Search (225 results, page 1 of 12)

0.12653719 = product of:
  0.25307438 = sum of:
    0.25307438 = sum of:
      0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14085601 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
      0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11221837 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29

0.12653719 = product of:
  0.25307438 = sum of:
    0.25307438 = sum of:
      0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14085601 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11221837 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108

0.085733205 = product of:
  0.17146641 = sum of:
    0.17146641 = sum of:
      0.12938452 = weight(_text_:language in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12938452 = score(doc=1637,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.6370634 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04208189 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29

0.063268594 = product of:
  0.12653719 = sum of:
    0.12653719 = sum of:
      0.07042801 = weight(_text_:language in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07042801 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056109186 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition, aim at universal applicability. Some problems brought forth through the translation process and the laws in the workability of rules in a nonEnglish working language are examined. This leads to acknowledge the failure of AACR2 to acquire an international adaptability. Enquiry into the needs of potential users is advised.

Date

6. 1.2007 19:12:22

0.05536002 = product of:
  0.11072004 = sum of:
    0.11072004 = sum of:
      0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0616245 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049095538 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)

Date

6. 1.1999 10:22:07

0.05536002 = product of:
  0.11072004 = sum of:
    0.11072004 = sum of:
      0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0616245 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049095538 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.

Date

8.11.1995 11:52:22

0.05536002 = product of:
  0.11072004 = sum of:
    0.11072004 = sum of:
      0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0616245 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049095538 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.

Date

14. 3.1996 13:22:21

0.05536002 = product of:
  0.11072004 = sum of:
    0.11072004 = sum of:
      0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0616245 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
      0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049095538 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.2007 12:21:29

0.04980012 = product of:
  0.09960024 = sum of:
    0.09960024 = product of:
      0.19920048 = sum of:
        0.19920048 = weight(_text_:language in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19920048 = score(doc=383,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.9808232 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Keyword catalogues and the free language approach. Ed.: P. Bryant

0.047451444 = product of:
  0.09490289 = sum of:
    0.09490289 = sum of:
      0.052821 = weight(_text_:language in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052821 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.26008 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04208189 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051766515 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.

Date

9. 1.1996 10:22:31

0.0440175 = product of:
  0.088035 = sum of:
    0.088035 = product of:
      0.17607 = sum of:
        0.17607 = weight(_text_:language in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17607 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0440175 = product of:
  0.088035 = sum of:
    0.088035 = product of:
      0.17607 = sum of:
        0.17607 = weight(_text_:language in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17607 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0440175 = product of:
  0.088035 = sum of:
    0.088035 = product of:
      0.17607 = sum of:
        0.17607 = weight(_text_:language in 6201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17607 = score(doc=6201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 6201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0440175 = product of:
  0.088035 = sum of:
    0.088035 = product of:
      0.17607 = sum of:
        0.17607 = weight(_text_:language in 7513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17607 = score(doc=7513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 7513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0440175 = product of:
  0.088035 = sum of:
    0.088035 = product of:
      0.17607 = sum of:
        0.17607 = weight(_text_:language in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17607 = score(doc=2852,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Studies the salient features of ordinary language as a means of designing languages for information storage and retrieval systems. Pays particular attention to the POPSI (Postulate-based Permuted Subject Indexing) language.

0.043575108 = product of:
  0.087150216 = sum of:
    0.087150216 = product of:
      0.17430043 = sum of:
        0.17430043 = weight(_text_:language in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17430043 = score(doc=2697,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.85822034 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Gateway software and natural language interfaces. Ed.: J.A. Benson u. B.H. Weinberg

0.039370455 = product of:
  0.07874091 = sum of:
    0.07874091 = product of:
      0.15748182 = sum of:
        0.15748182 = weight(_text_:language in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15748182 = score(doc=1679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.77540886 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article introduces a series of 8 papers giving a survey of the decisions to be made in the choice of the most expedient indexing method and presenting a short description of the contents of each of the papers, namely: the definability of the requested information; individual vs. generic concepts; the predictibility of their mode of expression; the fidelity of concept representation: the indexing language vocabulary; the indexing language grammar; the category-controlled interplay between vocabulary and grammar in an indexing language; the practice of information supply: the personal file; the employment of a large indexing language vocabulary; eth employment of an indexing language syntax

0.039370455 = product of:
  0.07874091 = sum of:
    0.07874091 = product of:
      0.15748182 = sum of:
        0.15748182 = weight(_text_:language in 5224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15748182 = score(doc=5224,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.77540886 = fieldWeight in 5224, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The applicability of the three types of string indexing, as defined by Tim Craven, to the Chinese language is investigated. It was found that KWIC and KWOC indexing cannot be used for the Chinese language. Term list input string indexing is directly applicable to Chinese, but it has not been used. The applicability of coded input strings varies with different systems: the application of PRECIS to the Chinese language requires much effort while the adoption of NEPHIS to the Chinese language require fewer changes

0.037350092 = product of:
  0.074700184 = sum of:
    0.074700184 = product of:
      0.14940037 = sum of:
        0.14940037 = weight(_text_:language in 1215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14940037 = score(doc=1215,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.7356174 = fieldWeight in 1215, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Keyword catalogues and the free language approach. Ed.: Ph. Bryant

0.035214003 = product of:
  0.07042801 = sum of:
    0.07042801 = product of:
      0.14085601 = sum of:
        0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14085601 = score(doc=784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051766515 = queryNorm
            0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)