Search (190 results, page 1 of 10)

0.0994253 = product of:
  0.1988506 = sum of:
    0.1988506 = product of:
      0.3977012 = sum of:
        0.3977012 = weight(_text_:a.j in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3977012 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            1.1132411 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Swires, A.J.

0.07101807 = product of:
  0.14203614 = sum of:
    0.14203614 = product of:
      0.28407228 = sum of:
        0.28407228 = weight(_text_:a.j in 7289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28407228 = score(doc=7289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.7951722 = fieldWeight in 7289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7289)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Meadows, A.J.

0.07101807 = product of:
  0.14203614 = sum of:
    0.14203614 = product of:
      0.28407228 = sum of:
        0.28407228 = weight(_text_:a.j in 6308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28407228 = score(doc=6308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.7951722 = fieldWeight in 6308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Australian academic and research libraries 27(1996) no.2, S.153 (J. Cram), Library review 45(1996) no.7, S.70-71 (A.J. Meadows)

0.06821224 = sum of:
  0.011397779 = product of:
    0.045591116 = sum of:
      0.045591116 = weight(_text_:authors in 3680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045591116 = score(doc=3680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 3680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3680)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05681446 = product of:
    0.11362892 = sum of:
      0.11362892 = weight(_text_:a.j in 3680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11362892 = score(doc=3680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.3180689 = fieldWeight in 3680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3680)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: AUSTER, E. u. C.W. CHOO: Environmental scanning: a conceptual framework for studying the information seeking behavior of executives; BROWN, M.E.: A general model of information-seeking behavior; MARCHIONINI, G. u. P. LIEBSCHER: Performance in electronic encyclopedias: implications for adaptive systems; MARCUS, R.S.: Computer and human understanding in intelligent retrieval assistance; FLORIAN, D.: Understanding and overcoming cultural barriers in information systems; NEWBY, G.B., M.S. NILAN u. L.M. DUVALL: Toward a reassessment of individual differences for information systems: the power of user-based situational predictors; SARACEVIC, T.: Individual differences in organizing, searching and retrieving information; HOWARD, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicting a documents's pertinence from its citation; JANES, J.W.: An alternative to precision; ADI, T. u. O.K. EWELL: A new mathematical model of an ancient paradigm for information processing; NEWBY, G.B.: Navigation: a fundamental concept for information systems with implications for information retrieval; FROEHLICH, T.J.: Towards a better conceptual framework for understanding relevance for information science research;SCHAMBER, L.: Users' criteria for evaluation in a multimedia environment; CASE, D.O.: An example of the social construction of information technologies: videotex in the United States and Europe; VIZINE-GOETZ, D. u. K.M. DRABENSTOTT: Computer and manual analysis of subject terms entered by online catalog users; BORGMAN, C.L., A.L. GALLAGHER, V.A. WALTER u. J. ROSENBERG: The Science Library Catalog project: comparison of children's searching behavior in hypertext and a keyword search system; HERT, C.A. u. M.S. NILAN: User-based information retrieval system interface evaluation: an examination of an on-line public access catalog; KALIN, S.W.: The searching behavior of remote users: a study of one online public access catalog (OPAC); WARNER, A.J. u. P.H. WENZEL: A linguistic analysis and categorization of nominal expressions; HAAS, S.W.: Sublanguage analysis using the case hierarchy; PALMQUIST, R.A. u. G.M. SINKANKAS: Client needs without clients: can we understand information needs without clients present to explain them?; HERSH, W.R. u. D.H. HICKMAN: A comparative analysis of retrieval effectiveness for three methods of indexing AIDS-related abstracts; LOGAN, E.L. u. M.L. PAO: Identification of key authors in a collaborative network; BONZI, S. u. D.L. DAY: Faculty productivity as a function of cohort group, discipline, and academic age; BROWN, M.E.: Design for a bibliographic database for non-professional users; BALARAMAN, K.: End-user studies in CD-ROM environment: work in progress; BROWN, M.E.: Library attractibility based on social styles of users; WILDEMUTH, B.M., E.K. JACOB et al.: A detailed analysis of end-user search behaviors; SHNEIDERMAN, B.: Visual user interfaces for information exploration; BELKIN, N.J.: Understanding user-intermediary dialogues from multiple perspectives

0.05681446 = product of:
  0.11362892 = sum of:
    0.11362892 = product of:
      0.22725783 = sum of:
        0.22725783 = weight(_text_:a.j in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22725783 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.6361378 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Pao, M.L. u. A.J. Warner

0.042610846 = product of:
  0.08522169 = sum of:
    0.08522169 = product of:
      0.17044339 = sum of:
        0.17044339 = weight(_text_:a.j in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17044339 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.47710335 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: DAHLBERG, I.: Die Pilotstudie "DB-Thesaurus" (Allgemeiner Thesaurus für Bibliotheken); VASILJEV, A.: Thesaurus project of the Delft University of Technology Library; ROGALLA von BIEBERSTEIN, J.: Handhabung und Weiterentwicklung eines feinsystematischen Buchaufstellungssystems; MARCZINSKI, R.: Ein Klassifikationssystem für audiovisuelle Medien im Bildungsbereich; THALLER, M.: Klassifikatorische Voraussetzungen der Analyse historischer Quellen mittels formaler Verfahren; RAHMSTORF, G.: Sprachlich bestimmte Begriffssysteme und Klassifikation; FANGMEYER, H.: Automatische Indexierung mit SLC-II (Simulated Linguistic Computer); JOCHUM, F.: Auswirkungen einer unterschiedlich tiefen Wissensrepräsentation auf das Verhalten von Information Retrieval Systemen; KÖNIG, E.: Verbindliche versus freie Indexierung; KUTZELNIGG, A.: Warenkategorien: Unlösbare Probleme?; GASTHUBER, H.: Die Begriffe "Eigenschaft" und "Merkmal" in der Warenbeschreibung und -klassifikation; SCHIFFELS, R.: Kategorien der Internationalen Patentklassifikation, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Einordnung von Produkten; MATHY, A.J.: Erfahrungen bei der Erarbeitung eines Thesaurus für die Bundesstatistik (Statistik-Thesaurus); POTKOWIK, G.: Die Systematiken in der amtlichen Statistik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

0.041150335 = sum of:
  0.012743105 = product of:
    0.05097242 = sum of:
      0.05097242 = weight(_text_:authors in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05097242 = score(doc=822,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.22525369 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02840723 = product of:
    0.05681446 = sum of:
      0.05681446 = weight(_text_:a.j in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05681446 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.15903445 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

However, for well over a century, major libraries in developed nations have been engaging in sophisticated measure of their operations, and thoughtful scholars have been involved along the way; if no "unified theory" has emerged thus far, why would it happen in the near future? What if "libraries" are a historicallydetermined conglomeration of distinct functions, some of which are much less important than others? It is telling that McGrath cites as many studies an brittle paper as he does investigations of reference services among his constellation of measurable services, even while acknowledging that the latter (as an aspect of "circulation") is more "essential." If one were to include in a unified theory similar phenomena outside of libraries-e.g., what happens in bookstores and WWW searches-it can be seen how difficult a coordinated explanation might become. Ultimately the value of McGrath's chapter is not in convincing the reader that a unified theory might emerge, but rather in highlighting the best in recent studies that examine library operations, identifying robust conclusions, and arguing for the necessity of clarifying and coordinating common variables and units of analysis. McGrath's article is one that would be useful for a general course in LIS methodology, and certainly for more specific lectures an the evaluation of libraries. Fra going to focus most of my comments an the remaining articles about theory, rather than the others that offer empirical results about the growth or quality of literature. I'll describe the latter only briefly. The best way to approach this issue is by first reading McKechnie and Pettigrew's thorough survey of the "Use of Theory in LIS research." Earlier results of their extensive content analysis of 1, 160 LIS articles have been published in other journals before, but is especially pertinent here. These authors find that only a third of LIS literature makes overt reference to theory, and that both usage and type of theory are correlated with the specific domain of the research (e.g., historical treatments versus user studies versus information retrieval). Lynne McKechnie and Karen Pettigrew identify four general sources of theory: LIS, the Humanities, Social Sciences and Sciences. This approach makes it obvious that the predominant source of theory is the social sciences (45%), followed by LIS (30%), the sciences (19%) and the humanities (5%) - despite a predominance (almost 60%) of articles with science-related content. The authors discuss interdisciplinarity at some length, noting the great many non-LIS authors and theories which appear in the LIS literature, and the tendency for native LIS theories to go uncited outside of the discipline. Two other articles emphasize the ways in which theory has evolved. The more general of three two is Jack Glazier and Robert Grover's update of their classic 1986 Taxonomy of Theory in LIS. This article describes an elaborated version, called the "Circuits of Theory," offering definitions of a hierarchy of terms ranging from "world view" through "paradigm," "grand theory" and (ultimately) "symbols." Glazier & Grover's one-paragraph example of how theory was applied in their study of city managers is much too brief and is at odds with the emphasis an quantitative indicators of literature found in the rest of the volume. The second article about the evolution of theory, Richard Smiraglia's "The progress of theory in knowledge organization," restricts itself to the history of thinking about cataloging and indexing. Smiraglia traces the development of theory from a pragmatic concern with "what works," to a reliance an empirical tests, to an emerging flirtation with historicist approaches to knowledge.
There is only one article in the issue that claims to offer a theory of the scope that discussed by McGrath, and I am sorry that it appears in this issue. Bor-Sheng Tsai's "Theory of Information Genetics" is an almost incomprehensible combination of four different "models" wich names like "Möbius Twist" and "Clipping-Jointing." Tsai starts by posing the question "What is it that makes the `UNIVERSAL' information generating, representation, and transfer happen?" From this ungrammatical beginning, things get rapidly worse. Tsai makes side trips into the history of defining information, offers three-dimensional plots of citation data, a formula for "bonding relationships," hypothetical data an food consumption, sample pages from a web-based "experts directory" and dozens of citations from works which are peripheral to the discussion. The various sections of the article seem to have little to do with one another. I can't believe that the University of Illinois would publish something so poorly-edited. Now I will turn to the dominant, "bibliometric" articles in this issue, in order of their appearance: Judit Bar-Ilan and Bluma Peritz write about "Informetric Theories and Methods for Exploring the Internet." Theirs is a survey of research an patterns of electronic publication, including different ways of sampling, collecting and analyzing data an the Web. Their contribution to the "theory" theme lies in noting that some existing bibliometric laws apply to the Web. William Hood and Concepción Wilson's article, "Solving Problems ... Using Fuzzy Set Theory," demonstrates the widespread applicability of this mathematical tool for library-related problems, such as making decisions about the binding of documents, or improving document retrieval. Ronald Rosseau's piece an "Journal Evaluation" discusses the strength and weaknesses of various indicators for determining impact factors and rankings for journals. His is an exceptionally well-written article that has everything to do with measurement but almost nothing to do with theory, to my way of thinking. "The Matthew Effect for Countries" is the topic of Manfred Bonitz's paper an citations to scientific publications, analyzed by nation of origin. His research indicates that publications from certain countries-such as Switzerland, Denmark, the USA and the UK-receive more than the expected number of citations; correspondingly, some rather large countries like China receive much fewer than might be expected. Bonitz provides an extensive discussion of how the "MEC" measure came about, and what it ments-relating it to efficiency in scientific research. A bonus is his detour into the origins of the Matthew Effect in the Bible, and the subsequent popularization of the name by the sociologist Robert Merton. Wolfgang Glänzel's "Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998)" is, as the title implies, another citation analysis. He compares the number of authors an papers in three fields-Biomedical research, Chemistry and Mathematics - at sixyear intervals. Among other conclusions, Glänzel notes that the percentage of publications with four or more authors has been growing in all three fields, and that multiauthored papers are more likely to be cited.
Coauthorship is also the topic in Hildrun Kretschmer's article an the origins and uses of "Gestalt Theory." The explanation of the theory is fascinating but the application of it, involving threedimensional graphics depicting coauthorship in physics and medicine, seems somewhat distant from Gestalt Theory and the importance of the results is hard to appreciate. Henk Moed, Marc Luwel, and A.J. Nederhof apply bibliometrics to the evaluation of research performance in the humanities, specifically, Flemish professors of law. Their attempts to classify and measure research output appear rather specific to the population they studied, with little contribution to a more general bibliometric theory. The final contribution is by Peter Vinkler. He offers a comprehensive model of the growth and institutionalization of scientific information. Since it could be viewed as an overview of the concerns of scientometrics, Vinkler's article might best be read before some of the others described above. To conclude, this issue of Library Trends has a schizophrenic quality about it. "Theory" is defined broadly in those initial articles "about" theory (especially in those by McKechnie and Pettigrew, and by Glazier and Grover), but most of the remainder of the pieces consider theory narrowly in the context of bibliometric analysis. This is unfortunate an two counts. First, while bibliometric investigations have uncovered fascinating and useful statistical regularities in the growth, authorship and citation of literature, they are often short an the sort of explanation that we would expect from a well-developed theory. That is, why do the statistical distributions (of publications, citations, etc.) appear as they do? Second, information science studies people at least as much as it does documents. Appropriately, then, most of our theory comes from the social sciences (as the McKechnie and Pettigrew article convincingly demonstrates). However, this source of theory is virtually ignored in the issue of Library Trends an "current theory." What a shame."

0.033626102 = product of:
  0.067252204 = sum of:
    0.067252204 = product of:
      0.13450441 = sum of:
        0.13450441 = weight(_text_:22 in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13450441 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Serials librarian. 22(1992), nos.3/4

0.033288144 = product of:
  0.06657629 = sum of:
    0.06657629 = product of:
      0.13315257 = sum of:
        0.13315257 = weight(_text_:22 in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13315257 = score(doc=4698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Issue

Vol.22.

Signature

78 BAHH 1089-22

0.031060275 = sum of:
  0.014247224 = product of:
    0.056988895 = sum of:
      0.056988895 = weight(_text_:authors in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056988895 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016813051 = product of:
    0.033626102 = sum of:
      0.033626102 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033626102 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This is an edited collection of 39 original papers and as many commentaries and replies. The target papers and replies were written by senior members of the MIND Group, while all commentaries were written by junior group members. All papers and commentaries have undergone a rigorous process of anonymous peer review, during which the junior members of the MIND Group acted as reviewers. The final versions of all the target articles, commentaries and replies have undergone additional editorial review. Besides offering a cross-section of ongoing, cutting-edge research in philosophy and cognitive science, this collection is also intended to be a free electronic resource for teaching. It therefore also contains a selection of online supporting materials, pointers to video and audio files and to additional free material supplied by the 92 authors represented in this volume. We will add more multimedia material, a searchable literature database, and tools to work with the online version in the future. All contributions to this collection are strictly open access. They can be downloaded, printed, and reproduced by anyone.

Date

27. 1.2015 11:48:22

0.030419575 = sum of:
  0.011397779 = product of:
    0.045591116 = sum of:
      0.045591116 = weight(_text_:authors in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045591116 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22628894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019021796 = product of:
    0.038043592 = sum of:
      0.038043592 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038043592 = score(doc=2753,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963768 = queryNorm
          0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed post-conference proceedings of the First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference on semantic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources, IKC 2015, held in Coimbra, Portugal, in September 2015. The 13 revised full papers, 3 revised short papers, and 2 invited papers were carefully reviewed and selected from 22 initial submissions. The paper topics cover techniques for keyword search, semantic data management, social Web and social media, information retrieval, benchmarking for search on big data.

Content

Inhalt: Professional Collaborative Information Seeking: On Traceability and Creative Sensemaking / Nürnberger, Andreas (et al.) - Recommending Web Pages Using Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Approaches / Cadegnani, Sara (et al.) - Processing Keyword Queries Under Access Limitations / Calì, Andrea (et al.) - Balanced Large Scale Knowledge Matching Using LSH Forest / Cochez, Michael (et al.) - Improving css-KNN Classification Performance by Shifts in Training Data / Draszawka, Karol (et al.) - Classification Using Various Machine Learning Methods and Combinations of Key-Phrases and Visual Features / HaCohen-Kerner, Yaakov (et al.) - Mining Workflow Repositories for Improving Fragments Reuse / Harmassi, Mariem (et al.) - AgileDBLP: A Search-Based Mobile Application for Structured Digital Libraries / Ifrim, Claudia (et al.) - Support of Part-Whole Relations in Query Answering / Kozikowski, Piotr (et al.) - Key-Phrases as Means to Estimate Birth and Death Years of Jewish Text Authors / Mughaz, Dror (et al.) - Visualization of Uncertainty in Tag Clouds / Platis, Nikos (et al.) - Multimodal Image Retrieval Based on Keywords and Low-Level Image Features / Pobar, Miran (et al.) - Toward Optimized Multimodal Concept Indexing / Rekabsaz, Navid (et al.) - Semantic URL Analytics to Support Efficient Annotation of Large Scale Web Archives / Souza, Tarcisio (et al.) - Indexing of Textual Databases Based on Lexical Resources: A Case Study for Serbian / Stankovic, Ranka (et al.) - Domain-Specific Modeling: Towards a Food and Drink Gazetteer / Tagarev, Andrey (et al.) - Analysing Entity Context in Multilingual Wikipedia to Support Entity-Centric Retrieval Applications / Zhou, Yiwei (et al.)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

0.028532695 = product of:
  0.05706539 = sum of:
    0.05706539 = product of:
      0.11413078 = sum of:
        0.11413078 = weight(_text_:22 in 7578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11413078 = score(doc=7578,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 7578, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7578)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2000 18:22:14

0.028532695 = product of:
  0.05706539 = sum of:
    0.05706539 = product of:
      0.11413078 = sum of:
        0.11413078 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11413078 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2000 18:22:27

0.02840723 = product of:
  0.05681446 = sum of:
    0.05681446 = product of:
      0.11362892 = sum of:
        0.11362892 = weight(_text_:a.j in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11362892 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35724625 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.3180689 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält 47 Beiträge den Schwerpunkten der Tagung: Biology and related fields - Engineering and natural sciences - Medicine - Information science and information technology - Law and economics - Social sciences and humanities - Terminology research and interdisciplinary aspects; darunter: OESER, E. u. G. BUDIN: Explication and representation of qualitative biological and medical concepts: the example of the pocket knowledge data base on carnivores; HOHENEGGER, J.: Specles as the basic units in taxonomy and nomenclature; LAVIETER, L. de, J.A. DESCHAMPS u. B. FELLUGA: A multilingual environmental thesaurus: past, present, and future; TODESCHINI, C. u. G. Thoemig: The thesaurus of the International Nuclear Information System: experiences in an international environment; CITKINA, F.: Terminology of mathematics: contrastive analysis as a basis for standardization and harmonization; WALKER, D.G.: Technology and engineering terminolgy: translation problems encountered and suggested solutions; VERVOOM, A.J.: Terminology and engineering sciences; HIRS, W.M.: ICD-10, a missed chance and a new opportunity for medical terminology standardization; THOMAS, P.: Subject indexes in medical literature; RAHMSTORF, G.: Analysis of information technology terms; NEGRINI, G.: Indexing language for research projects and its graphic display; BATEWICZ, M.: Impact of modern information technology on knowledge transfer services and terminology; RATZINGER, M.: Multilingual product description (MPD): a European project; OHLY, H.P.: Terminology of the social sciences and social context approaches; BEAUGRANDE, R. de: Terminology and discourse between the social sciences and the humanities; MUSKENS, G.: Terminological standardisation and socio-linguistic diversity: dilemmas of crosscultural sociology; SNELL, B.: Terminology ten years on; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Standard ontological structures of systems of concepts of active knowledge; WRIGHT, S.E.: Terminology standardization in standards societies and professional associations in the United States; DAHLBERG; I.: The terminology of subject fields - reconsidered; AHMAD, K. u. H. Fulford: Terminology of interdisciplinary fields: a new perspective; DATAA, J.: Full-text databases as a terminological support for translation

0.026900882 = product of:
  0.053801764 = sum of:
    0.053801764 = product of:
      0.10760353 = sum of:
        0.10760353 = weight(_text_:22 in 6563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10760353 = score(doc=6563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:42:34

0.026900882 = product of:
  0.053801764 = sum of:
    0.053801764 = product of:
      0.10760353 = sum of:
        0.10760353 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10760353 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Reference librarian; no.22

0.026900882 = product of:
  0.053801764 = sum of:
    0.053801764 = product of:
      0.10760353 = sum of:
        0.10760353 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10760353 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1

0.023538271 = product of:
  0.047076542 = sum of:
    0.047076542 = product of:
      0.094153084 = sum of:
        0.094153084 = weight(_text_:22 in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094153084 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.023538271 = product of:
  0.047076542 = sum of:
    0.047076542 = product of:
      0.094153084 = sum of:
        0.094153084 = weight(_text_:22 in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094153084 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1999 13:37:59

0.023538271 = product of:
  0.047076542 = sum of:
    0.047076542 = product of:
      0.094153084 = sum of:
        0.094153084 = weight(_text_:22 in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094153084 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963768 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17.10.1995 18:22:54