Search (582 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.32 
    0.31804562 = product of:
  0.530076 = sum of:
    0.11926475 = product of:
      0.35779426 = sum of:
        0.35779426 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35779426 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3819745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.053017035 = weight(_text_:web in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053017035 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.35779426 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.35779426 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3819745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.16 
    0.15902281 = product of:
  0.265038 = sum of:
    0.059632376 = product of:
      0.17889713 = sum of:
        0.17889713 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17889713 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3819745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.026508518 = weight(_text_:web in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026508518 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.17889713 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17889713 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3819745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  3. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.15 
    0.1526589 = product of:
  0.38164723 = sum of:
    0.09541181 = product of:
      0.28623542 = sum of:
        0.28623542 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28623542 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3819745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.28623542 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28623542 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3819745 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  4. Li, Z.: ¬A domain specific search engine with explicit document relations (2013) 0.10 
    0.10144578 = product of:
  0.1690763 = sum of:
    0.048862036 = weight(_text_:wide in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048862036 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
    0.079525545 = weight(_text_:web in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079525545 = score(doc=1210,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
    0.040688716 = product of:
      0.08137743 = sum of:
        0.08137743 = weight(_text_:server in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08137743 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25762302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7180014 = idf(docFreq=394, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.31587794 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7180014 = idf(docFreq=394, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The current web consists of documents that are highly heterogeneous and hard for machines to understand. The Semantic Web is a progressive movement of the Word Wide Web, aiming at converting the current web of unstructured documents to the web of data. In the Semantic Web, web documents are annotated with metadata using standardized ontology language. These annotated documents are directly processable by machines and it highly improves their usability and usefulness. In Ericsson, similar problems occur. There are massive documents being created with well-defined structures. Though these documents are about domain specific knowledge and can have rich relations, they are currently managed by a traditional search engine, which ignores the rich domain specific information and presents few data to users. Motivated by the Semantic Web, we aim to find standard ways to process these documents, extract rich domain specific information and annotate these data to documents with formal markup languages. We propose this project to develop a domain specific search engine for processing different documents and building explicit relations for them. This research project consists of the three main focuses: examining different domain specific documents and finding ways to extract their metadata; integrating a text search engine with an ontology server; exploring novel ways to build relations for documents. We implement this system and demonstrate its functions. As a prototype, the system provides required features and will be extended in the future.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  5. ¬Third International World Wide Web Conference, Darmstadt 1995 : [Inhaltsverzeichnis] (1995) 0.09 
    0.08610902 = product of:
  0.21527255 = sum of:
    0.13111061 = weight(_text_:wide in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13111061 = score(doc=3458,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.65677917 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
    0.08416194 = weight(_text_:web in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08416194 = score(doc=3458,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    ANDREW, K. u. F. KAPPE: Serving information to the Web with Hyper-G; BARBIERI, K., H.M. DOERR u. D. DWYER: Creating a virtual classroom for interactive education on the Web; CAMPBELL, J.K., S.B. JONES, N.M. STEPHENS u. S. HURLEY: Constructing educational courseware using NCSA Mosaic and the World Wide Web; CATLEDGE, L.L. u. J.E. PITKOW: Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide Web; CLAUSNITZER, A. u. P. VOGEL: A WWW interface to the OMNIS/Myriad literature retrieval engine; FISCHER, R. u. L. PERROCHON: IDLE: Unified W3-access to interactive information servers; FOLEY, J.D.: Visualizing the World-Wide Web with the navigational view builder; FRANKLIN, S.D. u. B. IBRAHIM: Advanced educational uses of the World-Wide Web; FUHR, N., U. PFEIFER u. T. HUYNH: Searching structured documents with the enhanced retrieval functionality of free WAIS-sf and SFgate; FIORITO, M., J. OKSANEN u. D.R. IOIVANE: An educational environment using WWW; KENT, R.E. u. C. NEUSS: Conceptual analysis of resource meta-information; SHELDON, M.A. u. R. WEISS: Discover: a resource discovery system based on content routing; WINOGRAD, T.: Beyond browsing: shared comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-line communities
  6. Leighton, H.V.: Performance of four World Wide Web (WWW) index services : Infoseek, Lycos, WebCrawler and WWWWorm (1995) 0.07 
    0.07235573 = product of:
  0.18088932 = sum of:
    0.11726888 = weight(_text_:wide in 3168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11726888 = score(doc=3168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 3168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3168)
    0.06362044 = weight(_text_:web in 3168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06362044 = score(doc=3168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3168)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  7. World Wide Web JAVA : die revolutionäre Programmiersprache nicht nur für das Internet (1996) 0.07 
    0.07235573 = product of:
  0.18088932 = sum of:
    0.11726888 = weight(_text_:wide in 5222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11726888 = score(doc=5222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5874411 = fieldWeight in 5222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5222)
    0.06362044 = weight(_text_:web in 5222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06362044 = score(doc=5222,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 5222, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5222)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  8. Resource Description Framework (RDF) (2004) 0.07 
    0.06520261 = product of:
  0.16300651 = sum of:
    0.078179255 = weight(_text_:wide in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078179255 = score(doc=3063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
    0.08482725 = weight(_text_:web in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08482725 = score(doc=3063,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Resource Description Framework (RDF) integrates a variety of applications from library catalogs and world-wide directories to syndication and aggregation of news, software, and content to personal collections of music, photos, and events using XML as an interchange syntax. The RDF specifications provide a lightweight ontology system to support the exchange of knowledge on the Web. The W3C Semantic Web Activity Statement explains W3C's plans for RDF, including the RDF Core WG, Web Ontology and the RDF Interest Group.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  9. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.06 
    0.060966887 = product of:
  0.10161147 = sum of:
    0.048862036 = weight(_text_:wide in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048862036 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
    0.037488706 = weight(_text_:web in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037488706 = score(doc=2564,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
    0.015260735 = product of:
      0.03052147 = sum of:
        0.03052147 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03052147 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15777399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    PageRank is defined as the stationary state of a Markov chain. The chain is obtained by perturbing the transition matrix induced by a web graph with a damping factor alpha that spreads uniformly part of the rank. The choice of alpha is eminently empirical, and in most cases the original suggestion alpha=0.85 by Brin and Page is still used. Recently, however, the behaviour of PageRank with respect to changes in alpha was discovered to be useful in link-spam detection. Moreover, an analytical justification of the value chosen for alpha is still missing. In this paper, we give the first mathematical analysis of PageRank when alpha changes. In particular, we show that, contrarily to popular belief, for real-world graphs values of alpha close to 1 do not give a more meaningful ranking. Then, we give closed-form formulae for PageRank derivatives of any order, and an extension of the Power Method that approximates them with convergence O(t**k*alpha**t) for the k-th derivative. Finally, we show a tight connection between iterated computation and analytical behaviour by proving that the k-th iteration of the Power Method gives exactly the PageRank value obtained using a Maclaurin polynomial of degree k. The latter result paves the way towards the application of analytical methods to the study of PageRank.
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
    Source
    http://vigna.di.unimi.it/ftp/papers/PageRankAsFunction.pdf [Proceedings of the ACM World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2005]
  10. Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.06 
    0.06055665 = product of:
  0.15139163 = sum of:
    0.06840685 = weight(_text_:wide in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06840685 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
    0.08298478 = weight(_text_:web in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08298478 = score(doc=4684,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  11. Wright, H.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2018) 0.06 
    0.06055665 = product of:
  0.15139163 = sum of:
    0.06840685 = weight(_text_:wide in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06840685 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
    0.08298478 = weight(_text_:web in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08298478 = score(doc=80,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Semantic Web and ontologies can help archaeologists combine and share data, making it more open and useful. Archaeologists create diverse types of data, using a wide variety of technologies and methodologies. Like all research domains, these data are increasingly digital. The creation of data that are now openly and persistently available from disparate sources has also inspired efforts to bring archaeological resources together and make them more interoperable. This allows functionality such as federated cross-search across different datasets, and the mapping of heterogeneous data to authoritative structures to build a single data source. Ontologies provide the structure and relationships for Semantic Web data, and have been developed for use in cultural heritage applications generally, and archaeology specifically. A variety of online resources for archaeology now incorporate Semantic Web principles and technologies.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  12. Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998) 0.06 
    0.060296442 = product of:
  0.1507411 = sum of:
    0.09772407 = weight(_text_:wide in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09772407 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
    0.053017035 = weight(_text_:web in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053017035 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  13. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung bibliografischer Titeldatensätze der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (2009) 0.06 
    0.05848838 = product of:
  0.09748063 = sum of:
    0.055281084 = weight(_text_:wide in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055281084 = score(doc=3284,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
    0.029990964 = weight(_text_:web in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029990964 = score(doc=3284,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
    0.0122085875 = product of:
      0.024417175 = sum of:
        0.024417175 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024417175 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15777399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Die Menge der zu klassifizierenden Veröffentlichungen steigt spätestens seit der Existenz des World Wide Web schneller an, als sie intellektuell sachlich erschlossen werden kann. Daher werden Verfahren gesucht, um die Klassifizierung von Textobjekten zu automatisieren oder die intellektuelle Klassifizierung zumindest zu unterstützen. Seit 1968 gibt es Verfahren zur automatischen Dokumentenklassifizierung (Information Retrieval, kurz: IR) und seit 1992 zur automatischen Textklassifizierung (ATC: Automated Text Categorization). Seit immer mehr digitale Objekte im World Wide Web zur Verfügung stehen, haben Arbeiten zur automatischen Textklassifizierung seit ca. 1998 verstärkt zugenommen. Dazu gehören seit 1996 auch Arbeiten zur automatischen DDC-Klassifizierung bzw. RVK-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen und Volltextdokumenten. Bei den Entwicklungen handelt es sich unseres Wissens bislang um experimentelle und keine im ständigen Betrieb befindlichen Systeme. Auch das VZG-Projekt Colibri/DDC ist seit 2006 u. a. mit der automatischen DDC-Klassifizierung befasst. Die diesbezüglichen Untersuchungen und Entwicklungen dienen zur Beantwortung der Forschungsfrage: "Ist es möglich, eine inhaltlich stimmige DDC-Titelklassifikation aller GVK-PLUS-Titeldatensätze automatisch zu erzielen?"
    Date
    22. 1.2010 14:41:24
  14. RDF Primer : W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004 (2004) 0.06 
    0.055264473 = product of:
  0.13816118 = sum of:
    0.078179255 = weight(_text_:wide in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078179255 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
    0.059981927 = weight(_text_:web in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059981927 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a language for representing information about resources in the World Wide Web. This Primer is designed to provide the reader with the basic knowledge required to effectively use RDF. It introduces the basic concepts of RDF and describes its XML syntax. It describes how to define RDF vocabularies using the RDF Vocabulary Description Language, and gives an overview of some deployed RDF applications. It also describes the content and purpose of other RDF specification documents.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Saabiyeh, N.: What is a good ontology semantic similarity measure that considers multiple inheritance cases of concepts? (2018) 0.05 
    0.053074636 = product of:
  0.13268659 = sum of:
    0.06840685 = weight(_text_:wide in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06840685 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
    0.06427974 = weight(_text_:web in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06427974 = score(doc=4530,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    I need to measure semantic similarity between CSO ontology concepts, depending on Ontology structure (concept path, depth, least common subsumer (LCS) ...). CSO (Computer Science Ontology) is a large-scale ontology of research areas. A concepts in CSO may have multiple parents/super concepts (i.e. a concept may be a child of many other concepts), e.g. : (world wide web) is parent of (semantic web) (semantics) is parent of (semantic web) I found some measures that meet my needs, but the papers proposing these measures are not cited, so i got hesitated. I also found a measure that depends on weighted edges, but multiple inheritance (super concepts) is not considered..
  16. Hüsken, P.: Information Retrieval im Semantic Web (2006) 0.05 
    0.051905703 = product of:
  0.12976426 = sum of:
    0.05863444 = weight(_text_:wide in 4333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05863444 = score(doc=4333,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4333, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4333)
    0.07112982 = weight(_text_:web in 4333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07112982 = score(doc=4333,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 4333, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4333)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Das Semantic Web bezeichnet ein erweitertes World Wide Web (WWW), das die Bedeutung von präsentierten Inhalten in neuen standardisierten Sprachen wie RDF Schema und OWL modelliert. Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit dem Aspekt des Information Retrieval, d.h. es wird untersucht, in wie weit Methoden der Informationssuche sich auf modelliertes Wissen übertragen lassen. Die kennzeichnenden Merkmale von IR-Systemen wie vage Anfragen sowie die Unterstützung unsicheren Wissens werden im Kontext des Semantic Web behandelt. Im Fokus steht die Suche nach Fakten innerhalb einer Wissensdomäne, die entweder explizit modelliert sind oder implizit durch die Anwendung von Inferenz abgeleitet werden können. Aufbauend auf der an der Universität Duisburg-Essen entwickelten Retrievalmaschine PIRE wird die Anwendung unsicherer Inferenz mit probabilistischer Prädikatenlogik (pDatalog) implementiert.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  17. Singh, A.; Sinha, U.; Sharma, D.k.: Semantic Web and data visualization (2020) 0.05 
    0.05162501 = product of:
  0.12906252 = sum of:
    0.039089628 = weight(_text_:wide in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039089628 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
    0.08997289 = weight(_text_:web in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08997289 = score(doc=79,freq=36.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
            36.0 = termFreq=36.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    With the terrific growth of data volume and data being produced every second on millions of devices across the globe, there is a desperate need to manage the unstructured data available on web pages efficiently. Semantic Web or also known as Web of Trust structures the scattered data on the Internet according to the needs of the user. It is an extension of the World Wide Web (WWW) which focuses on manipulating web data on behalf of Humans. Due to the ability of the Semantic Web to integrate data from disparate sources and hence makes it more user-friendly, it is an emerging trend. Tim Berners-Lee first introduced the term Semantic Web and since then it has come a long way to become a more intelligent and intuitive web. Data Visualization plays an essential role in explaining complex concepts in a universal manner through pictorial representation, and the Semantic Web helps in broadening the potential of Data Visualization and thus making it an appropriate combination. The objective of this chapter is to provide fundamental insights concerning the semantic web technologies and in addition to that it also elucidates the issues as well as the solutions regarding the semantic web. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the semantic web architecture in detail while also comparing it with the traditional search system. It classifies the semantic web architecture into three major pillars i.e. RDF, Ontology, and XML. Moreover, it describes different semantic web tools used in the framework and technology. It attempts to illustrate different approaches of the semantic web search engines. Besides stating numerous challenges faced by the semantic web it also illustrates the solutions.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  18. Martínez-González, M.M.; Alvite-Díez, M.L.: Thesauri and Semantic Web : discussion of the evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web (2019) 0.05 
    0.051355034 = product of:
  0.12838759 = sum of:
    0.048862036 = weight(_text_:wide in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048862036 = score(doc=5997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
    0.079525545 = weight(_text_:web in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079525545 = score(doc=5997,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Thesauri are Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), that arise from the consensus of wide communities. They have been in use for many years and are regularly updated. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals for indexing and searching, today there is a demand for conceptual vocabularies that enable inferencing by machines. The development of the Semantic Web has brought a new opportunity for thesauri, but thesauri also face the challenge of proving that they add value to it. The evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web is examined. Elements and structures in the thesaurus standard, ISO 25964, and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the Semantic Web standard for representing KOS, are reviewed and compared. Moreover, the integrity rules of thesauri are contrasted with the axioms of SKOS. How SKOS has been applied to represent some real thesauri is taken into account. Three thesauri are chosen for this aim: AGROVOC, EuroVoc and the UNESCO Thesaurus. Based on the results of this comparison and analysis, the benefits that Semantic Web technologies offer to thesauri, how thesauri can contribute to the Semantic Web, and the challenges that would help to improve their integration with the Semantic Web are discussed.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Klic, L.; Miller, M.; Nelson, J.K.; Germann, J.E.: Approaching the largest 'API' : extracting information from the Internet with Python (2018) 0.05 
    0.048901953 = product of:
  0.12225488 = sum of:
    0.05863444 = weight(_text_:wide in 4239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05863444 = score(doc=4239,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19962662 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4239, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4239)
    0.06362044 = weight(_text_:web in 4239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06362044 = score(doc=4239,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4239, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4239)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article explores the need for libraries to algorithmically access and manipulate the world's largest API: the Internet. The billions of pages on the 'Internet API' (HTTP, HTML, CSS, XPath, DOM, etc.) are easily accessible and manipulable. Libraries can assist in creating meaning through the datafication of information on the world wide web. Because most information is created for human consumption, some programming is required for automated extraction. Python is an easy-to-learn programming language with extensive packages and community support for web page automation. Four packages (Urllib, Selenium, BeautifulSoup, Scrapy) in Python can automate almost any web page for all sized projects. An example warrant data project is explained to illustrate how well Python packages can manipulate web pages to create meaning through assembling custom datasets.
  20. Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (2008) 0.05 
    0.048497576 = product of:
  0.12124394 = sum of:
    0.06427974 = weight(_text_:web in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06427974 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14703658 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04505473 = queryNorm
        0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
    0.0569642 = product of:
      0.1139284 = sum of:
        0.1139284 = weight(_text_:server in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1139284 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25762302 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7180014 = idf(docFreq=394, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04505473 = queryNorm
            0.44222912 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7180014 = idf(docFreq=394, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This document describes best practice recipes for publishing vocabularies or ontologies on the Web (in RDF Schema or OWL). The features of each recipe are described in detail, so that vocabulary designers may choose the recipe best suited to their needs. Each recipe introduces general principles and an example configuration for use with an Apache HTTP server (which may be adapted to other environments). The recipes are all designed to be consistent with the architecture of the Web as currently specified, although the associated example configurations have been kept intentionally simple.
    Theme
    Semantic Web

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 400
  • d 163
  • a 5
  • el 2
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 244
  • i 17
  • n 14
  • r 13
  • s 10
  • x 10
  • m 8
  • b 2
  • p 2
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications