Search (1586 results, page 1 of 80)

0.074077606 = product of:
  0.12346267 = sum of:
    0.004266663 = weight(_text_:a in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004266663 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
    0.07519735 = product of:
      0.1503947 = sum of:
        0.1503947 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1503947 = score(doc=1936,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6967909 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.04399866 = product of:
      0.08799732 = sum of:
        0.08799732 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08799732 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.

Object

DDC-22

0.07147552 = product of:
  0.11912586 = sum of:
    0.0065930025 = weight(_text_:a in 1212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065930025 = score(doc=1212,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.13779864 = fieldWeight in 1212, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1212)
    0.05581955 = product of:
      0.1116391 = sum of:
        0.1116391 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1116391 = score(doc=1212,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.517233 = fieldWeight in 1212, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1212)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0567133 = product of:
      0.1134266 = sum of:
        0.1134266 = weight(_text_:melvil in 1212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1134266 = score(doc=1212,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.316871 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.35795832 = fieldWeight in 1212, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1212)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

Many of you first heard the word "taxonomy" in junior high science class when you studied Linnaeus and biologic nomenclature. The word originated with the Greek word taxis, meaning "to arrange," and is related to similar arrangement words like taxidermy. The other "tax" word comes from a Latin verb taxare, meaning "to collect money," and is linked to such collecting devices as taxicabs. In the 18th century, Linnaeus arranged all known living things into a hierarchy. Figure 1 shows where dogs fit into the Animalia hierarchy, as identified in the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS, www.itis.usda.gov). It's a straight drill down from the Animal Kingdom to the species Canis familiaris. For domesticated animals, biology taxonomists rely on categories from animal breeding associations. So I added two facets from the American Kennel Club, "Hounds" and "Beagles," leading us directly to that most articulate and philosophical dog, Snoopy. Linnaeus's straightforward structure continues to serve life scientists after two centuries of development. The whole Animalia taxonomy offers valuable information about the natural relationships of animals. It shows exactly where an organism sits in the vast complexity of life. Snoopy's extended family of coyotes and wolves lives one step above in the genus Canis. Foxes are added at the next step in the family Canidae. Because the Linnaean taxonomy must be scientifically accurate, it must also be flexible. If a new scientific discovery changes our knowledge of life, that change is reflected by taxonomic revision. However, one important grouping remains the same: In 1758, Linnaeus placed humans and apes together in the Primate order, 73 years before Charles Darwin sailed to the Galapagos on the HMS Beagle.
Dewey and the Library of Congress The late 19th and early 20th centuries were a hotbed of intellectual activity for library categorizers. First Melvil Dewey developed his decimal system. Then the Library of Congress (LC) adapted Charles Ammi Cutter's alphanumeric system for its collection. Dewey, the only librarian popularly known for librarianship, had a healthy ego and placed information science at the very beginning of his classifications. The librarians at LC followed Cutter and relegated their profession to the back of their own bus, in the Zs. These two systems became the primary classifications accepted by the library community. I was once chastised at an SLA meeting for daring to design my own systems, and library schools that mainly train people for public and academic institutions reinforce this idea. In addition, LC provides cataloging and call numbers for almost every book commercially published in the United States and quite a few international publications. This is a seductive strategy for libraries that have little money and little time. These two systems contain drawbacks for special libraries. Let's see how they treat Snoopy. I'll be using Dewey for this exercise. Dewey has an index, which facilitates classification analysis. In addition, LC is a larger system, and we have space considerations here. However, other than length, call number building, and self-esteem, there is not much difference in the two theories. Figure 2 shows selected Dewey classifications for Snoopy, beagles, dogs, and animals (Melvil Dewey. Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index. 21st ed. Edited by Joan S. Mitchell, et al. Albany, NY: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 1996). The call numbers are removed to emphasize hierarchy rather than notation. There are 234 categories. Both Dewey and LC are designed to describe the whole of human knowledge. For historic reasons, they do this from the perspective of an educated white male in 19th century America. This perspective presents some problems if your specialty is Snoopy. In "Generalities," newspaper cartoon strips are filed away under "Miscellaneous information, advice, amusement." However, a collection of Charles Schulz cartoons would be shelved way over in "The Arts [right arrow] Drawing and decorative arts," thereby separating two almost equal subjects by a very wide distance. The generic vocabulary required to describe all of human knowledge is also problematic for specialists. In "The Arts [right arrow] Standard subdivisions of fine and decorative arts and iconography," there are five synonyms for miscellaneous before we get to a real subject. Then it's another six facets to get to the dogs.

Type

a

0.05852012 = product of:
  0.09753353 = sum of:
    0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004876186 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
    0.070169576 = product of:
      0.14033915 = sum of:
        0.14033915 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14033915 = score(doc=1088,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6502027 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.022487769 = product of:
      0.044975538 = sum of:
        0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044975538 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

The CD-ROM version of the 20th DDC ed., featuring advanced online search and windowing techniques, full-text indexing, personal notepad, LC subject headings linked to DDC numbers and a database of all DDC changes

Footnote

Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 19(1994) no.1, S.134-137 (M. Carpenter). - Inzwischen existiert auch eine Windows-Version: 'Electronic Dewey for Windows', vgl. Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.17

0.05324702 = product of:
  0.08874503 = sum of:
    0.008177614 = weight(_text_:a in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008177614 = score(doc=1752,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
    0.061710842 = product of:
      0.123421684 = sum of:
        0.123421684 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123421684 = score(doc=1752,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5718227 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018856568 = product of:
      0.037713137 = sum of:
        0.037713137 = weight(_text_:22 in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037713137 = score(doc=1752,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2595412 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Content

"Although the Dewey Decimal Classification is currently available on the web to subscribers as WebDewey and Abridged WebDewey in the OCLC Connexion service and in an XML version to licensees, OCLC does not provide any "web services" based on the DDC. By web services, we mean presentation of the DDC to other machines (not humans) for uses such as searching, browsing, classifying, mapping, harvesting, and alerting. In order to build web-accessible services based on the DDC, several elements have to be considered. One of these elements is the design of an appropriate Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) structure for Dewey. The design goals of mapping the entity model of the DDC into an identifier space can be summarized as follows: * Common locator for Dewey concepts and associated resources for use in web services and web applications * Use-case-driven, but not directly related to and outlasting a specific use case (persistency) * Retraceable path to a concept rather than an abstract identification, reusing a means of identification that is already present in the DDC and available in existing metadata. We have been working closely with our colleagues in the OCLC Office of Research (especially Andy Houghton as well as Eric Childress, Diane Vizine-Goetz, and Stu Weibel) on a preliminary identifier syntax. The basic identifier format we are currently exploring is: http://dewey.info/{aspect}/{object}/{locale}/{type}/{version}/{resource} where * {aspect} is the aspect associated with an {object}-the current value set of aspect contains "concept", "scheme", and "index"; additional ones are under exploration * {object} is a type of {aspect} * {locale} identifies a Dewey translation * {type} identifies a Dewey edition type and contains, at a minimum, the values "edn" for the full edition or "abr" for the abridged edition * {version} identifies a Dewey edition version * {resource} identifies a resource associated with an {object} in the context of {locale}, {type}, and {version}
Some examples of identifiers for concepts follow: <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/en/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the English-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/de/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the German-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 333.7-333.9 concept across all editions and language versions. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/about.skos> This identifier is used to retrieve a SKOS representation of the 333.7-333.9 concept (using the "resource" element). There are several open issues at this preliminary stage of development: Use cases: URIs need to represent the range of statements or questions that could be submitted to a Dewey web service. Therefore, it seems that some general questions have to be answered first: What information does an agent have when coming to a Dewey web service? What kind of questions will such an agent ask? Placement of the {locale} component: It is still an open question if the {locale} component should be placed after the {version} component instead (<http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/edn/22/en>) to emphasize that the most important instantiation of a Dewey class is its edition, not its language version. From a services point of view, however, it could make more sense to keep the current arrangement, because users are more likely to come to the service with a present understanding of the language version they are seeking without knowing the specifics of a certain edition in which they are trying to find topics. Identification of other Dewey entities: The goal is to create a locator that does not answer all, but a lot of questions that could be asked about the DDC. Which entities are missing but should be surfaced for services or user agents? How will those services or agents interact with them? Should some entities be rendered in a different way as presented? For example, (how) should the DDC Summaries be retrievable? Would it be necessary to make the DDC Manual accessible through this identifier structure?"

Source

025.431: The Dewey blog: September 04, 2007

0.045408007 = product of:
  0.11352001 = sum of:
    0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006095233 = score(doc=2442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
    0.10742478 = product of:
      0.21484956 = sum of:
        0.21484956 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21484956 = score(doc=2442,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.9954155 = fieldWeight in 2442, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2442)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

Vortrag, anlässlich des Seminarium om Dewey och klassifikationens roll nationellt och internationellt Stockholm 5 February 2009.

0.04326309 = product of:
  0.108157724 = sum of:
    0.07442607 = product of:
      0.14885214 = sum of:
        0.14885214 = weight(_text_:dewey in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14885214 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6896441 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03373165 = product of:
      0.0674633 = sum of:
        0.0674633 = weight(_text_:22 in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0674633 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.039510403 = product of:
  0.098776005 = sum of:
    0.08787252 = product of:
      0.26361755 = sum of:
        0.26361755 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26361755 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35179147 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.010903485 = weight(_text_:a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010903485 = score(doc=230,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

Type

a

0.038532775 = product of:
  0.09633193 = sum of:
    0.008619961 = weight(_text_:a in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008619961 = score(doc=1569,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
    0.08771197 = product of:
      0.17542394 = sum of:
        0.17542394 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17542394 = score(doc=1569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.8127534 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that builds tools for automatic subject assignment by combining library science and information retrieval techniques. A thesis of Scorpion is that the Dewey Decimal Classification (Dewey) can be used to perform automatic subject assignment for electronic items.

0.03752288 = product of:
  0.0938072 = sum of:
    0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 5676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006095233 = score(doc=5676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5676)
    0.08771197 = product of:
      0.17542394 = sum of:
        0.17542394 = weight(_text_:dewey in 5676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17542394 = score(doc=5676,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.8127534 = fieldWeight in 5676, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

HILT aims to facilitate cross-searching distributed information services by subject in a multi-scheme, multi-lingual "common information environment.

Content

Presentation, IFLA 2007, Dewey Translators Meeting, 21 Aug 2007, Durban.

Source

http://www.oclc.org/dewey/news/conferences/hilt_and_ddc.ppt

0.03311845 = product of:
  0.05519741 = sum of:
    0.0043099807 = weight(_text_:a in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043099807 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
    0.031010862 = product of:
      0.062021725 = sum of:
        0.062021725 = weight(_text_:dewey in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062021725 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2873517 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.019876566 = product of:
      0.03975313 = sum of:
        0.03975313 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03975313 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.

Type

a

0.03269614 = product of:
  0.08174035 = sum of:
    0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073142797 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
    0.07442607 = product of:
      0.14885214 = sum of:
        0.14885214 = weight(_text_:dewey in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14885214 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6896441 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

0.032525145 = product of:
  0.05420857 = sum of:
    0.00914285 = weight(_text_:a in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00914285 = score(doc=3628,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
    0.031010862 = product of:
      0.062021725 = sum of:
        0.062021725 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062021725 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2873517 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014054855 = product of:
      0.02810971 = sum of:
        0.02810971 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02810971 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a prototype middleware framework between different terminology resources in order to provide a subject cross-browsing service for library portal systems. Design/methodology/approach: Nine terminology experts were interviewed to collect appropriate knowledge to support the development of a theoretical framework for the research. Based on this, a simplified software-based prototype system was constructed incorporating the knowledge acquired. The prototype involved mappings between the computer science schedule of the Dewey Decimal Classification (which acted as a spine) and two controlled vocabularies UKAT and ACM Computing Classification. Subsequently, six further experts in the field were invited to evaluate the prototype system and provide feedback to improve the framework. Findings: The major findings showed that given the large variety of terminology resources distributed on the web, the proposed middleware service is essential to integrate technically and semantically the different terminology resources in order to facilitate subject cross-browsing. A set of recommendations are also made outlining the important approaches and features that support such a cross browsing middleware service.

Content

This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.

0.03208189 = product of:
  0.16040945 = sum of:
    0.16040945 = product of:
      0.3208189 = sum of:
        0.3208189 = weight(_text_:melvil in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3208189 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.316871 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            1.012459 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object

Melvil

0.03119951 = product of:
  0.07799877 = sum of:
    0.00837956 = weight(_text_:a in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00837956 = score(doc=2127,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17513901 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
    0.069619216 = product of:
      0.13923843 = sum of:
        0.13923843 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13923843 = score(doc=2127,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.645103 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

"When dealing with a large-scale and widely-used knowledge organization system like the Dewey Decimal Classification, we often tend to focus solely on the organization aspect, which is closely intertwined with editorial work. This is perfectly understandable, since developing and updating the DDC, keeping up with current scientific developments, spotting new trends in both scholarly communication and popular publishing, and figuring out how to fit those patterns into the structure of the scheme are as intriguing as they are challenging. From the organization perspective, the intended user of the scheme is mainly the classifier. Dewey acts very much as a number-building engine, providing richly documented concepts to help with classification decisions. Since the Middle Ages, quasi-religious battles have been fought over the "valid" arrangement of places according to specific views of the world, as parodied by Jorge Luis Borges and others. Organizing knowledge has always been primarily an ontological activity; it is about putting the world into the classification. However, there is another side to this coin--the discovery side. While the hierarchical organization of the DDC establishes a default set of places and neighborhoods that is also visible in the physical manifestation of library shelves, this is just one set of relationships in the DDC. A KOS (Knowledge Organization System) becomes powerful by expressing those other relationships in a manner that not only collocates items in a physical place but in a knowledge space, and exposes those other relationships in ways beneficial and congenial to the unique perspective of an information seeker.
What are those "other" relationships that Dewey possesses and that seem so important to surface? Firstly, there is the relationship of concepts to resources. Dewey has been used for a long time, and over 200,000 numbers are assigned to information resources each year and added to WorldCat by the Library of Congress and the German National Library alone. Secondly, we have relationships between concepts in the scheme itself. Dewey provides a rich set of non-hierarchical relations, indicating other relevant and related subjects across disciplinary boundaries. Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, there is the relationship between the same concepts across different languages. Dewey has been translated extensively, and current versions are available in French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Briefer representations of the top-three levels (the DDC Summaries) are available in several languages in the DeweyBrowser. This multilingual nature of the scheme allows searchers to access a broader range of resources or to switch the language of--and thus localize--subject metadata seamlessly. MelvilClass, a Dewey front-end developed by the German National Library for the German translation, could be used as a common interface to the DDC in any language, as it is built upon the standard DDC data format. It is not hard to give an example of the basic terminology of a class pulled together in a multilingual way: <class/794.8> a skos:Concept ; skos:notation "794.8"^^ddc:notation ; skos:prefLabel "Computer games"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Computerspiele"@de ; skos:prefLabel "Jeux sur ordinateur"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Juegos por computador"@es .
Expressed in such manner, the Dewey number provides a language-independent representation of a Dewey concept, accompanied by language-dependent assertions about the concept. This information, identified by a URI, can be easily consumed by semantic web agents and used in various metadata scenarios. Fourthly, as we have seen, it is important to play well with others, i.e., establishing and maintaining relationships to other KOS and making the scheme available in different formats. As noted in the Dewey blog post "Tags and Dewey," since no single scheme is ever going to be the be-all, end-all solution for knowledge discovery, DDC concepts have been extensively mapped to other vocabularies and taxonomies, sometimes bridging them and acting as a backbone, sometimes using them as additional access vocabulary to be able to do more work "behind the scenes." To enable other applications and schemes to make use of those relationships, the full Dewey database is available in XML format; RDF-based formats and a web service are forthcoming. Pulling those relationships together under a common surface will be the next challenge going forward. In the semantic web community the concept of Linked Data (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_Data) currently receives some attention, with its emphasis on exposing and connecting data using technologies like URIs, HTTP and RDF to improve information discovery on the web. With its focus on relationships and discovery, it seems that Dewey will be well prepared to become part of this big linked data set. Now it is about putting the classification back into the world!"

0.029665658 = product of:
  0.074164145 = sum of:
    0.008177614 = weight(_text_:a in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008177614 = score(doc=2803,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This paper introduces ACL RD-TEC: a dataset for evaluating the extraction and classification of terms from literature in the domain of computational linguistics. The dataset is derived from the Association for Computational Linguistics anthology reference corpus (ACL ARC). In its first release, the ACL RD-TEC consists of automatically segmented, part-of-speech-tagged ACL ARC documents, three lists of candidate terms, and more than 82,000 manually annotated terms. The annotated terms are marked as either valid or invalid, and valid terms are further classified as technology and non-technology terms. Technology terms signify methods, algorithms, and solutions in computational linguistics. The paper describes the dataset and reports the relevant statistics. We hope the step described in this paper encourages a collaborative effort towards building a full-fledged annotated corpus from the computational linguistics literature.

Pages

S.52-63

Type

a

0.02895601 = product of:
  0.07239002 = sum of:
    0.0030476165 = weight(_text_:a in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0030476165 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
    0.069342405 = product of:
      0.13868481 = sum of:
        0.13868481 = weight(_text_:dewey in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13868481 = score(doc=305,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.642538 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This paper explores the history, uses cases, and future plans associated with availability of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as linked data. Parts of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have been available as linked data since 2009. Initial efforts included the DDC Summaries (the top three levels of the DDC) in eleven languages exposed as linked data in dewey.info. In 2010, the content of dewey.info was further extended by the addition of assignable numbers and captions from the Abridged Edition 14 data files in English, Italian, and Vietnamese. During 2012, we will add assignable numbers and captions from the latest full edition database, DDC 23. In addition to the "old friends" of different Dewey language versions, institutions such as the British Library and Deutsche Nationalbibliothek have made use of Dewey linked data in bibliographic records and authority files, and AGROVOC has linked to our data at a general level. We expect to extend our linked data network shortly to "new acquaintances" such as GeoNames, ISO 639-3 language codes, and Mathematics Subject Classification. In particular, we will examine the linking process to GeoNames as an example of cross-domain vocabulary alignment. In addition to linking plans, we report on use cases that facilitate machine-assisted categorization and support discovery in the Semantic Web environment.

0.028229063 = product of:
  0.07057266 = sum of:
    0.006642126 = weight(_text_:a in 3370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006642126 = score(doc=3370,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.13882536 = fieldWeight in 3370, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3370)
    0.063930534 = product of:
      0.12786107 = sum of:
        0.12786107 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12786107 = score(doc=3370,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5923907 = fieldWeight in 3370, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3370)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

"Last week, I received an email from Yulia Skora in Ukraine who is working on the mapping between UDC Summary and BBK (Bibliographic Library Classification) Summary. It reminded me of yet another challenging area of work. When responding to Yulia I realised that the issues with mapping, for instance, UDC Summary to Dewey Summaries [pdf] are often made more difficult because we have to deal with classification summaries in both systems and we cannot use a known exactMatch in many situations. In 2008, following advice received from colleagues in the HILT project, two of our colleagues quickly mapped 1000 classes of Dewey Summaries to UDC Master Reference File as a whole. This appeared to be relatively simple. The mapping in this case is simply an answer to a question "and how would you say e.g. Art metal work in UDC?" But when in 2009 we realised that we were going to release 2000 classes of UDC Summary as linked data, we decided to wait until we had our UDC Summary set defined and completed to be able to publish it mapped to the Dewey Summaries. As we arrived at this stage, little did we realise how much more complex the reversed mapping of UDC Summary to Dewey Summaries would turn out to be. Mapping the Dewey Summaries to UDC highlighted situations in which the logic and structure of two systems do not agree. Especially because Dewey tends to enumerate combinations of subject and attributes that do not always logically belong together. For instance, 850 Literatures of Italian, Sardinian, Dalmatian, Romanian, Rhaeto-Romanic languages Italian literature. This class mixes languages from three different subgroups of Romance languages. Italian and Sardinian belong to Italo Romance sub-family; Romanian and Dalmatian are Balkan Romance languages and Rhaeto Romance is the third subgroup that includes Friulian Ladin and Romanch. As UDC literature is based on a strict classification of language families, Dewey class 850 has to be mapped to 3 narrower UDC classes 821.131 Literature of Italo-Romance Languages , 821.132 Literature of Rhaeto-Romance languages and 821.135 Literature of Balkan-Romance Languages, or to a broader class 821.13 Literature of Romance languages. Hence we have to be sure that we have all these classes listed in the UDC Summary to be able to express UDC-DDC many-to-one, specific-to-broader relationships.
Another challenge appears when, e.g., mapping Dewey class 890 Literatures of other specific languages and language families, which does not make sense in UDC in which all languages and literatures have equal status. Standard UDC schedules do not have a selection of preferred literatures and other literatures. In principle, UDC does not allow classes entitled 'others' which do not have defined semantic content. If entities are subdivided and there is no provision for an item outside the listed subclasses then this item is subsumed to a top class or a broader class where all unspecifiied or general members of that class may be expected. If specification is needed this can be divised by adding an alphabetical extension to the broader class. Here we have to find and list in the UDC Summary all literatures that are 'unpreferred' i.e. lumped in the 890 classes and map them again as many-to-one specific-to-broader match. The example below illustrates another interesting case. Classes Dewey 061 and UDC 06 cover roughy the same semantic field but in the subdivision the Dewey Summaries lists a combination of subject and place and as an enumerative classification, provides ready made numbers for combinations of place that are most common in an average (American?) library. This is a frequent approach in the schemes created with the physical book arrangement, i.e. library schelves, in mind. UDC, designed as an indexing language for information retrieval, keeps subject and place in separate tables and allows for any concept of place such as, e.g. (7) North America to be used in combination with any subject as these may coincide in documents. Thus combinations such as Newspapers in North America, or Organizations in North America would not be offered as ready made combinations. There is no selection of 'preferred' or 'most needed countries' or languages or cultures in the standard UDC edition: <Tabelle>
If we map the Dewey Summaries to UDC in general and do not have to worry about a reverse relationship the situation is very simple as shown above. Mapping of UDC Summary to Dewey Summaries requires more thought. Firstly, UDC class (7) North America (common auxiliary of place) which simply represents the place has to be mapped to all occurences in which this place is 'built in' to the Dewey subjects: 063 Organization of North America 073 Journalism of North America 917 Geography of North America 970 History of North America 277 Christianity in North America 317 General Statistics in North America 557 Earth Sciences of North America The type of mapping from what is a general UDC concept of place (7) North America to a specific subject is clearly a broader-to-narrow match. Mapping of, for instance , UDC class 07 Newspapers. The press (includes journalism) to DDC class of 073 Journalim of North America is again broad-to-narrow match.
Precombined subjects, such as those shown above from Dewey, may be expressed in UDC Summary as examples of combination within various records. To express an exact match UDC class 07 has to contain example of combination 07(7) Journals. The Press - North America. In some cases we have, therefore, added examples to UDC Summary that represent exact match to Dewey Summaries. It is unfortunate that DDC has so many classes on the top level that deal with a selection of countries or languages that are given a preferred status in the scheme, and repeating these preferences in examples of combinations of UDC emulates an unwelcome cultural bias which we have to balance out somehow. This brings us to another challenge.. UDC 913(7) Regional Geography - North America [contains 2 concepts each of which has its URI] is an exact match to Dewey 917 [represented as one concept, 1 URI]. It seems that, because they represent an exact match to Dewey numbers, these UDC examples of combinations may also need a separate URIs so that they can be published as SKOS data. Albeit challenging, mapping proves to be a very useful exercise and I am looking forward to future work here especially in relation to our plans to map UDC Summary to Colon Classification. We are discussing this project with colleagues from DRTC in Bangalore (India)."

0.028067831 = product of:
  0.14033915 = sum of:
    0.14033915 = product of:
      0.2806783 = sum of:
        0.2806783 = weight(_text_:dewey in 5764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2806783 = score(doc=5764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            1.3004054 = fieldWeight in 5764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5764)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Präsentation, Dewey Update Breakfast, 3 July 2008.

Source

http://www.oclc.org/dewey/news/conferences/multilingual_melvil_class.pdf

0.027850738 = product of:
  0.069626845 = sum of:
    0.0051719765 = weight(_text_:a in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051719765 = score(doc=5323,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
    0.06445487 = product of:
      0.12890974 = sum of:
        0.12890974 = weight(_text_:dewey in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12890974 = score(doc=5323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5972493 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird zum einen erläutert, wie die Pfingstbewegung in den neun gedruckten Ausgaben der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, die diesen Begriff im Register aufführen, jeweils behandelt wird - beginnend mit der 15. Auflage von 1951 bis zur jüngsten, der 23. Auflage von 2011. Es werden Probleme mit der Charakterisierung der Pfingstbewegung herausgearbeitet - insbesondere, dass sie als ein Amerika-zentriertes und rassisch homogenes Phänomen dargestellt wird. Dies verhindert eine soziohistorisch akkurate Repräsentation der Pfingstbewegung als einer geografisch und rassisch vielfältigen religiösen Tradition innerhalb von Bibliotheksbeständen, die nach der weltweit am meisten verbreiteten Klassifikation organisiert sind. Zum anderen werden Empfehlungen zur Reklassifikation der Pfingstbewegung in der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation gegeben, die zu einer korrekteren soziohistorischen Repräsentation beitragen und dadurch auch den Zugang zur großen Bandbreite von Literatur über diese globale und diverse religiöse Tradition verbessern würden.

Type

a

0.027515382 = product of:
  0.068788454 = sum of:
    0.0073900777 = weight(_text_:a in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073900777 = score(doc=538,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
    0.061398376 = product of:
      0.12279675 = sum of:
        0.12279675 = weight(_text_:dewey in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12279675 = score(doc=538,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.56892735 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The presentation will briefly introduce a series of major principles for bringing subject terminology to the network level. A closer look at one KOS in particular, the Dewey Decimal Classification, should help to gain more insight into the perceived difficulties and potential benefits of building taxonomy services out and on top of classic large-scale vocabularies or taxonomies.