Search (12892 results, page 1 of 645)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.11
    0.10963258 = sum of:
      0.016826019 = product of:
        0.13460815 = sum of:
          0.13460815 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13460815 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.09280656 = sum of:
        0.013381496 = weight(_text_:e in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013381496 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.07942507 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07942507 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  2. Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998) 0.06
    0.062852755 = product of:
      0.12570551 = sum of:
        0.12570551 = sum of:
          0.013381496 = weight(_text_:e in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013381496 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.112324014 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.112324014 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29.11.2004 13:03:22
    Language
    e
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
  3. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.06
    0.058348455 = sum of:
      0.023545997 = product of:
        0.18836798 = sum of:
          0.18836798 = weight(_text_:a4 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18836798 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32266116 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.583795 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.03480246 = sum of:
        0.0050180606 = weight(_text_:e in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050180606 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
        0.0297844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0297844 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
    
    Abstract
    Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  4. Serial cataloguing : modern perspectives and international developments (1992) 0.06
    0.058004104 = product of:
      0.11600821 = sum of:
        0.11600821 = sum of:
          0.01672687 = weight(_text_:e in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01672687 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.31761688 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
          0.09928134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09928134 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), nos.3/4
  5. Smith, G.: Newspapers on CD-ROM (1992) 0.06
    0.058004104 = product of:
      0.11600821 = sum of:
        0.11600821 = sum of:
          0.01672687 = weight(_text_:e in 6396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01672687 = score(doc=6396,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.31761688 = fieldWeight in 6396, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6396)
          0.09928134 = weight(_text_:22 in 6396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09928134 = score(doc=6396,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6396, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Serials. 5(1992) no.3, S.17-22
  6. Gagan, D.: Scanning: a survival guide : 7 (1993) 0.06
    0.057722528 = sum of:
      0.054377154 = product of:
        0.43501723 = sum of:
          0.43501723 = weight(_text_:a4 in 6297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.43501723 = score(doc=6297,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.32266116 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              1.3482169 = fieldWeight in 6297, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6297)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.003345374 = product of:
        0.006690748 = sum of:
          0.006690748 = weight(_text_:e in 6297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006690748 = score(doc=6297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 6297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6297)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses factors controlling the speed of image and text processing other than those related to the scanning software. A flatbed scanner taker around 45 seconds to scan a sheet of A4. The computer itself imposes a limit on speed. File size makes demands on resources. A4 ASCII files take about 3,5K, formatted word processed text 7,5K. A4 images require 0,9Mb for black and white, 7 Mb for grey scale and 21,1Mb for colour. Evaluates uses for scanners and compares them with conventional entry routes
    Language
    e
  7. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.06
    0.056036286 = sum of:
      0.00910735 = product of:
        0.0728588 = sum of:
          0.0728588 = weight(_text_:authors in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0728588 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.046928935 = sum of:
        0.011827683 = weight(_text_:e in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011827683 = score(doc=2808,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.035101254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035101254 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
    Language
    e
  8. Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999) 0.05
    0.054996163 = product of:
      0.109992325 = sum of:
        0.109992325 = sum of:
          0.011708809 = weight(_text_:e in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011708809 = score(doc=8727,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
          0.098283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098283514 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2001 12:22:47
    Language
    e
    Source
    Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
  9. Advances in librarianship (1998) 0.05
    0.054996163 = product of:
      0.109992325 = sum of:
        0.109992325 = sum of:
          0.011708809 = weight(_text_:e in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011708809 = score(doc=4698,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
          0.098283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098283514 = score(doc=4698,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Issue
    Vol.22.
    Language
    e
    Signature
    78 BAHH 1089-22
  10. Townsel-Winston, M.: What's new in public services? (1992) 0.05
    0.05481629 = sum of:
      0.008413009 = product of:
        0.067304075 = sum of:
          0.067304075 = weight(_text_:authors in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067304075 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.04640328 = sum of:
        0.006690748 = weight(_text_:e in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006690748 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
        0.039712533 = weight(_text_:22 in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039712533 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC has added 5 new databases to the FirstSearch catalogue and EPIC service: ContentsFirst, ArticleFirst, Social Sciences Index, General Science Index and Event-Line. DiscLit is available in a British literature version. DiscLit: British Authors is a CD-ROM tool for high school and college literature students. Announces winners of the OCLC on the Front Line Award and Database Magazine's Product of the year as Jane Bambrick and the Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials
    Language
    e
    Source
    OCLC micro. 8(1992) no.6, S.21-22
  11. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.05
    0.05481629 = sum of:
      0.008413009 = product of:
        0.067304075 = sum of:
          0.067304075 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067304075 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.04640328 = sum of:
        0.006690748 = weight(_text_:e in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006690748 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.039712533 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039712533 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
    
    Abstract
    The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  12. Aptagiri, D.V.; Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, A.R.D.: ¬A frame based knowledge representation paradigm for automating POPSI (1995) 0.05
    0.05481629 = sum of:
      0.008413009 = product of:
        0.067304075 = sum of:
          0.067304075 = weight(_text_:authors in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067304075 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.04640328 = sum of:
        0.006690748 = weight(_text_:e in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006690748 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
        0.039712533 = weight(_text_:22 in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039712533 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is based on the project work carries out by the authors at DRTC. Knowledge representation models are used in building intelligent systems for problem solving. The paper discusses, a frame based knowledge representation model built for automatic indexing. The system assigns POPSI indicators and produces subject strings for titles. The results are given in appendices
    Language
    e
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.162-167
  13. Cetron, M.; Davies, O.: Mastering information in the new century (1994) 0.05
    0.05481629 = sum of:
      0.008413009 = product of:
        0.067304075 = sum of:
          0.067304075 = weight(_text_:authors in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067304075 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.04640328 = sum of:
        0.006690748 = weight(_text_:e in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006690748 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
        0.039712533 = weight(_text_:22 in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039712533 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
    
    Abstract
    Offers a thought-provoking forecast abouit the development of the information superhighway and the changes it will bring. Focusing on the legal, social and political implications of the enormous growth of information, the authors focus on anticipated changes in the professional and personal lives of people throughout the developed world
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.1, S.62 (R.F. Rose)
    Language
    e
  14. CannCasciato, D.: ¬The OLUC from a NACO point of view : eliminating derived search keys (1994) 0.05
    0.05481629 = sum of:
      0.008413009 = product of:
        0.067304075 = sum of:
          0.067304075 = weight(_text_:authors in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067304075 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.04640328 = sum of:
        0.006690748 = weight(_text_:e in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006690748 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
        0.039712533 = weight(_text_:22 in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039712533 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
    
    Abstract
    Explains how the current resurgence of cooperative cataloguing initiatives require that OCLC Online Union Catalog (OLUC) search keys evolve to allow more precise searching. Describes the results achieved by searching personal and corporate authors by word and phrase to obtain guidance on deciding about heading formation and necessary references. Concludes that phrase searching needs to be brought into existence in OLUC search mechanisms as quickly as possible to speed up cataloguing, and that OCLC needs to take note of these requirements by eliminating limitations on searching
    Language
    e
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 10(1994) no.4, S.22-25
  15. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.05
    0.053353164 = sum of:
      0.01275029 = product of:
        0.10200232 = sum of:
          0.10200232 = weight(_text_:authors in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10200232 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.040602874 = sum of:
        0.0058544045 = weight(_text_:e in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058544045 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
        0.03474847 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03474847 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Language
    e
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  16. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.05
    0.05101344 = sum of:
      0.010410568 = product of:
        0.08328454 = sum of:
          0.08328454 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08328454 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.040602874 = sum of:
        0.0058544045 = weight(_text_:e in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058544045 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.03474847 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03474847 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Language
    e
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  17. Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993) 0.05
    0.05038923 = sum of:
      0.0073613827 = product of:
        0.05889106 = sum of:
          0.05889106 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05889106 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.043027848 = sum of:
        0.0082793785 = weight(_text_:e in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0082793785 = score(doc=582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.03474847 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03474847 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
    Language
    e
    Source
    Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
  18. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.05
    0.05038923 = sum of:
      0.0073613827 = product of:
        0.05889106 = sum of:
          0.05889106 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05889106 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.043027848 = sum of:
        0.0082793785 = weight(_text_:e in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0082793785 = score(doc=602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.03474847 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03474847 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
    Language
    e
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
  19. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.05
    0.050258145 = sum of:
      0.015455684 = product of:
        0.12364547 = sum of:
          0.12364547 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12364547 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.16702999 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
        0.125 = coord(1/8)
      0.03480246 = sum of:
        0.0050180606 = weight(_text_:e in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050180606 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
        0.0297844 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0297844 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12830323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03663891 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Language
    e
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  20. Sokal, A.: Transgressing the boundaries : toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity (1996) 0.05
    0.04915748 = sum of:
      0.048112053 = product of:
        0.19244821 = sum of:
          0.09622411 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09622411 = score(doc=2136,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3572652 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.26933524 = fieldWeight in 2136, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2136)
          0.09622411 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09622411 = score(doc=2136,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3572652 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.26933524 = fieldWeight in 2136, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2136)
        0.25 = coord(2/8)
      0.0010454294 = product of:
        0.0020908588 = sum of:
          0.0020908588 = weight(_text_:e in 2136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0020908588 = score(doc=2136,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05266367 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03663891 = queryNorm
              0.03970211 = fieldWeight in 2136, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2136)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1996 reichte der amerikanische Physiker Alan Sokal einen Aufsatz mit dem Titel Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity (deutsch: Die Grenzen überschreiten: Auf dem Weg zu einer transformativen Hermeneutik der Quantengravitation) bei der amerikanischen, für ihre postmoderne Ausrichtung bekannten Zeitschrift für Cultural studies Social Text zur Veröffentlichung ein. Diese druckte ihn unbeanstandet mit anderen in einer Sondernummer ab. Kurz nach der Veröffentlichung bekannte Sokal in einer anderen Zeitschrift, Lingua Franca, dass es sich bei dem Aufsatz um eine Parodie handle. Er habe die zusammengesuchten Zitate verschiedener postmoderner Denker mit dem typischen Jargon dieser Denkrichtung zu einem Text montiert, dessen unsinniger Inhalt bei Beachtung wissenschaftlicher Standards, so der Vorwurf an die Herausgeber von Social Text, als solcher hätte erkannt werden müssen. Dieser Vorfall löste im akademischen Milieu und der Presse (der Fall kam immerhin bis auf die Titelseite der New York Times) eine öffentliche Diskussion aus, wie dieser Vorfall im Besonderen und die Seriosität der postmodernen Philosophie im Allgemeinen zu bewerten sei. Sokal und Vertreter des kritisierten Personenkreises führten die Diskussion in weiteren Zeitschriftenartikeln fort und verteidigten ihre Standpunkte. 1997 veröffentlichte Sokal zusammen mit seinem belgischen Kollegen Jean Bricmont dazu ein Buch mit dem Titel Impostures Intellectuelles (übersetzt: Intellektuelle Hochstapeleien, deutscher Titel: Eleganter Unsinn), in dem er seine Thesen erklärt und an Beispielen von Texten bedeutender postmoderner französischer Philosophen erläutert (namentlich Jean Baudrillard, Gilles Deleuze/Félix Guattari, Luce Irigaray, Julia Kristeva, Jacques Lacan, Bruno Latour und Paul Virilio und - obwohl kein Postmoderner, als historisches Beispiel - Henri Bergson). In diesem Buch gaben Sokal/Bricmont - neben der Verteidigung gegen den vermuteten Missbrauch der Wissenschaft - auch ein politisches Motiv für ihren Vorstoß an. Sie bekannten sich zur politischen Linken und vertraten die Meinung, dass die zunehmende Verbreitung der postmodernen Denkrichtung in der Linken deren Fähigkeit zu wirkungsvoller Gesellschaftskritik schwäche. (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal-Aff%C3%A4re)
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications