Search (128 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.17 
    0.17072359 = product of:
  0.25608537 = sum of:
    0.06402134 = product of:
      0.19206402 = sum of:
        0.19206402 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19206402 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4100879 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19206402 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19206402 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4100879 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048370767 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  2. Curwen, A.G.: Bliss for beginners (1989) 0.09 
    0.085948616 = product of:
  0.25784585 = sum of:
    0.25784585 = product of:
      0.7735375 = sum of:
        0.7735375 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.7735375 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            2.2354977 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bliss classification bulletin. 1989, no.31, S.14-17
  3. Saro, C.; Wolters, C.: EDV-gestützte Bestandserschließung in kleineren und mittleren Museen : Including an English Summary und einem Anhang "Projekt 'Kleine Museen' mit "Beispiele für Druckprodukte" (1988) 0.05 
    0.049827483 = product of:
  0.14948244 = sum of:
    0.14948244 = product of:
      0.2989649 = sum of:
        0.2989649 = weight(_text_:museumskunde in 4014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2989649 = score(doc=4014,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44171885 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.67682165 = fieldWeight in 4014, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4014)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Museen sind gesellschaftliche Kultureinrichtungen, die für eine interessierte Öffentlichkeit ein qualifiziertes Informationsangebot über die materiellen Zeugnisse von Kunst-, Kultur- und Naturgeschichte bereitstellen sollen. Ohne systematische Erfassung der musealen Sammlungsbestände und die darauf fußende wissenschaftliche Erschließung und Dokumentation vermögen sie dieser Aufgabenstellung und Anforderung aber nicht gerecht zu werden. Zum kulturpflegerischen Auftrag der Landschaftsverbände gehört gemäß §5 Abs. lc der Landschaftsverbandsordnung für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 15.5.1953 (in der Neufassung vom 25.8.1984) die "Pflege und Förderung der Heimatmuseen". Da hierfür Inventarisierung und Dokumentation eine Grundvoraussetzung bilden, haben sich die Museumsämter der Landschaftsverbände Rheinland und Westfalen-Lippe seit ihrer Gründung dieser Aufgabe in den Museen ihres Zuständigkeitsbereiches intensiv angenommen. Vor dem Hintergrund rasch wachsender und zunehmend unüberschaubarer Dokumentationsbestände in den aufgebauten Zentralarchiven der Museumsämter - Anfang der 80er-Jahre waren bereits über 65.000 Karteikarten und eine entsprechende Anzahl Fotos archiviert - gewann die Auflösung der lediglich nach dem Provenienzsystem (Ordnung nach Museen) zusammengefaßten Informationsträger äußerste Dringlichkeit. Vordringliche Aufgabe war die Erschließung und Nutzbarmachung der Zentralarchive für einen großen Benutzerkreis über eine differenzierte Sachgruppensystematik mit alphabetischen, Konkordanz- und Verweisregistern, um differenzierte Fragestellungen und einen raschen, direkten und möglichst umfassenden Zugriff auf die Objekte zu ermöglichen. Da eine "konventionelle" Durchführung dieser Arbeiten äußerst personal-, zeit- und kostenintensiv sowie mit hoher Fehlerquote verbunden gewesen wäre, begannen die Museumsämter die Realisierung der systematischen Neustrukturierung ihrer Zentralarchive mit Hilfe EDV-gestützter Verfahren im Rahmen eines 1984 angelaufenen Kooperationsprojektes mit dem Berliner Institut für Museumskunde der Staatlichen Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz. Nach Abschluß der ersten, bis 1987 terminierten Projektphase dürfen die Beteiligten an dieser Stelle mit großer Genugtuung und nicht ohne Stolz feststellen, daß sich die gemeinsamen Anstrengungen gelohnt haben. Es gelang einerseits eine Ordnungshilfe für die Archive der Museumsämter bereitzustellen (Grobklassifikation) und erste Erfahrungen im Datenverarbeitungsbereich zu sammeln, zum anderen praxisorientierte, generell nutzbare Regelwerke (Thesauri) zu erarbeiten. Da das Institut für Museumskunde und das Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin überdies im Rahmen cles Projektes Software für eine PC-Version des GOS-Datenbanksystems entwickelt haben, die im Laufe dieses Jahres verfügbar sein wird, könnten die Museumsämter die dringend erforderliche Sachkompetenz erwerben, um die zunehmende Nachfrage der Museen in Nordrhein-Westfalen nach Beratung und Entscheidungshilfe bei Fragen und Problemen der EDV-gestützten Erschließung ihrer Sammlungsbestände zu befriedigen.
    Diese Früchte des Projekts kamen aber nicht nur den direkt am Vorhaben Beteiligten zugute. Der 1985 konstituierte "Arbeitskreis Museumsdokumentation" war eine wichtige Begleitung für die erfolgreich angelaufenen Unternehmungen; damit war eine bundesweite Plattform für den Informations- und Erfahrungsaustausch über den Problemkomplex Computer-Einsatz im Rahmen musealer Sammlungserschließung geschaffen. Bereits 1986 beschlossen Mitglieder des Arbeitskreises in anderen Bundesländern neueThesaurus-Projekte zu initiieren. Zwei dieser Unternehmen wurden im vergangenen Jahr weitgehend abgeschlossen, weitere Projekte 1988 eingeleitet. Nicht zuletzt auf dieser mittlerweile bundesweiten Ausstrahlung des Projekts und der konkret eingeleiteten länderübergreifenden Kooperation bei der Erarbeitung einer gemeinsamen fachlichen Dokumentationssprache, hat der Ausschuß für Kunst und Erwachsenenbildung der Kultusministerkonferenz die Konferenz gebeten, den Museen und Museumsämtern in der Bundesrepublik zu empfehlen, der Entwicklung einheitlicher Regelwerke für den problemlosen Austausch von Objektdaten die gebotene Aufmerksamkeit zu schenken und dabei die Zusammenarbeit mit den auf diesem Gebiet schon jetzt führend tätigen und miteinander kooperierenden Einrichtungen zu verstärken. Daß sich der Kreis der Teilnehmer schon im Verlauf der ersten Phase des Vorhabens vergrößerte und sich in der zweiten Projektphase (1989-1992) durch den Anschluß weiterer Bundesländer noch stärker erweitern wird, spricht für die Qualität der praxisorientierten Arbeitsergebnisse und läßt einen erfolgreichen Projekt-Fortgang erwarten. Durch das 1986 unter dem Arbeitstitel "Computergestützte Inventarisierungsfibeln" geplante Anschlußprojekt sollen auf der Grundlage abgesicherter Thesauri praktische Handreichungen (Fibeln) zur Bestimmung von Museumsobjekten zur Verfügung gestellt und die Erfassungstiefe bei der maschinellen Datenverarbeitung um weitere Kategorien (z.B. Material, Datierung, Herkunft) vergrößert werden. Die mit dem Projekt "Kleine Museen" erzielten Ergebnisse sind die Frucht gemeinsamer Anstrengungen und konstruktiver Kooperation auf einem grundlegenden Feld der Museumsarbeit. Von einzelnen Beteiligten hätten diese Arbeitsleistungen ohne fremde Hilfe nicht erbracht werden können. In diesem Sinn wünschen und erhoffen wir für das neue Unternehmen und den "Arbeitskreis Museumsdokumentation" am Institut für Museumskunde der Staatlichen Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz eine noch stärkere Resonanz und eine noch breitere überregionale Fundierung.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Institut für Museumskunde
    Series
    Materialien aus dem Institut für Museumskunde; H.24
  4. Campbell, D.J.: ¬A summary of reviews of and published comments on the 2nd edition of the Bibliographic Classification. (1980) 0.05 
    0.04861988 = product of:
  0.14585964 = sum of:
    0.14585964 = product of:
      0.43757892 = sum of:
        0.43757892 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43757892 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            1.2645885 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bliss classification bulletin. 7(1980), S.18-30
  5. Aitchison, J.: ¬A classification as a source for a thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986) 0.05 
    0.048238542 = product of:
  0.14471562 = sum of:
    0.14471562 = product of:
      0.43414685 = sum of:
        0.43414685 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43414685 = score(doc=1569,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            1.2546699 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The second edition of the Bibliographic Classidication of H.E. Bliss (BC2), being prepared under the editorship of Jack Mills, Vanda Broughton and others, is a rich source of structure and terminology for thesauri covering different subject fields. The new edition employs facet analysis and is thesaurus-compatible. A number of facet-based thesauri have drawn upon Bliss for terms and relationships. In two of these thesauri the Bliss Classification was the source of both systematic and alphabetical displays. The DHSS-DATA thesaurus, published by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security, provides controlled terms and Bliss class numbers for indexing and searching the DHSS-DATA database. The ECOT thesaurus (Educational courses and occupations thesaurus) prepared for the Department of Education and Science, uses the software sedigned for the British Standards Institution ROOT thesaurus to genearte an alphabetical display from the systematic display derived from the Bliss schedules. Problems, benefits, and future prospects of Bliss-based thesaurus construction are discussed
  6. Aitchison, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986) 0.04 
    0.042974308 = product of:
  0.12892292 = sum of:
    0.12892292 = product of:
      0.38676876 = sum of:
        0.38676876 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38676876 = score(doc=1570,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            1.1177489 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  7. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985) 0.04 
    0.04031348 = product of:
  0.12094043 = sum of:
    0.12094043 = product of:
      0.36282128 = sum of:
        0.36282128 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36282128 = score(doc=3621,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            1.0485414 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
    Footnote
    Original in: Bliss, H.E.: A bibliographic classification extended by systematic auxuliary schedules for composite specification and notation. vols 1-2. 2nd ed. New York: Wilson 1952. S.3-11.
  8. Bury, S.: Ranganathan's theories embodied in both Colon Classification and the second edition of Bliss' Bibliographic Classification (1988) 0.04 
    0.03646491 = product of:
  0.10939473 = sum of:
    0.10939473 = product of:
      0.3281842 = sum of:
        0.3281842 = weight(_text_:bliss in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3281842 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  9. Mills, J.: Practice and theory in a general classification : the new Bliss Classification (BC2) (1982) 0.04 
    0.03646491 = product of:
  0.10939473 = sum of:
    0.10939473 = product of:
      0.3281842 = sum of:
        0.3281842 = weight(_text_:bliss in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3281842 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.9484414 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  10. Relevance of Ranganathan's contributions to library science : Companion volume to Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Library Association and co-sponsored by the Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, 11.-14.11.1985, New Dehli, India (1988) 0.02 
    0.02430994 = product of:
  0.07292982 = sum of:
    0.07292982 = product of:
      0.21878946 = sum of:
        0.21878946 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21878946 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BURY, S.: Ranganathan's theories embodies in both Colon Classification and the second edition of Bliss' Bibliographic Classification; COATES, E.J.: Ranganathan's thought and its significance for the mechanisation of information storage and retrieval
  11. Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980) 0.02 
    0.02430994 = product of:
  0.07292982 = sum of:
    0.07292982 = product of:
      0.21878946 = sum of:
        0.21878946 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21878946 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.02 
    0.02184524 = product of:
  0.06553572 = sum of:
    0.06553572 = product of:
      0.13107143 = sum of:
        0.13107143 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13107143 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  13. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.02 
    0.02184524 = product of:
  0.06553572 = sum of:
    0.06553572 = product of:
      0.13107143 = sum of:
        0.13107143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13107143 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  14. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.02 
    0.02184524 = product of:
  0.06553572 = sum of:
    0.06553572 = product of:
      0.13107143 = sum of:
        0.13107143 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13107143 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
  15. Ranganathan's philosophy : assessment, impact and relevance. Proc. of the Int. Conf. organised by the Indian Libary Association and co-sponsored by Sarada Ranganathan's Endowment for Library Science (1986) 0.02 
    0.021487154 = product of:
  0.06446146 = sum of:
    0.06446146 = product of:
      0.19338438 = sum of:
        0.19338438 = weight(_text_:bliss in 8926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19338438 = score(doc=8926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 8926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8926)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: AITCHISON, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus: the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure; DEVADASON, F.J.: Ranganathan's idea of facet analysis in action; FOSKETT, D.J.: The "personality" of the personaliyt facet; GOPINATH, M.A.: Relevance of Ranganathan's postulational approach in the identification of key concepts in the newly formed subjects and its implications to intellectual organisation of information; IYER, H.: Users preference of sequence of component ideas in subject representation: PMEST model; IYER, H.: Ask hypothesis and Ranganathan's fundamental categories; KASHYAP, M.M.: Ranganathan's postulational approach to classification: its development and impact; KUMAR, P.S.G.: Hidden roots of Colon Classification; LANGRIDGE, D.W.: Disciplines, forms and phenomena; NARASIMHAN, S.: Classification of oriental libraries with the case study of four regions; PARAMESWARAN, M.: The contribution of S.R. Ranganathan in the classification and cataloguing of ancient sanskrit classics; PRASAD, K.N.: Development of classification terminology: contributions of Professor S.R. Ranganathan; SANGAMESWARAN, S.V. u. M.V. GOPINATH: Design and development of depth version of Colon Classification for food technology; SANKARALINGAM, P., RAGHAVAN, K.S. u. P. GANGADHARA RAO: Structure and synthesis in DDC: an analysis; SEETHARAMA, S.: Compatibility issues affecting classification system: relevance of Ranganathan's normative principles; VOHRA, R.: Analytico-synthetic scheme of classification: its impact and relevance to modern thories of classification; DAS, S.P.: Chain procedure and precoordinate indexing; TEJOMURTY, A.: Chain procedure: the first model of pre-coordinate indexing; VINAYAK, K. u. K.K. TANEJA: Chain procedure and its influence on other precoordinate indexing systems; AUSTIN, D.: Standards in documentation: a subjective view
  16. Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988) 0.02 
    0.018536301 = product of:
  0.055608902 = sum of:
    0.055608902 = product of:
      0.111217804 = sum of:
        0.111217804 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111217804 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:22:27
  17. Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1985) 0.02 
    0.018232455 = product of:
  0.054697365 = sum of:
    0.054697365 = product of:
      0.1640921 = sum of:
        0.1640921 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1640921 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34602475 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This book provides a coherent account of the theory of classification. It discusses the contributions made by theoreticians like E.C. Richardson, J.B. Brown, W. Hulme, W.C. Berwick Sayers, H.E. Bliss and S.R. Ranganathan. However, the theory put forward by S.R. Ranganathan predominates the whole book because his contribution is far more than anybody else's. Five major schemes - DDC, UDC, LCC, CC, and BC - have also been discussed. Library classification is a specialized area of study. In recent years, library classification has become a vast and complicated field of study using highly technical terminology. A special attempt has been made to provide descriptions as simple and direct as could be possible. To illustrate the theory of classification, large number of examples have been given from all major schemes so that an average student ould also grasp the concepts easily. This book has been especially written to meet the requirements of students, preparing for their library science, documentation, information science diplomas and degrees.
  18. Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988) 0.02 
    0.017476192 = product of:
  0.052428573 = sum of:
    0.052428573 = product of:
      0.10485715 = sum of:
        0.10485715 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10485715 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
  19. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02 
    0.017476192 = product of:
  0.052428573 = sum of:
    0.052428573 = product of:
      0.10485715 = sum of:
        0.10485715 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10485715 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  20. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.02 
    0.017476192 = product of:
  0.052428573 = sum of:
    0.052428573 = product of:
      0.10485715 = sum of:
        0.10485715 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10485715 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1693862 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048370767 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27

Authors

Languages

  • e 83
  • d 42
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 94
  • m 22
  • s 8
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications