Search (2526 results, page 1 of 127)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Attar, K.: ¬The application of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification in Cambridge college libraries (2000) 0.16
    0.15962715 = sum of:
      0.12854442 = product of:
        0.38563326 = sum of:
          0.38563326 = weight(_text_:bliss in 7778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.38563326 = score(doc=7778,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              1.1065149 = fieldWeight in 7778, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7778)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.031082738 = product of:
        0.09324821 = sum of:
          0.09324821 = weight(_text_:29 in 7778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09324821 = score(doc=7778,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 7778, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7778)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:11:45
  2. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.13
    0.1267243 = sum of:
      0.11132273 = product of:
        0.3339682 = sum of:
          0.3339682 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3339682 = score(doc=2550,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.95827 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.015401566 = product of:
        0.046204697 = sum of:
          0.046204697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046204697 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
    Biographed
    Bliss, Henry Evelyn
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  3. LaBarre, K.: Bliss and Ranganathan : synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes? (2000) 0.11
    0.108740665 = sum of:
      0.09541949 = product of:
        0.28625846 = sum of:
          0.28625846 = weight(_text_:bliss in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28625846 = score(doc=88,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.8213743 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013321174 = product of:
        0.03996352 = sum of:
          0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996352 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The concerns of the past century follow us into the next. Despite continuing technological advancement we find ourselves overwhelmed by a virtual tidal wave of information. Instead of reinventing seemingly novel solutions, it is appropriate to reexamine the successes and failures of the past. In light of the increasing focus on faceted classification as a potential approach to the problems of organizing conceptual space, it is appropriate to direct critical attention to the convoluted nature of the interaction between Henry Evelyn Bliss and S. R. Ranganathan. Drawing upon the methods of historiography, this is a review of original documents and an analysis of primary examples drawn from the correspondence between Ranganathan and Bliss currently in possession of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University and Archives and Special Collections at the Morris Raphael Cohen Library, City College of New York. This analysis will serve as a springboard to further exploration of the synthetic nature of faceted classification
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:43:23
  4. Attar, K.E.: ¬The practice of Bliss (2002) 0.11
    0.106436 = sum of:
      0.09089463 = product of:
        0.2726839 = sum of:
          0.2726839 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2726839 = score(doc=5473,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 5473, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5473)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.015541369 = product of:
        0.046624105 = sum of:
          0.046624105 = weight(_text_:29 in 5473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046624105 = score(doc=5473,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5473, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5473)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The second edition of Bliss's Bibliographic Classification (BC2) has been acclaimed as a modern, faceted scheme that offers short classmarks with enhanced exactitude. Simultaneously, doubts have been voiced about its success because it is new and lacks institutional support. Both praise and skepticism have been expressed in theoretical terms. The present article tests the opinions by case studies. It compares BC2 classmarks with DDC, LCC and UDC classmarks for works about Shakespeare to demonstrate the truth of the claim that BC2 offers greater precision and brevity. It then summarises the results of a survey sent to non-Bliss Cambridge College libraries which substantiates in practical terms reservations about BC2, but shows that evidence of its success where practiced causes it to be regarded sympathetically.
    Date
    29. 7.2006 19:20:07
  5. Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008) 0.09
    0.091230854 = sum of:
      0.07790968 = product of:
        0.23372903 = sum of:
          0.23372903 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23372903 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013321174 = product of:
        0.03996352 = sum of:
          0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996352 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis is an established methodology for building classifications and subject indexing systems, but has been less rigorously applied to thesauri. The process of creating a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition highlights the ways in which the conceptual relationships in a subject field are handled in the two types of retrieval languages. An underlying uniformity of theory is established, and the way in which software can manage the relationships is discussed. The manner of displaying verbal expressions of concepts (vocabulary control) is also considered, but is found to be less well controlled in the classification than in the thesaurus. Nevertheless, there is good reason to think that facet analysis provides a sound basis for structuring a variety of knowledge organization tools.
    Date
    31. 5.2008 19:11:29
  6. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.09
    0.09069891 = sum of:
      0.07737774 = product of:
        0.23213321 = sum of:
          0.23213321 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23213321 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41303515 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013321174 = product of:
        0.03996352 = sum of:
          0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996352 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09
    0.09057908 = sum of:
      0.07737774 = product of:
        0.23213321 = sum of:
          0.23213321 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23213321 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41303515 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013201341 = product of:
        0.039604023 = sum of:
          0.039604023 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039604023 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Williamson, N.J.: Complementary and alternative medicine : its place in the reorganized medical sciences in the Universal Decimal Classification (2004) 0.08
    0.07981358 = sum of:
      0.06427221 = product of:
        0.19281663 = sum of:
          0.19281663 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19281663 = score(doc=2662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 2662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2662)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.015541369 = product of:
        0.046624105 = sum of:
          0.046624105 = weight(_text_:29 in 2662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046624105 = score(doc=2662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2662)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An investigation into the requirements for the inclusion of alternative and complementary medicine in a universal classification scheme with special reference to a proposed revision of Class 61 Medical Sciences in the Universal Decimal Classification. Questions related to the content and location of the topic and its structure based on the principles set down in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification are addressed. A solution for UDC Class 61 is proposed.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 17:31:00
  9. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.08
    0.07602572 = sum of:
      0.06492474 = product of:
        0.19477421 = sum of:
          0.19477421 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19477421 = score(doc=5895,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0111009795 = product of:
        0.033302937 = sum of:
          0.033302937 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033302937 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
    Date
    29. 6.2014 17:31:49
  10. Tochtermann, K.; Granitzer, M.: Wissenserschließung : Pfade durch den digitalen Informationsdschungel (2005) 0.07
    0.07072671 = product of:
      0.14145342 = sum of:
        0.14145342 = product of:
          0.21218012 = sum of:
            0.10656939 = weight(_text_:29 in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10656939 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
            0.105610736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105610736 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5.11.2005 19:18:22
    Source
    Wissensmanagement. 7(2005) H.5, S.26-29
  11. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.07
    0.06841164 = sum of:
      0.05509047 = product of:
        0.1652714 = sum of:
          0.1652714 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1652714 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013321174 = product of:
        0.03996352 = sum of:
          0.03996352 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03996352 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0487184 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Date
    29. 8.2004 14:20:40
  12. Mills, J.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification First Edition (2009) 0.06
    0.06361299 = product of:
      0.12722598 = sum of:
        0.12722598 = product of:
          0.38167793 = sum of:
            0.38167793 = weight(_text_:bliss in 3808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38167793 = score(doc=3808,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.34851158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                1.0951657 = fieldWeight in 3808, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3808)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss was probably the greatest American contributor to the theory of the classification of library materials. The first edition of the classification scheme he developed is discussed here by a major British thinker in this area, Jack Mills. After some years of use, the scheme was extensively revised, under the Editorship of the same Jack Mills, and the resulting second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification is discussed in the entry by that name.
  13. Herrmann, C.: Partikulare Konkretion universal zugänglicher Information : Beobachtungen zur Konzeptionierung fachlicher Internet-Seiten am Beispiel der Theologie (2000) 0.06
    0.06188587 = product of:
      0.12377174 = sum of:
        0.12377174 = product of:
          0.1856576 = sum of:
            0.09324821 = weight(_text_:29 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09324821 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
            0.092409395 = weight(_text_:22 in 4364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092409395 = score(doc=4364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4364)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:29:08
  14. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.06
    0.06188587 = product of:
      0.12377174 = sum of:
        0.12377174 = product of:
          0.1856576 = sum of:
            0.09324821 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09324821 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
            0.092409395 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092409395 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2002 19:29:54
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  15. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.06
    0.06188587 = product of:
      0.12377174 = sum of:
        0.12377174 = product of:
          0.1856576 = sum of:
            0.09324821 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09324821 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
            0.092409395 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092409395 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:29:38
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  16. Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001) 0.05
    0.053400546 = product of:
      0.10680109 = sum of:
        0.10680109 = product of:
          0.16020164 = sum of:
            0.09419492 = weight(_text_:29 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09419492 = score(doc=6835,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
            0.06600671 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06600671 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1997 14:03:29
    11.11.2001 17:25:22
    Source
    Com!online. 2001, H.12, S.24-29
  17. Dirks, H.: Lernen im Internet oder mit Gedrucktem? : Eine Untersuchung zeigt: Fernunterrichts-Teilnehmer wollen beides! (2002) 0.05
    0.05304503 = product of:
      0.10609006 = sum of:
        0.10609006 = product of:
          0.15913509 = sum of:
            0.07992704 = weight(_text_:29 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07992704 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
            0.079208046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079208046 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1997 18:49:05
    11. 8.2002 15:05:22
  18. Ruskai, M.B.: Response to Graham : the quantum view (2001) 0.05
    0.05304503 = product of:
      0.10609006 = sum of:
        0.10609006 = product of:
          0.15913509 = sum of:
            0.07992704 = weight(_text_:29 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07992704 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
            0.079208046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079208046 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 23(2001) no.1, S.23-29
  19. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.05
    0.05304503 = product of:
      0.10609006 = sum of:
        0.10609006 = product of:
          0.15913509 = sum of:
            0.07992704 = weight(_text_:29 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07992704 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
            0.079208046 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079208046 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
  20. Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000) 0.05
    0.05304503 = product of:
      0.10609006 = sum of:
        0.10609006 = product of:
          0.15913509 = sum of:
            0.07992704 = weight(_text_:29 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07992704 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1713761 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
            0.079208046 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079208046 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17060354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0487184 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 17:22:42
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.1, S.9-12

Languages

Types

  • a 2164
  • m 240
  • el 116
  • s 87
  • b 28
  • x 22
  • i 11
  • r 5
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications