Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0026269327 = product of:
  0.021015462 = sum of:
    0.021015462 = product of:
      0.06304638 = sum of:
        0.06304638 = weight(_text_:22 in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06304638 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03323817 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0019847844 = product of:
  0.015878275 = sum of:
    0.015878275 = product of:
      0.079391375 = sum of:
        0.079391375 = weight(_text_:problem in 1862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079391375 = score(doc=1862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03323817 = queryNorm
            0.5627445 = fieldWeight in 1862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1862)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Footnote

"Bevor man ein Klassifikationsschema aufbauen kann, muß klar sein, was klassifiziert werden soll. Das ist kein großes Problem, wenn Bücher klassifiziert werden." (S.25)

0.0018763805 = product of:
  0.015011044 = sum of:
    0.015011044 = product of:
      0.04503313 = sum of:
        0.04503313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04503313 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1163944 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03323817 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Source

Library trends. 22(1973), no.1

0.0015147304 = product of:
  0.012117843 = sum of:
    0.012117843 = product of:
      0.03635353 = sum of:
        0.03635353 = weight(_text_:29 in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03635353 = score(doc=350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116921484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03323817 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

29. 5.2007 13:04:04

5.7889544E-4 = product of:
  0.0046311636 = sum of:
    0.0046311636 = product of:
      0.023155818 = sum of:
        0.023155818 = weight(_text_:problem in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023155818 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1410789 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03323817 = queryNorm
            0.1641338 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.244485 = idf(docFreq=1723, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text