Search (202 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"s"
  1. Theories of citation? (1998) 0.10
    0.09832793 = product of:
      0.29498377 = sum of:
        0.29498377 = weight(_text_:citation in 3836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29498377 = score(doc=3836,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            1.2563207 = fieldWeight in 3836, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3836)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  2. Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication : a Festschrift in honor of Blaise Cronin (2016) 0.08
    0.08479851 = product of:
      0.12719776 = sum of:
        0.097319394 = weight(_text_:citation in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097319394 = score(doc=3801,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.4144783 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
        0.02987836 = product of:
          0.05975672 = sum of:
            0.05975672 = weight(_text_:index in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05975672 = score(doc=3801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Frontmatter -- -- Foreword -- -- Prologue -- -- Contents -- -- Introduction -- -- Part I: Critical informetrics -- -- The Incessant Chattering of Texts -- -- Informetrics Needs a Foundation in the Theory of Science -- -- Part II: Citation theories -- -- Referencing as Cooperation or Competition -- -- Semiotics and Citations -- -- Data Citation as a Bibliometric Oxymoron -- -- Part III: Statistical theories -- -- TypeToken Theory and Bibliometrics -- -- From a Success Index to a Success Multiplier -- -- From Matthew to Hirsch: A Success-Breeds-Success Story -- -- Informations Magic Numbers: The Numerology of Information Science -- -- Part IV: Authorship theories -- -- Authors as Persons and Authors as Bundles of Words -- -- The Angle Sum Theory: Exploring the Literature on Acknowledgments in Scholarly Communication -- -- The Flesh of Science: Somatics and Semiotics -- -- Part V: Knowledge organization theories -- -- Informetric Analyses of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) -- -- Information, Meaning, and Intellectual Organization in Networks of Inter-Human Communication -- -- Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Science Using Books -- -- Part VI: Altmetric theories -- -- Webometrics and Altmetrics: Home Birth vs. Hospital Birth -- -- Scientific Revolution in Scientometrics: The Broadening of Impact from Citation to Societal -- -- Altmetrics as Traces of the Computerization of the Research Process -- -- Interpreting Altmetrics: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories -- -- Biographical information for the editor and contributors -- -- Index
  3. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.08
    0.08297026 = product of:
      0.12445539 = sum of:
        0.097319394 = weight(_text_:citation in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097319394 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.4144783 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.027136 = product of:
          0.054272 = sum of:
            0.054272 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054272 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  4. Universal classification II : Subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, 6th Annual Conf. of Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982 (1983) 0.08
    0.07853806 = product of:
      0.11780708 = sum of:
        0.072989546 = weight(_text_:citation in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072989546 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
        0.044817537 = product of:
          0.089635074 = sum of:
            0.089635074 = weight(_text_:index in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089635074 = score(doc=811,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: OESER, E.: The two systems of knowledge organization; CAVALCANTI, C.: Systems applications and concepts in the field of classification; KAULA, P.N.: Rethinking on concepts in the study of classification; WAHLIN, E.: Analysis of different ordering principles (Appendices); GIERTZ, L.M.: Note on general principles and policies; VET, P.E. vander: Notes on the foundations of classificatio theories; MÖNKE, H.: Analytische Pragmatik und Dogmatik in der Klassifikation; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages; HENRIKSEN, T.: On the mechanization of the chain index (abstract); Rajan, T.N. et al: Associate relationships of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (abstract); RAHMSTORF, G.: Explication of class descriptions; DIENES, M.: Structural differences in classification systems and the testing of the compatibility matrix in the field of culture; KOERNER, H.G.: Classification and small computers; SCIBOR, E.: Polish subject-field classification - broad ordering system for use on a national scale; KLESZCZ, F.: Towards a classification, unification and selection of automatic indexing methods
  5. Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993) 0.07
    0.06939038 = product of:
      0.20817113 = sum of:
        0.20817113 = sum of:
          0.12676314 = weight(_text_:index in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12676314 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050071523 = queryNorm
              0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.081407994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081407994 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050071523 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    15. 6.1996 18:06:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Catalogue & index. 1995, no.117, S.12,16 (G. Muirhead)
  6. ¬The impact of CD-ROM on library operations and universal availability of information : 11th International Symposium Essen, 1988. Festschrift in honour of Maurice B. Line (1989) 0.06
    0.05815574 = product of:
      0.08723361 = sum of:
        0.06082462 = weight(_text_:citation in 14) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06082462 = score(doc=14,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 14, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=14)
        0.026408987 = product of:
          0.052817974 = sum of:
            0.052817974 = weight(_text_:index in 14) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052817974 = score(doc=14,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 14, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=14)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ABID, A.: CD-ROM and access to information in the south; SEVER, S.: CD-ROM and bridging of cultural and technological gaps in developing countries; MITCHELL, J.: Electronic publishing developments and opportunities from OCLC; TAYLOR, H.: Science Citation Index print and CD: the best of both worlds from ISI; DAHLGREN, A.C.: The forgiving building revisited; KOCH, H.-A.: How will CD-ROM affect the cooperation within library networks? SCHNELLING, H.: Beyond online? Interactive public access to library files via CD-ROM; NEUBAUER, K.W.: Electronic library? The consequences of micros on data processing systems in libraries in the age of CD-ROM; PEARSON, E.M.: The impact of CD-ROM on library operations: to buy or to make - one library's experience producing a catalogue on CD-ROM; BROWN, D.J.: ADONIS - The strategic needs of publishers; BRAID, J.A.: ADONIS - from myth to reality; KORWITZ, U.: The ADONIS project: first experiences in the central library of medicine, Cologne; LINE, M.B.: The future of CD-ROMs for full text of journlas; FEIJEN, J.M.: Dutch reference databases (NRB); NOWAK, K.: The Deutsche Bibliographie and CD-ROM; SMITH, R.L.: CD-ROM for national bibliographies: a european project; CHADWYCK-HEALEY, C.: Two major British catalogues on CD-ROM
  7. Luukkonen, T.: Why has Latour's theory of citation been ignored by the bibliometric community? : Discussion od sociological interpretations of citation analysis (1997) 0.06
    0.056187384 = product of:
      0.16856214 = sum of:
        0.16856214 = weight(_text_:citation in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16856214 = score(doc=406,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.71789753 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the often lamented lack of a theory of citations, and the lack of a sociological theory in particular. Draws attention to one proposed theory and discusses the potential reasons why it has not been generally accepted as the theory of citations, despite its merits in explaining many phenomena in the citation behaviour of scientists. This theory has been expounded by B. Latour and presented, in particular, in his book entitled 'Science in action'
  8. Metrics in research : for better or worse? (2016) 0.05
    0.05235871 = product of:
      0.07853806 = sum of:
        0.048659697 = weight(_text_:citation in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048659697 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.20723915 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
        0.02987836 = product of:
          0.05975672 = sum of:
            0.05975672 = weight(_text_:index in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05975672 = score(doc=3312,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    If you are an academic researcher but did not earn (yet) your Nobel prize or your retirement, it is unlikely you never heard about research metrics. These metrics aim at quantifying various aspects of the research process, at the level of individual researchers (e.g. h-index, altmetrics), scientific journals (e.g. impact factors) or entire universities/ countries (e.g. rankings). Although such "measurements" have existed in a simple form for a long time, their widespread calculation was enabled by the advent of the digital era (large amount of data available worldwide in a computer-compatible format). And in this new era, what becomes technically possible will be done, and what is done and appears to simplify our lives will be used. As a result, a rapidly growing number of statistics-based numerical indices are nowadays fed into decisionmaking processes. This is true in nearly all aspects of society (politics, economy, education and private life), and in particular in research, where metrics play an increasingly important role in determining positions, funding, awards, research programs, career choices, reputations, etc.
    Content
    Inhalt: Metrics in Research - For better or worse? / Jozica Dolenc, Philippe Hünenberger Oliver Renn - A brief visual history of research metrics / Oliver Renn, Jozica Dolenc, Joachim Schnabl - Bibliometry: The wizard of O's / Philippe Hünenberger - The grip of bibliometrics - A student perspective / Matthias Tinzl - Honesty and transparency to taxpayers is the long-term fundament for stable university funding / Wendelin J. Stark - Beyond metrics: Managing the performance of your work / Charlie Rapple - Scientific profiling instead of bibliometrics: Key performance indicators of the future / Rafael Ball - More knowledge, less numbers / Carl Philipp Rosenau - Do we really need BIBLIO-metrics to evaluate individual researchers? / Rüdiger Mutz - Using research metrics responsibly and effectively as a researcher / Peter I. Darroch, Lisa H. Colledge - Metrics in research: More (valuable) questions than answers / Urs Hugentobler - Publication of research results: Use and abuse / Wilfred F. van Gunsteren - Wanted: Transparent algorithms, interpretation skills, common sense / Eva E. Wille - Impact factors, the h-index, and citation hype - Metrics in research from the point of view of a journal editor / Renato Zenobi - Rashomon or metrics in a publisher's world / Gabriella Karger - The impact factor and I: A love-hate relationship / Jean-Christophe Leroux - Personal experiences bringing altmetrics to the academic market / Ben McLeish - Fatally attracted by numbers? / Oliver Renn - On computable numbers / Gerd Folkers, Laura Folkers - ScienceMatters - Single observation science publishing and linking observations to create an internet of science / Lawrence Rajendran.
  9. Pao, M.L.: Retrieval differences between term and citation indexing (1989) 0.05
    0.0458768 = product of:
      0.1376304 = sum of:
        0.1376304 = weight(_text_:citation in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1376304 = score(doc=3566,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.58616084 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A retrieval experiment was conducted to compare on-line searching using terms opposed to citations. This is the first study in which a single data base was used to retrieve two equivalent sets for each query, one using terms found in the bibliographic record to achieve higher recall, and the other using documents. Reports on the use of a second citation searching strategy. Overall, by using both types of search keys, the total recall is increased.
  10. Theory of subject analysis : A sourcebook (1985) 0.04
    0.041837722 = product of:
      0.06275658 = sum of:
        0.03041231 = weight(_text_:citation in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03041231 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.12952447 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
        0.032344274 = product of:
          0.06468855 = sum of:
            0.06468855 = weight(_text_:index in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06468855 = score(doc=3622,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.2956505 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Definition and Scope For the purpose of this reader, subject analysis is understood to encompass vocabulary structuring and subject indexing. Vocabulary structuring refers to the constructing of tools, such as classifications, subject heading lists, and thesauri, designed to facilitate the organization and retrieval of information. These tools, though called by different names, are similar in that they structure or control the basic vocabulary of a subject index language by 1) stipulating terms that may be used in the classing or indexing of documents and 2) displaying semantic relationships, such as hierarchy and synonymy, that obtain between these terms. They differ in the kinds of terms and relationships they recognize and in the manner in which these are displayed. Subject indexing refers to the application of a vocabulary, which may be more or less well structured, to indicate the content or aboutness of documents. Traditionally subject indexing limits its domain to only certain types of documents, such as passages within books (back-of-book indexing) or periodical articles, and the expression it uses to only certain types of strings, for example, descriptors or index terms as opposed to subject headings or class numbers. However, in a generalized and more modern sense, subject indexing refers to the indication of the theme or topic of any document, indeed any retrieval artifact, by any meaningful string of alphanumeric characters. The value of construing the meaning of subject analysis broadly is threefold: it permits comparing a variety of approaches to subject analysis; it permits generalizing about these approaches at a relatively high descriptive level, so that principles and objectives are shown in relief; and, most importantly perhaps, it permits a unified view of the traditional and information scientific approaches to subject analysis.
    Content
    Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages
  11. Universal classification I : subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, 6th Annual Conf. of Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982 (1982) 0.04
    0.04070902 = product of:
      0.061063524 = sum of:
        0.042577233 = weight(_text_:citation in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042577233 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.18133426 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
        0.018486291 = product of:
          0.036972582 = sum of:
            0.036972582 = weight(_text_:index in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036972582 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.16897833 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: GROLIER, E. de: Classifications as a cultural artefacts; FOSKETT, D.J., S. BURY: Concept organisation and universal classification systems; ROLLAND-THOMAS, P.: Towards the establishment of the validity of encyclopedic library classification systems; KASHYAP, C.M.M.: General theory of measurement and theory of subjects; WELLISCH, H.H.: A new classification of the world's language; MILLS, J.: Practice and theory in a general classification: the new BLISS Classification (BC2); GOPINATH, M.A.: Application of general systems theory to the classification theory of Ranganathan; AUSTIN, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations; FELBER; H., W. NEDOBITY: The basis of Wüster's classification research; EISENWORT, W.: Remarks on certain foundational problems of a general theory of terminology; GÖDERT, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty; WAHLIN, E.: Analysis of different ordering principles in the area 'technology' (T), 'industry' (I) and 'material culture' (M) - the TIM project; SVENONIUS, E.: Indexical contents; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Classaurus: its fundamentals, design and use; RICHMOND, P.A.: Classification in syndetic structures; CRAVEN, T.C.: The representation of facets in a general concept network for index display generation; CIGANIK, M.: Fuzzy faceted thesaurus construction; DEVADASON, F.J., M. KOTHANDA RAMANUJAM: Computer-aided construction of an 'alphabetic' classaurus; SECHSER, O.: Theoretical generalizations in retrieval system research, their objectivity and relevance; KUMAR, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems; GLICKERT, P.: Gradational classification: a topic-tagging scheme for computerized production of a scannable list; PEJTERSEN, A.M.: A new approach to the classification of fiction; AUSTIN, J.: The AMP classification system for fiction: trial applications and retrieval tests; BONNER, R.: Community information classification research prject: user oriented empirical methods of classification construction; BORKO, H.: The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries; KELM, B., B. MAASSEN: Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließungsarbeit an der Deutschen Bibliothek; JOITA, E., P. ATANASIU, V. TEODORU: The use of ordering systems by different user groups; COCHRANE, P.A.: Classification as a users's tool in online public access catalogs; TRAVIS, I.L.: Faceted classification in an online environment; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Videotex information retrieval systems: the logical development and optimization of tree structures in a general online interactive system; SCHABAS, A.H.: Videotex information systems: complements to the tree structure; WERSIG, G., M. BURKART-SABSOUB: Empirical classification research as a basis of informaton policy; MALANGA, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data; RIGBY, M.: The use of the UDC in automated terminology data banks; SWAYDAN, N.: The universal classification and the needs of libraries in developing countries; MEDER, N.: Family resemblance and empirical classification, cluster analysis: its philosophy of science and strategy of research; KRAUTH, J.: Models of the measurement of similarity; LÖFFLER, G.: Cluster-Strukturvergleiche - Ein Ansatz zur Zusammenhangsanalyse multivariat definierter Raumstrukturen; KRISHNAMURTHY, E.V., VENKATASEKHAR, H.S.: A relational data-base system and query language for storage, manipulation and retrieval of virus data. -
  12. Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980) 0.04
    0.040549748 = product of:
      0.12164924 = sum of:
        0.12164924 = weight(_text_:citation in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12164924 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.5180979 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  13. How should citations to articles in high and low impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth? (1996) 0.04
    0.040549748 = product of:
      0.12164924 = sum of:
        0.12164924 = weight(_text_:citation in 7169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12164924 = score(doc=7169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.5180979 = fieldWeight in 7169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7169)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.04
    0.040549748 = product of:
      0.12164924 = sum of:
        0.12164924 = weight(_text_:citation in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12164924 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.5180979 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  15. Garfield, E.: Essays of an information scientist (1977-) 0.04
    0.040549748 = product of:
      0.12164924 = sum of:
        0.12164924 = weight(_text_:citation in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12164924 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.5180979 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  16. Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006) 0.03
    0.031113848 = product of:
      0.046670772 = sum of:
        0.036494773 = weight(_text_:citation in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036494773 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.15542936 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.010175999 = product of:
          0.020351999 = sum of:
            0.020351999 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020351999 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Zins, C.: Knowledge map of information science: issues, principles, implications. - Lin, X., S. Aluker u. W. Zhu u.a.: Dynamic concept representation through a visual concept explorer. - Kohlbacher, F.: Knowledge organization(s) in Japan: empirical evidence from Japanese and western corporations. - Beghtol, C.: The global learning society and the iterative relationship between theory and practice in knowledge organization systems. - Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks. - Doyle, A.: Naming and reclaiming knowledges in public intersections of landscapes and experience. - Qin, J., P. Creticos u. W.Y. Hsiao: Adaptive modeling of workforce domain knowledge. - Gnoli, C.: The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications. - Loehrlein, A., E.K. Jacob u. S. Lee u.a.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification. - Thellefsen, M.: The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation. - LaBarre, K.: A multi faceted view: use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access. - Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation: expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents. - Bean, C.A.: Hierarchical relationships used in mapping between knowledge structures. - Friedman, A.: Concept mapping a measurable sign. - Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri. - Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs. - Robert, C.A., A. Davis: Annotation and its application to information research in economic intelligence. - Mcllwaine, I.C., J.S. Mitchel: The new ecumenism: exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion. - Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages. - Eito Brun, R.: Uncovering hidden clues about geographic visualization in LCC. - Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet progress and prospects. - Pajarillo, E.J.Y.: A classification scheme to determine medical necessity: a knowledge organization global learning application. - López-Huertas, M.J.: Thematic map of interdisciplinary domains based on their terminological representation: the gender studies. - Rodriguez Bravo, B.: The visibility of women in indexing languages. - Beall, J., D. Vizine-Goetz: Finding fiction: facilitating access to works of the imagination scattered by form and format. - Kwasnik, B.H., Y.L. Chun u. K. Crowston u.a.: Challenges in ceating a taxonomy of genres of digital documents. - Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation: using wikis in science. - Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis: a study. - Lee, H.L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword: two cultural perspectives. - Loehrlein, A., R. Martin u. E.L. Robertson: Integration of international standards in the domain of manufacturing enterprise. -
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:22:36
  17. Emerging frameworks and methods : Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002 (2002) 0.03
    0.029334417 = product of:
      0.044001624 = sum of:
        0.0344076 = weight(_text_:citation in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0344076 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.14654021 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
        0.009594025 = product of:
          0.01918805 = sum of:
            0.01918805 = weight(_text_:22 in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01918805 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    LIS research and evaluation methodologies fell under the same scrutiny and systematization, particularly in the presentations employing multiple and mixed methodologies. Jaana Kekäläinen's and Kalervo Järvelin's proposal for a framework of laboratory information retrieval evaluation measures, applied along with analyses of information seeking and work task contexts, employed just such a mix. Marcia Bates pulled together Bradford's Law of Scattering of decreasingly relevant information sources and three information searching techniques (browsing, directed searching, and following links) to pose the question: what are the optimum searching techniques for the different regions of information concentrations? Jesper Schneider and Pia Borlund applied bibliometric methods (document co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-word analysis) to augment manual thesaurus construction and maintenance. Fredrik Åström examined document keyword co-occurrence measurement compared to and then combined with bibliometric co-citation analysis to map LIS concept spaces. Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas, and Keith van Rijsbergen compared system-supplied query expansion terms with interactive user query expansion, incorporating both partial relevance assessment feedback (how relevant is a document) and ostensive relevance feedback (measuring when a document is assessed as relevant over time). Scheduled in the midst of the presentations were two stimulating panel and audience discussions. The first panel, chaired by Glynn Harmon, explored the current re-positioning of many library and information science schools by renaming themselves to eliminate the "library" word and emphasize the "information" word (as in "School of Information," "Information School," and schools of "Information Studies"). Panelists Marcia Bates, Harry Bruce, Toni Carbo, Keith Belton, and Andrew Dillon presented the reasons for name changes in their own information programs, which include curricular change and expansion beyond a "stereotypical" library focus, broader contemporary theoretical approaches to information, new clientele and markets for information services and professionals, new media formats and delivery models, and new interdisciplinary student and faculty recruitment from crossover fields. Sometimes criticized for over-broadness and ambiguity-and feared by library practitioners who were trained in more traditional library schools-renaming schools both results from and occasions a renewed examination of the definitions and boundaries of the field as a whole and the educational and research missions of individual schools.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:12:10
  18. Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization : Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India (2012) 0.03
    0.02907787 = product of:
      0.043616805 = sum of:
        0.03041231 = weight(_text_:citation in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03041231 = score(doc=986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.12952447 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
        0.013204494 = product of:
          0.026408987 = sum of:
            0.026408987 = weight(_text_:index in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026408987 = score(doc=986,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.12069881 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: KEYNOTE ADDRESS Richard P. Smiraglia. Universes, Dimensions, Domains, Intensions and Extensions: Knowledge Organization for the 21st Century DOMAIN OF KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Birger Hjorland. Is Knowledge Organization = Information Organization? - H.Peter Ohly. Mission, Programs and Challenges of Knowledge Organization - Rick Szostak. The Basic Concepts Classification - José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Ely Tannuri de Oliveira and Maria Cláudia Cabrini Gracio. Theoretical Referents in Knowledge Organization: A Domain Analysis of Knowledge Organization Journal - José Augusto Chaves Guimarães and Joseph T. Tennis. Constant Pioneers: The Citation Frontiers of Indexing Theory in the ISKO International Proceedings- Aline Elis Arboit, Maria Cláudia Cabrini Gracio, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira and Leilah Santiago Bufrem. Relationship Between Authors and Main Subject Categories in the Knowledge Organization Domain: A Bibliometric Approach
    INFORMATION MINING / AUTOMATIC INDEXING Flávio Codeço Coelho, Renato Rocha Souza, Daniel Magalhães Chada and Pablo de Camargo Cerdeira. Information Mining and Visualization of Data from the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF): A Case Study - Carlos Alberto Correa and Nair Yumiko Kobashi. Automatic Indexing and Information Visualization: A Study Based on Paraconsistent Logics - Nalini A. Raja. Digitized Contents and Index Pages as Alternative Subject Access Fields USERS AND CONTEXT Carol L. Tilley and Kathryn A. La Barre. What if they build it and no one comes? Balancing Full-Text Access and User Tasks - Sholeh Arastoopoor and Rahmatollah Fattahi. Users. perception of Aboutness and Ofness in Images: An Approach to Subject Indexing Based on Ervin Panofsky's Theory and Users' View - Melodie J. Fox. Communities of Practice, Gender and Social Tagging - Radia Bernaoui and Mohmed Hassoun. User Expectations and Reality and Delineation of Agricultural Information Systems in the Maghreb ABSTRACTS OF POSTERS
  19. Panzer, M.: Dewey: how to make it work for you (2013) 0.03
    0.02891266 = product of:
      0.086737975 = sum of:
        0.086737975 = sum of:
          0.052817974 = weight(_text_:index in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052817974 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050071523 = queryNorm
              0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
          0.03392 = weight(_text_:22 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03392 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050071523 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The article discusses various aspects of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system of classifying library books in 2013. Background is presented on some librarians' desire to stop using DDC and adopt a genre-based system of classification. It says librarians can use the DDC to deal with problems and issues related to library book classification. It highlights the benefits of using captions and relative index terms and semantic relationships in DDC.
    Source
    Knowledge quest. 42(2013) no.2, S.22-29
  20. Indexing legal materials (1993) 0.02
    0.024898633 = product of:
      0.0746959 = sum of:
        0.0746959 = product of:
          0.1493918 = sum of:
            0.1493918 = weight(_text_:index in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1493918 = score(doc=3633,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.6827756 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält Kapitel zu folgenden Themen: History of law indexing; Types of law books and their users; Structure and design of indexes; Selecting and analyzing subjects; Indexing terms; Form of entries and references; Indexing EC materials; Cases and statutes; Conclusion; Index of works cited; Index

Languages

  • e 151
  • d 44
  • m 8
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • m 103
  • el 4
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications