Search (943 results, page 1 of 48)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.30
    0.2988761 = product of:
      0.69737756 = sum of:
        0.09962537 = product of:
          0.2988761 = sum of:
            0.2988761 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2988761 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2988761 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2988761 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.2988761 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2988761 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.24
    0.2391009 = product of:
      0.5579021 = sum of:
        0.0797003 = product of:
          0.23910089 = sum of:
            0.23910089 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23910089 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.23910089 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23910089 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.23910089 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23910089 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.15
    0.14943805 = product of:
      0.34868878 = sum of:
        0.049812686 = product of:
          0.14943805 = sum of:
            0.14943805 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14943805 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14943805 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14943805 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.14943805 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14943805 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31907457 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Information retrieval research : Proceedings of the 19th Annual BCS-IRSG Colloquium on IR Research, Aberdeen, Scotland, 8-9 April 1997 (1997) 0.13
    0.13293044 = product of:
      0.31017104 = sum of:
        0.027122704 = weight(_text_:information in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027122704 = score(doc=5393,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
        0.08053202 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08053202 = score(doc=5393,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.7073872 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
        0.20251632 = weight(_text_:kongress in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20251632 = score(doc=5393,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24693015 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
    Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
    RSWK
    Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
    Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
    Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>
  5. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Crosskonkordanzen (2007) 0.04
    0.043843456 = product of:
      0.15345208 = sum of:
        0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010251419 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.14320067 = weight(_text_:kongress in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14320067 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24693015 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.57992375 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Auch in: Lokal-Global: Vernetzung wissenschaftlicher Infrastrukturen; 12. Kongress der IuK-Initiative der Wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaft in Deutschland, Tagungsberichte, GESIS-IZ Sozialwissenschaft, Bonn, S.149-166.
    Source
    http://www.gesis.org/Information/Forschungsuebersichten/Tagungsberichte/Vernetzung/Mayr-Walter.pdf
  6. Rindflesch, T.C.; Aronson, A.R.: Semantic processing in information retrieval (1993) 0.04
    0.03835719 = product of:
      0.089500114 = sum of:
        0.017939983 = weight(_text_:information in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017939983 = score(doc=4121,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
        0.059554238 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059554238 = score(doc=4121,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
        0.0120058935 = product of:
          0.03601768 = sum of:
            0.03601768 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03601768 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Intuition suggests that one way to enhance the information retrieval process would be the use of phrases to characterize the contents of text. A number of researchers, however, have noted that phrases alone do not improve retrieval effectiveness. In this paper we briefly review the use of phrases in information retrieval and then suggest extensions to this paradigm using semantic information. We claim that semantic processing, which can be viewed as expressing relations between the concepts represented by phrases, will in fact enhance retrieval effectiveness. The availability of the UMLS® domain model, which we exploit extensively, significantly contributes to the feasibility of this processing.
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:51:28
  7. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.04
    0.036058977 = product of:
      0.08413761 = sum of:
        0.012685482 = weight(_text_:information in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012685482 = score(doc=4330,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.059554238 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059554238 = score(doc=4330,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.011897894 = product of:
          0.03569368 = sum of:
            0.03569368 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03569368 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  8. Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023) 0.03
    0.031345837 = product of:
      0.073140286 = sum of:
        0.017192151 = weight(_text_:information in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017192151 = score(doc=1045,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
        0.045657367 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045657367 = score(doc=1045,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
        0.010290766 = product of:
          0.030872298 = sum of:
            0.030872298 = weight(_text_:29 in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030872298 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The initial dimensions extracted by latent semantic analysis (LSA) of a document-term matrixhave been shown to mainly display marginal effects, which are irrelevant for informationretrieval. To improve the performance of LSA, usually the elements of the raw document-term matrix are weighted and the weighting exponent of singular values can be adjusted.An alternative information retrieval technique that ignores the marginal effects is correspon-dence analysis (CA). In this paper, the information retrieval performance of LSA and CA isempirically compared. Moreover, it is explored whether the two weightings also improve theperformance of CA. The results for four empirical datasets show that CA always performsbetter than LSA. Weighting the elements of the raw data matrix can improve CA; however,it is data dependent and the improvement is small. Adjusting the singular value weightingexponent often improves the performance of CA; however, the extent of the improvementdepends on the dataset and the number of dimensions. (PDF) Improving information retrieval through correspondence analysis instead of latent semantic analysis.
    Date
    15. 9.2023 12:28:29
    Source
    Journal of intelligent information systems [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-023-00815-y]
  9. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.03
    0.029082458 = product of:
      0.06785907 = sum of:
        0.012814272 = weight(_text_:information in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012814272 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.038047805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038047805 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.01699699 = product of:
          0.050990973 = sum of:
            0.050990973 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050990973 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Präsentation zum Vortrag anlässlich des 98. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Erfurt: Ein neuer Blick auf Bibliotheken; TK10: Information erschließen und recherchieren Inhalte erschließen - mit neuen Tools
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.03
    0.028684624 = product of:
      0.066930786 = sum of:
        0.017192151 = weight(_text_:information in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017192151 = score(doc=3261,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
        0.03954044 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03954044 = score(doc=3261,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
        0.0101981945 = product of:
          0.030594582 = sum of:
            0.030594582 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030594582 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  11. Francu, V.: Does convenience trump accuracy? : the avatars of the UDC in Romania (2007) 0.03
    0.02794619 = product of:
      0.06520778 = sum of:
        0.015536481 = weight(_text_:information in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015536481 = score(doc=544,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
        0.037665404 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037665404 = score(doc=544,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
        0.0120058935 = product of:
          0.03601768 = sum of:
            0.03601768 = weight(_text_:29 in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03601768 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper will concentrate on some major issues regarding the potential of UDC and the current controversy about its use UDC in Romania: i) the importance of hierarchical structures in controlled vocabularies with a direct impact on improved information retrieval given by the browsing function which enables visualizing the hierarchies in subject areas rather than just locating a particular topic; ii) the lack of popularity of the UDC as an indexing and information retrieval language among its users be they librarians or end users of library OPACs; and iii) the situation of UDC teachers and teaching in Romanian universities.
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich des 'UDC Seminar: Information Access for the Global Community, The Hague, 4-5 June 2007'. - http://www.udcc.org/seminar07/presentations/francu.pdf.gl. http://www.udcc.org/seminar07/presentations/francu.pdf.
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.263-272
  12. Schirrmeister, N.-P.; Keil, S.: Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen (2012) 0.03
    0.025995674 = product of:
      0.09098485 = sum of:
        0.022922868 = weight(_text_:information in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022922868 = score(doc=3097,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
        0.068061985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068061985 = score(doc=3097,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt "Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen" (AIIRE) bietet eine Softwareinfrastruktur zur Unterstützung von Information Retrieval-Evaluationen (IR-Evaluationen). Die Infrastruktur basiert auf einem Tool-Kit, das bei GESIS im Rahmen des DFG-Projekts IRM entwickelt wurde. Ziel ist es, ein System zu bieten, das zur Forschung und Lehre am Fachbereich Media für IR-Evaluationen genutzt werden kann. This paper describes some aspects of a project called "Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen" (AIIRE). Its goal is to build a software-infrastructure which supports the evaluation of information retrieval algorithms.
  13. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.03
    0.025085695 = product of:
      0.05853329 = sum of:
        0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0089699915 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
        0.037665404 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037665404 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
        0.011897894 = product of:
          0.03569368 = sum of:
            0.03569368 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03569368 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.02
    0.02465133 = product of:
      0.05751977 = sum of:
        0.007688564 = weight(_text_:information in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007688564 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.03954044 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03954044 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.010290766 = product of:
          0.030872298 = sum of:
            0.030872298 = weight(_text_:29 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030872298 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 20:57:41
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02
    0.023685064 = product of:
      0.08289772 = sum of:
        0.065900736 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065900736 = score(doc=5865,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
        0.01699699 = product of:
          0.050990973 = sum of:
            0.050990973 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050990973 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    We present a short survey of the literature on indexing and retrieval of mathematical knowledge, with pointers to 72 papers and tentative taxonomies of both retrieval problems and recurring techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  16. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.02
    0.023318864 = product of:
      0.054410685 = sum of:
        0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010251419 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
        0.030438244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030438244 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
        0.013721022 = product of:
          0.041163065 = sum of:
            0.041163065 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041163065 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to define what is meant by facet analysis, and to review briefly the history of facet analysis within the context of other types of subject analysis in libraries and within the context of information retrieval research
    Date
    20. 8.2006 12:29:16
  17. Henrich, A.: Information Retrieval : Grundlagen, Modelle und Anwendungen (2008) 0.02
    0.023265967 = product of:
      0.054287255 = sum of:
        0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010251419 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
        0.030438244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030438244 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
        0.013597593 = product of:
          0.040792778 = sum of:
            0.040792778 = weight(_text_:22 in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040792778 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2015 21:23:08
  18. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.02
    0.023265967 = product of:
      0.054287255 = sum of:
        0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010251419 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.030438244 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030438244 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.013597593 = product of:
          0.040792778 = sum of:
            0.040792778 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040792778 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037635546 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  19. Gödert, W.: ¬An ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval (2013) 0.02
    0.02237526 = product of:
      0.0783134 = sum of:
        0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010251419 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
        0.068061985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068061985 = score(doc=1510,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Starting from an unsolved problem of information retrieval this paper presents an ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval. The model combines the methods and experiences of cognitive-to-interpret indexing languages with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of hit quantities in the context of retrieval processes. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.
  20. Strecker, D.: Dataset Retrieval : Informationsverhalten von Datensuchenden und das Ökosystem von Data-Retrieval-Systemen (2022) 0.02
    0.02237526 = product of:
      0.0783134 = sum of:
        0.010251419 = weight(_text_:information in 4021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010251419 = score(doc=4021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4021)
        0.068061985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068061985 = score(doc=4021,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 4021, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4021)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Verschiedene Stakeholder fordern eine bessere Verfügbarkeit von Forschungsdaten. Der Erfolg dieser Initiativen hängt wesentlich von einer guten Auffindbarkeit der publizierten Datensätze ab, weshalb Dataset Retrieval an Bedeutung gewinnt. Dataset Retrieval ist eine Sonderform von Information Retrieval, die sich mit dem Auffinden von Datensätzen befasst. Dieser Beitrag fasst aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse über das Informationsverhalten von Datensuchenden zusammen. Anschließend werden beispielhaft zwei Suchdienste verschiedener Ausrichtung vorgestellt und verglichen. Um darzulegen, wie diese Dienste ineinandergreifen, werden inhaltliche Überschneidungen von Datenbeständen genutzt, um den Metadatenaustausch zu analysieren.

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 438
  • i 26
  • r 22
  • m 18
  • s 17
  • x 16
  • n 9
  • p 7
  • b 5
  • More… Less…

Themes