Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.09

0.09329757 = sum of:
  0.042037636 = product of:
    0.16815054 = sum of:
      0.16815054 = weight(_text_:2000 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16815054 = score(doc=234,freq=3.0), product of:
          0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06305678 = queryNorm
          0.6580353 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
            1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
              3.0 = termFreq=3.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05125994 = product of:
    0.10251988 = sum of:
      0.10251988 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10251988 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22081411 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.06305678 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages: 22 S
Year: 2000

IVS und IK im Innovationszyklus : Studie des Informationsrings Kreditwirtschaft (2000) 0.03

0.031657703 = product of:
  0.06331541 = sum of:
    0.06331541 = product of:
      0.25326163 = sum of:
        0.25326163 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25326163 = score(doc=5829,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.9911065 = fieldWeight in 5829, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5829)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Issue: Stand: Mai 2000.
Year: 2000

Gajewski, T.; Klement, T.: Generierung eines multidimensionalen Katalogsystems mit Datawarehouse-Architektur (2000) 0.03

0.031657703 = product of:
  0.06331541 = sum of:
    0.06331541 = product of:
      0.25326163 = sum of:
        0.25326163 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25326163 = score(doc=6009,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.9911065 = fieldWeight in 6009, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6009)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series: GMD research series; 2/2000
Year: 2000

Beaulieu, M.; Gatford, M.; Jones, S.: Widening access to Okapi (2000) 0.02

0.024521954 = product of:
  0.04904391 = sum of:
    0.04904391 = product of:
      0.19617563 = sum of:
        0.19617563 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19617563 = score(doc=3782,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.7677078 = fieldWeight in 3782, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3782)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Literacy in the information age : Final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey (2000) 0.02

0.024521954 = product of:
  0.04904391 = sum of:
    0.04904391 = product of:
      0.19617563 = sum of:
        0.19617563 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19617563 = score(doc=6479,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.7677078 = fieldWeight in 6479, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6479)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Kluck, M.; Krause, J.; Müller, M.N.O.; AG Elfikom TU Darmstadt: Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Sozialwissenschaften : Projektskizze (2000) 0.02

0.021018818 = product of:
  0.042037636 = sum of:
    0.042037636 = product of:
      0.16815054 = sum of:
        0.16815054 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16815054 = score(doc=4609,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.6580353 = fieldWeight in 4609, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4609)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Oberhauser, O.; Seidler, W.: Reklassifizierung grösserer fachspezifischer Bibliotheksbestände : Durchführbarkeitsstudie für die Fachbibliothek für Germanistik an der Universität Wien (2000) 0.02

0.021018818 = product of:
  0.042037636 = sum of:
    0.042037636 = product of:
      0.16815054 = sum of:
        0.16815054 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16815054 = score(doc=4631,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.6580353 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.; Rösch, H.; Sleegers, P.: Evit@: Evaluation elektronischer Informationsmittel (2000) 0.02

0.017515682 = product of:
  0.035031363 = sum of:
    0.035031363 = product of:
      0.14012545 = sum of:
        0.14012545 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14012545 = score(doc=1881,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.54836273 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Mandl, T.: Einsatz neuronaler Netze als Transferkomponenten beim Retrieval in heterogenen Dokumentbeständen (2000) 0.01

0.014012545 = product of:
  0.02802509 = sum of:
    0.02802509 = product of:
      0.11210036 = sum of:
        0.11210036 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11210036 = score(doc=6563,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.4386902 = fieldWeight in 6563, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6563)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Roßmann, N.: Website-usability : Landtag NRW (2002) 0.01

0.012422633 = product of:
  0.024845267 = sum of:
    0.024845267 = product of:
      0.049690533 = sum of:
        0.049690533 = weight(_text_:x in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049690533 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26626876 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.18661796 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type: x

Bredemeier, W.; Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Branche elektronischer Geschäftsinformationen in Deutschland 2000/2001 (2001) 0.01
```
0.012385457 = product of:
  0.024770914 = sum of:
    0.024770914 = product of:
      0.099083655 = sum of:
        0.099083655 = weight(_text_:2000 in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099083655 = score(doc=621,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.387751 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

Der deutsche Markt für Elektronische Informationsdienste im Jahre 2000 - Ergebnisse einer Umsatzerhebung - Von Willi Bredemeier: - Abgesicherte Methodologie unter Berücksichtigung der Spezifika des EIS-Marktes und der aktuellen Entwicklung - teilweise Vergleichbarkeit der Daten ab 1989 - Weitgehende quantitative Markttransparenz, da der Leser die Aggregationen der Markt- und Teilmarktdaten aus einzelwirtschaftlichen Daten voll nachvollziehen kann - 93 zum Teil ausführliche Tabellen vorwiegend zu einzelnen Informationsanbietern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Geschäftsjahre 2000 und 1999, unterteilt in die Bereiche Gesamtmarkt für Elektronische Informationsdienste, Datev, Realtime-Finanzinformationen, Nachrichtenagenturen, Kreditinformationen, Firmen- und Produktinformationen, weitere Wirtschaftsinformationen, Rechtsinformationen, Wissenschaftlich-technisch-medizinische Informationen - Intellectual Property, Konsumentendienste, Nachbarmärkte - Analyse aktueller Markttrends. Qualität professioneller Firmeninformationen im World Wide Web - Von Mechtild Stock und Wolfgang G. Stock: - Weiterführung der Qualitätsdiskussion und Entwicklung eines Systems von Qualitätskriterien für Informationsangebote, bezogen auf Firmeninformationen im Internet - "Qualitätspanel" für die Bereiche Bonitätsinformationen, Firmenkurzdossiers, Produktinformationen und Adressinformationen mit den Anbietern Bürgel, Creditreform, Dun & Bradstreet Deutschland, ABC online, ALLECO, Hoppenstedt Firmendatenbank, Who is Who in Multimedia, Kompass Deutschland, Sachon Industriedaten, Wer liefert was?, AZ Bertelsmann, Schober.com - Hochdifferenzierte Tests, die den Kunden Hilfen bei der Auswahl zwischen Angeboten und den Anbietern Hinweise auf Maßnahmen zu qualitativen Verbesserungen geben - Detaillierte Informationen über eingesetzte Systeme der Branchen- und Produktklassifikationen - Rankings der Firmeninformationsanbieter insgesamt sowie nach Datenbasen, Retrievalsystemen und Websites, Detailinformationen zu allen Qualitätsdimensionen

Binder, G.; Stahl, M.; Faulborn, L.: Vergleichsuntersuchung MESSENGER-FULCRUM (2000) 0.01

0.012260977 = product of:
  0.024521954 = sum of:
    0.024521954 = product of:
      0.09808782 = sum of:
        0.09808782 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09808782 = score(doc=4885,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.3838539 = fieldWeight in 4885, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4885)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Hodge, G.: Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries : beyond traditional authority files (2000) 0.01

0.010509409 = product of:
  0.021018818 = sum of:
    0.021018818 = product of:
      0.08407527 = sum of:
        0.08407527 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08407527 = score(doc=4723,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.32901764 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2000

Cataloging culutural objects : a guide to describing cultural works and their images (2003) 0.01
```
0.009049417 = product of:
  0.018098835 = sum of:
    0.018098835 = product of:
      0.07239534 = sum of:
        0.07239534 = weight(_text_:authors in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07239534 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28746414 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both
Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.01
```
0.009049417 = product of:
  0.018098835 = sum of:
    0.018098835 = product of:
      0.07239534 = sum of:
        0.07239534 = weight(_text_:authors in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07239534 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28746414 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
Stein, R.; Gottschewski, J.; Heuchert, R.; Ermert, A.; Hagedorn-Saupe, M.; Hansen, H.-J.; Saro, C.; Scheffel, R.; Schulte-Dornberg, G.: ¬Das CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model : Eine Hilfe für den Datenaustausch? (2005) 0.01
```
0.008580896 = product of:
  0.017161792 = sum of:
    0.017161792 = product of:
      0.06864717 = sum of:
        0.06864717 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06864717 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Mit dieser Publikation veröffentlicht das Institut für Museumskunde die bisherigen Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe "Datenaustausch" in der Fachgruppe Dokumentation des Deutschen Museumsbunds (DMB). Kolleginnen und Kollegen verschiedener Interessenschwerpunkte aus Museen und Informatik-Einrichtungen haben seit dem Jahre 2000 die Entwicklung des CIDOC-CRM (das "Conceptual Reference Model" des Dokumentationskomitees von ICOM, dem Internationalen Museumsrat) zu einem Arbeitsinstrument begleitet, das derzeit auf dem Wege ist, als Norm ISO 21 127 Anerkennung zu finden. Die Arbeitsgruppe hat sich intensiv damit beschäftigt, zunächst das komplexe Modell zu verstehen, und sie hat diskutiert, inwieweit es eine Hilfestellung für die Arbeit von Museen miteinander und für einen Datenaustausch zwischen ihnen bietet. Die Ergebnisse der Überlegungen werden hier vorgestellt in der Hoffnung, dass dadurch viele Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit dem Modell bekannt werden, ihnen das Verständnis des CRM erleichtert wird und das Modell auch in Deutschland für die Konzeption von Informationssystemen und die Vermittlung zwischen unterschiedlichen Dokumentationen genutzt werden kann.

Nohr, H.: Wissen und Wissensprozesse visualisieren (2000) 0.01

0.007914426 = product of:
  0.015828852 = sum of:
    0.015828852 = product of:
      0.06331541 = sum of:
        0.06331541 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06331541 = score(doc=2974,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.24777663 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series: Arbeitspapiere Wissensmanagement; 2000/1
Year: 2000

Babeu, A.: Building a "FRBR-inspired" catalog : the Perseus digital library experience (2008) 0.01
```
0.007239533 = product of:
  0.014479066 = sum of:
    0.014479066 = product of:
      0.057916265 = sum of:
        0.057916265 = weight(_text_:authors in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057916265 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28746414 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Our catalog should not be called a FRBR catalog perhaps, but instead a "FRBR Inspired catalog." As such our main goal has been "practical findability," we are seeking to support the four identified user tasks of the FRBR model, or to "Search, Identify, Select, and Obtain," rather than to create a FRBR catalog, per se. By encoding as much information as possible in the MODS and MADS records we have created, we believe that useful searching will be supported, that by using unique identifiers for works and authors users will be able to identify that the entity they have located is the desired one, that by encoding expression level information (such as the language of the work, the translator, etc) users will be able to select which expression of a work they are interested in, and that by supplying links to different online manifestations that users will be able to obtain access to a digital copy of a work. This white paper will discuss previous and current efforts by the Perseus Project in creating a FRBRized catalog, including the cataloging workflow, lessons learned during the process and will also seek to place this work in the larger context of research regarding FRBR, cataloging, Library 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and the growing importance of the FRBR model in the face of growing million book digital libraries.
Sykes, J.: Making solid business decisions through intelligent indexing taxonomies : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2003) 0.01
```
0.0057205977 = product of:
  0.011441195 = sum of:
    0.011441195 = product of:
      0.04576478 = sum of:
        0.04576478 = weight(_text_:2000 in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04576478 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

In 2000, Factiva published "The Value of Indexing," a white paper emphasizing the strategic importance of accurate categorization, based on a robust taxonomy for later retrieval of documents stored in commercial or in-house content repositories. Since that time, there has been resounding agreement between persons who use Web-based systems and those who design these systems that search engines alone are not the answer for effective information retrieval. High-quality categorization is crucial if users are to be able to find the right answers in repositories of articles and documents that are expanding at phenomenal rates. Companies continue to invest in technologies that will help them organize and integrate their content. A March 2002 article in EContent suggests a typical taxonomy implementation usually costs around $100,000. The article also cites a Merrill Lynch study that predicts the market for search and categorization products, now at about $600 million, will more than double by 2005. Classification activities are not new. In the third century B.C., Callimachus of Cyrene managed the ancient Library of Alexandria. To help scholars find items in the collection, he created an index of all the scrolls organized according to a subject taxonomy. Factiva's parent companies, Dow Jones and Reuters, each have more than 20 years of experience with developing taxonomies and painstaking manual categorization processes and also have a solid history with automated categorization techniques. This experience and expertise put Factiva at the leading edge of developing and applying categorization technology today. This paper will update readers about enhancements made to the Factiva Intelligent IndexingT taxonomy. It examines the value these enhancements bring to Factiva's news and business information service, and the value brought to clients who license the Factiva taxonomy as a fundamental component of their own Enterprise Knowledge Architecture. There is a behind-the-scenes-look at how Factiva classifies a huge stream of incoming articles published in a variety of formats and languages. The paper concludes with an overview of new Factiva services and solutions that are designed specifically to help clients improve productivity and make solid business decisions by precisely finding information in their own everexpanding content repositories.
Forschen für die Internet-Gesellschaft : Trends, Technologien, Anwendungen, Trends und Handlungsempfehlungen 2008 des Feldafinger Kreises (2008) 0.01
```
0.0057205977 = product of:
  0.011441195 = sum of:
    0.011441195 = product of:
      0.04576478 = sum of:
        0.04576478 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04576478 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25553423 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06305678 = queryNorm
            0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Ausgangslage: Im April 2000 haben führende Repräsentanten der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen und der Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) beschlossen, gemeinsame Strategien zur Stärkung des Standorts Deutschland im globalen Innovationswettbewerb zu entwickeln. Weil entscheidende Impulse für Innovationen von der Zusammenarbeit zwischen öffentlicher Forschung und privaten Unternehmen ausgehen, muss dieser Prozess durch mehr Autonomie und Wettbewerb von Hochschulen und Forschungsinstituten und durch intensive Kommunikation und Kooperation weiter verbessert werden. Ziel sollte sein, die Partner aus unterschiedlichen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen und aus allen Branchen der Wirtschaft noch besser ins Gespräch zu bringen, um Defizite bei der Umsetzung von Forschungsergebnissen in innovative Produkte, Dienste und Verfahren abzubauen. Um den Dialog zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft zu intensivieren, haben die Spitzenorganisationen von Wissenschaft und Industrie gemeinsame Symposien auf den Gebieten "Energie", "Lebenswissenschaften" und "Internet-Gesellschaft" beschlossen. Von diesen Symposien sollen Impulse für die Ermittlung des künftigen Forschungsbedarfs und entsprechende Handlungsempfehlungen für diese Gebiete höchster volkswirtschaftlicher Relevanz ausgehen. Stellvertretend für die Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat die Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft gemeinsam mit dem BDI die Ausrichtung des Symposiums zur Internet-Gesellschaft organisiert und finanziell unterstützt.

Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes