Search (3079 results, page 1 of 154)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998) 0.16 
    0.16261798 = product of:
  0.27102995 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.057769675 = weight(_text_:7 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057769675 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.1-9
  2. Varela, C.A.; Agha, G.A.: What after Java? : From objects to actors (1998) 0.16 
    0.16261798 = product of:
  0.27102995 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.057769675 = weight(_text_:7 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057769675 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.573-577
  3. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.13 
    0.1256491 = product of:
  0.31412274 = sum of:
    0.24034934 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24034934 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.0737734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0737734 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  4. Buckland, M.K.; Butler, M.H.; Norgard, B.A.; Plaunt, C.: OASIS: a front end for prototyping catalog enhancements (1992) 0.11 
    0.111836724 = product of:
  0.2795918 = sum of:
    0.13204499 = weight(_text_:7 in 5405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13204499 = score(doc=5405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 5405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5405)
    0.1475468 = weight(_text_:22 in 5405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1475468 = score(doc=5405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5405)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22
  5. Steinke, K.: ¬Die Deutsche Bibliothek als Datenlieferant (1996) 0.11 
    0.111836724 = product of:
  0.2795918 = sum of:
    0.13204499 = weight(_text_:7 in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13204499 = score(doc=4283,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
    0.1475468 = weight(_text_:22 in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1475468 = score(doc=4283,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 8(1996) H.2, S.7-10
  6. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.11 
    0.111836724 = product of:
  0.2795918 = sum of:
    0.13204499 = weight(_text_:7 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13204499 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
    0.1475468 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1475468 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  7. Corbett, M.: Indexing and searching in statutory text (1995) 0.11 
    0.111836724 = product of:
  0.2795918 = sum of:
    0.13204499 = weight(_text_:7 in 6811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13204499 = score(doc=6811,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 6811, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6811)
    0.1475468 = weight(_text_:22 in 6811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1475468 = score(doc=6811,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6811, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6811)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:22:27
    Source
    Keywords. 3(1995) no.1, S.7-10
  8. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.11 
    0.110442005 = product of:
  0.27610502 = sum of:
    0.22077498 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22077498 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.055330046 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055330046 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  9. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.11 
    0.10994295 = product of:
  0.27485737 = sum of:
    0.21030566 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21030566 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  10. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.11 
    0.10515638 = product of:
  0.26289093 = sum of:
    0.21620598 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21620598 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5770437 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
    0.046684954 = weight(_text_:7 in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046684954 = score(doc=7394,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.20704803 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  11. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.10 
    0.1034042 = product of:
  0.2585105 = sum of:
    0.180262 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.180262 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.07824851 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07824851 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
  12. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.10 
    0.1022123 = product of:
  0.25553074 = sum of:
    0.099033736 = weight(_text_:7 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099033736 = score(doc=3227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
    0.15649702 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15649702 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  13. Kübler, H.-D.: Medienkompetenz : Dimensionen eines Schlagwortes (1999) 0.10 
    0.09785712 = product of:
  0.2446428 = sum of:
    0.11553935 = weight(_text_:7 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11553935 = score(doc=6362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
    0.12910344 = weight(_text_:22 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12910344 = score(doc=6362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 1.1998 21:44:09
    6. 8.2001 10:42:22
  14. Chowdhury, G.G.; Neelameghan, A.; Chowdhury, S.: VOCON: Vocabulary control online in MicroIsis databases (1995) 0.10 
    0.09599939 = product of:
  0.23999847 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
    0.09128992 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09128992 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the need for facilities for online vocabulary control and standardization of terms, codes, etc., so as to secure consistency in naming of subjects, objects, countries, languages, etc., in databases at data entry stage. Most information storage and retrieval packages for microcomputers including MicroIsis provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrieval, but not at the data entry stage. VOCON.PAS is a Pascal interface program for use with MicroIsis software for (a) online selection of term(s) and/or code(s) from vocabulary control tool, such as, thesaurus, subject heading list, classification scheme, nomenclature list(s)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.18-22
  15. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.09 
    0.085304104 = product of:
  0.21326026 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  16. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.09 
    0.085304104 = product of:
  0.21326026 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  17. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.09 
    0.085304104 = product of:
  0.21326026 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  18. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.09 
    0.085304104 = product of:
  0.21326026 = sum of:
    0.14870855 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14870855 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  19. Poynder, R.: WinSPIRS from SilverPlatter (1994) 0.08 
    0.083877526 = product of:
  0.20969382 = sum of:
    0.099033736 = weight(_text_:7 in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099033736 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
    0.11066009 = weight(_text_:22 in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11066009 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:32:22
    Source
    Silverplatter exchange. 7(1994) no.1, S.40-42
  20. Advances in library automation and networking (1995) 0.08 
    0.083877526 = product of:
  0.20969382 = sum of:
    0.099033736 = weight(_text_:7 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099033736 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
    0.11066009 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11066009 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 9.1996 17:12:12
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.1, S.60 (C. Hurt)

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 2411
  • m 420
  • s 185
  • i 63
  • el 59
  • b 23
  • r 17
  • x 9
  • ? 7
  • d 4
  • l 4
  • p 4
  • n 3
  • h 2
  • au 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications