Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.019790437 = product of:
  0.039580874 = sum of:
    0.039580874 = product of:
      0.07916175 = sum of:
        0.07916175 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07916175 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17050382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048689928 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

22 S

0.0069875983 = product of:
  0.0139751965 = sum of:
    0.0139751965 = product of:
      0.055900786 = sum of:
        0.055900786 = weight(_text_:authors in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055900786 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22196832 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048689928 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both

0.0069875983 = product of:
  0.0139751965 = sum of:
    0.0139751965 = product of:
      0.055900786 = sum of:
        0.055900786 = weight(_text_:authors in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055900786 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22196832 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048689928 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.

0.0055900784 = product of:
  0.011180157 = sum of:
    0.011180157 = product of:
      0.044720627 = sum of:
        0.044720627 = weight(_text_:authors in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044720627 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22196832 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048689928 = queryNorm
            0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Our catalog should not be called a FRBR catalog perhaps, but instead a "FRBR Inspired catalog." As such our main goal has been "practical findability," we are seeking to support the four identified user tasks of the FRBR model, or to "Search, Identify, Select, and Obtain," rather than to create a FRBR catalog, per se. By encoding as much information as possible in the MODS and MADS records we have created, we believe that useful searching will be supported, that by using unique identifiers for works and authors users will be able to identify that the entity they have located is the desired one, that by encoding expression level information (such as the language of the work, the translator, etc) users will be able to select which expression of a work they are interested in, and that by supplying links to different online manifestations that users will be able to obtain access to a digital copy of a work. This white paper will discuss previous and current efforts by the Perseus Project in creating a FRBRized catalog, including the cataloging workflow, lessons learned during the process and will also seek to place this work in the larger context of research regarding FRBR, cataloging, Library 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and the growing importance of the FRBR model in the face of growing million book digital libraries.