Search (1598 results, page 1 of 80)

0.09743467 = sum of:
  0.044692896 = product of:
    0.17877159 = sum of:
      0.17877159 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17877159 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.052741777 = product of:
    0.105483554 = sum of:
      0.105483554 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.105483554 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.091765575 = product of:
  0.18353115 = sum of:
    0.18353115 = product of:
      0.3670623 = sum of:
        0.3670623 = weight(_text_:w.s in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3670623 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.91293013 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.07341246 = product of:
  0.14682493 = sum of:
    0.14682493 = product of:
      0.29364985 = sum of:
        0.29364985 = weight(_text_:w.s in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29364985 = score(doc=4018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.7303441 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Proposes a new experimental methodology for evaluating the results of library research from the user's viewpoint. Illustrates the theory by comparing the efficacy of information retrieved from 2 document catalogues, identical except that one is alphabetical and the other numerical/verbal. The methodology utilises the concept of 3 dependent variables: 'promising references retrieved' by the researcher; 'documents read'; and 'documents cited'. Claims that the retrieval effectiveness of the techniques outlined compares favourably with that of W.S. Cooper's methodology

0.06488806 = product of:
  0.12977612 = sum of:
    0.12977612 = product of:
      0.25955224 = sum of:
        0.25955224 = weight(_text_:w.s in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25955224 = score(doc=1470,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.6455391 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This book seeks to complement two major works on the subject published in the U.S.A.by devoting it self tochronological book numbers. It is mostly an ignored rival line to alphabetical book numbers, indeed an ignored subject. The first four chapters dwell on the theoretical and general problems of book numbers, indeed an ignored subject. the first four chapters dwell on the tehoretical and general problem of book numbers: their definition, nature , usefulness and history. The chapter on the debate over the usefulness of book numbers tries to give the readersa taste of the debate that followed their conceptionand immediate development. Chapter four catalogues advantages of chronological book numbers. The remaining four chapters dwell upon the four specific chronollgical book numbering system. The desription of each system is prefaced by a brief life sketch of the inventor. Ranganathan's system has been fully but concsely explained. The other systems are by W.S.Biscoe, J. D. Brown, Fremont Rider and W.S. Rider and W.S. Merrill. There are twoappendices: one onthe chronology of book numbers (1873-1992), and another an almost exhaustive bibliography on the subject. Its aim is to invite the attention of scholars to a neglected part of our heritage.

0.0642359 = product of:
  0.1284718 = sum of:
    0.1284718 = product of:
      0.2569436 = sum of:
        0.2569436 = weight(_text_:w.s in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2569436 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

W.S. Cooper's utility theory was used to evaluate end user and mediated searching of online and CD-ROM databases. The searches were conducted by 510 end users, using MEDLINE. The relevance of the references and the usefulness of the documents retrieved were examnied. The study also assessed the perceived value to end users of the information retrieved. Mediated online searching cost 3 times as much as end user CD-ROM searching, but was only about twice as effective in terms of user satisfaction; user convenience should be a high priority for the information provider and mediated CD-ROM searching may be the best compromise currently available as regards cost effectiveness and successful information retrieval for end users

0.0642359 = product of:
  0.1284718 = sum of:
    0.1284718 = product of:
      0.2569436 = sum of:
        0.2569436 = weight(_text_:w.s in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2569436 = score(doc=3110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BELKIN, N.J.: In memoriam: B.C. Brookes; CLEVERDON, C.W.: The significance of the Cranfield tests on index languages; TAGUE, J., A. SALMINEN u. C. McCLELLAN: A complete model for information retrieval systems; SALTON, G. u. C. BUCKLEY: Automatic text structuring and retrieval: experiments in automatic encyclopedia searching; CROFT, B., H. TURTLE u. D.D. LEWIS: The use of phrases and structured queries in information retrieval; COOPER, W.S.: Inconsistencies and misnomers in probabilistic IR; LIN, X., D. SOERGEL u. G. MARCHIONINI: A self-organizing semantic map for information retrieval; WENDLANDT, E.G. u. J.R. DRSICOLL: Incorporating a semantic analysis into a document retrieval strategy; SWANSON, D.R.: Analysis of unintended connections between disjoint science literatures

0.0642359 = product of:
  0.1284718 = sum of:
    0.1284718 = product of:
      0.2569436 = sum of:
        0.2569436 = weight(_text_:w.s in 4495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2569436 = score(doc=4495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 4495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0642359 = product of:
  0.1284718 = sum of:
    0.1284718 = product of:
      0.2569436 = sum of:
        0.2569436 = weight(_text_:w.s in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2569436 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes S.R. Ranganathan's contribution to library and information science in general, mentioning his library education at London and influence of W.C. Berwick Sayers. Describes the seeds of Colon Classification, ed.1 (CC-1) and discusses the salient features of the scheme. Brings out the indebtedness of Ranganathan to Melvil Dewey and describes the influence of UDC on CC-1. Discusses the growth and development of the concept of 'categories', mentioning the influence of W. Hulme, W.S. Biscoe and others. Concludes that Ranganathan possessed an amazing degree of ingenuity to apply established ideas in such a way in a distinctive and original way

0.0642359 = product of:
  0.1284718 = sum of:
    0.1284718 = product of:
      0.2569436 = sum of:
        0.2569436 = weight(_text_:w.s in 2579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2569436 = score(doc=2579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.6390511 = fieldWeight in 2579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2579)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.06083121 = sum of:
  0.041053046 = product of:
    0.16421218 = sum of:
      0.16421218 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16421218 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019778166 = product of:
    0.039556332 = sum of:
      0.039556332 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039556332 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23

0.05694157 = sum of:
  0.03386704 = product of:
    0.13546816 = sum of:
      0.13546816 = weight(_text_:authors in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13546816 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023074528 = product of:
    0.046149056 = sum of:
      0.046149056 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046149056 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42

0.055059347 = product of:
  0.110118695 = sum of:
    0.110118695 = product of:
      0.22023739 = sum of:
        0.22023739 = weight(_text_:w.s in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22023739 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40207052 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.5477581 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.05329784 = sum of:
  0.033519674 = product of:
    0.1340787 = sum of:
      0.1340787 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1340787 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.019778166 = product of:
    0.039556332 = sum of:
      0.039556332 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039556332 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles

0.050726846 = sum of:
  0.02765232 = product of:
    0.11060928 = sum of:
      0.11060928 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11060928 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023074528 = product of:
    0.046149056 = sum of:
      0.046149056 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046149056 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.050726846 = sum of:
  0.02765232 = product of:
    0.11060928 = sum of:
      0.11060928 = weight(_text_:authors in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11060928 = score(doc=3030,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023074528 = product of:
    0.046149056 = sum of:
      0.046149056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046149056 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The theory of diffusion can be successfully applied to scientific information dissemination by identifying space with a series of successive authors, and potential (temperature) with the interest of new authors towards earlier published papers, measured by the number of citations. As the total number of citation equals the number of references, the conservation law is fulfilled and Fourier's parabolic differential equation can be applied

Date

22. 2.1999 16:16:11

0.048717335 = sum of:
  0.022346448 = product of:
    0.08938579 = sum of:
      0.08938579 = weight(_text_:authors in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08938579 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026370889 = product of:
    0.052741777 = sum of:
      0.052741777 = weight(_text_:22 in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052741777 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

OCLC has added 5 new databases to the FirstSearch catalogue and EPIC service: ContentsFirst, ArticleFirst, Social Sciences Index, General Science Index and Event-Line. DiscLit is available in a British literature version. DiscLit: British Authors is a CD-ROM tool for high school and college literature students. Announces winners of the OCLC on the Front Line Award and Database Magazine's Product of the year as Jane Bambrick and the Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials

Source

OCLC micro. 8(1992) no.6, S.21-22

0.048717335 = sum of:
  0.022346448 = product of:
    0.08938579 = sum of:
      0.08938579 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08938579 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026370889 = product of:
    0.052741777 = sum of:
      0.052741777 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052741777 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved

Source

Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22

0.048717335 = sum of:
  0.022346448 = product of:
    0.08938579 = sum of:
      0.08938579 = weight(_text_:authors in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08938579 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026370889 = product of:
    0.052741777 = sum of:
      0.052741777 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052741777 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem

0.048717335 = sum of:
  0.022346448 = product of:
    0.08938579 = sum of:
      0.08938579 = weight(_text_:authors in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08938579 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026370889 = product of:
    0.052741777 = sum of:
      0.052741777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052741777 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper is based on the project work carries out by the authors at DRTC. Knowledge representation models are used in building intelligent systems for problem solving. The paper discusses, a frame based knowledge representation model built for automatic indexing. The system assigns POPSI indicators and produces subject strings for titles. The results are given in appendices

Source

Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.162-167

0.048717335 = sum of:
  0.022346448 = product of:
    0.08938579 = sum of:
      0.08938579 = weight(_text_:authors in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08938579 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026370889 = product of:
    0.052741777 = sum of:
      0.052741777 = weight(_text_:22 in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052741777 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048659734 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Offers a thought-provoking forecast abouit the development of the information superhighway and the changes it will bring. Focusing on the legal, social and political implications of the enormous growth of information, the authors focus on anticipated changes in the professional and personal lives of people throughout the developed world

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.1, S.62 (R.F. Rose)