-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.13037327 = product of:
0.19555989 = sum of:
0.058479317 = product of:
0.17543794 = sum of:
0.17543794 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17543794 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37458855 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13708057 = product of:
0.27416113 = sum of:
0.27416113 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27416113 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46826932 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.10
0.10136415 = product of:
0.15204622 = sum of:
0.13708057 = product of:
0.27416113 = sum of:
0.27416113 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27416113 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46826932 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01496565 = product of:
0.0299313 = sum of:
0.0299313 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0299313 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Creating Web-accessible databases : case studies for libraries, museums, and other nonprofits (2001)
0.08
0.08032593 = product of:
0.24097778 = sum of:
0.24097778 = sum of:
0.18111518 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18111518 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
0.0598626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0598626 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:21:28
- Editor
- Still, J.M.
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.08
0.08032593 = product of:
0.24097778 = sum of:
0.24097778 = sum of:
0.18111518 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18111518 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.67297614 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.0598626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0598626 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005)
0.06
0.06426074 = product of:
0.19278222 = sum of:
0.19278222 = sum of:
0.14489214 = weight(_text_:j.m in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14489214 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.04789008 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04789008 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.06
0.058755975 = product of:
0.08813396 = sum of:
0.07017518 = product of:
0.21052553 = sum of:
0.21052553 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21052553 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37458855 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017958779 = product of:
0.035917558 = sum of:
0.035917558 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035917558 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
McLaren, J.; Gillis, J.M.: Is this rule necessary? : a discussion of new rules for rare serials (2006)
0.06
0.058041953 = product of:
0.087062925 = sum of:
0.023672609 = product of:
0.071017824 = sum of:
0.071017824 = weight(_text_:authors in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071017824 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20142455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.063390315 = product of:
0.12678063 = sum of:
0.12678063 = weight(_text_:j.m in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12678063 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4710833 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Rare serials have always been the stepchild of cataloging rules, in both the serials cataloging world and the rare book cataloging world. This article focuses on the problems raised by this history, including definition of "rare" in the serials world, a description of their special characteristics and of the problems rare serials pose for catalogers. Issues addressed include the inadequacy of present day rules for accurate cataloging and recommended solutions for these problems that have been developed and tested by the authors.
-
Boydston, J.M.K.; Leysen, J.M.: Observations on the catalogers' role in descriptive metadata creation in academic libraries (2006)
0.06
0.058041953 = product of:
0.087062925 = sum of:
0.023672609 = product of:
0.071017824 = sum of:
0.071017824 = weight(_text_:authors in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071017824 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20142455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.063390315 = product of:
0.12678063 = sum of:
0.12678063 = weight(_text_:j.m in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12678063 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4710833 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article examines the case for the participation of catalogers in the creation of descriptive metadata. Metadata creation is an extension of the catalogers' existing skills, abilities, and knowledge. As such, it should be encouraged and supported. However, issues in this process, such as cost, supply of catalogers, and the need for further training will also be examined. The authors use examples from the literature and their own experiences in descriptive metadata creation. Suggestions for future research on the topic are included.
-
Campanario, J.M.; Acedo, E.: Rejecting highly cited papers : the views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists (2007)
0.06
0.055353396 = product of:
0.08303009 = sum of:
0.028695535 = product of:
0.0860866 = sum of:
0.0860866 = weight(_text_:authors in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0860866 = score(doc=273,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20142455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.054334555 = product of:
0.10866911 = sum of:
0.10866911 = weight(_text_:j.m in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10866911 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We studied the views of scientists who experience resistance to their new ideas by surveying a sample of 815 scientists who are authors of highly cited articles. The 132 responses (16.2%) received indicated that only 47 scientists (35.6%) had no problems with referees, editors, or other scientists. The most common causes of difficulty were rejection of the manuscript, and scepticism, ignorance, and incomprehension. The most common arguments given by referees against papers were that the findings were an insufficient advance to warrant publication, lacked practical impact, were based on a wrong hypothesis, or were based on a wrong concept. The strategies authors used to overcome resistance included obtaining help from someone to publish problematic papers, making changes in the text, and simple persistence. Despite difficulties, however, some respondents acknowledged the positive effect of peer review.
-
Axtell, R.; Dixon, J.M.: Voyager 2000 : a review of accessibility for persons with visual disabilities (2002)
0.05
0.04975024 = product of:
0.07462536 = sum of:
0.020290807 = product of:
0.06087242 = sum of:
0.06087242 = weight(_text_:authors in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06087242 = score(doc=4796,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20142455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.054334555 = product of:
0.10866911 = sum of:
0.10866911 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10866911 = score(doc=4796,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The authors evaluate the accessibility for persons with visual disabilities of WebVoyage 2000, the online public access catalog from Endeavor. They briefly review the assistive technologies used by persons with visual disabilities and the major Web accessibility guidelines and requirements; then, using specific provisions from Federal Web accessibility regulations, they examine several Voyager implementations, reviewing introductory pages, search pages, limit pages, list and record displays, and help pages noting areas where particular elements of page design or construction cause the content to be confusing or unusable to a person using a screen reader. The evaluation is concluded with specific recommendations for Endeavor and the implementing libraries for necessary modifications to make WebVoyage usable by persons with visual disabilities.
-
Montesi, M.; Owen, J.M.: Research journal articles as document genres : exploring their role in knowledge organization (2008)
0.05
0.049710702 = product of:
0.07456605 = sum of:
0.02928726 = product of:
0.08786178 = sum of:
0.08786178 = weight(_text_:authors in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08786178 = score(doc=1733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20142455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.045278795 = product of:
0.09055759 = sum of:
0.09055759 = weight(_text_:j.m in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09055759 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to outline how article genres, or article types, are classified and described in the disciplines of biology, education, and software engineering. By using the expression article genres, emphasis is placed on the social role of journal articles that, as such, accomplish specific communicative functions and are intended for a certain context and audience. Design/methodology/approach - Drawing on this idea, the instructions to authors of the research journals cited in the Journal Citation Reports for each of the three disciplines are analysed. Findings - The information provided by the instructions to authors of major publications in the fields studied allows one to describe the following article genres: major articles, theoretical articles, review articles, short articles, practice-oriented articles, case studies, comment and opinion, and reviews. Research limitations/implications - Results show that article genres reflect the nature of research in each field to the extent that using them to describe items along with topic may improve management and retrieval of scientific documents. In addition, article genres perform specific communicative functions within disciplinary communities, which accounts for both emerging types of articles and variations in traditional types. Originality/value - The paper summarizes the information on article genres available in the instructions to authors of scientific journals in the disciplines of biology, education and software engineering. It attempts to show how results can mirror the nature of research in each field as well as current debates within each discipline on the state and quality of research. Also it shows how article genres convey specific communication needs within disciplinary communities, which proves that genres are social and evolving objects.
-
Russell, M.; Brittain, J.M.: Health informatics (2002)
0.05
0.048297383 = product of:
0.14489214 = sum of:
0.14489214 = product of:
0.28978428 = sum of:
0.28978428 = weight(_text_:j.m in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28978428 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
1.0767618 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Dabbadie, M.; Blancherie, J.M.: Alexandria, a multilingual dictionary for knowledge management purposes (2006)
0.05
0.048195556 = product of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.10866911 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10866911 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
0.035917558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035917558 = score(doc=2465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2465)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Alexandria is an innovation of international impact. It is the only multilingual dictionary for websites and PCs. A double click on a word opens a small window that gives interactive translations between 22 languages and includes meaning, synonyms and associated expressions. It is an ASP application grounded on a semantic network that is portable on any operating system or platform. Behind the application is the Integral Dictionary is the semantic network created by Memodata. Alexandria can be customized with specific vocabulary, descriptive articles, images, sounds, videos, etc. Its domains of application are considerable: e-tourism, online medias, language learning, international websites. Alexandria has also proved to be a basic tool for knowledge management purposes. The application can be customized according to a user or an organization needs. An application dedicated to mobile devices is currently being developed. Future developments are planned in the field of e-tourism in relation with French "pôles de compétitivité".
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.05
0.048195556 = product of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.10866911 = weight(_text_:j.m in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10866911 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.035917558 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035917558 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.05
0.048195556 = product of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.10866911 = weight(_text_:j.m in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10866911 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.035917558 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035917558 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003)
0.05
0.048195556 = product of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.14458667 = sum of:
0.10866911 = weight(_text_:j.m in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10866911 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.035917558 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035917558 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:30:19
-
Eiriksson, J.M.; Retsloff, J.M.: Librarians in the 'information age' : promoter of change or provider of stability? (2005)
0.05
0.045439206 = product of:
0.13631761 = sum of:
0.13631761 = sum of:
0.102454215 = weight(_text_:j.m in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102454215 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.3806928 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
0.0338634 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0338634 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2009 11:23:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.04
0.044295616 = product of:
0.13288684 = sum of:
0.13288684 = sum of:
0.09055759 = weight(_text_:j.m in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09055759 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.042329248 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042329248 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Knowledge management strategy and technology (2002)
0.04
0.04226021 = product of:
0.12678063 = sum of:
0.12678063 = product of:
0.25356126 = sum of:
0.25356126 = weight(_text_:j.m in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25356126 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2691257 = queryWeight, product of:
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.9421666 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Editor
- Bellaver, R.F. u. J.M. Lusa
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.04
0.041302714 = product of:
0.06195407 = sum of:
0.04100216 = product of:
0.123006485 = sum of:
0.123006485 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.123006485 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20142455 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.020951908 = product of:
0.041903816 = sum of:
0.041903816 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041903816 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15472323 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04418354 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
