Search (142 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.13 
    0.1323984 = product of:
  0.2647968 = sum of:
    0.19561674 = weight(_text_:fields in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19561674 = score(doc=2830,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.6189564 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The PRO-CITE and BIBLIO-LINK software packages make the process of compiling bibliographies and internal data bases much easier than when all the steps in the process were manual (compiling, typing). The 2 programs work on records that have been downloaded from on-line data bases. BIBLIO-LINK analyses the downloaded records to determine document type and stores the data in the appropriate PRO-CITE workform, putting fields from the downloaded record into the correct PRO-CITE fields.
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  2. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.09 
    0.09078212 = product of:
  0.18156424 = sum of:
    0.12103168 = weight(_text_:fields in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12103168 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.38295972 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
    0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060532555 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.06 
    0.06335763 = product of:
  0.25343052 = sum of:
    0.25343052 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25343052 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5411154 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Peritz, B.C.: ¬A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields (1983) 0.06 
    0.06051584 = product of:
  0.24206336 = sum of:
    0.24206336 = weight(_text_:fields in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24206336 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.76591945 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  5. Feng, S.: ¬A comparative study of indexing languages in single and multidatabase searching (1989) 0.05 
    0.048904184 = product of:
  0.19561674 = sum of:
    0.19561674 = weight(_text_:fields in 2494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19561674 = score(doc=2494,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.6189564 = fieldWeight in 2494, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2494)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    An experiment was conducted using 3 data bases in library and information science - Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA), Information Science Abstracts and ERIC - to investigate some of the main factors affecting on-line searching: effectiveness of search vocabularies, combinations of fields searched, and overlaps among databases. Natural language, controlled vocabulary and a mixture of natural language and controlled terms were tested using different fields of bibliographic records. Also discusses a comparative evaluation of single and multi-data base searching, measuring the overlap among data bases and their influence upon on-line searching.
  6. Barnett, J.B.: Technical report cataloging for OCLC (1988) 0.05 
    0.048904184 = product of:
  0.19561674 = sum of:
    0.19561674 = weight(_text_:fields in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19561674 = score(doc=396,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.6189564 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Specific provisions for cataloging technical reports are included in OCLC's Book Format. Over 200 technical report records for publications in the marine sciences, input by 60 libraries, were retrieved from the OCLC database and studied to determine the extent of use of the technical report tagging fields and indicators. It was found that these tagging fields and indicators, provided to accommodate the bibliographic characteristics of technical reports, are infrequently used. Suggestions are made to improve the quality and increase the quantity of technical report records in the OCLC database.
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.04 
    0.04323754 = product of:
  0.17295016 = sum of:
    0.17295016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17295016 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  8. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.04 
    0.04323754 = product of:
  0.17295016 = sum of:
    0.17295016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17295016 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  9. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.04 
    0.04323754 = product of:
  0.17295016 = sum of:
    0.17295016 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17295016 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
  10. Binwal, J.C.; Karisiddappa, C.R.: Organizing knowledge in the field of creative arts (1988) 0.04 
    0.0432256 = product of:
  0.1729024 = sum of:
    0.1729024 = weight(_text_:fields in 2503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1729024 = score(doc=2503,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.54708534 = fieldWeight in 2503, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2503)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Analyses the basic concepts which provide the central focus to various fields of knowledge in creative arts. The structural features of these subjects are delineated. The concepts are identified in relation to their manifestation in the PMEST (Personality, Matter, Energy, Space, Time) facet matrix.
  11. Schuhböck, H.P.: EDV-Katalogisierung und Online-Benutzerkatalog : Möglichkeiten und Probleme neuer Erschließungstechniken in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1989) 0.04 
    0.042791158 = product of:
  0.17116463 = sum of:
    0.17116463 = weight(_text_:fields in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17116463 = score(doc=2517,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.5415868 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the function and problems of the traditional card catalogue compared with a computerised catalogue. Examines library cataloguing with the computer, linked to rules for subject cataloguing, as well as the oppor-tunities offered by computerised title entries, the transfer of data from outside, data base structure and indexing. Also looks at techniques for searching catalogues with computers, including search rules with Boolean operators, searches restricted to specific fields of free search in all fields for a vague concept. Other topics cover the essential principles of the OPAC, its information functions, mail box function and hardware configuration.
  12. Peritz, B.C.: On the informativeness of titles (1984) 0.04 
    0.042791158 = product of:
  0.17116463 = sum of:
    0.17116463 = weight(_text_:fields in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17116463 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.5415868 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The frequency of non-informative titles of journal articles was assessed for two fields: library and information science and sociology. The percentage of non informative titles was 21% in the formaer and 15% in the latter. In both fields, the non-informative titles, were concentratein only a few journals. The non-informative titles in library science were derived mainly from non-research journals. IN sociology the reasons for non-informative titles may be more complex; some of these journals are highly cited. For the improvement of retrievaleffiency the adoption of a policy encouraging informative titles (as in journals of chemistry) is recommended.
  13. Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988) 0.04 
    0.036688272 = product of:
  0.14675309 = sum of:
    0.14675309 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14675309 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:22:27
  14. Yerkey, N.; Glogowski, M.: Bibliographic scatter of library and information science literature (1989) 0.04 
    0.03667814 = product of:
  0.14671256 = sum of:
    0.14671256 = weight(_text_:fields in 6150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14671256 = score(doc=6150,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.4642173 = fieldWeight in 6150, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6150)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    As part of a largerstudy concerning the scatter of library and information science (LIS) documents in bibliographic databases, this paper focuses on the publishing sources of a sample of 822 highly relevant documents. 67% were journal articles with the largest subject categories outside of LIS being medicine / health sciences, business, education, and computer science. Other journal titles ranged from popular and trade magazines to scholarly journals spanning the disciplinary map. The largest number of nonjournal items were conference reports, government reports, bibliographic resource guides, monographs, and nongovernment agency reports. These were scattered mostly between technological and medical databases. The results show that LIS is an interdisciplinary field, borrowing and supplying information to and from other disciplines. Articles written about the application of LIS concepts to other fields are often published in the journals of those other fields, not in LIS journals
  15. Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
  16. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  17. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
  18. Grundsätze der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (DK) und Regeln für ihre Revision und Veröffentlichung (1981) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 1175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=1175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 25(1981) Nr.4, S.15-22
  19. Hermes, H.J.: ¬Die DK: eine todkranke Klassifikation? (1983) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 27(1983) Nr.6, S.19-22
  20. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29

Authors

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 44
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 114
  • m 19
  • s 4
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications