Search (139 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.08 
    0.08257932 = product of:
  0.16515864 = sum of:
    0.16515864 = sum of:
      0.11421338 = weight(_text_:word in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11421338 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05371688 = queryNorm
          0.40551287 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050945267 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05371688 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  2. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.08 
    0.07658355 = product of:
  0.1531671 = sum of:
    0.1531671 = sum of:
      0.12769446 = weight(_text_:word in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12769446 = score(doc=3644,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05371688 = queryNorm
          0.45337722 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.025472634 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025472634 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05371688 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  3. Milstead, J.L.: Natural versus inverted word order in subject headings (1980) 0.07 
    0.06526479 = product of:
  0.13052958 = sum of:
    0.13052958 = product of:
      0.26105917 = sum of:
        0.26105917 = weight(_text_:word in 2867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26105917 = score(doc=2867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.92688656 = fieldWeight in 2867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Kintsch, W.; Mross, E.F.: Context effects in word identification (1985) 0.07 
    0.06526479 = product of:
  0.13052958 = sum of:
    0.13052958 = product of:
      0.26105917 = sum of:
        0.26105917 = weight(_text_:word in 7751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26105917 = score(doc=7751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.92688656 = fieldWeight in 7751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Tucker, G.: ¬The STRIX system in HTV film library (1988) 0.04 
    0.04079049 = product of:
  0.08158098 = sum of:
    0.08158098 = product of:
      0.16316196 = sum of:
        0.16316196 = weight(_text_:word in 2539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16316196 = score(doc=2539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.5793041 = fieldWeight in 2539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes the STRIX text retrieval system used in the Harlech Television (HTV) film library. The package is designed for use in libraries where a free text computer system can be utilised. The system will allow you to search on any number or records for the particular word or phrase required
  6. Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for authors (1987) 0.04 
    0.04079049 = product of:
  0.08158098 = sum of:
    0.08158098 = product of:
      0.16316196 = sum of:
        0.16316196 = weight(_text_:word in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16316196 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.5793041 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Guidelines for authors of scholarly publications who wish to prepare documents for a publisher on existing text entry devices, word processors and personal computers, adding markup to the text in accordance with the SGML
  7. Ungvary, R.: Intensional splitting : an empirical examination of conceptual duality (1986) 0.04 
    0.040380526 = product of:
  0.08076105 = sum of:
    0.08076105 = product of:
      0.1615221 = sum of:
        0.1615221 = weight(_text_:word in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1615221 = score(doc=5219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.5734818 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Certain words are extremely closely connected, regarding their meanings; such word pairs can be formed, however, not only with the well-known synonyms and antonyms, but also with words of clearly different meaning (e.g. light-photon). Our studies show that, even in the case of real synonyms, there is a purely semantical - and consequently conceptual - difference between the parts/elements of the word pairs. Within the pairs there is an elementary conceptual accessibility between the parts; according to all indications this is the basis for the remarkable semantical connection. This close connection is the intensional splitting, the quantum of relation. It is assumed that is plays an important role in the semantical deep structure. Synonyms and antonyms are mere random marks of the existence of this relation on the level of the natural language
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.04 
    0.036389478 = product of:
  0.072778955 = sum of:
    0.072778955 = product of:
      0.14555791 = sum of:
        0.14555791 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14555791 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  9. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.04 
    0.036389478 = product of:
  0.072778955 = sum of:
    0.072778955 = product of:
      0.14555791 = sum of:
        0.14555791 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14555791 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  10. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.04 
    0.036389478 = product of:
  0.072778955 = sum of:
    0.072778955 = product of:
      0.14555791 = sum of:
        0.14555791 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14555791 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
  11. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.04 
    0.035548605 = product of:
  0.07109721 = sum of:
    0.07109721 = product of:
      0.21329162 = sum of:
        0.21329162 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21329162 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4554123 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  12. Veltman, K.: Multidimensional bibliography in classification (1985) 0.03 
    0.03461188 = product of:
  0.06922376 = sum of:
    0.06922376 = product of:
      0.13844752 = sum of:
        0.13844752 = weight(_text_:word in 1543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13844752 = score(doc=1543,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.49155584 = fieldWeight in 1543, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A classification system traditionally presents knowledge as if it were static. However, pictures, words and the books written about them have meanings which (1) vary from place to place, (2) change with time and (3) depend on a cluster of related terms. The paper outlines a framework for these dynamic characteristics of knowledge: a model for integrating information from competing and even seemingly conflicting classification systems. To outline this model the word 'perspective' is analysed in terms of theory, practice and individuals. Perspectival theory is considered under definitions, primary and secondary literature and related terms. The lecture emphasizes the potential value of computers, lase discs and word processors for a new awareness of the historical and dynamic dimensions of knowledge. This model, if applied systematically, might lead to a reorganization of knowledge
  13. Mowery, R.L.: Women in literature : a study of Library of Congress subject cataloging (1989) 0.03 
    0.03461188 = product of:
  0.06922376 = sum of:
    0.06922376 = product of:
      0.13844752 = sum of:
        0.13844752 = weight(_text_:word in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13844752 = score(doc=423,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.49155584 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study analyzes the Library of Congress (LC) class numbers and the LC subject headings which LC has assigned to 164 works of history and criticism of literature (belles lettres) related to women's studies. These books were classed in more than one hundred different class numbers and spans of numbers. Less than half of these books were assigned to class numbers in PA-PT whose captions contain either the word "women" or another word which points to women's studies, but slightly more than half were assigned "literature" subject headings which contain the words "women," "feminism," "feminist," or "sex role." The subject heading "Women in literature" was assigned to forty of these books, while the words "women authors" appear in a series of different subject headings assigned to forty-five of these books.
  14. Asija, S.P.: Natural language interface without artifical intelligence (1989) 0.03 
    0.032632396 = product of:
  0.06526479 = sum of:
    0.06526479 = product of:
      0.13052958 = sum of:
        0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13052958 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    SWIFT-ANSWER (Special Word Indexed Full Text Alpha Numeric Storage With Easy Retrieval) is a natural language interface that allows searchers to communicate with the computer in their own languages. The system operates without the need for artificial intelligence.
  15. Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988) 0.03 
    0.030877497 = product of:
  0.061754994 = sum of:
    0.061754994 = product of:
      0.12350999 = sum of:
        0.12350999 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12350999 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:22:27
  16. Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988) 0.03 
    0.029111583 = product of:
  0.058223166 = sum of:
    0.058223166 = product of:
      0.11644633 = sum of:
        0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11644633 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
  17. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.029111583 = product of:
  0.058223166 = sum of:
    0.058223166 = product of:
      0.11644633 = sum of:
        0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11644633 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  18. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.03 
    0.029111583 = product of:
  0.058223166 = sum of:
    0.058223166 = product of:
      0.11644633 = sum of:
        0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11644633 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
  19. Grundsätze der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (DK) und Regeln für ihre Revision und Veröffentlichung (1981) 0.03 
    0.029111583 = product of:
  0.058223166 = sum of:
    0.058223166 = product of:
      0.11644633 = sum of:
        0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 1175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11644633 = score(doc=1175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 25(1981) Nr.4, S.15-22
  20. Hermes, H.J.: ¬Die DK: eine todkranke Klassifikation? (1983) 0.03 
    0.029111583 = product of:
  0.058223166 = sum of:
    0.058223166 = product of:
      0.11644633 = sum of:
        0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11644633 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05371688 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 27(1983) Nr.6, S.19-22

Authors

Languages

  • e 95
  • d 42
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 109
  • m 19
  • s 5
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications