Search (4229 results, page 1 of 212)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.1340293 = product of:
      0.2680586 = sum of:
        0.2680586 = product of:
          0.5361172 = sum of:
            0.20919816 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20919816 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4466721 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.32691905 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32691905 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.55838025 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.10
    0.100343995 = sum of:
      0.018146584 = product of:
        0.072586335 = sum of:
          0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072586335 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.08219741 = sum of:
        0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627607 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.060569804 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060569804 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  3. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.10
    0.09957531 = sum of:
      0.08172976 = product of:
        0.32691905 = sum of:
          0.32691905 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.32691905 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.55838025 = queryWeight, product of:
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017845549 = product of:
        0.035691097 = sum of:
          0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035691097 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  4. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.10
    0.09907851 = sum of:
      0.025663147 = product of:
        0.10265259 = sum of:
          0.10265259 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10265259 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07341537 = sum of:
        0.030586056 = weight(_text_:m in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030586056 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042829316 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    
    Abstract
    Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  5. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.10
    0.097887166 = product of:
      0.19577433 = sum of:
        0.19577433 = sum of:
          0.08156282 = weight(_text_:m in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08156282 = score(doc=4686,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.62211215 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211515 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
    Type
    m
  6. Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006) 0.10
    0.09637076 = sum of:
      0.021171015 = product of:
        0.08468406 = sum of:
          0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08468406 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.075199746 = sum of:
        0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025232209 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
        0.049967535 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049967535 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
    
    Abstract
    Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:37:49
  7. Feinberg, M.: Classificationist as author : the case of the Prelinger Library (2008) 0.10
    0.09637076 = sum of:
      0.021171015 = product of:
        0.08468406 = sum of:
          0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08468406 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.075199746 = sum of:
        0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025232209 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
        0.049967535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049967535 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    
    Content
    Within information science, neutrality and objectivity have been standard design goals for knowledge organization schemes; designers have seen themselves as compilers, rather than as authors or creators. The organization of resources in the Prelinger Library in San Francisco, however, shows a distinct authorial voice, or unique sense of expression and vision. This voice, in turn, works as a persuasive mechanism, facilitating a rhetorical purpose for the collection.
    Pages
    S.22-28
  8. Trauth, E.M.: Qualitative research in IS : issues and trends (2001) 0.09
    0.08594257 = product of:
      0.17188513 = sum of:
        0.17188513 = sum of:
          0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05767362 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
          0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211515 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 15:35:22
    Type
    m
  9. Makarov, M.: ¬The seventh edition of the IPC (2000) 0.09
    0.08594257 = product of:
      0.17188513 = sum of:
        0.17188513 = sum of:
          0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05767362 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
          0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211515 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    World patent information. 22(2000) no.1, S.53-58
  10. Fank, M.: Wissensbewahrung : Wissensverlust bedroht Geschäftserfolg (2005) 0.09
    0.08594257 = product of:
      0.17188513 = sum of:
        0.17188513 = sum of:
          0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 6746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05767362 = score(doc=6746,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 6746, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6746)
          0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 6746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211515 = score(doc=6746,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6746, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2005 9:14:55
  11. Piggott, M.: How the Index Society began - and ended (2000) 0.09
    0.08594257 = product of:
      0.17188513 = sum of:
        0.17188513 = sum of:
          0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05767362 = score(doc=505,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 505, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=505)
          0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211515 = score(doc=505,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 505, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=505)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.33-35
  12. Tochtermann, K.; Granitzer, M.: Wissenserschließung : Pfade durch den digitalen Informationsdschungel (2005) 0.09
    0.08594257 = product of:
      0.17188513 = sum of:
        0.17188513 = sum of:
          0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05767362 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
          0.114211515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211515 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5.11.2005 19:18:22
  13. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.09
    0.085835464 = sum of:
      0.07321936 = product of:
        0.29287744 = sum of:
          0.29287744 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29287744 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4466721 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012616104 = product of:
        0.025232209 = sum of:
          0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025232209 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  14. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.084174104 = sum of:
      0.062759444 = product of:
        0.25103778 = sum of:
          0.25103778 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25103778 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4466721 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021414658 = product of:
        0.042829316 = sum of:
          0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042829316 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  15. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.08
    0.08260351 = sum of:
      0.018146584 = product of:
        0.072586335 = sum of:
          0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072586335 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.064456925 = sum of:
        0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627607 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042829316 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  16. Harris, M.: Contexts of justification (2001) 0.08
    0.08219741 = product of:
      0.16439483 = sum of:
        0.16439483 = sum of:
          0.043255214 = weight(_text_:m in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043255214 = score(doc=5647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
          0.12113961 = weight(_text_:22 in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12113961 = score(doc=5647,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 23(2001) no.1, S.18-22
  17. Christoffel, M.; Schmitt, B.: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game (2002) 0.08
    0.08219741 = product of:
      0.16439483 = sum of:
        0.16439483 = sum of:
          0.043255214 = weight(_text_:m in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043255214 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
          0.12113961 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12113961 = score(doc=1361,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:19:01
  18. Knowledge management in practice : connections and context. (2008) 0.08
    0.075971164 = sum of:
      0.012097723 = product of:
        0.04839089 = sum of:
          0.04839089 = weight(_text_:authors in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04839089 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.06387344 = sum of:
        0.014418405 = weight(_text_:m in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014418405 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
        0.049455035 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049455035 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
    
    Classification
    658.4/038 22
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:43:51
    DDC
    658.4/038 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 60(2006) no.3, S.642 (A.E. Prentice): "What is knowledge management (KM)? How do we define it? How do we use it and what are the benefits? KM is still an operational discipline that has yet to have an academic foundation. Its core has yet to solidify and concepts and practices remain fluid, making it difficult to discuss or even to identify the range of relevant elements. Being aware of this lack of a well-structured retrievable disciplinary literature, the editors made a practice of attending trade shows and conferences attended by KM professionals to look for presentations that would in some way expand knowledge of the field. They asked presenters to turn their paper into a book chapter, which is the major source of the material in this book. Although this is a somewhat chancy method of identifying authors and topics, several of the papers are excellent and a number add to an understanding of KM. Because of the fluidity of the area of study, the editors devised a three-dimensional topic expansion approach to the content so that the reader can follow themes in the papers that would not have been easy to do if one relied solely on the table of contents. The table of contents organizes the presentations into eight subject sections, each section with a foreword that introduces the topic and indicates briefly the contribution of each chapter to the overall section title. Following this, the Roadmap lists 18 topics or themes that appear in the book and relevant chapters where information on the theme can be found. Readers have the choice of following themes using the roadmap or of reading the book section by section. ..."
    Type
    m
  19. Kmuche, W.: Strategischer Erfolgsfaktor Wissen : Content Management: der Weg zum erfolgreichen Informationsmanagement (2000) 0.08
    0.075199746 = product of:
      0.15039949 = sum of:
        0.15039949 = sum of:
          0.050464418 = weight(_text_:m in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050464418 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
          0.09993507 = weight(_text_:22 in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09993507 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 7.2002 22:05:14
    Type
    m
  20. International yearbook of library and information management : 2001/2002 information services in an electronic environment (2001) 0.08
    0.075199746 = product of:
      0.15039949 = sum of:
        0.15039949 = sum of:
          0.050464418 = weight(_text_:m in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050464418 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
          0.09993507 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09993507 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 13:22:23
    Type
    m

Languages

Types

  • a 2690
  • m 1326
  • s 336
  • el 205
  • x 60
  • i 51
  • b 37
  • r 20
  • p 7
  • n 4
  • fi 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications