Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994) 0.07
    0.06947707 = product of:
      0.27790827 = sum of:
        0.25081712 = weight(_text_:property in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25081712 = score(doc=7306,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25336683 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.9899367 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
        0.027091147 = product of:
          0.054182295 = sum of:
            0.054182295 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054182295 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:53:48
  2. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.03
    0.030135395 = product of:
      0.12054158 = sum of:
        0.082613975 = weight(_text_:computer in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082613975 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.56527805 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.037927605 = product of:
          0.07585521 = sum of:
            0.07585521 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07585521 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  3. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.03
    0.030102933 = product of:
      0.12041173 = sum of:
        0.052577145 = weight(_text_:network in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052577145 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
        0.067834586 = sum of:
          0.03532521 = weight(_text_:resources in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03532521 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039991006 = queryNorm
              0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.032509375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032509375 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039991006 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the final phase of the work on the ELINOR (Electronic Library INformation Online Retrieval) project at De Montfort University, Leicester, which concluded in 1996. ELINOR was 2 phase project with 3 overall goals: to create a practical pilot system based on a commercial product (Excalibur EFS); to investigate the expansion of a small scale electronic library to a larger, distributed library system; and to develop a more efficient and effective means of accessing and sharing resources within a networked multi campus institution. ELINOR was successful in demonstrating that libraries may conveniently digitize and supply smal collections of high demand materials over a campus network in text anf TIFF format. Operational conditions have so far indicated that the barriers are not technological but involve copyright, use issues and sustainability
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  4. Stone, P.; Hume, C.; Smith, P.: Project EARL (Electronic Access to Resources in Libraries : networking for public libraries information and resource sharing via the Internet (1997) 0.03
    0.025851946 = product of:
      0.103407785 = sum of:
        0.07010286 = weight(_text_:network in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010286 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
        0.033304926 = product of:
          0.06660985 = sum of:
            0.06660985 = weight(_text_:resources in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06660985 = score(doc=82,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the 1st year (from Sep 1995) of The British Library Research and Innovation Centre supported EARL project (Electronic Access to Resources in Libraries) which aims to improve electronic network and services and facilities for UK public libraries. Details the EARL pilot development and project workplace, its objectives, project methodology, management and financial control, information dissemination, EARL services developed, and the user monitoring/evaluation process. Reviews future needs and development of a business plan
  5. Bredemeier, W.; Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Branche elektronischer Geschäftsinformationen in Deutschland 2000/2001 (2001) 0.03
    0.025849022 = product of:
      0.10339609 = sum of:
        0.08867725 = weight(_text_:property in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08867725 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25336683 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.3499955 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
        0.014718837 = product of:
          0.029437674 = sum of:
            0.029437674 = weight(_text_:resources in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029437674 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Content
    Der deutsche Markt für Elektronische Informationsdienste im Jahre 2000 - Ergebnisse einer Umsatzerhebung - Von Willi Bredemeier: - Abgesicherte Methodologie unter Berücksichtigung der Spezifika des EIS-Marktes und der aktuellen Entwicklung - teilweise Vergleichbarkeit der Daten ab 1989 - Weitgehende quantitative Markttransparenz, da der Leser die Aggregationen der Markt- und Teilmarktdaten aus einzelwirtschaftlichen Daten voll nachvollziehen kann - 93 zum Teil ausführliche Tabellen vorwiegend zu einzelnen Informationsanbietern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Geschäftsjahre 2000 und 1999, unterteilt in die Bereiche Gesamtmarkt für Elektronische Informationsdienste, Datev, Realtime-Finanzinformationen, Nachrichtenagenturen, Kreditinformationen, Firmen- und Produktinformationen, weitere Wirtschaftsinformationen, Rechtsinformationen, Wissenschaftlich-technisch-medizinische Informationen - Intellectual Property, Konsumentendienste, Nachbarmärkte - Analyse aktueller Markttrends. Qualität professioneller Firmeninformationen im World Wide Web - Von Mechtild Stock und Wolfgang G. Stock: - Weiterführung der Qualitätsdiskussion und Entwicklung eines Systems von Qualitätskriterien für Informationsangebote, bezogen auf Firmeninformationen im Internet - "Qualitätspanel" für die Bereiche Bonitätsinformationen, Firmenkurzdossiers, Produktinformationen und Adressinformationen mit den Anbietern Bürgel, Creditreform, Dun & Bradstreet Deutschland, ABC online, ALLECO, Hoppenstedt Firmendatenbank, Who is Who in Multimedia, Kompass Deutschland, Sachon Industriedaten, Wer liefert was?, AZ Bertelsmann, Schober.com - Hochdifferenzierte Tests, die den Kunden Hilfen bei der Auswahl zwischen Angeboten und den Anbietern Hinweise auf Maßnahmen zu qualitativen Verbesserungen geben - Detaillierte Informationen über eingesetzte Systeme der Branchen- und Produktklassifikationen - Rankings der Firmeninformationsanbieter insgesamt sowie nach Datenbasen, Retrievalsystemen und Websites, Detailinformationen zu allen Qualitätsdimensionen
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Freigang, K.-H.; Mayer, F.; Schmitz, K.-D.: Micro- and minicomputer-based terminology databases in Europe (1991) 0.02
    0.0245894 = product of:
      0.1967152 = sum of:
        0.1967152 = weight(_text_:europe in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1967152 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24358861 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.8075714 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  7. Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986) 0.02
    0.022111915 = product of:
      0.08844766 = sum of:
        0.059009988 = weight(_text_:computer in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059009988 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.40377006 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
        0.029437674 = product of:
          0.05887535 = sum of:
            0.05887535 = weight(_text_:resources in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05887535 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.40330917 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Series
    Research report. Online Computer Library Center; OCLC/OPR/RR-86/1
  8. Colomb, R.M.: Quality of ontologies in interoperating information systems (2002) 0.02
    0.015518518 = product of:
      0.124148145 = sum of:
        0.124148145 = weight(_text_:property in 7858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.124148145 = score(doc=7858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25336683 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.4899937 = fieldWeight in 7858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.335595 = idf(docFreq=212, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7858)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is an quality of ontologies as they relate to interoperating information systems. Quality is not a property of something but a judgment, so must be relative to some purpose, and generally involves recognition of design tradeoffs. Ontologies used for information systems interoperability have much in common with classification systems in information science, knowledge based systems, and programming languages, and inherit quality characteristics from each of these older areas. Factors peculiar to the new field lead to some additional characteristics relevant to quality, some of which are more profitably considered quality aspects not of the ontology as such, but of the environment through which the ontology is made available to its users. Suggestions are presented as to how to use these Factors in producing quality ontologies.
  9. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.012894975 = product of:
      0.1031598 = sum of:
        0.1031598 = sum of:
          0.07065042 = weight(_text_:resources in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07065042 = score(doc=3685,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039991006 = queryNorm
              0.483971 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.032509375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032509375 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1400417 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039991006 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the findings of the South Ayrshire Libraries OPen Learning and the Internet project, Sep 1997 to Oct 1998. The objective was to demonstrate how open learning materials available on the Internet could be integrated with the provision of local open learning resources to provide an enhanced learning environment in public libraries. The main areas of concentration within the project were information skills support to public library users and the provision of WWW based independent materials to learners. The organisation and retrieval of Web based resources for local use was a major issue throughout the project. Recommends the adoption of Dublin Core metadata standards, the connection of databases of resources with searchable wen pages, and the development of thesauri of terms used to index the Web based resources locally. Sstaff training, and the new skills which will need to be developed, were identified as issues. Cost was also identified as a related issue, extending to issues such as access to open learning material and the Internet
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  10. Pejtersen, A.M.: Interfaces based on associative semantics for browsing in information retrieval (1990) 0.01
    0.012392553 = product of:
      0.09914042 = sum of:
        0.09914042 = weight(_text_:network in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09914042 = score(doc=3842,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.5566718 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the extent to which techniques of word association can be applied to the development of interfaces for data browsing and searching for which the present methods are either not adequate or completely ineffective. Focuses on the development, application and evaluation of aids for browsing associative semantics displayed textually in interfaces as a network of related terms, or displayed visually as a network of terms and pictures
  11. Borgman, C.L.: End user behavior on the Ohio State University Libraries' online catalog : a computer monitoring study (1983) 0.01
    0.011801997 = product of:
      0.09441598 = sum of:
        0.09441598 = weight(_text_:computer in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09441598 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.6460321 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  12. Wood, F.: Information skills for student centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1997) 0.01
    0.011545654 = product of:
      0.092365235 = sum of:
        0.092365235 = weight(_text_:computer in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092365235 = score(doc=812,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.6320001 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a study of undergraduate students' use of computer-based information retrieval services in relation to their cognitive and learning styles. Includes a survey of staff at Sheffield University, UK on their use of computer databases and the extend to which undergraduates are made aware of these services. Results show that undergraduate use is low and varies greatly between students of differnt faculties. Student searching behaviour was found to be basic and their performance inadequate. Significant correlation's between cognitive and learning styles and search behaviour were found. Computer-assisted learning (CAL) packages were developed and customised for 3 departments. Guidelines were drawn up based on the project's findings for introducing a computerised information sources programme into the undergraduate curriculum and preparing CAL teaching packages on information skills
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  13. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.01
    0.01128904 = product of:
      0.04515616 = sum of:
        0.03338109 = weight(_text_:computer in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03338109 = score(doc=5013,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.22840683 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
        0.01177507 = product of:
          0.02355014 = sum of:
            0.02355014 = weight(_text_:resources in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02355014 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.16132367 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
  14. Harken, S.E.: Subject semantic interoperability. Report of the Subcommittee on Semantic Interoperability to the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee : Final report (2006) 0.01
    0.0110559575 = product of:
      0.04422383 = sum of:
        0.029504994 = weight(_text_:computer in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029504994 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.20188503 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
        0.014718837 = product of:
          0.029437674 = sum of:
            0.029437674 = weight(_text_:resources in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029437674 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The need for improved semantic in teroperability between and among vocabularies and knowledge organization schemes is undeniable and growing in importance. There is an ever-increasing need to create an environment by which even multiple portals could be accessed via subject metadata using software that is neutral and available ubiquitously or directly to the user, that could be copied by libraries for use in their own environment. In order to develop or improve a knowledge organization system including emerging options in semantic interoperability, scholars and practitioners need to be able to evaluate a wide variety of projects and stay current with the professional literature. Based on its findings, the Subcommittee concludes that the development of a successful subject semantic interoperability project is a long and difficult process. It requires a substantial investment of financial, human and computer resources. The Subcommittee recommends using the information and tools in this report and its appendices to assist in developing a successful project incorporating subject semantic interoperability. Finally the Subcommittee concludes that since this field of endeavor is still relatively young and immature, it is too early to generate a set of Best Practices that could be used in developing a successful project. We are past the theoretical and basic research phase and into the development phase. Even though there are some successful projects in full production, more projects need to reach maturity and much more research needs to be done.
  15. Philip, G.; Crookes, D.; Juhasz, Z.: Development and implementation of an photographic database using a network of transputers (1994) 0.01
    0.008762858 = product of:
      0.07010286 = sum of:
        0.07010286 = weight(_text_:network in 944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010286 = score(doc=944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17809492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=944)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  16. Subject access : Report of a meeting sponsored by the Council on Library Resources, Dublin, Ohio, 7.-9.6.1982 (1982) 0.01
    0.0083262315 = product of:
      0.06660985 = sum of:
        0.06660985 = product of:
          0.1332197 = sum of:
            0.1332197 = weight(_text_:resources in 2144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1332197 = score(doc=2144,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.9125845 = fieldWeight in 2144, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Washington : Council on Library Resources
  17. Hoogcarspel, A.: Guidelines for cataloging monographic electronic texts at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities (1994) 0.01
    0.0073762485 = product of:
      0.059009988 = sum of:
        0.059009988 = weight(_text_:computer in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059009988 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.40377006 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The guidelines are a response to 2 interconnected problems: little bibliographic control exists for electronic texts, and the AACR2 standards for control of computer files are not entirely satisfactory
  18. Körner, H.G.: Notationssysteme für Dokumentationssprachen und Klassifikationssysteme (1980) 0.01
    0.0073021133 = product of:
      0.058416907 = sum of:
        0.058416907 = weight(_text_:computer in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058416907 = score(doc=1239,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1461475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039991006 = queryNorm
            0.39971197 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Klassifikationen haben i.a. bei jeder Systemstelle eine Notation, die den Platz im System festlegt und als Kurzbezeichnung dient. Dokumentationssprachen verwenden häufig einen hierarchisch strukturierten Thesaurus, bei dem ebenfalls Notationen eingesetzt werden können. Beim Entwurf von Notationen sollten computer-interne und computer-externe Aspekte berücksichtigt werden. Es wird systematisch dargestellt, welche grundsätzlichen Typen von Notationssysstemen entworfen werden können, u.a. auch die vom Verfasser entwickelten durchgehenden oder sequentiellen Notationen mit Ebenenindikator. Linksbündige sequentielle Notationssysteme sind besonders flexibel, d.h. Einfügungen und andere Veränderungen sind leicht möglich. Die Bewertung von Notationssystemen, an einem Beispiel durchgeführt, geschieht an Hand eines möglichst umfassenden Anforderungskatalogs. Für Entwurfsentscheidungen werden die Methoden der Nutzwertanalyse empfohlen, insbesondere auch bei der Frage, ob Notationen überhaupt eingesetzt werden sollen. Eine weitere Möglichkeit ist, daß Notationen nur auf bestimmten hierarchischen Ebenen verwendet werden
  19. Lawrence, G.S.; Matthews, J.R.: Detailed data analysis of the CLR online catalog project : final report for the Council on Library Resources (1984) 0.01
    0.007285453 = product of:
      0.058283623 = sum of:
        0.058283623 = product of:
          0.11656725 = sum of:
            0.11656725 = weight(_text_:resources in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11656725 = score(doc=2420,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.79851145 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : Council on Library Resources
  20. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : Pt.2: interacting with online catalogs. Final report for the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.01
    0.007285453 = product of:
      0.058283623 = sum of:
        0.058283623 = product of:
          0.11656725 = sum of:
            0.11656725 = weight(_text_:resources in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11656725 = score(doc=2424,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14598069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039991006 = queryNorm
                0.79851145 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : Council on Library Resources

Years

Languages

  • e 56
  • d 9

Types