Search (397 results, page 2 of 20)

  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × type_ss:"s"
  1. Classification, automation, and new media : Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Passau, March 15 - 17, 2000 (2002) 0.08
    0.08349996 = product of:
      0.16699992 = sum of:
        0.04882569 = weight(_text_:world in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04882569 = score(doc=5997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
        0.0648802 = weight(_text_:wide in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0648802 = score(doc=5997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
        0.04310937 = weight(_text_:web in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04310937 = score(doc=5997,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
        0.010184665 = weight(_text_:information in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010184665 = score(doc=5997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Given the huge amount of information in the internet and in practically every domain of knowledge that we are facing today, knowledge discovery calls for automation. The book deals with methods from classification and data analysis that respond effectively to this rapidly growing challenge. The interested reader will find new methodological insights as well as applications in economics, management science, finance, and marketing, and in pattern recognition, biology, health, and archaeology.
    Content
    Data Analysis, Statistics, and Classification.- Pattern Recognition and Automation.- Data Mining, Information Processing, and Automation.- New Media, Web Mining, and Automation.- Applications in Management Science, Finance, and Marketing.- Applications in Medicine, Biology, Archaeology, and Others.- Author Index.- Subject Index.
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Wissensorganisation / Kongress / Passau <2000>
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Wissensorganisation / Kongress / Passau <2000>
  2. Emerging frameworks and methods : Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002 (2002) 0.07
    0.0713656 = product of:
      0.11418496 = sum of:
        0.023919607 = weight(_text_:world in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023919607 = score(doc=55,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.14710988 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
        0.01835089 = weight(_text_:wide in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01835089 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.09790685 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
        0.014079461 = weight(_text_:web in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014079461 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1019847 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
        0.022498662 = weight(_text_:information in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022498662 = score(doc=55,freq=122.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.30296698 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
              11.045361 = tf(freq=122.0), with freq of:
                122.0 = termFreq=122.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
        0.03533634 = sum of:
          0.019125482 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019125482 = score(doc=55,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.14946283 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
          0.01621086 = weight(_text_:22 in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01621086 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Held for the first time in the United States, the Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4) is the fourth in the series of international conferences that bring together leading researchers from around the world. CoLIS4 provides a forum for critically exploring and analyzing library and information science as a discipline and as a field of research from historical, philosophical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives. The papers in this volume cover a wide variety of topics, presenting the latest research and information on new developments and new approaches to conceptual frameworks and methods in library and information science. Papers range from a re-examination of the core concepts to empirical studies, analyzing such areas as Web searching, information retrieval, informetrics, information behavior, aspects of learning, business intelligence, and information processing mechanisms. As library and information science is closely associated with a variety of other disciplines and its practice employs technologies that are changing rapidly, presenters focus on the old and the new, address theory and practice, and bridge diverse intellectual areas. From challenging existing approaches and proposing new ones to establishing models and reviewing methods-the presenters lead the way to change and further exploration.
    Content
    The Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), held at the The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, continued the tradition of the previous three CoLIS conferences, begun in 1991 at the University of Tampere, Finland. CoLIS4 was organized by Washington in cooperation with the Department of Information Studies, Tampere, the Royal School of Library and Information Science in Denmark, and the American Society for Information Science and Technology. As in the previous conferences, CoLIS4 invited papers presenting new research topics and approaches in library and information science (LIS) and, at the same time, encouraged contributors and attendees to step back from the practice and dissemination of their research to assess the current state of LIS as a discipline, from historical, theoretical, philosophical, and empirical perspectives. Held for the first time in North America-significantly at the home of a revitalized and actively expanding LIS program in a technology-rich region-CoLIS4 attracted 120 attendees from 16 countries. Presenters and attendees were mostly LIS researchers from academic institutions and research institutes, as well as a number from the information and technology industries. Three full days included a keynote address, 17 papers by an international slate of presenters, two panel discussions, and a poster session during an evening reception. The conference was preceded and followed by two days of tutorials and workshops, as well as a doctoral presentation forum. Breakfasts, lunches, coffee breaks, and a banquet at Microsoft Corporation headquarters were provided to give participants ample time to mix informally.
    To encourage a spirit of deeper reflection, the organizing committee invited 20-minute paper presentations, each followed by 10 minutes of discussion. (There were no separate, concurrent tracks.) This approach encouraged direct follow-up questions and discussion which carried forward from session to session, providing a satisfying sense of continuity to the overall conference theme of exploring the interaction between conceptual and empirical approaches to LIS. The expressed goals of CoLIS4 were to: - explore the existing and emerging conceptual frameworks and methods of library and information science as a field, - encourage discourse about the character and definitions of key concepts in LIS, and - examine the position of LIS among parallel contemporary domains and professions likewise concerned with information and information technology, such as computer science, management information systems, and new media and communication studies. The keynote address by Tom Wilson (University of Sheffield) provided an historical perspective on the philosophical and research frameworks of LIS in the post-World War II period. He traced the changing emphases on the objects of LIS study: definitions of information and documents; information retrieval, relevance, systems, and architectures; information users and behaviors. He raised issues of the relevance of LIS research to real-world information services and practice, and the gradual shift in research approaches from quantitative to qualitative. He concluded by stressing the ongoing need of LIS for cumulative, theory-based, and content-rich bodies of research, meaningful to practitioners and useful to contemporary LIS education.
    Themes and questions threaded throughout the conference papers and panels addressed the uniqueness of LIS as a contemporary "intersection of information, technology, people, and society" (CoLIS Proceedings Preface). Papers by Birger Hjørland and by Sanna Talja, Kimmo Tuominen, and Reijo Savolainen directly addressed the essential nature and metatheory of LIS as a field of inquiry by reviewing its theoretical models and epistemological perspectives, such as the information transfer model and socio-cognitive theory. The cognitive grounding of much LIS research was present in Pertti Vakkari's and Mikko Pennanen's study linking university students' concept formation with their search processes and task performances while preparing research proposals, as well as in Peter Ingwersen's analysis of the cognitive conception of document polyrepresentation (multiple ways of representing documents) applied to information retrieval. A number of papers presented empirically and theoretically derived taxonomies of the fundamental characteristics of information bearers (documents and systems) and information behaviors (both individual and collaborative). These mark a contemporary effort to enumerate and classify the elements that LIS researchers should be examining and with which they should be building systems and generating theory. Nicholas Belkin and Colleen Cool reported on field research with which they are constructing a taxonomy of interactions in information seeking and communication behavior, to be used to inform information system building. Rong Tang presented her taxonomic study of Web searching query patterns and argued for the need to link these to user cognitive operations and search tasks. Linda Cooper explored school children's categorizations and knowledge of information organization in libraries by having them arrange books and topics visually and spatially on "virtual" bookshelves. Kartriina Byström and Preben Hansen proposed a nested typology of the concepts of work tasks, information seeking tasks, and information retrieval tasks as units of analysis for LIS research. Work task and domain analysis figured importantly in several papers, reflecting a increasing application of information context research approaches. In addition to Byström and Hansen's theoretical study of the concepts of tasks in general, the work reported by researchers at Risø National Laboratory, Denmark (Annelise Mark Pejtersen, Bryan Cleal, Morten Hertzum, Hanne Albrechtsen) demonstrated the application of the Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) framework used to inform the design of a virtual "collaboratory" used by three European film archives. Birger Hjørland asserted that domain analysis, including the study of the interests, goals, values, and consequences of information use and users in specific subject and work domains, is central to the practice of LIS.
    LIS research and evaluation methodologies fell under the same scrutiny and systematization, particularly in the presentations employing multiple and mixed methodologies. Jaana Kekäläinen's and Kalervo Järvelin's proposal for a framework of laboratory information retrieval evaluation measures, applied along with analyses of information seeking and work task contexts, employed just such a mix. Marcia Bates pulled together Bradford's Law of Scattering of decreasingly relevant information sources and three information searching techniques (browsing, directed searching, and following links) to pose the question: what are the optimum searching techniques for the different regions of information concentrations? Jesper Schneider and Pia Borlund applied bibliometric methods (document co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-word analysis) to augment manual thesaurus construction and maintenance. Fredrik Åström examined document keyword co-occurrence measurement compared to and then combined with bibliometric co-citation analysis to map LIS concept spaces. Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas, and Keith van Rijsbergen compared system-supplied query expansion terms with interactive user query expansion, incorporating both partial relevance assessment feedback (how relevant is a document) and ostensive relevance feedback (measuring when a document is assessed as relevant over time). Scheduled in the midst of the presentations were two stimulating panel and audience discussions. The first panel, chaired by Glynn Harmon, explored the current re-positioning of many library and information science schools by renaming themselves to eliminate the "library" word and emphasize the "information" word (as in "School of Information," "Information School," and schools of "Information Studies"). Panelists Marcia Bates, Harry Bruce, Toni Carbo, Keith Belton, and Andrew Dillon presented the reasons for name changes in their own information programs, which include curricular change and expansion beyond a "stereotypical" library focus, broader contemporary theoretical approaches to information, new clientele and markets for information services and professionals, new media formats and delivery models, and new interdisciplinary student and faculty recruitment from crossover fields. Sometimes criticized for over-broadness and ambiguity-and feared by library practitioners who were trained in more traditional library schools-renaming schools both results from and occasions a renewed examination of the definitions and boundaries of the field as a whole and the educational and research missions of individual schools.
    Another panel discussion, "The Dark Side of Information Technology," chaired by Victor Rosenberg, focused on the role of LIS in studying and ameliorating the contemporary social impact of technology and of information itself. Panelists Rosenberg, Paul Edwards, and David Levy asked what the social and psychological impact of information and its technologies means for how LIS studies people and collections as parts of information "systems." They suggested that LIS as a discipline is the logical forum for discussing the negative effects of technology and the less healthy aspects of information-its increasing ubiquity and volume, speedy proliferation, and invasive potential-as well as their demonstrated positive potential for applications in education and community-building. Several audience contributors, however, questioned the reality and "hype" of information overload and threats to human psychology and social values, and also reminded the attendees that new technologies and information encourage self-sufficiency and independence in developing countries. (Indeed, the global impact of information science and technologies was a theme of several conference papers, for example, in the studies of Erica Cosijn, Ari Pirkola, Theo Bothma, and Kalervo Järvelin of cross-lingual information access in indigenous languages and in Irene Wormell's study of the global dissemination of national and regional LIS journals by means of informetric analysis and the quantitative study of information flows.) With re-examination of such a broad range of interests, principles, methodologies, and applications of LIS currently taking place, CoLIS4 was in itself a demonstration of a spontaneous, collaborative "domain analysis." The CoLIS4 goal of providing a forum for just this sort of discussion was well realized.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:12:10
    LCSH
    Information science / Congresses
    Subject
    Information science / Congresses
  3. ¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004) 0.07
    0.06878056 = product of:
      0.11004889 = sum of:
        0.020714985 = weight(_text_:world in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020714985 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12740089 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.027526336 = weight(_text_:wide in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027526336 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.029867046 = weight(_text_:web in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867046 = score(doc=3243,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.014968341 = weight(_text_:information in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968341 = score(doc=3243,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.01697218 = product of:
          0.03394436 = sum of:
            0.03394436 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03394436 = score(doc=3243,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.2652702 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."
    Enthält die Beiträge: Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction: a pilot study. Aitchison, J., S.G. Dextre-Clarke: The Thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, reading, resources. Shearer, J.R.: A practical exercise in building a thesaurus. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction: key issues and selected readings. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade: vocabulary management software. Will, L.: Thesaurus consultancy. Owens, L.A., P.A. Cochrane: Thesaurus evaluation. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services. Thomas, A.R., S.K. Roe: An interview with Dr. Amy J. Warner. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.95-97 (A. Gilchrist):"It might be thought unfortunate that the word thesaurus is assonant with prehistoric beasts but as this book clearly demonstrates, the thesaurus is undergoing a notable revival, and we can remind ourselves that the word comes from the Greek thesaurus, meaning a treasury. This is a useful and timely source book, bringing together ten chapters, following an Editorial introduction and culminating in an interview with a member of the team responsible for revising the NISO Standard Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual thesauri; formal proof of the thesaural renaissance. Though predominantly an American publication, it is good to see four English authors as well as one from Canada and one from Denmark; and with a good balance of academics and practitioners. This has helped to widen the net in the citing of useful references. While the techniques of thesaurus construction are still basically sound, the Editors, in their introduction, point out that the thesaurus, in its sense of an information retrieval tool is almost exactly 50 years old, and that the information environment of today is radically different. They claim three purposes for the compilation: "to acquaint or remind the Library and Information Science community of the history of the development of the thesaurus and standards for thesaurus construction. to provide bibliographies and tutorials from which any reader can become more grounded in her or his understanding of thesaurus construction, use and evaluation. to address topics related to thesauri but that are unique to the current digital environment, or network of networks." This last purpose, understandably, tends to be the slightly more tentative part of the book, but as Rosenfeld and Morville said in their book Information architecture for the World Wide Web "thesauri [will] become a key tool for dealing with the growing size and importance of web sites and intranets". The evidence supporting their belief has been growing steadily in the seven years since the first edition was published.
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    Electronic information resource searching
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Information Retrieval / Inhaltserschließung / Thesaurus (BVB)
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Information Retrieval / Inhaltserschließung / Thesaurus (BVB)
    Information retrieval
    Electronic information resource searching
  4. ¬Das Sondersammelgebiets-Fachinformationsprojekt (SSG-FI) der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen : GeoGuide, MatheGuide, Anglo-American History Guide und Anglo-American Literature Guide (www.SUB.Uni-Goettingen.de/ssgfi/); Dokumentation (1999) 0.07
    0.06700705 = product of:
      0.17868546 = sum of:
        0.05859083 = weight(_text_:world in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05859083 = score(doc=3007,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
        0.077856235 = weight(_text_:wide in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077856235 = score(doc=3007,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
        0.042238384 = weight(_text_:web in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042238384 = score(doc=3007,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    RSWK
    Göttingen / Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek / World wide web / Elektronisches Dokument / Katalogisierung (34512) (43512) (54312)
    Subject
    Göttingen / Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek / World wide web / Elektronisches Dokument / Katalogisierung (34512) (43512) (54312)
  5. Geiselberger, H. u.a. [Red.]: Big Data : das neue Versprechen der Allwissenheit (2013) 0.07
    0.06700705 = product of:
      0.17868546 = sum of:
        0.05859083 = weight(_text_:world in 2484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05859083 = score(doc=2484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 2484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2484)
        0.077856235 = weight(_text_:wide in 2484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077856235 = score(doc=2484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 2484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2484)
        0.042238384 = weight(_text_:web in 2484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042238384 = score(doc=2484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2484)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Privatsphäre / Datenschutz / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Privatsphäre / Datenschutz / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
  6. Medien-Informationsmanagement : Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte ; [Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar und Folgetagung 2001 in Köln] (2003) 0.06
    0.0636505 = product of:
      0.101840794 = sum of:
        0.020714985 = weight(_text_:world in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020714985 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12740089 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.027526336 = weight(_text_:wide in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027526336 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.014933523 = weight(_text_:web in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014933523 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008641975 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.030023977 = sum of:
          0.012829763 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012829763 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
          0.017194213 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017194213 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Als in den siebziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts immer häufiger die Bezeichnung Informationsmanager für Leute propagiert wurde, die bis dahin als Dokumentare firmierten, wurde dies in den etablierten Kreisen der Archivare und Bibliothekare gelegentlich belächelt und als Zeichen einer Identitätskrise oder jedenfalls einer Verunsicherung des damit überschriebenen Berufsbilds gewertet. Für den Berufsstand der Medienarchivare/Mediendokumentare, die sich seit 1960 in der Fachgruppe 7 des Vereins, später Verbands deutscher Archivare (VdA) organisieren, gehörte diese Verortung im Zeichen neuer inhaltlicher Herausforderungen (Informationsflut) und Technologien (EDV) allerdings schon früh zu den Selbstverständlichkeiten des Berufsalltags. "Halt, ohne uns geht es nicht!" lautete die Überschrift eines Artikels im Verbandsorgan "Info 7", der sich mit der Einrichtung von immer mächtigeren Leitungsnetzen und immer schnelleren Datenautobahnen beschäftigte. Information, Informationsgesellschaft: diese Begriffe wurden damals fast nur im technischen Sinne verstanden. Die informatisierte, nicht die informierte Gesellschaft stand im Vordergrund - was wiederum Kritiker auf den Plan rief, von Joseph Weizenbaum in den USA bis hin zu den Informations-Ökologen in Bremen. Bei den nationalen, manchmal auch nur regionalen Projekten und Modellversuchen mit Datenautobahnen - auch beim frühen Btx - war nie so recht deutlich geworden, welche Inhalte in welcher Gestalt durch diese Netze und Straßen gejagt werden sollten und wer diese Inhalte eigentlich selektieren, portionieren, positionieren, kurz: managen sollte. Spätestens mit dem World Wide Web sind diese Projekte denn auch obsolet geworden, jedenfalls was die Hardware und Software anging. Geblieben ist das Thema Inhalte (neudeutsch: Content). Und - immer drängender im nicht nur technischen Verständnis - das Thema Informationsmanagement. MedienInformationsManagement war die Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar überschrieben, und auch die Folgetagung 2001 in Köln, die der multimedialen Produktion einen dokumentarischen Pragmatismus gegenüber stellte, handelte vom Geschäftsfeld Content und von Content-Management-Systemen. Die in diesem 6. Band der Reihe Beiträge zur Mediendokumentation versammelten Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge auf diesen beiden Tagungen beleuchten das Titel-Thema aus den verschiedensten Blickwinkeln: archivarischen, dokumentarischen, kaufmännischen, berufsständischen und juristischen. Deutlich wird dabei, daß die Berufsbezeichnung Medienarchivarln/Mediendokumentarln ziemlich genau für all das steht, was heute mit sog. alten wie neuen Medien im organisatorischen, d.h. ordnenden und vermittelnden Sinne geschieht. Im besonderen Maße trifft dies auf das Internet und die aus ihm geborenen Intranets zu. Beide bedürfen genauso der ordnenden Hand, die sich an den alten Medien, an Buch, Zeitung, Tonträger, Film etc. geschult hat, denn sie leben zu großen Teilen davon. Daß das Internet gleichwohl ein Medium sui generis ist und die alten Informationsberufe vor ganz neue Herausforderungen stellt - auch das durchzieht die Beiträge von Weimar und Köln.
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (Dokumentarische Aspekte): Günter Perers/Volker Gaese: Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von Gr+J (Weimar 2000) Thomas Gerick: Finden statt suchen. Knowledge Retrieval in Wissensbanken. Mit organisiertem Wissen zu mehr Erfolg (Weimar 2000) Winfried Gödert: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (Weimar 2000) Elisabeth Damen: Klassifikation als Ordnungssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (Köln 2001) Clemens Schlenkrich: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit - Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (Köln 2001) Josef Wandeler: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof'? - Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (Köln 200 1)
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:49:22
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
    Subject
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
  7. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.06
    0.061833713 = product of:
      0.1648899 = sum of:
        0.039822727 = weight(_text_:web in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039822727 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
        0.019957788 = weight(_text_:information in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957788 = score(doc=4049,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
        0.10510938 = sum of:
          0.05925814 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05925814 = score(doc=4049,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.045851234 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045851234 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
    Imprint
    Gaithersburg, MD : National Institute of Standards / Information Technology Laboratory
  8. Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002) : Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002 (2002) 0.06
    0.061480686 = product of:
      0.0983691 = sum of:
        0.024412844 = weight(_text_:world in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024412844 = score(doc=3592,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.15014338 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
        0.022938613 = weight(_text_:wide in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022938613 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.122383565 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
        0.021554684 = weight(_text_:web in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021554684 = score(doc=3592,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.15613155 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
        0.021902952 = weight(_text_:information in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021902952 = score(doc=3592,freq=74.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.29494518 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              8.602325 = tf(freq=74.0), with freq of:
                74.0 = termFreq=74.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
        0.00756001 = product of:
          0.01512002 = sum of:
            0.01512002 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01512002 = score(doc=3592,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.11816074 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Current Research Information Systems is the focus of series of international conferences, initiated since 1991 by euroCRIS, a non-profit association. Screening the topics of the former conferences you can see that CRISs always picked up both the social challenges and the technological developments. Topics of former conferences were - establishment of research databases in single countries - standardisation and harmonisation - data exchange formats - Marketing, promotion and dissemination of research information CRIS 2002 is reflecting the real situation, influenced by social pressure an scientists to provide answers to problems of society and an transparency of research and research results in a world of unbounded (electronic) information networks. In the times of electronic networks it is not the problem to spread information, but the question is how to find the needed information at the right moment within appropriate time. Especially looking to WWW we not only have an enormous amount of information but different kinds of information systems (single systems and those em-bedded in a university research information management system), structured and non-structured information offers, data of different quality. The most exciting questions that will be discussed at CRIS 2002 are: - How can we solve the heterogeneity problem searching in distributed CRISs? - How efficient are search engines? Do we need CRISs in times of search engines like "google"? - What achieve new flexible and extensible data- and information-exchange models in addition? And last but not least: Is their any user for CRIS? Who are the users? Do they only want to find interesting information about research or do they want to use this information for analysis and evaluation of (local, regional, national, transnational) research systems and appropriate funding of research? We set our hopes an fruitful lectures and discussions and long lasting effects of CRIS 2002. This conference was organised by the University of Kassel and the Social Science Information Centre, Bonn, which give all the support needed to organise an international conference. But without funding and sponsoring of the conference by research funding institutions and by private firms of Germany the conference could not have taken place. We want to express our gratitude. We want to thank members of programme and organisation committees working for a good conference too.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CRIS-Cross: Research Information Systems at a Crossroads (Eric H. Zimmerman) Current Research Information as Part of Digital Libraries and the Heterogeneity Problem: Integrated searches in the context of databases with different content analyses (Jürgen Krause) CERIF: Past, Present and Future: An Overview (Anne Asserson, Keith G Jeffery, Andrei Lopatenko) Treatment of Semantic fleterogeneity using Meta-Data Extraction and Query Translation (Robert Strötgen) Proposals for a new flexible and extensible XML-model for exchange of research information (Jens Vindvad, Erlend Oeverby), Information Retrieval of Research Information in a Distributed Heterogeneous Environment (Andrei Lopatenko, Anne Asserson, Keith G Jeffery) Effectiveness of tagging laboratory data using Dublin Core in an electronic scientific notebook (Laura M. Bartolo, Cathy S. Lowe, Austin C Melton, Monica Strah, Louis Feng, Christopher J. Woolverton) Comparative Study of Metadata for Scientific Information: The place of CERIF in CRISs and Scientific Repositories (Keith G Jeffery, Andrei Lopatenko, Anne Asserson) Metasearch engine for Austrian research information (Marek Andricik) SEAL - a SEmantic portAL with content management functionality (Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer, York Sure, Raphael Volz) Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (Anthony FJ van Raan, Ed C. M. Noyons)
    Development of a central Knowledge Transfer Platform in a highly decentralised environment (Dominik Ulmer, Beat Birkenmeier) International Research Information System: Support to Science Management (Barend Mons, Renee van Kessel, Ruud Strijp, Bob Schijvenaars, Erik van Mulligen) DBClear: A Generic System for Clearinghouses (H. Hellweg, B. Hermes, M. Stempfhuber, W. Enderle, T. Fischer) Research Information and Strategic Decision Making (Richard Tomlin) AARLIN: Seamless information delivery to researchers (Doreen Parker, Earle Gow, Edward Lim) Information Retrieval in Distributed Environments based on Context-Aware, Proactive Documents (Michael Friedrich, Ralf-Dieter Schimkat, Wolfgang Küchlin) Integration via Meaning: Using the Semantic Web to deliver Web Services (Brian M. Matthews) Weaving the Web of European social science (Jostein Ryssevik) Is there any user for this CRIS? (Benedetto Lepori, Lorenzo Cantoni) What's your question? The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (Nieske Iris Koopmans) Accessing the Outputs of Scientific Projects (Brian M. Matthews, Michael D Wilson, Kerstin Kleese-van Dam)
    Workshops Data Collectors meet Data Suppliers an the Internet (DirkHennig, Wolfgang Sander-Beuermann) CERIF-2000 (Common European Research Information Format) (Andrei Lopatenko) Embedding of CRIS in a university research information management system (Jostein Helland Hauge) A European Research Information System (ERIS): an infrastructure tool in a European research world without boundaries? (M.L.H. Lalieu)
    Poster CERIF-2000 as a platform for university public research information service (Andrei Lopatenko) ELFI: ELectronic Research Funding Information System (Andreas Esch) Estonian r&d information system - ERIS (Taavi Türik) Including a Campus-Wide Publications List System into the existing CRIS of a University (Franz Holzer, Eva Bertha, Franz Haselbacher) Information Interface for RTD Co-operation between the European Union and Russia (Irina Gaslikova) KM_LINE: Knowledge Management for Local Innovation Networks e.services platform (Adriana Agrimi, Giuseppe Bux) METIS: the Research Information System of the Durch Universities (Eduard Simons) Research Information System of the University of Tartu (Viktor Muuli) Research Project Database - Forschungsthemen-Datenbank Sachsen-Anhalt (LSAFODB) (Sylvia Springer) The Architecture of an Information Portal for Telecommunications (Kerstin Zimmermann)
  9. Internet in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken -up (to) date! (1999) 0.06
    0.05980996 = product of:
      0.11961992 = sum of:
        0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034524977 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
        0.045877226 = weight(_text_:wide in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045877226 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
        0.024889207 = weight(_text_:web in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024889207 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
        0.014328511 = product of:
          0.028657023 = sum of:
            0.028657023 = weight(_text_:22 in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028657023 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: MÜLLER, H.: Internet: neueste Rechtsentwicklung; HOMMES, K.P u. S. THIER: Förderung von Internet in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken in den Bundesländern 1997 und 1998; STOLL, D.: Bibliotheken ans Netz: Internet für Öffentliche Bibliotheken im Land Brandenburg; DAHM, K.: Zusammenarbeit von Öffentlichen Bibliotheken und regionalen Verbundsystemen in Bayern; NIETIEDT, U.: Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund (GBV) und Öffentliche Bibliotheken; HOLL, K.: Bürgernetz und Bibliothek; MIEDTKE, E.: Von BINE zu ILEKS; WEIGERT, K.: Verzeichnis der Sammelschwerpunkte von Internet-Quellen und Bookmark-Sammlungen in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken - Service des DBI; ENGEL, U.: SUBITO: ein Angebot im World Wide Web; BRAUN, M. u. L. PILTZ: Möglichkeiten der Präsentation im Internet; KNOBLACH, B.: Erfahrung mit HTML-Editoren; MEYER, B.: Internet in der Stadtbiblithek Köln: Anfang, Gegenwart, Zukunft; BRENGEL, M.: Öffentlich zugängliche Internet-PCs in der Regionalbibliothek Weiden
    Footnote
    Referate und Materialien der Veranstaltungen: 'Internet in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken II, 25.-27.6.1998, Germershausen bei Göttingen' und 'Neue Informationstechnologien in der Fachstellenarbeit, 22.-24.6.1998, Nürnberg'
  10. Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age : proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto (2018) 0.06
    0.059608046 = product of:
      0.11921609 = sum of:
        0.04882569 = weight(_text_:world in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04882569 = score(doc=4696,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.045877226 = weight(_text_:wide in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045877226 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.010184665 = weight(_text_:information in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010184665 = score(doc=4696,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.014328511 = product of:
          0.028657023 = sum of:
            0.028657023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028657023 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The 15th International ISKO Conference has been held in Porto (Portugal) under the topic Challenges and opportunities for KO in the digital age. ISKO has been organizing biennial international conferences since 1990, in order to promote a space for debate among Knowledge Organization (KO) scholars and practitioners all over the world. The topics under discussion in the 15th International ISKO Conference are intended to cover a wide range of issues that, in a very incisive way, constitute challenges, obstacles and questions in the field of KO, but also highlight ways and open innovative perspectives for this area in a world undergoing constant change, due to the digital revolution that unavoidably moulds our society. Accordingly, the three aggregating themes, chosen to fit the proposals for papers and posters to be submitted, are as follows: 1 - Foundations and methods for KO; 2 - Interoperability towards information access; 3 - Societal challenges in KO. In addition to these themes, the inaugural session includes a keynote speech by Prof. David Bawden of City University London, entitled Supporting truth and promoting understanding: knowledge organization and the curation of the infosphere.
    Date
    17. 1.2019 17:22:18
  11. Internet der Dinge : www.internet-der-dinge.de; selbststeuernde Objekte und selbstorganisierende Systeme (2006) 0.06
    0.05773804 = product of:
      0.11547608 = sum of:
        0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034524977 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.045877226 = weight(_text_:wide in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045877226 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.024889207 = weight(_text_:web in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024889207 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.010184665 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010184665 = score(doc=485,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Das "Internet der Dinge" ist eine der "Perspektiven für Zukunftsmärkte" der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. Die Vision vom "Internet der Dinge" wurde erstmals 2004 formuliert, als RFID als eine der Technologien, die die Fantasie der Forscher und Ingenieure beflügelt, in die Welt der Warenströme versuchweise integriert wurde. Klar ist, die Technik lässt sich überall einsetzen, wo man Gegenstände identifizieren, registrieren und ihren Weg verfolgen will. Aber es scheint erst der Anfang einer Revolution zu sein. Das Internet der Dinge entwickelt sich rasant. Realistische Szenarien sollen die Warenströme vereinfachen, zuverlässig machen und Problemlösungen nachvollziehbar gestalten lassen. Keine Orwellschen Horrorszenarien, Transparenz der Warenherkunft, des Warenzustands und der Lieferzuverlässigkeit dienen dem Verbraucher und helfen dabei, unsere ständig komplexer werdende Welt gestaltbar zu erhalten. Bei der Idee hat denn auch, wie der Name "Internet der Dinge" andeutet, das existierende World Wide Web Pate gestanden. Jedes Paket, jeder Container, jeder Transportbehälter, so die Vision, findet selbst den richtigen Weg zum Empfänger. Ort und Zustand der Dinge werden transparent und nachvollziehbar, der Schutz der Intimsphären individuell steuerbar. "Die RFID-Technik macht es möglich", prophezeit der Logistikexperte Prof. Michael ten Hompel, Leiter des Fraunhofer-Instituts für Materialfluss und Logistik IML in Dortmund. "Das Ziel wird einfach in die intelligenten Etiketten geschrieben. So weiß das Paket, wo es hin muss, steuert sich selbst auf seinem Weg durch die Anlagen und bucht seinen Platz in einem Transportfahrzeug", beschreibt ten Hompel die Aufgabe, die die Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft in die Realität umsetzen wird.
    BK
    85.20 / Betriebliche Information und Kommunikation
    Classification
    85.20 / Betriebliche Information und Kommunikation
  12. Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimiento : IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación ; VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.06
    0.057438612 = product of:
      0.09190178 = sum of:
        0.020929655 = weight(_text_:world in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020929655 = score(doc=3541,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12872115 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
        0.02270807 = weight(_text_:wide in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02270807 = score(doc=3541,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12115355 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
        0.027547304 = weight(_text_:web in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027547304 = score(doc=3541,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.19953914 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
        0.01155073 = weight(_text_:information in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155073 = score(doc=3541,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.15554214 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
        0.009166026 = product of:
          0.018332051 = sum of:
            0.018332051 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018332051 = score(doc=3541,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.14326228 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: Hjoerland, B.: Fundamentals of knowledge organization. - Rowland, J.: From shelf arrangements to web searching: a journey through knowledge organization. - Campos, M.L. de A., Machado Campos, M.L.: Principios para a modelizacao de dominios de conhecimento:estudo comparativo entre abordagens da cienca da informacao, cienca da computacao e teoria da terminologia [Modelling knowledge domains: a comparative study based an information science, compution science and theory of terminology]. - Carsen, T, Garciá, H., Mabragana, C., Manzanos, N.: Modelo de descripción documental basado en el paradigma de objetos [Documentary description model based an the object paradigm]. - Fernandez Cano, A., Vallejo Ruiz, M., Torralbo Rodriguez, M.: Reconsiderando los modelos de Price [Reconsidering Price's modes]. - Fernandez-Pampillon Cesteros, A., Fernandez Valmayor, A., Lopez Alfonso, C.: Representacion y organizacion del conocimiento lexico: de) modelo de datos de Hipertexto al modelo HiperRed [Representing and organising lexical knowledge: from the Hypertext data model to the HyperNet data model]. - Fourie, I.: A theoretical model for studying Web information seeking/searching behaviour. - Francu, V: A linguistic approach to information languages. - Gabriele, G.: La classificacion de la filosofia: el sistema decimal de Dewey a la luz de los sistemas de classificacion de F. Bacon y l'Encyclopedie [The classification of Philosophy: the Dewey decimal system by the light of the F. Bacon's and the Encyclopedie classification systems. - Glazier, J.D., Glazier, R.R.: Cultural roots of modern classification. - Marzal Garcia-Quismondo, M.A., Beltran Orenes, P: Las bases cientificas de la informacion ante una nueva sociedad [Scientific basis of information in a new society]. - Odaisa Espinheiro de Oliveiro, M.: El lenguaje en la interrelacion con la representacion del conocimiento [The language in the interelation with knowledge representation]. - Orom, A.: Paradigmas y visiones del mundo en la organization fel conocimiento dentro del campo del arte [Paradigms and World Views in the Knowledge Organization in the domain art]. - Rafferty, P: Semiotics and image retrieval: can semiotics help our understanding of the operation of meaning in images? -
    McIlwaine, I.: Current trends in Knowledge Organization research. - Lopez-Huertas, M.J.: La investigacion espanola en Organizacion del Conocimiento (1992-2001) [Spanish research in knowledge organization (1992-2001). - Bazan, C.B.: La clasificacion de los materiales documentales del Deposito Legal [Documental material classification from legal deposit legislation]. - Bosch, M.: Modelo conceptual de objetos para la representaci6n y rastreabilidad de documentos en el medio digital [Conceptual object model for representation and traceability of digital documents]. - Brufem, L.S., Breda, S.M., Nunes Silva, H., Prates, Y, Fecchio, S.M.: Organizacao do conhecimento: tendencias da producao cientifica [Knowledge organization: tendencies of the scientific production]. - Caro Castro, C., Travieso Rodriguez, C.: Encabezamientos de materia en las bibliotecas espanolas : perspectiva historica y situacion actual [Subject headings in Spanish libraries: past en present]. - Carrizo Sainero, G., Pindado Villaverde, A.M.: Propuesta de normalizacion para el tratamiento bibliografico de documentos no contemplados en la norma ISO 6901987 [How to deal with works out of the scope of ISO 690-1987: a proposal for standarization]. Knecht, A., Frigeni, M., Hernandez, A., Tedde, L.: La transcion a la democracia en Espana: el archivo emerografico del profesor Juan J. Linz (1973-1983) [Spain's democratic transition: Professor Juan J. Linz's newspaper archive (1973-1983)] - Hajdu Barat, A.: Change in the process of cognition by contemporary information technology. - Del Castillo, D., Jimenez Piano, M., L6pez de Prado, R.: EI sistema de clasificacion de la FIAF para documentos no filmicos de eine y television: cuestiones especificas de compatibilidad para la recuperaci6n de informacion en cinematografia [FIAF classification system for non-film cinema and television documents: specific issues abour compatibility for information retrieval in cinematography]. - Villar Flecha, J., Alonso Alvarez, A., Benavides Cuellar, C., Garcia Rodriguez, I., Martinez Ordas, F., Moran Suarez, M.: Elaboracion de un corpus semantico para un clasificador de textos basado en extraccion de la informacion [Semantic corpus elaboration to train an information extraction based text classifier]. - Melly, M., Mara Ferreira, S., Garcia, L., Reis, G.: Ciencas de la informacion y de la computacion: una vision integrada del diseno de sistemas virtuales de busqueda directa de informacion centrados en el usuario [Information Science and Computer Science: an integrated vision for the design of user-centered virtual systems]. - Oliveira, R.M.: A organizacao do conhecimento nas bibliotecas portuguesas [Knowledge organization in Portuguese libraries. - Osuna Alarcon, R.: Catalogos, indices e inventarios en los siglos XVIII y XIX o los antecedentes de una disciplina [Catalogues, indexes and inventories in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, or the forerunners of a discipline]. - San Segundo Manual, R.: Nueva conception de la representaci6n del conocimiento [A new conception of representation of knowledge]. - Sidhom, S., Hassoun, M.: Morpho-syntactic parsing to text mining environment: NP recognition model to knowledge visualization and information. - Aldana Montes, J.F., Moreno Vergara, N., Roldan Garcia, M.M.: La web semantica: punto de encuentro [Semantic Web: a meeting point for DB, Al and IR]. - Pereira Pinheiro da Cruz, R.A., Garcia Penalvo, F.J., Romero, L.A.: Perfiles de usuarios para la adaptatividad de interfaces web [User profiling in web interfaces adaptivity]. - Dimitri, PJ.: Evaluacion de la pertinencia de la base de datos del Instituto National de la Administracion Publica [Pertinence evaluation of the Instituto National de la Administracion Publica's database]. - Eito Brun, R.: Applicacion de tecnicas de recuperaci6n de informacion y organizacion del conocimiento en los repositorios software: tendencias y vision retrospectiva [Information retrieval and knowledge organization in software libraries: bibliographic review and historical trends]. -
    Frias, J.A.: La visualizacion de la informacion bibliografica en los catalogos en linea y en entorno web: tendencias de investigacion [Visualization of bibliographic information in OPACs and web catalogues: trends of research]. - Hajdu Barat, A.: General information retrieval language dictionary in the Szechenyi National Library (Hungary). - Lloret Romero, N., Cabrera Mdndez, M., Peset Mancebo, F., Ferrer Sapena, A.: Metodologia para el desarrollo de una interfaz de usuario en entormos deprevencion de riesgos laborales [Methodology for the development of a user interface in prevention of occupational hazard environments]. Martin Rodriguez, F., Casado Candelas, M.: Organizar la recuperacion de la informacion para organizar el conocimiento: el caso practico de UBUCAT, catalogo de la Biblioteca de Universidad de Burgos [Organising the recovery of information for the organisation of knowledge: the practical case of the UBUCAT, the catalogue of the University of Burgos Library]. Moreiro, J.A., Llorens Morillo, J., Marzel Garcia-Quismondo, M.A., Vianello Osti, M., Morato Lara, J., Beltran Orenes, P, Sanchez Cuadrado, S.: Aplicacion del estandar ISO/IEC 13250-1999 a la construccion de un tesauro de verbos: estado del proyecto [Application of standard ISO/IEC 13250-1999 to the construction of a thesaurus of verbs: state of the project]. - Dill Orrico, E.G., Gonzales de Gomez, M.N., Brito, E.: El discurso metaforico y su vinculacion con grupos de investigacion a efectos de busqueda y recuperacion de informacion [The metaphorical discourse and its connection with research groups for the purposes of information searching and retrieval]. - Herrera-Viedma, E., Olvera, M., Peis, E., Porcel, C.: Revision de los sistemas de recomendaciones para la recuperacion de informacion [Review of recommender systems for information retrieval]. - Zecheru, M.: The role of the e-library in the information society / knowledge society: a romanian prospective analysis. -
    Manuel Burgos, J., Galve, J., Garcia, J.: Un modelo bidimensional para la organizacion [A bidimensional model for the organization of programming knowledge]. - Miranda, A., Simeao, E.: EI concepto de masa documental y el ciclo de interaction entre recnologfa y registro del conocimiento [The concept of documentary mass and the interaction cycle between technology and the registration of the knowledge]. - Moros, A., Aplicacion de herramientas tecnologicas para la toma de decisiones en la organizacion del conocimiento, propuesta analftica del Data Warehouse [Application of technological tools for the taking of decisions in the knowledge organization, analytical proposal of the Data Warehouse]. - Munera Torres, M.T.: Investigacion sobre la incidencia de la gestion del conocimiento en las empresas de servicios de Medellin [Research about the incidence of knowledge management in the companies of services of Medellin]. - Perez Alarcon, A.: La gestion de contenidos digitales en el entorno universitario: un primer paso en la gestion del conocimiento [Digital content management in the university area: the first step to knowledge management]. Perez-Montoro Gutidrrez, M.: La propuesta epistemologica clasica en la identificacion organizacional [The classical epistomological approach an the organizational knowledge identification and representation]. - Sanz Casado, E., Martin Moreno, C., Garcia-Zorita, C., Lasturin, M.L.: Aplicacion en la gestion de bibliotecas especializadas de la interdisciplinariedad observada en la actividad cientifica [Application of the interdisciplinary observed in scientific research in specialized library management]. Triska, R.: EI proceso de generation de una base de datos para gestion del conocimiento: caracteristicas y condicionantes [The database generation process for knowledge management: characteristics and conditionals]. - Vianello Osti, M.: Reflexiones acercade la creacion de conocimiento en la World Wide Web [Reflections an the knowledge creation in the World Wide Web]. - Barrueco Cruz, J.M., Krichel, T: Subject description in the Academic Metadata Format. - Bautista, T, De Castro Martin, P, Cottereau, M., Gonz lez Sereno, E., Rfos, Y: EI tat logo de autoridades de la Red de Bibliothecas del CSIC Como herramienta de gestios del conocimiento: hacia una accesibilidad sin restricciones [CSIC Libraries authorities catalog as a knowledge management tool: towards an restricted accessibility]. - Scott Cree, J.: How friendly are UK government websites?. -
    Gregory VL., Perrault, A.H., Ramirez Wohlmuth, S.: Looking from the outside in: an evidente-based model for website usability assesment. - Lichtnow, D., Caring, A., Lucas dos Anjos, P, Saldana, R., Loh, S.: Recomendaciones de documentos electronicos en discusiones on-line [Recommendations of electronic documents in online discussions]. - Lopez Yepes, A., Pdrez Agüera, J.R., Sanchez Jimenez, R.: Un modelo para el diseno de sistemas din micos de gestion de informacion multimedia [A model for dynamic multimedia information management systems design] Paganelli, C., Mounier, E.: Extraccion y representacion del conocimiento contenido en un documento tecnico [Extraction and representation of knowledge contained in a technical document]. - Naumis Pena, C.: Los orientadores de informacion para portales [Reader's advisory for websites]. - Perez Lorenzo, B., Morales Garcia, A.M., Garcia Lopez, F., Monje Jimenez, T.: La organizacfon del conocimiento en los portales de Internet: estudio de los principales proveedores de contenides [The organization of the knowledge in the portals of the main suppliers of information]. - Peset Mancebo, F., Ferrer Sapena, A., Lloret Romeno, N., Tolosa Robledo, L., Moreno Nunez, M.T, Diaz Novillo, S.: EI proyecto WinEcs: una vision practica para la implantacion de bibliotecas digitales [WinEcs project: how to implementing digital libraries]. Prieto Castro, E.: Organizacion del conocimiento de los recursos gratuitos de Internet: el caso de documentacion juridica en las bibliotecas universitarias espanolas [Knowledge management of free internet resources: law related information in academic libraries in Spain]. - Saldana, R., Teixeira Goncalez, A., Barrocco Farias, G., Branco, R.K., Lichtnow, D., Loh, S.: Captura automatica y selectiva de informaciones para bibliotecas digitales [Automatic and selective caption of information for digital libraries]. - Tramullas, J.: Clasificaciones y portales tem ticos especializados. Estudio en recursos de informacion digital sobre ciencas sociales [Classifications and specialized subject gateways. A study in social sciences digital information resources]. - Henriques, R., Worcman, K.: A experiencia do Museu da Pessoa: organizacao da memoria socialaem formato digital [The Museum of the Person's experience: social memory organization in digital Format]. Olson, H.A.: Transgressive deconstructions: feminist/postcolonial methodology for research in knowledge organization. - Brito Santana, J., Cruz Rodriguez, J.M.: Sistema informatico de soporte al analisis del discurso [The computer system for support to discourse analysis]. -
  13. Subject retrieval in a networked environment : Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC (2003) 0.06
    0.057401128 = product of:
      0.0918418 = sum of:
        0.019530276 = weight(_text_:world in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019530276 = score(doc=3964,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.120114714 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
        0.01835089 = weight(_text_:wide in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01835089 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.09790685 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
        0.017243749 = weight(_text_:web in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017243749 = score(doc=3964,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12490524 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
        0.008147732 = weight(_text_:information in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008147732 = score(doc=3964,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
        0.028569158 = sum of:
          0.01710635 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01710635 = score(doc=3964,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
          0.011462809 = weight(_text_:22 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011462809 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Devadason, F.J., N. Intaraksa u. P. Patamawongjariya u.a.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources; Nicholson, D., S. Wake: HILT: subject retrieval in a distributed environment; Olson, T.: Integrating LCSH and MeSH in information systems; Kuhr, P.S.: Putting the world back together: mapping multiple vocabularies into a single thesaurus; Freyre, E., M. Naudi: MACS : subject access across languages and networks; McIlwaine, I.C.: The UDC and the World Wide Web; Garrison, W.A.: The Colorado Digitization Project: subject access issues; Vizine-Goetz, D., R. Thompson: Towards DDC-classified displays of Netfirst search results: subject access issues; Godby, C.J., J. Stuler: The Library of Congress Classification as a knowledge base for automatic subject categorization: subject access issues; O'Neill, E.T., E. Childress u. R. Dean u.a.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology; Bean, C.A., R. Green: Improving subject retrieval with frame representation; Zeng, M.L., Y. Chen: Features of an integrated thesaurus management and search system for the networked environment; Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education; Qin, J., J. Chen: A multi-layered, multi-dimensional representation of digital educational resources; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Information languages and multilingual subject access; Geisselmann, F.: Access methods in a database of e-journals; Beghtol, C.: The Iter Bibliography: International standard subject access to medieval and renaissance materials (400-1700); Slavic, A.: General library classification in learning material metadata: the application in IMS/LOM and CDMES metadata schemas; Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources; Koch, T., H. Neuroth u. M. Day: Renardus: Cross-browsing European subject gateways via a common classification system (DDC); Olson, H.A., D.B. Ward: Mundane standards, everyday technologies, equitable access; Burke, M.A.: Personal Construct Theory as a research tool in Library and Information Science: case study: development of a user-driven classification of photographs
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.2, S.117-118 (D. Campbell): "This excellent volume offers 22 papers delivered at an IFLA Satellite meeting in Dublin Ohio in 2001. The conference gathered together information and computer scientists to discuss an important and difficult question: in what specific ways can the accumulated skills, theories and traditions of librarianship be mobilized to face the challenges of providing subject access to information in present and future networked information environments? The papers which grapple with this question are organized in a surprisingly deft and coherent way. Many conferences and proceedings have unhappy sessions that contain a hodge-podge of papers that didn't quite fit any other categories. As befits a good classificationist, editor I.C. McIlwaine has kept this problem to a minimum. The papers are organized into eight sessions, which split into two broad categories. The first five sessions deal with subject domains, and the last three deal with subject access tools. The five sessions and thirteen papers that discuss access in different domains appear in order of in creasing intension. The first papers deal with access in multilingual environments, followed by papers an access across multiple vocabularies and across sectors, ending up with studies of domain-specific retrieval (primarily education). Some of the papers offer predictably strong work by scholars engaged in ongoing, long-term research. Gerard Riesthuis offers a clear analysis of the complexities of negotiating non-identical thesauri, particularly in cases where hierarchical structure varies across different languages. Hope Olson and Dennis Ward use Olson's familiar and welcome method of using provocative and unconventional theory to generate meliorative approaches to blas in general subject access schemes. Many papers, an the other hand, deal with specific ongoing projects: Renardus, The High Level Thesaurus Project, The Colorado Digitization Project and The Iter Bibliography for medieval and Renaissance material. Most of these papers display a similar structure: an explanation of the theory and purpose of the project, an account of problems encountered in the implementation, and a discussion of the results, both promising and disappointing, thus far. Of these papers, the account of the Multilanguage Access to Subjects Project in Europe (MACS) deserves special mention. In describing how the project is founded an the principle of the equality of languages, with each subject heading language maintained in its own database, and with no single language used as a pivot for the others, Elisabeth Freyre and Max Naudi offer a particularly vivid example of the way the ethics of librarianship translate into pragmatic contexts and concrete procedures. The three sessions and nine papers devoted to subject access tools split into two kinds: papers that discuss the use of theory and research to generate new tools for a networked environment, and those that discuss the transformation of traditional subject access tools in this environment. In the new tool development area, Mary Burke provides a promising example of the bidirectional approach that is so often necessary: in her case study of user-driven classification of photographs, she user personal construct theory to clarify the practice of classification, while at the same time using practice to test the theory. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green offer an intriguing combination of librarianship and computer science, importing frame representation technique from artificial intelligence to standardize syntagmatic relationships to enhance recall and precision.
    The papers discussing the transformation of traditional tools locate the point of transformation in different places. Some, like the papers an DDC, LCC and UDC, suggest that these schemes can be imported into the networked environment and used as a basis for improving access to networked resources, just as they improve access to physical resources. While many of these papers are intriguing, I suspect that convincing those outside the profession will be difficult. In particular, Edward O'Neill and his colleagues, while offering a fascinating suggestion for preserving the Library of Congress Subject Headings and their associated infrastructure by converting them into a faceted scheme, will have an uphill battle convincing the unconverted that LCSH has a place in the online networked environment. Two papers deserve mention for taking a different approach: both Francis Devadason and Maria Ines Cordeiro suggest that we import concepts and techniques rather than realized schemes. Devadason argues for the creation of a faceted pre-coordinate indexing scheme for Internet resources based an Deep Structure indexing, which originates in Bhattacharyya's Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing and in Ranganathan's chain indexing techniques. Cordeiro takes up the vitally important role of authority control in Web environments, suggesting that the techniques of authority control be expanded to enhance user flexibility. By focusing her argument an the concepts rather than an the existing tools, and by making useful and important distinctions between library and non-library uses of authority control, Cordeiro suggests that librarianship's contribution to networked access has less to do with its tools and infrastructure, and more to do with concepts that need to be boldly reinvented. The excellence of this collection derives in part from the energy, insight and diversity of the papers. Credit also goes to the planning and forethought that went into the conference itself by OCLC, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section, and the Program Committee, headed by editor I.C. McIlwaine. This collection avoids many of the problems of conference proceedings, and instead offers the best of such proceedings: detail, diversity, and judicious mixtures of theory and practice. Some of the disadvantages that plague conference proceedings appear here. Busy scholars sometimes interpret the concept of "camera-ready copy" creatively, offering diagrams that could have used some streamlining, and label boxes that cut off the tops or bottoms of letters. The papers are necessarily short, and many of them raise issues that deserve more extensive treatment. The issue of subject access in networked environments is crying out for further synthesis at the conceptual and theoretical level. But no synthesis can afford to ignore the kind of energetic, imaginative and important work that the papers in these proceedings represent."
  14. Theories of information behavior (2005) 0.06
    0.05675625 = product of:
      0.09081 = sum of:
        0.019530276 = weight(_text_:world in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019530276 = score(doc=68,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.120114714 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
        0.02595208 = weight(_text_:wide in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02595208 = score(doc=68,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1384612 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
        0.014079461 = weight(_text_:web in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014079461 = score(doc=68,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1019847 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
        0.020772722 = weight(_text_:information in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020772722 = score(doc=68,freq=104.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.2797255 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              10.198039 = tf(freq=104.0), with freq of:
                104.0 = termFreq=104.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
        0.010475458 = product of:
          0.020950915 = sum of:
            0.020950915 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020950915 = score(doc=68,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.16372833 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: An Introduction to Metatheories, Theories, and Models (Marcia J. Bates) - What Methodology Does to Theory: Sense-Making Methodology as Exemplar (Brenda Dervin) Evolution in Information Behavior Modeling Wilson's Model (T.D. Wilson) - Affective Load (Diane Nahl) - Anomalous State of Knowledge (Nicholas J. Belkin) - Archival Intelligence (Elizabeth Yakel) - Bandura's Social Cognition (Makiko Miwa) - Berrypicking (Marcia J. Bates) - Big6 Skills for Information Literacy (Carrie A. Lowe and Michael B. Eisenberg) - Chang's Browsing (Chan-Ju L. Chang) - Chatman's Information Poverty (Julie Hersberger) - Chatman's Life in the Round (Crystal Fulton) - Cognitive Authority (Soo Young Rieh) - Cognitive Work Analysis (Raya Fidel and Annelise Mark Pejtersen) - Collective Action Dilemma (Marc Smith and Howard T. Weiser) - Communicative Action (Gerald Benoît) - Communities of Practice (Elisabeth Davies) - Cultural Models of Hall and Hofstede (Anita Komlodi) - Dervin's Sense-Making (Tonyia J. Tidline) - Diffusion Theory (Darian Lajoie-Paquette) - The Domain Analytic Approach to Scholars' Information Practices (Sanna Talja) - Ecological Theory of Human Information Behavior (Kirsty Williamson) - Elicitation as Micro-Level Information Seeking (Mei-Mei Wu) - Ellis's Model of InformationSeeking Behavior (David Ellis) - Everyday Life Information Seeking (Reijo Savolainen) - Face Threat (Lorri Mon) - Flow Theory (Charles Naumer) - General Model of the Information Seeking of Professionals (Gloria J. Leckie) - The Imposed Query (Melissa Gross) - Information Acquiringand-Sharing (Kevin Rioux) - Information Activities in Work Tasks (Katriina Byström) - Information Encountering (Sanda Erdelez) - Information Grounds (Karen E. Fisher) - Information Horizons (Diane H. Sonnenwald) - Information Intents (Ross J. Todd) - Information Interchange (Rita Marcella and Graeme Baxter) - Institutional Ethnography (Roz Stooke) - Integrative Framework for Information Seeking and Interactive Information Retrieval (Peter Ingwersen) - Interpretative Repertoires (Pamela J. McKenzie) - Krikelas's Model of Information Seeking (Jean Henefer and Crystal Fulton) - Kuhlthau's Information Search Process (Carol Collier Kuhlthau) - Library Anxiety (Patricia Katopol) - Monitoring and Blunting (Lynda M. Baker) - Motivational Factors for Interface Design (Carolyn Watters and Jack Duffy) - Network Gatekeeping (Karine Barzilai-Nahon) - Nonlinear Information Seeking (Allen Foster) - Optimal Foraging (JoAnn Jacoby) - Organizational Sense Making and Information Use (Anu Maclntosh-Murray) - The PAIN Hypothesis (Harry Bruce) -
    Perspectives on the Tasks in which Information Behaviors Are Embedded (Barbara M. Wildemuth and Anthony Hughes) - Phenomenography (Louise Limberg) - Practice of Everyday Life (Paulette Rothbauer) - Principle of Least Effort (Donald O. Case) - Professions and Occupational Identities (Olof Sundin and Jenny Hedman) - Radical Change (Eliza T. Dresang) - Reader Response Theory (Catherine Sheldrick Ross) - Rounding and Dissonant Grounds (Paul Solomon) - Serious Leisure (Jenna Hartel) - Small-World Network Exploration (Lennart Björneborn) - Nan Lin's Theory of Social Capital (Catherine A. Johnson) - The Social Constructionist Viewpoint on Information Practices (Kimmo Tuominen, Sanna Talja, and Reijo Savolainen) - Social Positioning (Lisa M. Given) - The Socio-Cognitive Theory of Users Situated in Specific Contexts and Domains (Birger Hjoerland) - Strength of Weak Ties (Christopher M. Dixon) - Symbolic Violence (Steven Joyce) - Taylor's Information Use Environments (Ruth A. Palmquist) - Taylor's Question-Negotiation (Phillip M. Edwards) - Transtheoretical Model of the Health Behavior Change (C. Nadine Wathen and Roma M. Harris) - Value Sensitive Design (Batya Friedman and Nathan G. Freier) - Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (Lynne (E. E) McKechnie) - Web Information Behaviors of Organizational Workers (Brian Detlor) - Willingness to Return (Tammara Combs Turner and Joan C. Durrance) - Women's Ways of Knowing (Heidi Julien) - Work Task Information-Seeking and Retrieval Processes (Preben Hansen) - World Wide Web Information Seeking (Don Turnbull)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 59(2006) H.3, S.90-93 (O. Oberhauser): "What a marvellous book! [dies vorwegnehmend als Quintessenz der folgenden Rezension und auch für den englischsprachigen Verlag gedacht]. Den drei Herausgeberinnen, die an den Universitäten von Washington (Seattle, WA), Missouri (Columbia, MO) und Western Ontario (London, Kanada) lehren, ist das seltene Kunststück geglückt, einen Band zu erstellen, der nicht nur als mustergültige Einführung in die Thematik human information behaviour zu dienen vermag, sondern gleichzeitig auch als Nachschlagewerk zu den vielfältigen theoretischen Ansätzen innerhalb dieser bedeutenden Teildisziplin der Informationswissenschaft herangezogen werden kann. Wie sie selbst in der Danksagung feststellen, ist das Buch "a collaborative work of the information behavior community" (S. xvii), wobei die editorische Leistung vor allem darin lag, 85 Beitragende aus zehn Ländern zu koordinieren bzw. zur Abfassung von 72 Artikeln von jeweils ähnlicher Länge (bzw. Knappheit und Kürze), Gestaltung und Lesbarkeit zu veranlassen. Unter diesen 85 Beitragenden ist im übrigen alles versammelt, was in dieser Teildisziplin Rang und Namen hat, mit Ausnahme der leider bereits verstorbenen Soziologin Elfreda A. Chatman, einer der einflussreichsten Theoretikerinnen im Bereich des Informationsverhaltens, deren Andenken das Buch auch gewidmet ist.
    Im Gegensatz zur früher üblichen Praxis, Informationsverhalten auf die Aktivitäten der Informationssuche zu beschränken, folgt man heute Tom Wilsons Definition, wonach es sich dabei um "the totality of human behaviour in relation to sources and channels of information, including both active and passive information-seeking, and information use" handelt, bzw. jener von Karen Pettigrew [nunmehr Fisher] et al., "how people need, seek, give and use information in different contexts". Im Laufe der letzten Jahre, ja schon Jahrzehnte, hat sich dazu ein fast nicht mehr überschaubarer Bestand an Literatur angesammelt, der sich sowohl aus theoretischen bzw. theoretisierenden, als auch aus auch praktischen bzw. empirischen Arbeiten zusammensetzt. Einige wenige dieser theoretischen Ansätze haben weite Verbreitung gefunden, werden in Studiengängen der Informationswissenschaft gelehrt und tauchen in der laufend veröffentlichten Literatur immer wieder als Basis für empirische Untersuchungen oder modifizierende Weiterentwicklungen auf. Das Buch beginnt mit drei Grundsatzartikeln, die von herausragenden Vertretern des gegenständlichen Themenbereichs verfasst wurden. Im ersten und längsten dieser Beiträge, An Introduction to Metatheories, Theories and Models (S. 1-24), gibt Marcia J. Bates (Los Angeles, CA), zunächst eine wissenschaftstheoretische Einführung zu den drei im Titel genannten Begriffen, nicht ohne darauf hinzuweisen, dass der Großteil der theoretisierenden Ansätze in unserer Disziplin erst dem Modellstadium angehört. Am Beispiel des Principle of Least Effort zeigt sie, dass selbst für diesen am besten abgesicherten Befund der Forschung zum Informationsverhalten, keine ausreichende theoretische Begründung existiert. In der Folge versucht Bates, die in der Informationswissenschaft gängigen Metatheorien zu identifizieren und gelangt dabei zu der folgenden Kategorisierung, die auch als Bezugsrahmen für die Einordnung der zahlreichen in diesem Buch dargestellten Modelle dienen kann:
    1. historisch (die Gegenwart aus der Vergangheit heraus verstehen) 2. konstruktivistisch (Individuen konstruieren unter dem Einfluss ihres sozialen Kontexts das Verständnis ihrer Welten) 3. diskursanalytisch (Sprache konstituiert die Konstruktion der Identität und die Ausbildung von Bedeutungen) 4. philosophisch-analytisch (rigorose Analyse von Begriffen und Thesen) 5. kritische Theorie (Analyse versteckter Macht- und Herrschaftsmuster) 6. ethnographisch (Verständnis von Menschen durch Hineinversetzen in deren Kulturen) 7. sozialkognitiv (sowohl das Denken des Individuums als auch dessen sozialer bzw. fachlicher Umraum beeinflussen die Informationsnutzung) 8. kognitiv (Fokus auf das Denken der Individuen im Zusammenhang mit Suche, Auffindung und Nutzung von Information) 9. bibliometrisch (statistische Eigenschaften von Information) 10. physikalisch (Signalübertragung, Informationstheorie) 11. technisch (Informationsbedürfnisse durch immer bessere Systeme und Dienste erfüllen) 12. benutzerorientierte Gestaltung ("usability", Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion) 13. evolutionär (Anwendung von Ergebnissen von Biologie und Evolutionspsychologie auf informationsbezogene Phänomene). Bates Beitrag ist, wie stets, wohldurchdacht, didaktisch gut aufbereitet und in klarer Sprache abgefasst, sodass man ihn mit Freude und Gewinn liest. Zu letzterem trägt auch noch die umfangreiche Liste von Literaturangaben bei, mit der sich insbesondere die 13 genannten Metatheorien optimal weiterverfolgen lassen. . . .
    Zusammenfassend möchte ich folgende Behauptung wagen: Wer dieses Buch gründlich studiert (und natürlich auch die zahlreichen Literaturhinweise verfolgt), kennt mehr oder weniger alles, was es zum Themenbereich Informationsverhalten - als Teildisziplin der Informationswissenschaft - zu wissen gibt. Kann man über ein Buch noch etwas Besseres sagen? Und kann man voraussehen, welche neuen metatheoretischen Ansätze mit einer solchen Gesamtschau noch gefunden können und werden? In formaler Hinsicht bietet der Verlag Information Today mit dem vorliegenden Buch einen ansprechend gestalteten Hardcover-Band ohne größere Mängel und mit einem dem Gebotenen angemessenen Preis. Von dem fast 30 Seiten langen kombinierten Namens- und Sachregister könnten manche europäischen Verlage - die diesbezüglich eher auf Einsparung setzen oder wenig professionelle Register anbieten - lernen, wie man derlei macht. Als fehlend könnte man vielleicht einen Anhang mit den Kurzbiographien aller Beitragenden empfinden, doch mag es verständlich erscheinen, dass dies angesichts deren großer Zahl auf eine Vorstellung der drei Herausgeberinnen beschränkt wurde. Nicht gefallen hat mir der wenig konsistente Zitierstil bei den bibliographischen Angaben, einschließlich der Mode, beim Zitieren von Zeitschriftenaufsätzen vorgeblich redundante Heftangaben wegzulassen. Über die Exaltation der dritten Herausgeberin, ihrem Vornamen (auch auf dem Titelblatt!) noch den Klammerausdruck "(E. F.)" hinzuzufügen, sei rasch der Mantel des Schweigens gebreitet. In Summe daher, wie schon eingangs festgestellt wurde, ein vorzügliches und sehr empfehlenswertes Buch."
    Weitere Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.303 (D.E. Agosto): "Due to the brevity of the entries, they serve more as introductions to a wide array of theories than as deep explorations of a select few. The individual entries are not as deep as those in more traditional reference volumes, such as The Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (Drake, 2003) or The Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) (Cronin, 2005), but the overall coverage is much broader. This volume is probably most useful to doctoral students who are looking for theoretical frameworks for nascent research projects or to more veteran researchers interested in an introductory overview of information behavior research, as those already familiar with this subfield also will probably already be familiar with most of the theories presented here. Since different authors have penned each of the various entries, the writing styles vary somewhat, but on the whole, this is a readable, pithy volume that does an excellent job of encapsulating this important area of information research."
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    LCSH
    Information behavior
    Information retrieval ; Research
    Information resources
    Information science
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval / Informationsverhalten / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Information Retrieval / Informationsverhalten / Aufsatzsammlung
    Information behavior
    Information retrieval ; Research
    Information resources
    Information science
  15. Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014) 0.06
    0.055165946 = product of:
      0.11033189 = sum of:
        0.027619982 = weight(_text_:world in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027619982 = score(doc=5134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
        0.03670178 = weight(_text_:wide in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03670178 = score(doc=5134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
        0.034487497 = weight(_text_:web in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034487497 = score(doc=5134,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.24981049 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
        0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011522634 = score(doc=5134,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata research has emerged as a discipline cross-cutting many domains, focused on the provision of distributed descriptions (often called annotations) to Web resources or applications. Such associated descriptions are supposed to serve as a foundation for advanced services in many application areas, including search and location, personalization, federation of repositories and automated delivery of information. Indeed, the Semantic Web is in itself a concrete technological framework for ontology-based metadata. For example, Web-based social networking requires metadata describing people and their interrelations, and large databases with biological information use complex and detailed metadata schemas for more precise and informed search strategies. There is a wide diversity in the languages and idioms used for providing meta-descriptions, from simple structured text in metadata schemas to formal annotations using ontologies, and the technologies for storing, sharing and exploiting meta-descriptions are also diverse and evolve rapidly. In addition, there is a proliferation of schemas and standards related to metadata, resulting in a complex and moving technological landscape - hence, the need for specialized knowledge and skills in this area. The Handbook of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies is intended as an authoritative reference for students, practitioners and researchers, serving as a roadmap for the variety of metadata schemas and ontologies available in a number of key domain areas, including culture, biology, education, healthcare, engineering and library science.
    Imprint
    Singapore : World Scientific
    LCSH
    Semantic networks (Information theory)
    Subject
    Semantic networks (Information theory)
  16. Herausforderungen an die Wissensorganisation : Visualisierung, multimediale Dokumente, Internetstrukturen. 5. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Berlin, 07.-10. Oktober 1997 (1998) 0.05
    0.05389323 = product of:
      0.08622917 = sum of:
        0.024167484 = weight(_text_:world in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024167484 = score(doc=3123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.14863437 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
        0.03211406 = weight(_text_:wide in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03211406 = score(doc=3123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.171337 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
        0.017422445 = weight(_text_:web in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017422445 = score(doc=3123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
        0.0050411527 = weight(_text_:information in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050411527 = score(doc=3123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
        0.0074840286 = product of:
          0.014968057 = sum of:
            0.014968057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014968057 = score(doc=3123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 3123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Leistungsfähige Arbeitsplatzrechner mit ihrer Fähigkeit, Bild, Text und Ton zu kombinieren, und die weltweite Vernetzung der Arbeitsstationen über das "WorldWideWeb", die den unmittelbaren Austausch multimedialer Dokumente erlauben, verändern nicht nur Formen und Strukturen der alltäglichen Informationsbeschaffung und Informationsweitergabe, sondern prägen auch nachhaltig die Organisation und Repräsentation sowie die Kommunikation und Präsentation von Fachwissen. Die Deutsche Sektion der "International Society of Knowledge-Organization" (ISKO) empfindet angesichts dieser Entwicklungen eine besondere Herausforderung, sich wissenschaftlich und pragmatisch mit den dadurch verursachten Implikationen auseinander zu setzen. Deshalb beschäftigte sich die im Herbst 1997 an der Humboldt-Universität Berlin stattfindende Tagung Wissensorganisation '97 schwerpunktmäßig mit Fraugen und orientierenden Aussagen zum Begriff Bild, zur Bildrepräsentation und -manipulation, zu Visualisierungsprozessen, multimedialen Präsentationen und Anwendungen sowie den Besonderheiten und Möglichkeiten des Internets und seiner Strukturen. Gegenstand der Tagung waren aber auch allgemeine Grundlagen der Wissensorganisation, beispielsweise Probleme der Begriffsabgrenzung, der Klassifikation und des Information-Retrieval, die ebenfalls von der ISKO thematisch abgedeckt werden. Der vorliegende Band 5 der Reihe "Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation" beinhaltet eine repräsentative Auswahl der Tagungsbeiträge. Sie sind bewußt auf die Bedürfnisse einer interdisziplinär orientierten Leserschaft ausgerichtet und vermitteln einen faszinierenden Einblick in die Möglichkeiten, Techniken und Hilfsmittel moderner multimedialer und vernetzter Dokumente und Wissensstrukturen.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMAUKS, D.: Schweigende Texte, sprechende Bilder; RAHMSTORF, G.: Visualisierung: Vom Begriff zum Bild; SCHANTZ, R.: Sinnliche versus begriffliche Repräsentation; SCHUMACHER, R.: Über die anwendungsbedingungen des Bildbegriffs; SCHOLZ, M.: Abstraktion und Naturalismus in der Praxis der digitalen Bildherstellung; BERENDT, B.: Spatial thinking with geographic maps: an empirical study; OHLY, H.P.: Strukturierung sozialwissenschaftlicher Informationsressourcen im Internet: Wissensorganisatorische Aspekte beim aufbau eines Clearinghouses; OEHLER, A.: Analyse von Suchdiensten im Internet: Kriterien und Probleme; BATINIC, B.: Wie und für welche Aufgaben wird das Internet genutzt? Folgerungen für den Informationsaufbau und wissenschaftlichen Einsatz des Internet; FRIEDRICH, F. u.a.: Gruppengrösse, Nachrichtenmenge, Kohärenzprobleme und Informationsorganisation beim Lernen im Netz; VELTMAN, K.: Frontiers in conceptual navigation; LEHNER, C.: Hypertext und World Wide Web als Hilfen für einen Programmierkurs in Prolog; SCHOOP, E.: Strukturierung der betrieblichen Dokumentation als Grundbaustein für ein multimediales Wissensmanagement in der Unternehmung; OELTJEN, W.: Dokumentenstrukturen manipulieren und visualisieren: über das Arbeiten mit der logischen Struktur; PALME, J.: HTML / XML / SGML: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede; SCHWARZ, I. u. W. UMSTÄTTER: Zum Prinzip der Objektdarstellung in SGML; DAHN, B.I.: Publikation mathematischer Texte im Internet; FLATSCHER, R.: Konzeption von Glossaren für HTML-Browser; GRESHOFF, R.: Theorienvielfalt in den Sozialwissenschaften und ihre begrifflichen Probleme; BIES, W.: Memoria und Wissensorganisation: Probleme einer (Wisses-)Kultur des Erinnerns; SCHÖNFELD, G.: Automatische versus manuelle Kapitalgliederung: dargestellt am Beispiel einer soziologischen Bibliographie; OTTO, A.: Ordnungssysteme als Wissensbasis für die Suche in textbasierten Datenbeständen; LORENZ, B.: Die Fachsystematik Technik der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation: ein Fallbeispiel für Optimierung; BAUER, G.: Visualisierung durch 'geordnete' Strukturbilder des Wissens (Anwendung des Pronzips der Facettenklassifikation); SCHILDMANN, G.: Unterstützung des Forschungsprozesses durch Visualisierung von Wissenstrukturen; JAENECKE, P.: Forschungsorientierte Wissenschaftstheorie; OHLY, P. u. A. SIGEL: Einführung in wissensorganisatorische Aspekte bei der Nutzung und Bereitstellung fachlicher Internet-Ressourcen
  17. Semantic Web : Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft (2006) 0.05
    0.052487824 = product of:
      0.10497565 = sum of:
        0.017262489 = weight(_text_:world in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017262489 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.10616741 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
        0.022938613 = weight(_text_:wide in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022938613 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.122383565 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
        0.059682216 = weight(_text_:web in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059682216 = score(doc=117,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.43230867 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
        0.0050923326 = weight(_text_:information in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050923326 = score(doc=117,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.068573356 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic Web ist Vision, Konzept und Programm für die nächste Generation des Internets. Semantik ist dabei ein wesentliches Element in der Transformation von Information in Wissen, sei es um eine effizientere Maschine-Maschine-Kommunikation zu ermöglichen oder um Geschäftsprozess-Management, Wissensmanagement und innerbetriebliche Kooperation durch Modellierung zu verbessern. Der Band richtet sich gleichermaßen an ein praxisorientiertes und wissenschaftliches Publikum, das nicht nur aus der technischen Perspektive einen Zugang zum Thema sucht. Der praktische Nutzen wird in der Fülle von Anwendungsbeispielen offensichtlich, in denen semantische Technologien zum Einsatz kommen. Praxisorientierung ist auch das Leitthema der Semantic Web School, die sich zum Ziel gesetzt hat, den Wissenstransfer zu semantischen Technologien anzukurbeln und den interdisziplinären Diskurs über deren Nutzen und Folgen zu intensivieren. Der vorliegende Band vereinigt 33 Beiträge von 57 Autoren aus 35 Institutionen zu einem virulenten und multidisziplinären Thema. Der Band richtet sich gleichermaßen an interessierte Laien und fachfremde Experten, die nicht nur aus der technischen Perspektive einen Zugang zum Thema suchen. Denn obwohl das Thema Semantic Web zu überwiegendem Maße ein technisches ist, sollen hier bewusst jene Aspekte angesprochen werden. die außerhalb einer ingenieurswissenschaftlichen Perspektive von Relevanz sind und vor allem die praktischen Aspekte semantischer Technologien adressieren. Dieser Anforderung wird durch die vielen Praxisbezüge und Anwendungsbeispiele innerhalb der einzelnen Beiträge Rechnung getragen. Hierbei ist es den Herausgebern jedoch wichtig darauf hinzuweisen, das Semantic Web und semantische Technologien nicht als verheißungsvolles Allheilmittel der durch Informationstechnologien heraufbeschworenen Probleme und Herausforderungen zu betrachten. Ganz im Gegenteil plädieren die Herausgeber für eine verstärkte Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema unter Einbeziehung einer großen Vielfalt an Experten aus den unterschiedlichsten Fachbereichen, die einen reflektierten und kritischen Beitrag zu den positiven und negativen Effekten semantischer Technologien beitragen sollen.
    Content
    Inhalt: Im ersten Teil wird neben der begrifflichen Klärung eine Reihe von Einstiegspunkten angeboten, ohne dass der Leser das Semantic Web in seiner Systematik und Funktionsweise kennen muss. Im Beitrag von Andreas Blumauer und Tassilo Pellegrini werden die zentralen Begriffe rund um semantische Technologien vorgestellt und zentrale Konzepte überblicksartig dargestellt. Die Arbeitsgruppe um Bernardi et al. leitet über in den Themenbereich der Arbeitsorganisation und diskutieret die Bedingungen für den Einsatz semantischer Technologien aus der Perspektive der Wissensarbeit. Dem Thema Normen und Standards wurden sogar zwei Beiträge gewidmet. Während Christian Galinski die grundsätzliche Notwendigkeit von Normen zu Zwecken der Interoperabilität aus einer Top-DownPerspektive beleuchtet, eröffnet Klaus Birkenbihl einen Einblick in die technischen Standards des Semantic Web aus der Bottom-Up-Perspektive des World Wide Web Consortiums (W3C). Mit einem Beitrag zum Innovationsgrad semantischer Technologien in der ökonomischen Koordination betreten Michael Weber und Karl Fröschl weitgehend theoretisches Neuland und legen ein Fundament für weiterführende Auseinandersetzungen. Abgerundet wird der erste Teil noch mit einem Beitrag von Bernd Wohlkinger und Tassilo Pellegrini über die technologiepolitischen Dimensionen der Semantic Web Forschung in der europäischen Union.
    Im zweiten Teil steht der Anwender des Semantic Web im Mittelpunkt, womit auch die erste Ebene der systematischen Auseinandersetzung mit semantischen Technologien angesprochen wird. Nicola Henze zeigt auf, welchen Beitrag semantische Technologien für die Personalisierung von Informationssystemen leisten. Stefanie Lindstaedt und Armin Ulbrich diskutieren die Möglichkeiten der Zusammenführung von Arbeiten und Lernen zu Zwecken der Kompetenzentwicklung in Arbeitsprozessen. Leo Sauermann stellt daraufhin mit der Metapher des "Semantic Desktop" ein innovatives Konzept für den Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft vor und fragt - nicht ohne eine gewisse Ironie -, ob dieser Arbeitsplatz tatsächlich auf einen physischen Ort begrenzt ist. Mark Buzinkay zeigt aus einer historischen Perspektive, wie semantische Strukturen die Navigation sowohl im Web als auch auf einzelnen Webseiten verändert haben und noch werden. Michael Schuster und Dieter Rappold adressieren die Konvergenz von Social Software und Semantic Web entlang der persönlichen Aneignung von Informationstechnologien zu Zwecken der sozialen Vernetzung. Remo Burkhard plädiert dafür, Wissensvisualisierung als Brückenfunktion zwischen technischer Infrastruktur und Nutzer wahrzunehmen und demonstriert das Potential der Wissensvisualisierung zur zielgruppengerechten Kommunikation komplexer Zusammenhänge. Abschließend zeigt Gabriele Sauberer, welche Informationskompetenzen und Schlüsselqualifikationen in der modernen Informationsgesellschaft von Bedeutung sein werden, in der der Einsatz semantische Technologien zur täglichen Wissensarbeit gehören wird.
    Der dritte Teil des Bandes thematisiert die organisationalen Dimensionen des Semantic Web und demonstriert unter dem Stichwort "Wissensmanagement" eine Reihe von Konzepten und Anwendungen im betrieblichen und kollaborativen Umgang mit Information. Der Beitrag von Andreas Blumauer und Thomas Fundneider bietet einen Überblick über den Einsatz semantischer Technologien am Beispiel eines integrierten Wissensmanagement-Systems. Michael John und Jörg Drescher zeichnen den historischen Entwicklungsprozess des IT-Einsatzes für das Management von Informations- und Wissensprozessen im betrieblichen Kontext. Vor dem Hintergrund der betrieblichen Veränderungen durch Globalisierung und angeheizten Wettbewerb zeigt Heiko Beier, welche Rollen, Prozesse und Instrumente in wissensbasierten Organisationen die effiziente Nutzung von Wissen unterstützen. Mit dem Konzept des kollaborativen Wissensmanagement präsentiert das Autorenteam Schmitz et al. einen innovativen WissensmanagementAnsatz auf Peer-to-Peer-Basis mit dem Ziel der kollaborativen Einbindung und Pflege von dezentralisierten Wissensbasen. York Sure und Christoph Tempich demonstrieren anhand der Modellierungsmethode DILIGENT, welchen Beitrag Ontologien bei der Wissensvernetzung in Organisationen leisten können. Hannes Werthner und Michael Borovicka adressieren die Bedeutung semantischer Technologien für eCommerce und demonstrieren am Beispiel HARMONISE deren Einsatz im Bereich des eTourismus. Erweitert wird diese Perspektive durch den Beitrag von Fill et al., in dem das Zusammenspiel zwischen Web-Services und Geschäftsprozessen aus der Perspektive der Wirtschaftsinformatik analysiert wird. Abschließend präsentiert das Autorenteam Angele et al. eine Reihe von realisierten Anwendungen auf Basis semantischer Technologien und identifiziert kritische Faktoren für deren Einsatz.
    Im vierten Teil des Bandes stehen die technischen und infrastrukturellen Aspekte im Mittelpunkt des Interesses, die für den Aufbau und Betrieb semantischer Systeme von Relevanz sind. Wolfgang Kienreich und Markus Strohmaier identifizieren die Wissensmodellierung als Basis für den Einsatz semantischer Technologien für das Knowledge Engineering und stellen zwei grundlegende Modellierungsparadigmen vor. Andreas Koller argumentiert, dass die strukturierte Ablage von Content in Content Management Systemen den Lift-Off des Semantic Web stützen wird und zeigt eine Reihe von einfachen Maßnahmen auf, wie CMS Semantic Web tauglich gemacht werden können. Alois Reitbauer gibt einen leicht verständlichen Überblick über technische Fragestellungen der IT-Integration und demonstriert anhand von Beispielen die Vorteile semantischer Technologien gegenüber konventionellen Methoden. Gerald Reif veranschaulicht die Einsatzgebiete und Leistungsfähigkeit der semantischen Annotation und stellt Tools vor, die den Nutzer bei der Dokumentenverschlagwortung unterstützen. Robert Baumgartner stellt die Funktionsweise von Wrappertechnologien zur Extraktion von Daten aus unstrukturierten Dokumenten vor und demonstriert den Nutzen am Beispiel eines B2B-Szenarios. Michael Granitzer bietet einen Überblick über statistische Verfahren der Textanalyse und zeigt, welchen Beitrag diese zur Wartung von Ontologien leisten können.
    Gerhard Budin geht auf die zentrale Rolle des Terminologiemanagements bei der Ordnung und Intersubjektivierung komplexer Wissensstrukturen ein und gibt Anleitung für die Entwicklung von terminologischen Metamodellen. Marc Ehrig und Rudi Studer thematisieren Prinzipien und Herausforderungen der semantischen Integration von Ontologien zu Zwecken der Herstellung von Interoperabilität von Web Services. Wolfgang May gibt eine Einführung in das Thema Reasoning im und für das Semantic Web und zeigt auf, welche Mechanismen und Konzepte in naher Zukunft für das Semantic Web relevant werden. Abschließend führt die Autorengruppe um Polleres et al. in das junge Thema der semantischen Beschreibung von Web Services ein und adressiert Fragestellungen der Service Komposition und Automatisierung von Geschäftsprozessen. In einem Nachwort widmet sich Rafael Capurro der Frage, wie es in Zeiten eines auftauchenden semantischen Web um die philosophische Hermeneutik bestellt ist. Und er kommt zu dem Schluss, dass das Semantic Web als ein weltpolitisches Projekt verstanden werden sollte, das zu wichtig ist, um es alleine den Technikern oder den Politikern zu überlassen.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  18. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.05
    0.050997656 = product of:
      0.13599375 = sum of:
        0.094447896 = weight(_text_:web in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094447896 = score(doc=439,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
        0.019324046 = weight(_text_:information in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019324046 = score(doc=439,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
        0.022221804 = product of:
          0.044443607 = sum of:
            0.044443607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044443607 = score(doc=439,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information systems
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information systems
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.05
    0.048951056 = product of:
      0.09790211 = sum of:
        0.03211406 = weight(_text_:wide in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03211406 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.171337 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.017422445 = weight(_text_:web in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017422445 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.013337635 = weight(_text_:information in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013337635 = score(doc=1429,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1796046 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.035027973 = sum of:
          0.014968057 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014968057 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.020059915 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020059915 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.
    Content
    Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 28(2001) no.2, S.97-100 (S. Betrand-Gastaldy); Information processing and management 37(2001) no.5, S.766-767 (H. Borko); JASIST 23(2002) no.1, S.58-60 (A.T.D. Petrou); Library and information science research 23(2001) S.200-202 (D.J. Karpuk)
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  20. Creating Web-accessible databases : case studies for libraries, museums, and other nonprofits (2001) 0.05
    0.048479643 = product of:
      0.12927905 = sum of:
        0.08621874 = weight(_text_:web in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08621874 = score(doc=4806,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.6245262 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
        0.014403292 = weight(_text_:information in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014403292 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
        0.028657023 = product of:
          0.057314046 = sum of:
            0.057314046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057314046 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:21:28
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    LCSH
    Web databases
    Subject
    Web databases

Years

Languages

  • e 261
  • d 129
  • m 12
  • es 2
  • f 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications