Ontology Mapping methodologies - The proposed approach for thesaurus mapping - Standards for implementing the proposed methodology
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
    Object
    Unesco thesaurus
  4. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.11 
    0.10838642 = product of:
  0.27096605 = sum of:
    0.17212358 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17212358 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
    0.09884249 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09884249 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Goossens, P.: Authority control : trends and challenges (2007) 0.11 
    0.10838642 = product of:
  0.27096605 = sum of:
    0.17212358 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17212358 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.61267424 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
    0.09884249 = weight(_text_:22 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09884249 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Object
    CERL Thesaurus
  6. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.10 
    0.096558474 = product of:
  0.48279238 = sum of:
    0.48279238 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.48279238 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51542014 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  7. Doerr, M.: Semantic problems of thesaurus mapping (2001) 0.10 
    0.09532529 = product of:
  0.23831323 = sum of:
    0.09487692 = weight(_text_:objects in 5902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09487692 = score(doc=5902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5902)
    0.14343631 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14343631 = score(doc=5902,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 5902, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5902)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    With networked information access to heterogeneous data sources, the problem of terminology provision and interoperability of controlled vocabulary schemes such as thesauri becomes increasingly urgent. Solutions are needed to improve the performance of full-text retrieval systems and to guide the design of controlled terminology schemes for use in structured data, including metadata. Thesauri are created in different languages, with different scope and points of view and at different levels of abstraction and detail, to accomodate access to a specific group of collections. In any wider search accessing distributed collections, the user would like to start with familiar terminology and let the system find out the correspondences to other terminologies in order to retrieve equivalent results from all addressed collections. This paper investigates possible semantic differences that may hinder the unambiguous mapping and transition from one thesaurus to another. It focusses on the differences of meaning of terms and their relations as intended by their creators for indexing and querying a specific collection, in contrast to methods investigating the statistical relevance of terms for objects in a collection. It develops a notion of optimal mapping, paying particular attention to the intellectual quality of mappings between terms from different vocabularies and to problems of polysemy. Proposals are made to limit the vagueness introduced by the transition from one vocabulary to another. The paper shows ways in which thesaurus creators can improve their methodology to meet the challenges of networked access of distributed collections created under varying conditions. For system implementers, the discussion will lead to a better understanding of the complexity of the problem
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.09 
    0.090322025 = product of:
  0.22580506 = sum of:
    0.14343631 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14343631 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.5105618 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
    0.08236875 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08236875 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.09 
    0.08707922 = product of:
  0.21769805 = sum of:
    0.15180306 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15180306 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  10. Bartczak, J.; Glendon, I.: Python, Google Sheets, and the Thesaurus for Graphic Materials for efficient metadata project workflows (2017) 0.08 
    0.07996564 = product of:
  0.1999141 = sum of:
    0.1138523 = weight(_text_:objects in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1138523 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
    0.08606179 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08606179 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In 2017, the University of Virginia (U.Va.) will launch a two year initiative to celebrate the bicentennial anniversary of the University's founding in 1819. The U.Va. Library is participating in this event by digitizing some 20,000 photographs and negatives that document student life on the U.Va. grounds in the 1960s and 1970s. Metadata librarians and archivists are well-versed in the challenges associated with generating digital content and accompanying description within the context of limited resources. This paper describes how technology and new approaches to metadata design have enabled the University of Virginia's Metadata Analysis and Design Department to rapidly and successfully generate accurate description for these digital objects. Python's pandas module improves efficiency by cleaning and repurposing data recorded at digitization, while the lxml module builds MODS XML programmatically from CSV tables. A simplified technique for subject heading selection and assignment in Google Sheets provides a collaborative environment for streamlined metadata creation and data quality control.
  11. Hunter, J.: MetaNet - a metadata term thesaurus to enable semantic interoperability between metadata domains (2001) 0.08 
    0.07852069 = product of:
  0.19630173 = sum of:
    0.09487692 = weight(_text_:objects in 6471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09487692 = score(doc=6471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 6471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6471)
    0.1014248 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1014248 = score(doc=6471,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.36102176 = fieldWeight in 6471, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6471)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Metadata interoperability is a fundamental requirement for access to information within networked knowledge organization systems. The Harmony international digital library project [1] has developed a common underlying data model (the ABC model) to enable the scalable mapping of metadata descriptions across domains and media types. The ABC model [2] provides a set of basic building blocks for metadata modeling and recognizes the importance of 'events' to describe unambiguously metadata for objects with a complex history. To test and evaluate the interoperability capabilities of this model, we applied it to some real multimedia examples and analysed the results of mapping from the ABC model to various different metadata domains using XSLT [3]. This work revealed serious limitations in the ability of XSLT to support flexible dynamic semantic mapping. To overcome this, we developed MetaNet [4], a metadata term thesaurus which provides the additional semantic knowledge that is non-existent within declarative XML-encoded metadata descriptions. This paper describes MetaNet, its RDF Schema [5] representation and a hybrid mapping approach which combines the structural and syntactic mapping capabilities of XSLT with the semantic knowledge of MetaNet, to enable flexible and dynamic mapping among metadata standards.
  12. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.08 
    0.07724678 = product of:
  0.3862339 = sum of:
    0.3862339 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3862339 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51542014 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  13. Hill, L.L.; Frew, J.; Zheng, Q.: Geographic names : the implementation of a gazetteer in a georeferenced digital library (1999) 0.07 
    0.07011085 = product of:
  0.17527713 = sum of:
    0.07590153 = weight(_text_:objects in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07590153 = score(doc=1240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
    0.0993756 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0993756 = score(doc=1240,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.35372764 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Project has developed a content standard for gazetteer objects and a hierarchical type scheme for geographic features. Both of these developments are based on ADL experience with an earlier gazetteer component for the Library, based on two gazetteers maintained by the U.S. federal government. We define the minimum components of a gazetteer entry as (1) a geographic name, (2) a geographic location represented by coordinates, and (3) a type designation. With these attributes, a gazetteer can function as a tool for indirect spatial location identification through names and types. The ADL Gazetteer Content Standard supports contribution and sharing of gazetteer entries with rich descriptions beyond the minimum requirements. This paper describes the content standard, the feature type thesaurus, and the implementation and research issues. A gazetteer is list of geographic names, together with their geographic locations and other descriptive information. A geographic name is a proper name for a geographic place and feature, such as Santa Barbara County, Mount Washington, St. Francis Hospital, and Southern California. There are many types of printed gazetteers. For example, the New York Times Atlas has a gazetteer section that can be used to look up a geographic name and find the page(s) and grid reference(s) where the corresponding feature is shown. Some gazetteers provide information about places and features; for example, a history of the locale, population data, physical data such as elevation, or the pronunciation of the name. Some lists of geographic names are available as hierarchical term sets (thesauri) designed for information retreival; these are used to describe bibliographic or museum materials. Examples include the authority files of the U.S. Library of Congress and the GeoRef Thesaurus produced by the American Geological Institute. The Getty Museum has recently made their Thesaurus of Geographic Names available online. This is a major project to develop a controlled vocabulary of current and historical names to describe (i.e., catalog) art and architecture literature. U.S. federal government mapping agencies maintain gazetteers containing the official names of places and/or the names that appear on map series. Examples include the U.S. Geological Survey's Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency's Geographic Names Processing System (GNPS). Both of these are maintained in cooperation with the U.S. Board of Geographic Names (BGN). Many other examples could be cited -- for local areas, for other countries, and for special purposes. There is remarkable diversity in approaches to the description of geographic places and no standardization beyond authoritative sources for the geographic names themselves.
  14. Hierarchisch strukturiertes Fachwortverzeichnis : Thesaurus Technik und Management (1998) 0.06 
    0.060719498 = product of:
  0.30359748 = sum of:
    0.30359748 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30359748 = score(doc=1125,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        1.0806558 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Für 48.000 deutsche und 32.000 englische Fachwörter werden die synonymen, hierarchischen und verwandten Beziehungen aufgezeigt und in 34.000 Begriffsfamilien zusammengefaßt. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet
    Object
    TEMA-Thesaurus
    RSWK
    Technik / Thesaurus
    Technik / Thesaurus / CD-ROM
    Subject
    Technik / Thesaurus
    Technik / Thesaurus / CD-ROM
  15. Hierarchisch strukturiertes Fachwortverzeichnis : Thesaurus Technik und Management (2002) 0.06 
    0.060719498 = product of:
  0.30359748 = sum of:
    0.30359748 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30359748 = score(doc=1770,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        1.0806558 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet
    Object
    TEMA-Thesaurus
    RSWK
    Technik / Thesaurus
    Technik / Thesaurus / CD-ROM
    Subject
    Technik / Thesaurus
    Technik / Thesaurus / CD-ROM
  16. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Will, L.D.; Cochard, N.: ¬The BS8723 thesaurus data model and exchange format, and its relationship to SKOS (2008) 0.06 
    0.056797888 = product of:
  0.28398943 = sum of:
    0.28398943 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28398943 = score(doc=6051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        1.0108609 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Will, L.D.: Publications on thesaurus construction and use : including some references to facet analysis, taxonomies, ontologies, topic maps and related issues (2005) 0.06 
    0.056797888 = product of:
  0.28398943 = sum of:
    0.28398943 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28398943 = score(doc=3192,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        1.0108609 = fieldWeight in 3192, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3192)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  18. Hierarchisch strukturiertes Fachwortverzeichnis : Thesaurus Technik und Management (2006) 0.06 
    0.056797888 = product of:
  0.28398943 = sum of:
    0.28398943 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28398943 = score(doc=3735,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        1.0108609 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet. Enthält 41.200 Begriffsfamilien mit 58.300 deutschen und 63.500 englischen Fachwörtern zur Technik und aus dem techniknahen Managementvokabular. Alle deutschen Fachwörter haben ein englisches Synonym.
    Footnote
    Der Thesaurus wird für die Indexierung der FIZ Technik Fachdatenbanken TEMA, BEFO, BERG, DOMA, ETEC, ITEC, MEDI, TOGA, WEMA und ZDEE eingesetzt
    Object
    TEMA-Thesaurus
    RSWK
    Technik / Thesaurus
    Technik / Thesaurus / CD-ROM
    Subject
    Technik / Thesaurus
    Technik / Thesaurus / CD-ROM
  19. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.05 
    0.05419321 = product of:
  0.13548303 = sum of:
    0.08606179 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08606179 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30633712 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
    0.049421243 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049421243 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  20. Bastos Vieira, S.; DeBrito, M.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.: Developing imaged KOS with the FRSAD Model : a conceptual methodology (2016) 0.05 
    0.053310424 = product of:
  0.13327606 = sum of:
    0.07590153 = weight(_text_:objects in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07590153 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
    0.057374526 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057374526 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28093818 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.20422474 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 188
  • d 104
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 138
  • i 14
  • m 10
  • r 7
  • s 6
  • b 3
  • x 3
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects