Search (486 results, page 1 of 25)

0.38577053 = product of:
  0.6750984 = sum of:
    0.067509845 = product of:
      0.20252952 = sum of:
        0.20252952 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20252952 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.20252952 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20252952 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.20252952 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20252952 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.20252952 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20252952 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.041616704 = product of:
  0.29131693 = sum of:
    0.29131693 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29131693 = score(doc=1904,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Consolidates the decisions of 4 major national library agencies: LoC, BL, NLC, NLA on the options, alternatives and interpretations of rules that govern their cataloguing under AACR2. It replaces all other editions previously issued and is updated through Oct. 1994

0.035312947 = product of:
  0.24719062 = sum of:
    0.24719062 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 7742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24719062 = score(doc=7742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 7742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7742)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.034814086 = product of:
  0.24369858 = sum of:
    0.24369858 = weight(_text_:quantenphysiker in 4501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24369858 = score(doc=4501,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40090144 = queryWeight, product of:
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.60787654 = fieldWeight in 4501, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4501)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

"In Das offene Universum: Ein Argument für den Indeterminismus präsentiert Popper eine Kritik des 'wissenschaftlichen' und des metaphysischen Determinismus und argumentiert, daß die klassische Physik den Determinismus genauso wenig voraussetzt oder impliziert wie die Quantenphysik. Dennoch stellt er fest, daß der metaphysische Determinismus den Werken vieler zeitgenössischer Quantenphysiker immer noch zugrundeliegt, inklusive den Werken von Gegnern des Determinismus. Popper verfolgt die Rollen, die die subjektive Interpretation der Wahrscheinlichkeit in der Physik immer noch spielt, bis hin zu diesen metaphysischen deterministischen Voraussetzungen [.]. Der [.] Band tritt in seiner Abhandlung über den Determinismus für die Ansicht ein, daß unsere Rationalität, was die Voraussage des zukünftigen Wachstums des menschlichen Wissens anbelangt, begrenzt ist. Wenn es keine solche Grenze gäbe, wären ernsthafte Argumente sinnlos: und ihr Auftreten wäre eine Illusion.Popper argumentiert also, daß die menschliche Rationalität, was Kritik anbelangt, unbegrenzt ist, jedoch begrenzt, was ihre Voraussagekraft anbelangt; und er zeigt, daß die Unbegrenztheit und die Begrenztheit jede in ihrem Gebiet notwendig sind, damit es die menschliche Rationalität überhaupt geben kann." (Der Herausgeber im Nachwort).

0.019771986 = product of:
  0.069201946 = sum of:
    0.061797656 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061797656 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.23711035 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    0.0074042925 = product of:
      0.014808585 = sum of:
        0.014808585 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014808585 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

27. 9.2005 14:22:19

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.114-115 (M. Hudon); "This most interesting contribution to the literature of subject cataloguing originates in the author's doctoral dissertation, prepared under the direction of jerry Saye at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In seven highly readable chapters, Alenka Sauperl develops possible answers to her principal research question: How do cataloguers determine or identify the topic of a document and choose appropriate subject representations? Specific questions at the source of this research an a process which has not been a frequent object of study include: Where do cataloguers look for an overall sense of what a document is about? How do they get an overall sense of what a document is about, especially when they are not familiar with the discipline? Do they consider only one or several possible interpretations? How do they translate meanings in appropriate and valid class numbers and subject headings? Using a strictly qualitative methodology, Dr. Sauperl's research is a study of twelve cataloguers in reallife situation. The author insists an the holistic rather than purely theoretical understanding of the process she is targeting. Participants in the study were professional cataloguers, with at least one year experience in their current job at one of three large academic libraries in the Southeastern United States. All three libraries have a large central cataloguing department, and use OCLC sources and the same automated system; the context of cataloguing tasks is thus considered to be reasonably comparable. All participants were volunteers in this study which combined two datagathering techniques: the think-aloud method and time-line interviews. A model of the subject cataloguing process was first developed from observations of a group of six cataloguers who were asked to independently perform original cataloguing an three nonfiction, non-serial items selected from materials regularly assigned to them for processing. The model was then used for follow-up interviews. Each participant in the second group of cataloguers was invited to reflect an his/her work process for a recent challenging document they had catalogued. Results are presented in 12 stories describing as many personal approaches to subject cataloguing. From these stories a summarization is offered and a theoretical model of subject cataloguing is developed which, according to the author, represents a realistic approach to subject cataloguing. Stories alternate comments from the researcher and direct quotations from the observed or interviewed cataloguers. Not surprisingly, the participants' stories reveal similarities in the sequence and accomplishment of several tasks in the process of subject cataloguing. Sauperl's proposed model, described in Chapter 5, includes as main stages: 1) Examination of the book and subject identification; 2) Search for subject headings; 3) Classification. Chapter 6 is a hypothetical Gase study, using the proposed model to describe the various stages of cataloguing a hypothetical resource. ...

0.014713728 = product of:
  0.10299609 = sum of:
    0.10299609 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10299609 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The accelerating «iconic turn» in our society today increasingly demands the interactive representation of contextual knowledge. At the same time the use of Web based learning environments highlight the audio-visual dimension of (e)pedagogy and the move towards practical, project-oriented curricula. Regardless of the educational field pedagogical expertise thus requires more and more understanding and control of visual elements and their interpretations. There is a growing need for visually oriented pedagogical experts such as teachers, tutors, designers and developers who are capable of community knowledge building and collaboration with other experts from different fields from both private and public sectors. The book intends to illuminate scientific and programmatic excerpts from an international community of researchers, practitioners, teachers and scholars working in interrelated fields such as Aesthetic Education, ePedagogy Design - Visual Knowledge Building, Visual Education, Art Education, Media Pedagogy and Intermedia Art Education.

0.014713728 = product of:
  0.10299609 = sum of:
    0.10299609 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 5715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10299609 = score(doc=5715,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 5715, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5715)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Luciano Floridi presents an innovative approach to philosophy, conceived as conceptual design. He explores how we make, transform, refine, and improve the objects of our knowledge. His starting point is that reality provides the data, to be understood as constraining affordances, and we transform them into information, like semantic engines. Such transformation or repurposing is not equivalent to portraying, or picturing, or photographing, or photocopying anything. It is more like cooking: the dish does not represent the ingredients, it uses them to make something else out of them, yet the reality of the dish and its properties hugely depend on the reality and the properties of the ingredients. Models are not representations understood as pictures, but interpretations understood as data elaborations, of systems. Thus, Luciano Floridi articulates and defends the thesis that knowledge is design and philosophy is the ultimate form of conceptual design. Although entirely independent of Floridi's previous books, The Philosophy of Information (OUP 2011) and The Ethics of Information (OUP 2013), The Logic of Information both complements the existing volumes and presents new work on the foundations of the philosophy of information.

0.013057005 = product of:
  0.09139903 = sum of:
    0.09139903 = sum of:
      0.06671805 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06671805 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.3782405 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.024680976 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024680976 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

14. 4.2007 10:04:22

RSWK

Computer / Anwendung / Computerunterstützte Lexikographie / Aufsatzsammlung

Subject

Computer / Anwendung / Computerunterstützte Lexikographie / Aufsatzsammlung

0.012318473 = product of:
  0.08622931 = sum of:
    0.08622931 = sum of:
      0.05661214 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05661214 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.02961717 = weight(_text_:22 in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02961717 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Die kooperative Führung der Schlagwortnormdatei und die Gewährleistung der Qualität der in ihr enthaltenen Daten sind mit einem enormen Aufwand verbunden, der durch den Einsatz der EDV und geeignete Organisationsstrukturen nur geringfügig reduziert werden kann. Die Erstellung der SWD-Normdatensätze bleibt aufgrund der Vielzahl der den Ansetzungsformen beizufügenden Zusatzinformationen wie Codes, Notationen und Relationen relativ zeitintensiv. Diese lassen jedoch auch die SWD besonders wertvoll für die Recherche werden, da sie die Wiederauffindbarkeit der Daten unterstützen. Während die Schlagwortsuche in deutschen OPACs weit verbreitet ist, haben Codes, Notationen und Relationen bisher nur geringfügig Eingang in den OPAC gefunden. Bei einer Untersuchung von 111 Online-Katalogen wurde festgestellt, dass kein einziger OPAC all die Möglichkeiten nutzt, die mit der SWD gegeben sind. Am meisten werden noch Synonyme und - in geringerem Maße - hierarchische und assoziative Relationen zur Verbesserung des Recalls und zur Benutzerführung eingesetzt. Codes und Notationen finden nur vereinzelt Anwendung.

Date

30. 1.2007 18:22:15

0.012318473 = product of:
  0.08622931 = sum of:
    0.08622931 = sum of:
      0.05661214 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05661214 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
      0.02961717 = weight(_text_:22 in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02961717 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 5.2007 12:07:51

0.012318473 = product of:
  0.08622931 = sum of:
    0.08622931 = sum of:
      0.05661214 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05661214 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.02961717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02961717 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

24. 8.2016 14:03:22

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.011770982 = product of:
  0.08239687 = sum of:
    0.08239687 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08239687 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.31614712 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.173-175 (G. Campbell): "Bibliographic control rests on a rich and intriguing theoretical foundation. All too often, however, students and scholars of information studies pass this foundation over, perhaps because of its fragmentation. Information organization theory has evolved in tandem with practice, and particularly through innumerable policy decisions: its central tenets, therefore, appear in prefaces to manuals and catalogues, in library bulletins, in standards and rule interpretations, and in professional and scholarly conference proceedings. Gathering this theory together is a formidable task, and Svenonius has already made a significant contribution through the two sourcebooks she has coedited: Foundations of Cataloging (1985), and Theory of Subject Analysis (1985). With The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 'Svenonius goes a huge step further: she pulls the fragments of bibliographic control theory together and sets them within a holistic theoretical framework. The result is a significant contribution to LIS scholarship, one which evokes the best of all possible responses: dissatisfied cries for more. Svenonius divides her treatise into two parts containing five chapters each. The first part provides a theoretically-grounded articulation of the objectives, entities, languages and principles of information organization. The field, she argues, rests on three distinct philsophical traditions. Systems philosophy, as developed in library circles by Charles Cutter, gives a holistic and visionary dimension to bibliographic control: a tendency to see individual processes as part of a larger, coherent structure. The philosophy of science, typified in the field by Cyril Cleverdon in the 1950s, emphasizes the need to quantify and generalize, and to subject the tenets of information retrieval to empirical verification. Language philosophy introduces the concept of language rules, and argues that information organization is a "particular kind of language use" (p. 6): an approach which enables us to employ linguistic concepts of semantics, vocabulary and syntax to explain the processes of information organization. Having established this framework, Svenonius goes on to discuss the objectives of bibliographic retrieval systems. Deftly combining the seminal contributions of Cutter, Seymour Lubetzky, the Paris Principles of 1961, and the IFLA objectives of 1997, she produces five central objectives of bibliographic control: locating entitles (finding), identifying entitles (collocating), selecting them (choice), acquiring or gaining access to them (acquisition), and navigating a bibliographic database (navigation) (p. 20)". -

0.011770982 = product of:
  0.08239687 = sum of:
    0.08239687 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 1646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08239687 = score(doc=1646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.31614712 = fieldWeight in 1646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1646)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Finally, Melvil Dewey fully revealed, in entertaining prose, built on rigorous and deep historical scholarship. This is the definitive biography we've missed for so long. It tells the story of an American archetype?a man imbued with the inventive curiosity, sexism, anti-Semitism, racism, type-A control-freakishness, and reform zeal so characteristic of the power brokers of his time and his nation. The result is a masterpiece of history. It appropriately bears the imprint of the library association he founded and nurtured and which was enlisted for years to coconspire to cover up the darker side of the old boy. Wiegand's (a Dewey historian) penetrating, provocative interpretations add to the readability and pleasure of this fine biography, even his highly arguable view that the persistence of Dewey's design for librarianship means it "will likely remain a marginal profession." To this member of the small club of holders of jobs Dewey once held, it is obvious that Wiegand's work can be used to make the opposite case as well: that it was Dewey who gave librarianship any hope at all of becoming central to modern American society. Either way, you should own and read this brilliant, comprehensive study of the biased crackpot genius to whom we librarians owe so much.?

0.010783265 = product of:
  0.07548285 = sum of:
    0.07548285 = product of:
      0.1509657 = sum of:
        0.1509657 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1509657 = score(doc=1477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.85586053 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.010783265 = product of:
  0.07548285 = sum of:
    0.07548285 = product of:
      0.1509657 = sum of:
        0.1509657 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1509657 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.85586053 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.010783265 = product of:
  0.07548285 = sum of:
    0.07548285 = product of:
      0.1509657 = sum of:
        0.1509657 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1509657 = score(doc=3389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.85586053 = fieldWeight in 3389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.010783265 = product of:
  0.07548285 = sum of:
    0.07548285 = product of:
      0.1509657 = sum of:
        0.1509657 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1509657 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.85586053 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.010783265 = product of:
  0.07548285 = sum of:
    0.07548285 = product of:
      0.1509657 = sum of:
        0.1509657 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1509657 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.85586053 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.010445603 = product of:
  0.073119216 = sum of:
    0.073119216 = sum of:
      0.053374436 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053374436 = score(doc=774,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.3025924 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
      0.019744782 = weight(_text_:22 in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019744782 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

Inhalt: A. Grundsätzliche Fragen (aus dem Umfeld) der Wissensorganisation Markus Gottwald, Matthias Klemm und Jan Weyand: Warum ist es schwierig, Wissen zu managen? Ein soziologischer Deutungsversuch anhand eines Wissensmanagementprojekts in einem Großunternehmen H. Peter Ohly: Wissenskommunikation und -organisation. Quo vadis? Helmut F. Spinner: Wissenspartizipation und Wissenschaftskommunikation in drei Wissensräumen: Entwurf einer integrierten Theorie B. Dokumentationssprachen in der Anwendung Felix Boteram: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz Jessica Hubrich: Multilinguale Wissensorganisation im Zeitalter der Globalisierung: das Projekt CrissCross Vivien Petras: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen - eine Fallstudie Manfred Hauer, Uwe Leissing und Karl Rädler: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at
E. Metadaten und Ontologien Thomas Baker: Dublin Core Application Profiles: current approaches Georg Hohmann: Die Anwendung des CIDOC für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften Elena Semenova: Ontologie als Begriffssystem. Theoretische Überlegungen und ihre praktische Umsetzung bei der Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen F. Repositorien und Ressourcen Christiane Hümmer: TELOTA - Aspekte eines Wissensportals für geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung Philipp Scham: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale Benjamin Zapilko: Dynamisches Browsing im Kontext von Informationsarchitekturen

0.010265394 = product of:
  0.07185776 = sum of:
    0.07185776 = sum of:
      0.047176782 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047176782 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.024680976 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024680976 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.036433198 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Für Webseiten ist, wie für alle interaktiven Anwendungen vom einfachen Automaten bis zur komplexen Software, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von zentraler Bedeutung. Allerdings wird eine sinnvolle Benutzung von Informationsangeboten im World Wide Web häufig durch "cooles Design" unnötig erschwert, weil zentrale Punkte der Benutzerfreundlichkeit (Usability) vernachlässigt werden. Durch Usability Evaluation kann die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Webseiten und damit auch die Akzeptanz bei den Benutzern verbessert werden. Ziel ist die Gestaltung von ansprechenden benutzerfreundlichen Webangeboten, die den Benutzern einen effektiven und effizienten Dialog ermöglichen. Das Buch bietet eine praxisorientierte Einführung in die Web Usability Evaluation und beschreibt die Anwendung ihrer verschiedenen Methoden.

Date

22. 3.2008 14:24:08