-
ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998)
0.08
0.078835934 = product of:
0.1182539 = sum of:
0.012892594 = weight(_text_:a in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012892594 = score(doc=1404,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.105361305 = sum of:
0.063318536 = weight(_text_:de in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063318536 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.04204277 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04204277 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the final phase of the work on the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) project at De Montfort University, Leicester, which concluded in 1996. ELINOR was 2 phase project with 3 overall goals: to create a practical pilot system based on a commercial product (Excalibur EFS); to investigate the expansion of a small scale electronic library to a larger, distributed library system; and to develop a more efficient and effective means of accessing and sharing resources within a networked multi campus institution. ELINOR was successful in demonstrating that libraries may conveniently digitize and supply smal collections of high demand materials over a campus network in text anf TIFF format. Operational conditions have so far indicated that the barriers are not technological but involve copyright, use issues and sustainability
- Editor
- Ramsden, A.
- Series
- British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
-
Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975)
0.04
0.04498115 = product of:
0.06747173 = sum of:
0.018421829 = weight(_text_:a in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018421829 = score(doc=3473,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
0.0490499 = product of:
0.0980998 = sum of:
0.0980998 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0980998 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995)
0.04
0.036623575 = product of:
0.054935362 = sum of:
0.012892594 = weight(_text_:a in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012892594 = score(doc=2538,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.04204277 = product of:
0.08408554 = sum of:
0.08408554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408554 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
-
Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000)
0.03
0.034106143 = product of:
0.05115921 = sum of:
0.009116441 = weight(_text_:a in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009116441 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.04204277 = product of:
0.08408554 = sum of:
0.08408554 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408554 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for authors (1987)
0.03
0.033055637 = product of:
0.049583454 = sum of:
0.04198642 = product of:
0.16794568 = sum of:
0.16794568 = weight(_text_:authors in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16794568 = score(doc=5946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0075970334 = weight(_text_:a in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075970334 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Guidelines for authors of scholarly publications who wish to prepare documents for a publisher on existing text entry devices, word processors and personal computers, adding markup to the text in accordance with the SGML
-
Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994)
0.03
0.028421786 = product of:
0.042632677 = sum of:
0.0075970334 = weight(_text_:a in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075970334 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
0.035035644 = product of:
0.07007129 = sum of:
0.07007129 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07007129 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.1996 19:53:48
-
De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L.; Wilson, A.: Perceptions of libraries and information resources : A Report to the OCLC Membership (2005)
0.03
0.027183807 = product of:
0.04077571 = sum of:
0.009116441 = weight(_text_:a in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009116441 = score(doc=5018,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
0.031659268 = product of:
0.063318536 = sum of:
0.063318536 = weight(_text_:de in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063318536 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Summarizes findings of an international study on information-seeking habits and preferences: With extensive input from hundreds of librarians and OCLC staff, the OCLC Market Research team developed a project and commissioned Harris Interactive Inc. to survey a representative sample of information consumers. In June of 2005, we collected over 3,300 responses from information consumers in Australia, Canada, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Perceptions report provides the findings and responses from the online survey in an effort to learn more about: * Library use * Awareness and use of library electronic resources * Free vs. for-fee information * The "Library" brand The findings indicate that information consumers view libraries as places to borrow print books, but they are unaware of the rich electronic content they can access through libraries. Even though information consumers make limited use of these resources, they continue to trust libraries as reliable sources of information.
-
Ramsden, A.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, D.G.: ¬The pilot phase of the ELINOR Electronic Library Project, March 1992-April 1994 (1994)
0.03
0.026369557 = product of:
0.039554335 = sum of:
0.007895069 = weight(_text_:a in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007895069 = score(doc=2618,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
0.031659268 = product of:
0.063318536 = sum of:
0.063318536 = weight(_text_:de in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063318536 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) Electronic Library Project, at De Montfort University, UK, which aims to convert library primary materials and course documents to electronic form and to make the full text documents accessible to teaching staff and students in an electronic workstation environment. This pilot phase of the ELINOR Electronic Library Project demonstrated the feasibility of collecting electronic documents for 1 undergraduate course, BA/BSc Business Information Systems (BIS), and the benefits of optical character recognition (OCR) and scanning and document image processing (DIP) techniques in a client server environment. A key feature of the project was the negotiation of short term licences from 11 publishers for 53 textbooks. Publishers were prepared to participate in the project to provide useful early experience in copyright management on small scale
-
Akeroyd, J.; Brimage, D.; Royce, C.: Using CD-ROM as a public access catalogue (1988)
0.02
0.021564111 = product of:
0.032346167 = sum of:
0.023751104 = product of:
0.09500442 = sum of:
0.09500442 = weight(_text_:authors in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09500442 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.008595062 = weight(_text_:a in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008595062 = score(doc=2132,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This short guide describes the process for creating a CD-ROM based üublic access catalog. The authors admit that the material will be outdated by the time of publication, because product specifics change so rapidly. The report is useful, but not completely thorough. Disadvantages to using CD-ROM for public access catalog are listed, but existing methods to overcome these hindrances are not mentioned. The paper also touches on the possibility that CD-ROM-based catalogs may be more than simply an extra service, that they may become full-service catalogs in themselves
-
Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015)
0.02
0.021363754 = product of:
0.03204563 = sum of:
0.0075206803 = weight(_text_:a in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075206803 = score(doc=2092,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.02452495 = product of:
0.0490499 = sum of:
0.0490499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0490499 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:13:38
-
McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998)
0.02
0.020091884 = product of:
0.030137826 = sum of:
0.009116441 = weight(_text_:a in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009116441 = score(doc=3685,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.021021385 = product of:
0.04204277 = sum of:
0.04204277 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04204277 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents the findings of the South Ayrshire Libraries OPen Learning and the Internet project, Sep 1997 to Oct 1998. The objective was to demonstrate how open learning materials available on the Internet could be integrated with the provision of local open learning resources to provide an enhanced learning environment in public libraries. The main areas of concentration within the project were information skills support to public library users and the provision of WWW based independent materials to learners. The organisation and retrieval of Web based resources for local use was a major issue throughout the project. Recommends the adoption of Dublin Core metadata standards, the connection of databases of resources with searchable wen pages, and the development of thesauri of terms used to index the Web based resources locally. Sstaff training, and the new skills which will need to be developed, were identified as issues. Cost was also identified as a related issue, extending to issues such as access to open learning material and the Internet
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 18:55:19
-
Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996)
0.02
0.018685676 = product of:
0.05605703 = sum of:
0.05605703 = product of:
0.11211406 = sum of:
0.11211406 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11211406 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:46:30
-
Clavel, G.; Dale, P.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Kunz, M.; Landry, P.; MacEwan, A.; Naudi, M.; Oddy, P.; Saget, A.: CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access : final report (1999)
0.02
0.017917521 = product of:
0.026876282 = sum of:
0.008408376 = weight(_text_:a in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008408376 = score(doc=6067,freq=20.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.14100032 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.018467907 = product of:
0.036935814 = sum of:
0.036935814 = weight(_text_:de in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036935814 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This final report defines the problem of multilingual subject access, summarises the work carried out by the CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access from autumn 1997 until February 1999 and its results, identifies and discusses issues to be resolved, and presents a proposal for a prototype to the directors of the institutions concerned. For a summary of results, and the proposal, see 'CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access: proposals for discussion, March 18th 1999. This report will be distributed to members of the CENL and posted on the GABRIEL website. Genevieve Clavel has compiled it on the basis of the group's reports, discussions within the group and comments provided by the partners.
- Content
- Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.
-
Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995)
0.02
0.016349968 = product of:
0.0490499 = sum of:
0.0490499 = product of:
0.0980998 = sum of:
0.0980998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0980998 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30.11.1995 20:53:22
-
Babeu, A.: Building a "FRBR-inspired" catalog : the Perseus digital library experience (2008)
0.02
0.01576322 = product of:
0.023644827 = sum of:
0.011875552 = product of:
0.04750221 = sum of:
0.04750221 = weight(_text_:authors in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04750221 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.011769274 = weight(_text_:a in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011769274 = score(doc=2429,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.19735932 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- If one follows any of the major cataloging or library blogs these days, it is obvious that the topic of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) has increasingly become one of major significance for the library community. What began as a proposed conceptual entity-relationship model for improving the structure of bibliographic records has become a hotly debated topic with many tangled threads that have implications not just for cataloging but for many aspects of libraries and librarianship. In the fall of 2005, the Perseus Project experimented with creating a FRBRized catalog for its current online classics collection, a collection that consists of several hundred classical texts in Greek and Latin as well as reference works and scholarly commentaries regarding these works. In the last two years, with funding from the Mellon Foundation, Perseus has amassed and digitized a growing collection of classical texts (some as image books on our own servers that will eventually be made available through Fedora), and some available through the Open Content Alliance (OCA)2, and created FRBRized cataloging data for these texts. This work was done largely as an experiment to see the potential of the FRBR model for creating a specialized catalog for classics.
Our catalog should not be called a FRBR catalog perhaps, but instead a "FRBR Inspired catalog." As such our main goal has been "practical findability," we are seeking to support the four identified user tasks of the FRBR model, or to "Search, Identify, Select, and Obtain," rather than to create a FRBR catalog, per se. By encoding as much information as possible in the MODS and MADS records we have created, we believe that useful searching will be supported, that by using unique identifiers for works and authors users will be able to identify that the entity they have located is the desired one, that by encoding expression level information (such as the language of the work, the translator, etc) users will be able to select which expression of a work they are interested in, and that by supplying links to different online manifestations that users will be able to obtain access to a digital copy of a work. This white paper will discuss previous and current efforts by the Perseus Project in creating a FRBRized catalog, including the cataloging workflow, lessons learned during the process and will also seek to place this work in the larger context of research regarding FRBR, cataloging, Library 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and the growing importance of the FRBR model in the face of growing million book digital libraries.
-
Cataloging culutural objects : a guide to describing cultural works and their images (2003)
0.01
0.014960984 = product of:
0.022441475 = sum of:
0.014844441 = product of:
0.059377763 = sum of:
0.059377763 = weight(_text_:authors in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059377763 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0075970334 = weight(_text_:a in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075970334 = score(doc=2398,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both
-
Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.014960984 = product of:
0.022441475 = sum of:
0.014844441 = product of:
0.059377763 = sum of:
0.059377763 = weight(_text_:authors in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059377763 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0075970334 = weight(_text_:a in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075970334 = score(doc=2627,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
-
Darstellung der CrissCross-Mappingrelationen im Rahmen des Semantic Web (2010)
0.01
0.014084579 = product of:
0.021126868 = sum of:
0.0026589618 = weight(_text_:a in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026589618 = score(doc=4285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
0.018467907 = product of:
0.036935814 = sum of:
0.036935814 = weight(_text_:de in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036935814 = score(doc=4285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des CrissCross-Projekts wurde ein multilinguales, thesaurusbasiertes Recherchevokabular zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten geschaffen. Dieses Recherchevokabular besteht unter anderem aus den Sachschlagwörtern der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) und den Notationen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC). Die Schlagwortnormdatei bietet einen normierten, terminologisch kontrollierten Wortschatz an. Sie enthält Schlagwörter aus allen Fachgebieten und Schlagwortkategorien, die durch die beteiligten Bibliotheken zur verbalen Inhaltserschließung genutzt und dabei täglich aktualisiert werden. Unter anderem wird die Schlagwortnormdatei auch zur verbalen Erschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie verwendet. Während der verbalen Erschließung wird jedem Inhalt mindestens eine Schlagwortfolge zugewiesen. Schlagwortfolgen werden dazu benutzt, um die komplexen Themen eines Dokuments zu beschreiben. Zusätzlich wird für den Neuerscheinungsdienst der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie seit dem Jahrgang 2004 jeder Titel noch mindestens einer Sachgruppe zugewiesen. Die Strukturierung der Sachgruppen orientiert sich dabei weitestgehend an der zweiten Ebene der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation. Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation ist eine international weit verbreitete Universalklassifikation. Von ihr existieren zahlreiche Übersetzungen, u. a. ins Deutsche. Seit Januar 2006 wird die DDC gemeinsam mit der SWD zur Inhaltserschließung in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie verwendet. Bei der Inhaltserschließung mit Hilfe der DDC wird jedem Inhalt eine einzelne DDC-Notation zugewiesen. Komplexe Themen werden dabei durch die Synthese von zwei oder mehr Notationen zu einer neuen Notation dargestellt. Somit ist die DDC-Notation sowohl vergleichbar mit SWD-Schlagwörtern als auch mit ganzen Schlagwortfolgen.
Um aus diesen beiden unabhangigen Systemen zur Inhaltserschlieung ein einheitliches, multilinguales Recherchevokabular zu bilden wurden im Rahmen des CrissCross Projekts unidirektionale Verbindungen von den einzelnen Sachschlagwortern der SWD zu den (teilweise) synthetisierten Notationen der DDC gescha en. Mittels dieser Verbindungen soll ein praziser und umfassender Zugang zu DDC-erschlossenen Dokumenten uber SWD-Schlagworter gewahrleistet werden. Da DDC-Notationen aber eher ihre Entsprechung in einer Kombination aus Schlagwortfolge und Sachgruppe haben, kann dieses Mapping in der Regel nur von SWD in Richtung DDC ausgewertet werden ohne dass ein groerer Informationsverlust auftritt. Deshalb haben die erstellten Mappings immer eine spezielle Verknupfungsrichtung, bei der die SWD als Ausgangsvokabular und die DDC als Zielvokabular dient. Das Dokument startet in Abschnitt 2 mit einem Uberblick uber die vier verschiedenen CrissCross-Mappingrelationen. Diese Mappingrelationen sollen im Rahmen einer Erweiterung fur die SKOS-Spezi kation4 semantisch reprasentiert werden. SKOS soll dabei sowohl benutzt werden, um die Konzepthierarchien der SWD und der DDC darzustellen als auch um die Mappings zwischen den beiden zu reprasentieren. Anhand von zwei konkreten Beispielen wird in Abschnitt 3 genauer erklart, welche Probleme insbesondere bei der Abbildung der CrissCross-Mappingrelationen mit Hilfe der SKOSSpezi kation auftreten. Insbesondere die Unidirektionalitat der ursprunglichen CrissCross-Mappings ist problematisch, da die in SKOS de nierten Mappingrelationen von einer Bidirektionalitat ausgehen. Das heit die Mappings mussen sowohl nutzbar sein fur die Suche in SWD-erschlossenen Bestanden als auch fur die Suche in DDC-erschlossenen Bestanden. Anhand der Beispiele in Abschnitt 3 wird deshalb auch eine initiale Losungsidee entwickelt, wie die Unidirektionalitat der CrissCross-Mappings aufgehoben werden kann.
-
Haffner, A.: Internationalisierung der GND durch das Semantic Web (2012)
0.01
0.014084579 = product of:
0.021126868 = sum of:
0.0026589618 = weight(_text_:a in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026589618 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.018467907 = product of:
0.036935814 = sum of:
0.036935814 = weight(_text_:de in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036935814 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- http://www.kim-forum.org/Subsites/kim/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Berichte/internationalisierungDerGndDurchDasSemanticWeb.html
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.01
0.014014257 = product of:
0.04204277 = sum of:
0.04204277 = product of:
0.08408554 = sum of:
0.08408554 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408554 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
