-
McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996)
0.17
0.16515864 = product of:
0.3303173 = sum of:
0.3303173 = sum of:
0.22842675 = weight(_text_:word in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22842675 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.81102574 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101890534 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
-
Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997)
0.17
0.16515864 = product of:
0.3303173 = sum of:
0.3303173 = sum of:
0.22842675 = weight(_text_:word in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22842675 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.81102574 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101890534 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 2.1999 10:48:22
-
Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (1998)
0.11
0.10661514 = product of:
0.21323028 = sum of:
0.21323028 = sum of:
0.1695629 = weight(_text_:word in 3774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1695629 = score(doc=3774,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.6020305 = fieldWeight in 3774, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3774)
0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043667372 = score(doc=3774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: GRAINGER, J. u. A.M. JACOBS: On localist connectionism and psychological science; HOUGHTON, G. u. S.P. TIPPER: A model of selective attention as a mechanism of cognitive model; BURTON, A.M.: A model of human face recognition; FRAUENFELDER, U.H. u. G. PEETERS: Simulating the time course of spoken word recognition: an analysis of lexical competition in TRACE; JACOBS, A.M. u.a.: MROM-p: an interactive activation, multiple readabout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition; DIJKSTRA, T. u. W.J.B. van HEUVEN: The BIA model and bilingual word recognition; PAGE, M. u. D. NORRIS: Modeling immediate serial recall with a localist implementation of the primacy model; SCHADE, U. u. H.-J. EIKMEYER: Modeling the production of object spectifications; GOLDSTONE, R.L.: Hanging together: a connectionist model of similarity; MYUNG, J. u. A.A. PITT: Issues in selecting mathematical models of cognition
- Date
- 1. 6.1999 19:50:22
-
Rahmstorf, G.: Concept structures for large vocabularies (1998)
0.11
0.10661514 = product of:
0.21323028 = sum of:
0.21323028 = sum of:
0.1695629 = weight(_text_:word in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1695629 = score(doc=75,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.6020305 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043667372 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A technology is described which supports the acquisition, visualisation and manipulation of large vocabularies with associated structures. It is used for dictionary production, terminology data bases, thesauri, library classification systems etc. Essential features of the technology are a lexicographic user interface, variable word description, unlimited list of word readings, a concept language, automatic transformations of formulas into graphic structures, structure manipulation operations and retransformation into formulas. The concept language includes notations for undefined concepts. The structure of defined concepts can be constructed interactively. The technology supports the generation of large vocabularies with structures representing word senses. Concept structures and ordering systems for indexing and retrieval can be constructed separately and connected by associating relations.
- Date
- 30.12.2001 19:01:22
-
Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997)
0.11
0.106233686 = product of:
0.21246737 = sum of:
0.21246737 = sum of:
0.1615221 = weight(_text_:word in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1615221 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.5734818 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050945267 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines techniques that discover features in sets of pre-categorized documents, such that similar documents can be found on the WWW. Examines techniques which will classifiy training examples with high accuracy, then explains why this is not necessarily useful. Describes a method for extracting word clusters from the raw document features. Results show that the clustering technique is successful in discovering word groups in personal Web pages which can be used to find similar information on the WWW
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995)
0.11
0.106233686 = product of:
0.21246737 = sum of:
0.21246737 = sum of:
0.1615221 = weight(_text_:word in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1615221 = score(doc=2151,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.5734818 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050945267 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a model of semantic memory that utilizes a high dimensional semantic space constructed from a co-occurrence matrix. This matrix was formed by analyzing a lot) million word corpus. Word vectors were then obtained by extracting rows and columns of this matrix, These vectors were subjected to multidimensional scaling. Words were found to cluster semantically. suggesting that interword distance may be interpretable as a measure of semantic similarity, In attempting to replicate with our simulation the semantic and ...
- Source
- Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
-
Three systems are substantially enhanced (1995)
0.09
0.09437637 = product of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13052958 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058223166 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- For about 10 years, systems such as STATUS, CAIRS and INMAGIC have offered the ability to search for any word in a collection of unstructured text. Until recently, only librarians and documentalists have been interested, but free text retrieval is increasingly valued in the business world in general and all 3 systems are striving for a wider market by adding other features to their established core competence. Illustrates this trend with particualr reference to: STATUS/IQ; CAIRS; TMS and DB/TextWorks (the successor to InMagic Plus)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 10:18:16
-
Brooks, C.; Schickler, M.A.; Mazer, M.S.: Pan-browser support for annotations and other meta-information on the World Wide Web (1996)
0.09
0.09437637 = product of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 5861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13052958 = score(doc=5861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 5861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5861)
0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 5861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058223166 = score(doc=5861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes an innovative approach for groups to create and share commentary about the content of documents accessible via the WWW. The system supports the creation, presentation, and control of user created meta information, which is displayed with the corresponding documents but stored separately from them. Describes design considerations, the system architecture, usage scenarios, initial implementations, and future word
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
CannCasciato, D.: ¬The OLUC from a NACO point of view : eliminating derived search keys (1994)
0.09
0.09437637 = product of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13052958 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058223166 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explains how the current resurgence of cooperative cataloguing initiatives require that OCLC Online Union Catalog (OLUC) search keys evolve to allow more precise searching. Describes the results achieved by searching personal and corporate authors by word and phrase to obtain guidance on deciding about heading formation and necessary references. Concludes that phrase searching needs to be brought into existence in OLUC search mechanisms as quickly as possible to speed up cataloguing, and that OCLC needs to take note of these requirements by eliminating limitations on searching
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 10(1994) no.4, S.22-25
-
Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998)
0.09
0.09437637 = product of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13052958 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058223166 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:34
-
Staley, L.: E-mail reference : experiences at City University (1998)
0.09
0.09437637 = product of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13052958 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058223166 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- City University Library, Washington, provides an electronic mail reference facility for isolated and remote users. City University students can send reference questions by e-mail at any time of day. Notes the disadvantages of the service, including lack of non verbal clues and reliance on the written word to replace the reference interview. Reports briefly on 2 years of experience with the service
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 17:57:23
-
Ruge, G.: Sprache und Computer : Wortbedeutung und Termassoziation. Methoden zur automatischen semantischen Klassifikation (1995)
0.09
0.09437637 = product of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.18875274 = sum of:
0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13052958 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058223166 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: (1) Motivation; (2) Language philosophical foundations; (3) Structural comparison of extensions; (4) Earlier approaches towards term association; (5) Experiments; (6) Spreading-activation networks or memory models; (7) Perspective. Appendices: Heads and modifiers of 'car'. Glossary. Index. Language and computer. Word semantics and term association. Methods towards an automatic semantic classification
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.182-184 (M.T. Rolland)
-
L'Homme, M.-C.: Processing word combinations in existing terms banks (1995)
0.08
0.08478145 = product of:
0.1695629 = sum of:
0.1695629 = product of:
0.3391258 = sum of:
0.3391258 = weight(_text_:word in 2949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3391258 = score(doc=2949,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
1.204061 = fieldWeight in 2949, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- How specific can word combinations be stored in computerized reference tools? The focus of this paper is on word lexical groups in special languages and their representation for translation purposes
-
Kay, M.: ¬The proper place of men and machines in language translation (1997)
0.08
0.08257932 = product of:
0.16515864 = sum of:
0.16515864 = sum of:
0.11421338 = weight(_text_:word in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11421338 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.40551287 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050945267 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Machine translation stands no chance of filling actual needs for translation because, although there has been progress in relevant areas of computer science, advance in linguistics have not touched the core problems. Cooperative man-machine systems need to be developed, Proposes a translator's amanuensis, incorporating into a word processor some simple facilities peculiar to translation. Gradual enhancements of such a system could lead to the original goal of machine translation
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Dorr, B.J.: Large-scale dictionary construction for foreign language tutoring and interlingual machine translation (1997)
0.07
0.070782274 = product of:
0.14156455 = sum of:
0.14156455 = sum of:
0.09789718 = weight(_text_:word in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09789718 = score(doc=3244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.34758246 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043667372 = score(doc=3244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes techniques for automatic construction of dictionaries for use in large-scale foreign language tutoring (FLT) and interlingual machine translation (MT) systems. The dictionaries are based on a language independent representation called lexical conceptual structure (LCS). Demonstrates that synonymous verb senses share distribution patterns. Shows how the syntax-semantics relation can be used to develop a lexical acquisition approach that contributes both toward the enrichment of existing online resources and toward the development of lexicons containing more complete information than is provided in any of these resources alone. Describes the structure of the LCS and shows how this representation is used in FLT and MT. Focuses on the problem of building LCS dictionaries for large-scale FLT and MT. Describes authoring tools for manual and semi-automatic construction of LCS dictionaries. Presents an approach that uses linguistic techniques for building word definitions automatically. The techniques have been implemented as part of a set of lixicon-development tools used in the MILT FLT project
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Furlong, K.; Roberts, F.D.: If you teach it, will they learn? : Information literacy and reference services in a college library (1998)
0.07
0.070782274 = product of:
0.14156455 = sum of:
0.14156455 = sum of:
0.09789718 = weight(_text_:word in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09789718 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.34758246 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043667372 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the development, funding and staffing of the Information Literacy Program (ILP) at the Mantor Library at the University of Maine at Farmington (UMF). The programme aims at helping both UMF students and community patrons to understand better how and where to look for information. Instruction takes place in an electronic classroom equipped with 21 computers running campus-standard Web-browsers and word processing; the instructor's station can control all of the computers in the classroom, or the instructor may pass or share control with students. Discusses issues relating to campus politics, the positioning of the programme in the college experience, the necessity of teaching evaluation skills, and the programme's impact on reference services. gives advice to other libraries considering a similar project
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 18(1998) no.5, S.22-25
-
Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996)
0.07
0.067933306 = product of:
0.13586661 = sum of:
0.13586661 = product of:
0.4075998 = sum of:
0.4075998 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4075998 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
0.53207254 = queryWeight, product of:
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
-
Wiseman, R.: HTML-Dokumente mit Word für Windows erstellen (1995)
0.07
0.06526479 = product of:
0.13052958 = sum of:
0.13052958 = product of:
0.26105917 = sum of:
0.26105917 = weight(_text_:word in 7101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26105917 = score(doc=7101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.92688656 = fieldWeight in 7101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Using WordNet to disambiguate word senses for text retrieval (1993)
0.07
0.06526479 = product of:
0.13052958 = sum of:
0.13052958 = product of:
0.26105917 = sum of:
0.26105917 = weight(_text_:word in 8799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26105917 = score(doc=8799,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.92688656 = fieldWeight in 8799, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8799)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.: On the law of Zipf-Mandelbrot for multi-word phrases (1999)
0.07
0.06526479 = product of:
0.13052958 = sum of:
0.13052958 = product of:
0.26105917 = sum of:
0.26105917 = weight(_text_:word in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26105917 = score(doc=3058,freq=8.0), product of:
0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.05371688 = queryNorm
0.92688656 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies the probabilities of the occurence of multi-word (m-word) phrases (m=2,3,...) in relation to the probabilities of occurence of the single words. It is well known that, in the latter case, the lae of Zipf is valid (i.e., a power law). We prove that in the case of m-word phrases (m>=2), this is not the case. We present 2 independent proof of this
