Search (1536 results, page 1 of 77)

0.22395305 = product of:
  0.4479061 = sum of:
    0.4479061 = product of:
      0.8958122 = sum of:
        0.8958122 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 1120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.8958122 = score(doc=1120,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.9898044 = fieldWeight in 1120, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.22395305 = product of:
  0.4479061 = sum of:
    0.4479061 = product of:
      0.8958122 = sum of:
        0.8958122 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.8958122 = score(doc=5174,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.9898044 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.19595893 = product of:
  0.39191785 = sum of:
    0.39191785 = product of:
      0.7838357 = sum of:
        0.7838357 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 4045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.7838357 = score(doc=4045,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.7410789 = fieldWeight in 4045, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4045)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.1679648 = product of:
  0.3359296 = sum of:
    0.3359296 = product of:
      0.6718592 = sum of:
        0.6718592 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6718592 = score(doc=2987,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.4923533 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.13997066 = product of:
  0.27994132 = sum of:
    0.27994132 = product of:
      0.55988264 = sum of:
        0.55988264 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.55988264 = score(doc=3862,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.2436278 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.13856387 = product of:
  0.27712774 = sum of:
    0.27712774 = product of:
      0.5542555 = sum of:
        0.5542555 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5542555 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.2311286 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.118769035 = product of:
  0.23753807 = sum of:
    0.23753807 = product of:
      0.47507614 = sum of:
        0.47507614 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47507614 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            1.055253 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Erfahrungsbericht aus der UB Tübingen über den Abbruch des Eppelsheimer-Kataloges und den Beginn der RSWK-Arbeit ab 1994

0.11197653 = product of:
  0.22395305 = sum of:
    0.22395305 = product of:
      0.4479061 = sum of:
        0.4479061 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4479061 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            0.9949022 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.098974206 = product of:
  0.19794841 = sum of:
    0.19794841 = product of:
      0.39589682 = sum of:
        0.39589682 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39589682 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            0.8793776 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Methode Eppelsheimer

0.09723419 = sum of:
  0.0665799 = product of:
    0.1997397 = sum of:
      0.1997397 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1997397 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.030654289 = product of:
    0.061308578 = sum of:
      0.061308578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061308578 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.085079916 = sum of:
  0.058257412 = product of:
    0.17477223 = sum of:
      0.17477223 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17477223 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026822504 = product of:
    0.053645007 = sum of:
      0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053645007 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

0.084148265 = sum of:
  0.061157547 = product of:
    0.18347263 = sum of:
      0.18347263 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18347263 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.022990717 = product of:
    0.045981433 = sum of:
      0.045981433 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045981433 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models

Date

21.10.2000 15:01:22

0.0839824 = product of:
  0.1679648 = sum of:
    0.1679648 = product of:
      0.3359296 = sum of:
        0.3359296 = weight(_text_:eppelsheimer in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3359296 = score(doc=4047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45020115 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056563493 = queryNorm
            0.74617666 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im April 1994 nahm die UB Tübingen als erste große UB des Landes Baden-Württemberg die Sacherschließung ihrer Neuerwerbungen nach den RSWK auf, nachdem der seit 1960 geführte Sachkatalog nach 'Methode Eppelsheimer' bereits Ende 1993 abgebrochen worden war. Hatte sich die Bibliothek noch 1991 darauf geeinigt, den Eppelsheimer Sachkatalog fortzuführen bzw. eine EDV-gestützte Version zu entwickeln und sich der kooperativen Sacherschließung nach RSWK nicht anzuschließen, so zwang sie ein Erlaß des Ministeriums für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst vom 9.7.1993, der u.a. forderte, 'auch die Sacherschließung arbeitsteilig unter Inanspruchnahme der Dienstleistungen des SWB durchzuführen', den bisher eingeschlagenen Weg der Inhaltserschließung zu verlassen und dem auf RSWK beruhenden Kooperationsunternehmen beizutreten. Obwohl von vornherein im Blick auf die spezifischen Bestände der UB Tübingen mit ihrem hohen anteil an Sondersammelgebietsliteratur gegen diese Entscheidung des Ministeriums Bedenken angemeldet wurden, stellte sich die UB entschlossen der veränderten Situation

0.082448706 = sum of:
  0.049934924 = product of:
    0.14980477 = sum of:
      0.14980477 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14980477 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.032513786 = product of:
    0.06502757 = sum of:
      0.06502757 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06502757 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05
3. 1.1999 12:21:22

0.079126954 = sum of:
  0.041194208 = product of:
    0.123582624 = sum of:
      0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123582624 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03793275 = product of:
    0.0758655 = sum of:
      0.0758655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0758655 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the need for facilities for online vocabulary control and standardization of terms, codes, etc., so as to secure consistency in naming of subjects, objects, countries, languages, etc., in databases at data entry stage. Most information storage and retrieval packages for microcomputers including MicroIsis provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrieval, but not at the data entry stage. VOCON.PAS is a Pascal interface program for use with MicroIsis software for (a) online selection of term(s) and/or code(s) from vocabulary control tool, such as, thesaurus, subject heading list, classification scheme, nomenclature list(s)

Source

Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.18-22

0.06801671 = sum of:
  0.041194208 = product of:
    0.123582624 = sum of:
      0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123582624 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026822504 = product of:
    0.053645007 = sum of:
      0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053645007 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.06801671 = sum of:
  0.041194208 = product of:
    0.123582624 = sum of:
      0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123582624 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026822504 = product of:
    0.053645007 = sum of:
      0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053645007 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.06801671 = sum of:
  0.041194208 = product of:
    0.123582624 = sum of:
      0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123582624 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026822504 = product of:
    0.053645007 = sum of:
      0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053645007 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed

Date

9. 4.2000 17:22:00

0.06801671 = sum of:
  0.041194208 = product of:
    0.123582624 = sum of:
      0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123582624 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026822504 = product of:
    0.053645007 = sum of:
      0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053645007 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42

0.06801671 = sum of:
  0.041194208 = product of:
    0.123582624 = sum of:
      0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.123582624 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026822504 = product of:
    0.053645007 = sum of:
      0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053645007 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056563493 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.

Date

24. 1.2007 19:38:22