-
Hoogcarspel, A.: Guidelines for cataloging monographic electronic texts at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities (1994)
0.02
0.019517628 = product of:
0.1366234 = sum of:
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.08634636 = product of:
0.17269272 = sum of:
0.17269272 = weight(_text_:texts in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17269272 = score(doc=5937,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
1.049124 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The guidelines are a response to 2 interconnected problems: little bibliographic control exists for electronic texts, and the AACR2 standards for control of computer files are not entirely satisfactory
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.02
0.017777555 = product of:
0.082961924 = sum of:
0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059409913 = score(doc=1800,freq=32.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.011776006 = weight(_text_:classification in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011776006 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.12315229 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.011776006 = weight(_text_:classification in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011776006 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.12315229 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
-
Sweeney, R.: Standard book subject categories for EDI (1994)
0.02
0.017682536 = product of:
0.12377774 = sum of:
0.0735007 = weight(_text_:subject in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0735007 = score(doc=893,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68444026 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of an investigation into existing systems of subject categories at present in use in the bibliographic community. Makes recommendations for establishing a standard set of book subject categories for Electronic Data Interchange
-
¬The future of national bibliography (1997)
0.01
0.01210578 = product of:
0.08474045 = sum of:
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
0.024408007 = product of:
0.048816014 = sum of:
0.048816014 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048816014 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
- Imprint
- Boston Spa : British Library, National Bibliographic Service
-
Treglown, M.: HIBROWSE for bibliographic databases : a study of the application of usability techniques in view-based searching (1997)
0.01
0.010213552 = product of:
0.07149486 = sum of:
0.021217827 = weight(_text_:subject in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021217827 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- View based searching and multi view searching using HIBROWSE proposes a new paradigm for information retrieval from bibliographic databases and database management systems. The paradigm replaces command line and form based interaction with query specification and interaction which requires the user to identify views relating to query facets of the subject of their query. Attempted to apply techniques from human-computer interaction design in the development, construction and usability evaluation of a view based searching system for a very large bibliographic database. As the development of the HIBROWSE system had been in progress before usability became a major concern, as well as the class of system being developed, greater progress towards improved usability was made by adopting a less structured development life-cycle. Examined the usefulness of a number of usability evaluation methods in the context of trying to determine the usability of designs in interactive information retrieval systems. Measurement of the subjective usability of prototypes reinforced the finding of users' difficulties in forming a useful account of the system behaviour and functionality from the training material provided, highlighted some aspects of the system that could be improved, and the greater usability of the HIBROWSE prototypes over an extant commercial bibliographic database system
-
Clavel, G.; Dale, P.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Kunz, M.; Landry, P.; MacEwan, A.; Naudi, M.; Oddy, P.; Saget, A.: CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access : final report (1999)
0.01
0.0101640485 = product of:
0.071148336 = sum of:
0.05355137 = weight(_text_:subject in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05355137 = score(doc=6067,freq=26.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4986716 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.017596964 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017596964 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.15054363 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- This final report defines the problem of multilingual subject access, summarises the work carried out by the CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access from autumn 1997 until February 1999 and its results, identifies and discusses issues to be resolved, and presents a proposal for a prototype to the directors of the institutions concerned. For a summary of results, and the proposal, see 'CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access: proposals for discussion, March 18th 1999. This report will be distributed to members of the CENL and posted on the GABRIEL website. Genevieve Clavel has compiled it on the basis of the group's reports, discussions within the group and comments provided by the partners.
- Content
- Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.
-
Leeves, J.: Harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange (1993)
0.01
0.006220171 = product of:
0.08708239 = sum of:
0.08708239 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08708239 = score(doc=6031,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.7449978 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews the provision for bibliographic data within EDIFACT, compares those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and examines the implications for MARC based standards. Outlines the role of the major players involved. Describes stanbdards dealing with EDIFACT in greatest detail. Describes the library systems using the records
-
Berger, M.G.: Information seeking in the online bibliographic system : an exploratory study (1994)
0.01
0.005745948 = product of:
0.08044326 = sum of:
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=2149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 2149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2149)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Leeves, J.: EDIBIB: harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange : a report prepared for Book Industry Communication (1993)
0.01
0.005745948 = product of:
0.08044326 = sum of:
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=9,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Report commissioned by Book Industry Communications (BIC) and funded by the British National Bibliography Research Fund and the Britsh National Bibliographic Service. The aims of the project were: to review the provisions for bibliographic data within EDIFACT (Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport); to compare those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and the book publishing industry, and to examine the implications for MARC based databases, such as UKMARC
-
Barker, P.: ¬An examination of the use of the OSI Directory for accessing bibliographic information : project ABDUX (1993)
0.01
0.0057008807 = product of:
0.079812326 = sum of:
0.079812326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079812326 = score(doc=7310,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6828017 = fieldWeight in 7310, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7310)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Describes the work of the ABDUX project, containing a brief description of the rationale for using X.500 for access to bibliographic information. Outlines the project's design work and a demonstration system. Reviews the standards applicable to bibliographic data and library OPACs. Highlights difficulties found when handling bibliographic data in library systems. Discusses the service requirements of OPACs for accessing bibliographic, discussing how X.500 Directory services may be used. Suggests the DIT structures that coulb be used for storing both bibliographic information and descriptions on information resources in general in the directory. Describes the way in which the model of bibliographic data is presented. Outlines the syntax of ASN.1 and how records and fields may be described in terms of X.500 object classes and attribute types. Details the mapping of MARC format into an X.500 compatible form. Provides the schema information for representing research notes and archives, not covered by MARC definitions. Examines the success in implementing the designs and loos ahead to future possibilities
-
Ayres, F.H.: ¬The Bradford OPAC : a new concept in bibliographic control (1995)
0.01
0.0056211445 = product of:
0.07869602 = sum of:
0.07869602 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07869602 = score(doc=6294,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 6294, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6294)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Describes a feasibility study funded by BLRDD to test a new concept in bibliographic control in OPACs based on the manifestation of the work. The research was conducted at Bradford University, leading directly from the QUALCAT project, and used bibliographic records supplied by OCLC. A new type of hierarchical bibliographic record structure was used to import sets of bibliographic records into a hierarchical relational database. This was used for an experimental Windows based OPAC. Much of the early part of the project was spent clarifying the practical and theoretical implications of the manifestations concept
-
Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992)
0.01
0.0056137093 = product of:
0.07859193 = sum of:
0.07859193 = weight(_text_:subject in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07859193 = score(doc=367,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.73184985 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
-
Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998)
0.01
0.005078748 = product of:
0.07110247 = sum of:
0.07110247 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07110247 = score(doc=6418,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Editor
- IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
-
Siemer, J.A.: ¬A conceptual model for an information retrieval expert system prototype for agricultural bibliographic literature databases (1994)
0.00
0.0043094605 = product of:
0.060332447 = sum of:
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.00
0.0042866482 = product of:
0.060013074 = sum of:
0.060013074 = weight(_text_:subject in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060013074 = score(doc=5346,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Teil von: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee. June 1997 (http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/finalreport.cfm).
-
Voorbij, H.: Titelwoorden - trefwoorden : een vergelijkend onderzoek (1997)
0.00
0.0042435653 = product of:
0.059409913 = sum of:
0.059409913 = weight(_text_:subject in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059409913 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Title words - subject headings: a comparative research
-
Rickman, R.M.; Stonham, T.J.: Image database retrieval using neural networks (1994)
0.00
0.0036373418 = product of:
0.05092278 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Reports a study of the application of neural networks to the automatic subject indexing of images and to image database management systems (IDBMS)
-
Perkins, C.; Guest, P.: Operationalizing a sheet based cartographic information retrieval system (1993)
0.00
0.0035912173 = product of:
0.05027704 = sum of:
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=6573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6573)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Investigates and evaluates possible solutions to the problems facing map libraries wishing to gain carto-bibliographic control of its collections at the level of the sheet within the series. Assesses record availability and quality
-
Shared cataloguing : report to the principles of the six copyright libraries of the Copyright Libraries Shared Cataloguing Project Steering Group (1993)
0.00
0.0035912173 = product of:
0.05027704 = sum of:
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 8000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=8000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 8000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8000)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Imprint
- Boston Spa : Bristish Library National Bibliographic Service
-
Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994)
0.00
0.003560864 = product of:
0.04985209 = sum of:
0.04985209 = product of:
0.09970418 = sum of:
0.09970418 = weight(_text_:texts in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09970418 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460659 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.605712 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4822793 = idf(docFreq=499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The final report of the 2nd British Library abstracting project (the BLAB project), 1990-1992, which was carried out partly at the Computing Department of Lancaster University, and partly at the Centre for Computational Linguistics, UMIST. This project built on the results of the first project, of 1985-1987, to build a system designed create abstracts automatically from given texts
