Search (2247 results, page 1 of 113)

0.16726887 = sum of:
  0.13870114 = product of:
    0.4161034 = sum of:
      0.4161034 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.4161034 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.54317296 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.028567726 = product of:
    0.05713545 = sum of:
      0.05713545 = weight(_text_:work in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05713545 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches

0.10783544 = product of:
  0.21567088 = sum of:
    0.21567088 = sum of:
      0.14137357 = weight(_text_:work in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14137357 = score(doc=5689,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.70238936 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
      0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07429732 = score(doc=5689,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Most of the skills required in reference work can be learnt or developed over a period of time. Examines the following: skills and knowledge pertaining to stock, reference tools and the communities served in South Africa; and interpersonal skiills in traditional reference work and in a computerized library

Source

Cape librarian. 36(1992) no.10, S.22-23

0.093551636 = product of:
  0.18710327 = sum of:
    0.18710327 = sum of:
      0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 4830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09794649 = score(doc=4830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 4830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4830)
      0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 4830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08915678 = score(doc=4830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4830)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports work as an independent Internet researcher in the field of library research in the USA

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, A.112-113

0.09154782 = product of:
  0.18309563 = sum of:
    0.18309563 = sum of:
      0.13851725 = weight(_text_:work in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13851725 = score(doc=4503,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.6881982 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
      0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04457839 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables. (1) same work with different appendages (illustrated works, music with text, texts with commentary and/or biographical/critical material, scholia); (2) separately published parts of a work produced by the exercise of several different functions; (3) appendages to a work published separately (commentaries without text, concordances, continuations, indexes, sequels, supplements); (4) change in title of a work. A trend away from the collocation of the editions of a work called for by the second objective of the catalog is identified. It is suggested that this tendency stems from failure to take advantage of newer technologies for building catalogs

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

0.08820133 = product of:
  0.17640266 = sum of:
    0.17640266 = sum of:
      0.092344835 = weight(_text_:work in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092344835 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.084057815 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084057815 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography

Date

8. 3.1997 20:22:25

Source

Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22

0.087074704 = product of:
  0.17414941 = sum of:
    0.17414941 = sum of:
      0.12957102 = weight(_text_:work in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12957102 = score(doc=660,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.6437505 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
      0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04457839 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In companies, people often work together in order to understand and change the business. Some of this is explicitly considered development work, with a focus an working for tomorrow. A common element of much development work - whether implicit or explicit - is the use of various types of models. In model work, there are a number of differences that affect the process and outcome of co-operative development work. Drawing an theories of signs, learning, and knowledge, this paper develops a conceptual framework of model work. The framework examines differences and alternatives within three areas: models, activities, and basic assumptions. Recognition and exploration of a larger part of the framework are suggested as important means to utilising the differences to facilitate understanding and change within the company.

Source

Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers

0.08626836 = product of:
  0.17253672 = sum of:
    0.17253672 = sum of:
      0.11309886 = weight(_text_:work in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11309886 = score(doc=5118,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.56191146 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059437852 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22

0.08313951 = product of:
  0.16627902 = sum of:
    0.16627902 = sum of:
      0.1142709 = weight(_text_:work in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1142709 = score(doc=735,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05200812 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

0.08313951 = product of:
  0.16627902 = sum of:
    0.16627902 = sum of:
      0.1142709 = weight(_text_:work in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1142709 = score(doc=5618,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
      0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05200812 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the basic concepts of 'the item', 'the work' and the 'object' in cataloguing. Cataloguing is defined and viewed as a part of the communication process developed by library professionals to assist the various users of libraries. Cataloguing comproses 3 parts, each with specific definitions and function. The use of main access points has led to misleading concepts of items and work. The work may be presented by the item in different manners. Cataloguing has variables, which should establish the basis for it. Items and works are related through cataloguing, as identified by bibliographical relationships. Cataloguing must have some defined characteristics, for the better understanding of its connotative codes

Date

20. 2.1999 19:16:22

0.08226892 = product of:
  0.16453785 = sum of:
    0.16453785 = sum of:
      0.11995945 = weight(_text_:work in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11995945 = score(doc=595,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.5959971 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
      0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04457839 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

4th in a series of articles dealing with the concept and application of 'work' in cataloguing. Discusses the general concept of 'work' regardless of format, based on the writings of cataloguing theorists. Identifies a number of different criteris used to define the concept of work including criteria to do with creativity and/or single personal authorship, content, text or symbol strings, medium, identity and representation, and interchangeability, as well as the concept of work as product. Proposes a number of functions to be carried out by the ideal definition of work, and concludes by offering a definition

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46.

0.077959694 = product of:
  0.15591939 = sum of:
    0.15591939 = sum of:
      0.08162207 = weight(_text_:work in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08162207 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07429732 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the changing forces of demand, supply and technical change in the field of academic publishing. Covers electronic publishing; the UnCover document delivery service from B.H. Blackwell; the work of Blackwell Science and Blackwell Publishers and electronic pilot studies

Source

IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22

0.077959694 = product of:
  0.15591939 = sum of:
    0.15591939 = sum of:
      0.08162207 = weight(_text_:work in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08162207 = score(doc=1477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
      0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07429732 = score(doc=1477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Assesses the progress of the field of logic in databases over the past 20 years. covers the intellectual contributions of deductive databases, considers the status of implementations of deductive databases and discusses future work needed in deductive databases

Date

22. 1.1999 18:53:18

0.077959694 = product of:
  0.15591939 = sum of:
    0.15591939 = sum of:
      0.08162207 = weight(_text_:work in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08162207 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.40552467 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07429732 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 2.1999 20:59:22

0.077042945 = product of:
  0.15408589 = sum of:
    0.15408589 = sum of:
      0.1095075 = weight(_text_:work in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1095075 = score(doc=5945,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.54406846 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
      0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04457839 = score(doc=5945,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables: (1) contraction of a work (abridgements, condensations, digests, epitomes, outlines, chrestomathies, excerpts, extracts, selections); and (2) change in substance of a work (adaptations, dramatizations, free translations, novelizations, paraphrases, versifications, films or filmstrips of a text, musical arrangements, musical amplifications, musical settings, musical simplifications, musical transcriptions, musical versions, parodies, imitations, performances, reproductions of art works, revisions, editing, enlargements, expansion, updating, translation).

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22

0.075891346 = product of:
  0.15178269 = sum of:
    0.15178269 = sum of:
      0.092344835 = weight(_text_:work in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092344835 = score(doc=4247,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
      0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059437852 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines the value of the subject analysis fields in serial bibliographic records. Reports on the work of a recent CONSER task force on serial subject analysis. Presents finding of a detailed survey of the current subject analysis practices of all the full participants in the program, the policy issues the Task Force identified, and the recommendations it formulated. The group anticipated what the resultant supporting documentation would look like in the CONSER editing guide

Source

Serials librarian. 22(1992) nos.1/2, S.101-122

0.075891346 = product of:
  0.15178269 = sum of:
    0.15178269 = sum of:
      0.092344835 = weight(_text_:work in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092344835 = score(doc=8474,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
      0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059437852 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Today's increasing use of electronic documents raises the question: will it be necessary to change the core concepts of author and work within the tradition of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules when dealing with electronic documents? Describes the current definition of author and work as given in the traditional AACR and presents 2 systems working with electronic documents, electronic office systems and groupware

Source

New library world. 95(1994) no.1115, S.22-25

0.075891346 = product of:
  0.15178269 = sum of:
    0.15178269 = sum of:
      0.092344835 = weight(_text_:work in 3681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092344835 = score(doc=3681,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 3681, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3681)
      0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059437852 = score(doc=3681,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3681, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3681)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although assisting and advising have always been central to the role of the reference librarian, the nature of reference work has evolved as a result of the proliferation of electronic resources and their impact on information access. One consequence has been the growing importance of library training in reference work. Considers the place of cooperative teaching, electronic teaching, innovative reference services, reference services outside the library, networking technologies, organization of electronic information and organizational ethos

Date

22. 5.1999 18:27:09

0.066404924 = product of:
  0.13280985 = sum of:
    0.13280985 = sum of:
      0.080801725 = weight(_text_:work in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080801725 = score(doc=3809,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
      0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05200812 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In some areas of librarianship, such as cataloguing and subject classification, there are established rulebooks to guide librarians in their work. Information librarians however have no such aid; their metier is more an art than a profession, since reader queries may concern any aspect of human knowledge. After analysing hundreds of information library reader requests; G. Jahoda and colleagues have sought to formulate self-operating rules for interpreting such queries, utilising the 2 basic elements - what is 'known' and what is 'required' - contained in each request. Lists the categories into which each element breaks down. When presented in matrix form these can indicate the type of reference work to consult to resolve any reader queries

Date

6. 4.1996 13:22:31

0.066404924 = product of:
  0.13280985 = sum of:
    0.13280985 = sum of:
      0.080801725 = weight(_text_:work in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080801725 = score(doc=5162,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05200812 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Bradford OPAC is an experimental prototype OPAC, with a graphical user interface, based on the manifestation concept. It was designed to study some of the problems in catalogues where there are many versions of the same work or complex multipart works. In place of the main entry based approach of one complete record for each item, the OPAC groups together into sets items that are manifestations of the same work. Users are presented with shorter lists of different intellectual works. Items in a set can be sorted, searched and displayed according to user supplied criteria

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28

0.066404924 = product of:
  0.13280985 = sum of:
    0.13280985 = sum of:
      0.080801725 = weight(_text_:work in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080801725 = score(doc=75,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.40144894 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05200812 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054837555 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15