Search (1523 results, page 1 of 77)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.15 
    0.14617558 = product of:
  0.29235116 = sum of:
    0.22369093 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22369093 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.06866023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06866023 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.13 
    0.1284842 = product of:
  0.2569684 = sum of:
    0.20547324 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20547324 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05149517 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  3. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.13 
    0.12790363 = product of:
  0.25580725 = sum of:
    0.19572955 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19572955 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  4. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.12 
    0.12029669 = product of:
  0.24059337 = sum of:
    0.1677682 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1677682 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.07282517 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07282517 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
  5. Chowdhury, G.G.; Neelameghan, A.; Chowdhury, S.: VOCON: Vocabulary control online in MicroIsis databases (1995) 0.11 
    0.11168219 = product of:
  0.22336438 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
    0.0849627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0849627 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the need for facilities for online vocabulary control and standardization of terms, codes, etc., so as to secure consistency in naming of subjects, objects, countries, languages, etc., in databases at data entry stage. Most information storage and retrieval packages for microcomputers including MicroIsis provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrieval, but not at the data entry stage. VOCON.PAS is a Pascal interface program for use with MicroIsis software for (a) online selection of term(s) and/or code(s) from vocabulary control tool, such as, thesaurus, subject heading list, classification scheme, nomenclature list(s)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.18-22
  6. Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  7. Varela, C.A.; Agha, G.A.: What after Java? : From objects to actors (1998) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  8. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  9. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  10. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  11. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.10 
    0.09923969 = product of:
  0.19847938 = sum of:
    0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13840169 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
    0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0600777 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  12. Chang, C.-C.; Wu, T.-C.: Retrieving the most similar symbolic pictures from pictorial databases (1992) 0.09 
    0.08561385 = product of:
  0.3424554 = sum of:
    0.3424554 = weight(_text_:objects in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3424554 = score(doc=3072,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        1.017126 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this article, an iconic indexing mechanism is suggested for spatial similarity retrieval on iconic image databases based upon the spatial relationships among the objects in a picture. The iconic objects dealt with were some kinds of gross panorama of simple objects
  13. Huibers, T.W.C.; Bruza, P.D.: Situations, a general framework for studying information retrieval (1996) 0.09 
    0.08506259 = product of:
  0.17012519 = sum of:
    0.11863002 = weight(_text_:objects in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11863002 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
    0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05149517 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a framework for the theoretical comparison of information retrieval models based on how the models decide aboutness. The framework is based on concepts emerging from the field of situation theory. So called infons and profons represent elementary information carriers which can be manipulated by unions and fusion operators. These operators allow relationships between information carriers to be established. Sets of infons form so called situations which are used to model the information born by objects such as documents. Demonstrates how an arbitrary information retrieval model can be mapped down into the framework with special functions defined for this purpose depending on the model at hand. 2 examples are given based on the Boolean retrieval and coordination level matching models. Starting from an axiomatization of aboutness, retrieval models can be compared according to which axioms they are governed by
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  14. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.09 
    0.08506259 = product of:
  0.17012519 = sum of:
    0.11863002 = weight(_text_:objects in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11863002 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
    0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05149517 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  15. Will, L.: ¬The indexing of museum objects (1993) 0.08 
    0.07908668 = product of:
  0.31634673 = sum of:
    0.31634673 = weight(_text_:objects in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31634673 = score(doc=6101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Will, L.: Museum objects as sources of information (1994) 0.08 
    0.07908668 = product of:
  0.31634673 = sum of:
    0.31634673 = weight(_text_:objects in 8294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31634673 = score(doc=8294,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 8294, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8294)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Museums like libraries, have 2 missions: they preserve objects for the future and they make them available for use today. If objects are intended for use, museum must decide how this can best be achieved; by displaying and interpreting them in exhibitions, and by providing documentary and physical access to objects in store. Discusses these options focusing on the development of museum information centres and of museum catalogues. Describes the structure of the catalogue, name and subject access and the choice between singular forms for indexing, free text indexing, and classification into related groups
  17. Treu, S.: Conceptual distance and interface-supported visualization of information objects and patterns (1990) 0.08 
    0.07908668 = product of:
  0.31634673 = sum of:
    0.31634673 = weight(_text_:objects in 5307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31634673 = score(doc=5307,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 5307, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5307)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Automatic image indexation to support content-based retrieval (1992) 0.07 
    0.07264575 = product of:
  0.290583 = sum of:
    0.290583 = weight(_text_:objects in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.290583 = score(doc=3032,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.86305994 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The article presents a new approach for the automatic interpretation of the content of graphical and pictorial images and the creation of access structures based on this analysis. The automatic indexation of images is necessary to support the access to a database of images, giving conditions of the semantic image content. The key aspect of the image analysis process is on the composition of objects, in terms of other objects, taking into account different interpretations and different levels of recognition. The image analysis process can be applied to images belonging to specific domains, described in advance to the system. Image analysis is performed in two steps: in the first step, simple objects are recognized starting from basic graphical/pictorial elements; in the second step, complex objects are recognized (applying domain rules) as compositions of simpler objects and different interpretations are generated. The image query language allows the user to express conditions on the objects to be found in the images, on their relative positions, on their interpretation and degree of recognition. A comprehensive example, based on 2D graphical images, is discussed, and the implemented prototype is described.
  19. Winterhager, M.: Towards bibliometric objects : a relational view to ISI's Science Citation Index (1992) 0.07 
    0.06920084 = product of:
  0.27680337 = sum of:
    0.27680337 = weight(_text_:objects in 8855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27680337 = score(doc=8855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 8855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8855)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  20. Sukiasyan, E.R.: Classifikatsiya ili tipologiya? (1996) 0.07 
    0.06849108 = product of:
  0.27396432 = sum of:
    0.27396432 = weight(_text_:objects in 7918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27396432 = score(doc=7918,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06334615 = queryNorm
        0.8137008 = fieldWeight in 7918, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the use of the terms 'classification' and 'typology' and examines their essence and mutual relationship. Points out that these two terms are often, and quite incorrectly; used as synonyms. Argues that the difference between typology and classification can be summed up as follows: typology can be described as an analysis of characteristics of objects and subsequent determination of the individual types of the objects in question; classificatio, on the other hand, can be defined as grouping together of objects according to their type

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1285
  • m 132
  • s 80
  • el 23
  • i 13
  • r 9
  • b 7
  • x 7
  • ? 5
  • d 3
  • p 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications